Shocker: Obama Breaking Promise On War Funding, Democrats Porking Up The Spending Bill

Remember when Obama promised to end the Bush administration’s “budget tricks” by including war funding into the regular budgeting process instead of getting that money through emergency appropriations? Well surprise, surprise Obama and the Democrats are pushing through a war funding bill…through the emergency appropriations process.
Just another “say one thing and do another” moment for Obama.

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – A $100 billion bill to fund U.S. wars in Iraq and Afghanistan is rapidly accumulating extra items such as money for military aircraft the Pentagon doesn’t want and possibly a scheme to jump-start sagging auto sales.
The cars and planes are not directly linked to the U.S. war effort. But they are typical of Congress’ penchant for loading bills with unrelated spending in hopes the funds will sail through on the strength of the main legislation.
President Barack Obama originally sought $83.4 billion for the two wars and more foreign aid for countries like Pakistan. …
The unrelated provisions have slowed the bill down, especially for the IMF because Republicans have argued the extra items should be vetted through the normal congressional process rather than jammed into an emergency spending bill.

And let’s remember that Obama, who promised that he’d go through spending bills sent to him “line by line” to make sure no wasteful spending got passed, isn’t going to stand for this, right? Wrong. Democrats are being urged to vote for this porkfest so that Obama can get a victory:

Some 51 anti-war House Democrats had opposed the bill but now are under pressure to switch to give Obama a victory.

And what do Democrats have to say about Republicans who might be opposing this bill based on the non-war related spending that’s in it? Well if they oppose it, they hate the troops!

But a House Democratic leadership aide said Republicans will have to answer to constituents for opposing a war funding bill.

So the Democrats (and probably Republicans too) are porking up this bill. Obama, despite his promises to combat wasteful spending, wants to sign it into law so he can get a victory. And anyone trying to stop this from happening will be accused of not wanting to fund the troops on the battlefield.
Hope and change!

Tags: , ,


«
»
  • http://Array tothestars2

    totus strikes again

  • forexpreneur

    Well the idiots who voted for this moron wanted “change”. What they were too dumb to realize is that the “change” is all that will be left on their paycheck. No dollars, just change.

    The guy is not only a liar but a cocky, egotistical retard. Sure he may be smart in many areas but the guy is an absolute retard when it comes to business and the economy.

    Not politically correct? That’s right I’m not. I am not full of Bull Shit either and act like I care about crap when I don’t. I am tired of the politically correct BS and the Green BS. I just bought an SUV out of spite. I am doing everything possible to make my carbon footprint as big as possible. I also subscribe to newspapers and magazines I don’t really read and then burn them in my fireplace and love it.

  • http://norseberserker.blogspot.com/ Rugby Reader

    The occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan should be un-funded or de-funded. US military personnel do not belong in either nation.

  • http://ndgoon.blogspot.com/ goon

    More of the change we need I guess? I like how NOBAMA has broken all of these promises and not many on the left will question him.

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development