Shocker: Obama’s Justice Department Rules That ACORN Can Be Paid For ExistingGovernment Contracts

Granted the payments were for contracts signed before Congress banned federal funds for ACORN, but you’d think a political leader with integrity wouldn’t force the taxpayers to pay for contracts that included a substantial amount of fraud, graft and corruption.
If there are opt-out provisions in these contracts (and I can’t imagine the government didn’t leave itself a way to terminate these contracts) the Obama administration should be canceling them. Not paying them.

WASHINGTON — The Justice Department has concluded that the Obama administration can lawfully pay the community group Acorn for services provided under contracts signed before Congress banned the government from providing money to the group.
The department’s conclusion, laid out in a recently disclosed five-page memorandum from David Barron, the acting assistant attorney general for the Office of Legal Counsel, adds a new wrinkle to a sharp political debate over the antipoverty group’s activities and recent efforts to distance the government from it.
Since 1994, Acorn, which stands for the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, has received about $53 million in federal aid, much of it grants from the Department of Housing and Urban Development for providing various services related to affordable housing.
But the group has become a prime target for conservative critics, and on Oct. 1, President Obama signed into law a spending bill that included a provision that said no taxpayer money — including money authorized by previous legislation — could be “provided to” the group or its affiliates.
A Housing and Urban Development Department lawyer asked the Justice Department whether the new law meant that pre-existing contracts with Acorn should be broken. And in a memorandum signed Oct. 23 and posted online this week, Mr. Barron said the government should continue to make payments to Acorn as required by such contracts.

Hope for change.

Tags: , ,


«
»
  • http://Array djer

    Not changing the subject Rob, making an analogy. Get it now? And making the point that you are using ACORN since it is the right’s enemy du jour. Just pointing it out because you don’t!

  • Ozcar

    But company executives will not be paid money they and their companies agreed to because Obozo says “No”? Can’t quite put my finger on it, but something just doesn’t seem kosher.

    EOTIS

  • djer

    Yeah, I think all the companies that defrauded the military should be banned from further contracts with the US as well. And all those health insurers and providers who have defrauded medicare and medicaid should have their contracts stopped as well.

    What’s good for the goose…as they say.

  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    Do you lie compulsively now, boob, or is that the view you have from your head being so far up your arse?
    Or have you still not figured out that 1993 was NOT in the 19th century?

  • lock’em’up

    I think it would be a great idea if the president started to withhold payments to groups that he didn’t like. That would really be the American way. He would probably convert a lot of cons to his side. (sarcasm)

  • sayanything-4603

    the communists need to get re-elected they stole MN & PA crooks

  • lock’em’up

    You said, “I think it’s been pretty well documented throughout the history of America that the left is, without a doubt the party who wants to wipe their ass with the American Constitution.”

    I’m glad you didn’t say it was a fact, because your “thoughts” are wrong. The propaganda from the right has brainwashed you. The constitution is all about liberty, and liberals = liberty.

    I can’t really tell in the pic, but if you don’t have an acog, your target acquisition will not be as fast as it could be. Unless your just a gopher hunting mall ninja.

  • sayanything-106

    I see no reason why the Federal Government should be funding a democratic front group like ACORN that is full of thugs.

  • Wayne

    Can any of the liberal trolls on this site explain why a partisan group like ACORN should be receiving any taxpayer money? If ACORN were acting like it is only in conservative interests instead of liberal interests, liberals including the trolls here, would be going crazy. Liberals are hypocrites!

  • sayanything-51

    Not Shocking: Right wing extremists still hate the American constitution and are willing to fight to tear it apart.

  • sayanything-3174

    LMAO!!! A liberal is accusing a right winger of hating the American Constitution!??
    I think it’s been pretty well documented throughout the history of America that the left is, without a doubt the party who wants to wipe their ass with the American Constitution.
    What an ignorant and flat out foolish statement by you rbb.

  • sayanything-101

    Communist agitators hang together or they hang alone.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    Yeah, I think all the companies that defrauded the military should be banned from further contracts with the US as well.

    I agree.

    But why are you changing the subject?

  • sayanything-3174

    Liberals= loss of liberty. There I fixed that for you.
    You’re a liberal, don’t try and talk firearms,optics, or ammo with me. Your firearms knowledge goes as far the latest PS2 shooter game you’re playing.
    Go call your congressman and beg for the reinstatement of the Clinton AWB. Thats what your boy “O” and his administration want and I’m sure you do as well.
    Remind me again who said the Constitution is nothing but negative liberties? forget it, I’ll save you the time so you can go shoot your video game gun some more.
    http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2008/10/obama_2001_scrap_the_constitut.html

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development