Shocker: FDR’s Policies Prolonged Great Depression

Of late national politicians have been invoking Franklin Roosevelt’s policies as a solution to the economic problems we’re facing now. Obama invoked FDR’s housing policies during a debate. The New York Times has praised FDR’s public works projects. Indeed, Obama’s claims that pouring taxpayer money into developing green energy could create jobs and economic growth for the country are reminiscent of FDR’s policies.
Forgetting for a moment that the rocky economic times we’re facing right now aren’t even in the same ballpark, heck not even in the same area code, as the Great Depression, it’s worth noting that FDR’s policies…didn’t really work.
In fact, UCLA economists have calculated that FDR’s policies, far from solving it, actually exacerbated the Great Depression.

Two UCLA economists say they have figured out why the Great Depression dragged on for almost 15 years, and they blame a suspect previously thought to be beyond reproach: President Franklin D. Roosevelt.
After scrutinizing Roosevelt’s record for four years, Harold L. Cole and Lee E. Ohanian conclude in a new study that New Deal policies signed into law 71 years ago thwarted economic recovery for seven long years.
“Why the Great Depression lasted so long has always been a great mystery, and because we never really knew the reason, we have always worried whether we would have another 10- to 15-year economic slump,” said Ohanian, vice chair of UCLA’s Department of Economics. “We found that a relapse isn’t likely unless lawmakers gum up a recovery with ill-conceived stimulus policies.”
In an article in the August issue of the Journal of Political Economy, Ohanian and Cole blame specific anti-competition and pro-labor measures that Roosevelt promoted and signed into law June 16, 1933.
“President Roosevelt believed that excessive competition was responsible for the Depression by reducing prices and wages, and by extension reducing employment and demand for goods and services,” said Cole, also a UCLA professor of economics. “So he came up with a recovery package that would be unimaginable today, allowing businesses in every industry to collude without the threat of antitrust prosecution and workers to demand salaries about 25 percent above where they ought to have been, given market forces. The economy was poised for a beautiful recovery, but that recovery was stalled by these misguided policies.”

It’s worth noting that this country didn’t really pull out of the Great Depression until we mobilized for WWII. If not for our war against fascism the Great Depression might have gone on for decades longer than it did under the liberal, big-government policies of people like FDR.
Roosevelt gets a lot of credit for being a strong war-time leader, and he deserves every bit of that credit, but on domestic policy – and particularly fiscal policy – he didn’t do this country any favors. Just as those who would ape his policies today wouldn’t do anything but make our economic conditions worse.

Tags:


«
»
  • http://bopl.samharris.us/ Paul

    Incidentally, every time I post here I get the following message:

    Error

    Unable to load the following extension file:

    ext.email_confirm.php

  • Halatbis

    I read exerpts of that study, and it is verification of what one has suspected for years–the outbreak of war stopped the great depression. One thing FDR did that is raise the power of labor; that specter is rearing its ugly head with the rise of Organized Labor and its power in the election process and the Democrat Party. They are counting on the Dem’s getting veto proof majorities, and as a result they will get their legislation thru the congress–which is Card Check and labor law changes. Their power will then increase to unstoppable levels and they will become the “king-makers” of the Dem Party, and also the U.S. government.
    The Dem’s will rejoice in their 2008 victories–they will soon enough find they have drank the hemlock. The pity is that we all go down with them!

  • http://blogrescue.com/ King of Fools

    test comment (remove this)

  • http://blogrescue.com/ King of Fools

    clean up on aisle 4

  • http://blogrescue.com/ King of Fools

    one more time

  • http://bopl.samharris.us/ Paul

    Reports such as this always intrigue me. There are, of course, as many studies showing that FDR’s policies were critical to recovery, or were mildly beneficial, or were neither good nor bad. Presumably there is a truth there, but the idea that we will ever find it, or more importantly that we’d know it when we did, is unlikely to say the least.

  • http://blogrescue.com/ King of Fools

    xyzzy

  • http://blogrescue.com/ King of Fools

    one more try

  • http://bopl.samharris.us/ Paul

    Rob, there’d be no point my debating the point, because I’m far too ignorant of the subject to make a useful contribution. In fact given that these two guys spent 4 years to come up with this conclusion, I’m going to guess that I don’t know and have never even met someone who could. What I do know, however, is that stating a conclusion like this with any sort of certainty means that the authors have either a) found something definitive that the tens of thousands of people who’ve looked at this issue before missed, or b) lost the plot. Or I guess c) been misinterpreted.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    Again, Paul, don’t discuss any specifics. Just try to cast doubt on the source.

    I’ve read a lot of research into this issue. I believe FDR’s policies prolonged the Great Depression. This is an informed opinion.

    If you disagree, please explain why. No need to be vague.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    What a convenient way to obfuscate Paul. Don’t discuss the issue. Just claim that we can’t possibly know the answer.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    atease, we’re trying to fix the comment errors that have been plaguing the site for a while now.

  • robert108

    This has been a staple of free market economic thought for decades, Rob. FDR imposed redistributionism on our economy, with the inevitable results: shortages and stagnation.

  • LoadTheMule

    You're pissing into the wind, fellas. As true as this is–and it IS true–there is no liberal in the country who will acknowledge the possibility, much less the fact of it. To do so would bring down their entire socio-economic and nanny-state-political house of cards.

  • Scott

    And what's more – FDR really isn't a good image to conjure up when talking in the current war situation either. Remember, it was he that side-stepped congress with Lend-Lease, and it was he that ordered an outright illegal combat group into China to fight the Japanese contrary to the wishes of congress and a goodly percentage of voters.

    Yeah. A smart person wouldn't bring up FDR in the current race… unless they were banking on the ignorance of their audience.

  • di butler

    Scott,

    While you are very knowledgeable about history, you are seriously overestimating the intellect of the general populace. Read some of the blogger comments on most sites or watch when shows like Leno or Letterman go out and talk to the average person on the street. The Howard Stern tape was an excellent example.

  • di butler

    Ignorance is the most expensive commodity we have in this country today

  • atease

    What are you trying to accomplish KOF..?

    atease

  • http://blogrescue.com/ King of Fools

    one more time

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development