Shocker: 1 In 50 Children In America Are Not Actually Homeless

During Obama’s recent prime time press conference he was told by a reporter named Kevin Chappell from Ebony magazine (how’d he get in a White House press conference?) that 1 in 50 of America’s children are homeless. Obama responded by saying that number was “unacceptable.” Unfortunately for both Obama and the liberal reporter, that figure is wildly inflated by an anti-homelessness advocacy group that is no doubt inflating numbers in the hopes that it will draw more funding from politicians like Obama.
Mickey Kaus explains:

Chappell’s question is based on this study by an anti-homelessness advocacy group with every incentive to maximize the estimate of the problem. 1) The report apparently counts all people who are “homeless” even one night over the course of a year. That’s very different from saying that one-in-50 are homeless at the same time–e.g., “now.” 2) More significantly, the report counts as “homeless” families who’ve “doubled up”–e.g., moved in with relatives–apparently on the grounds that while these children in these families do have a home, they don’t have “a home of their own.” That’s not what most people mean by homeless, and not the image Chappell conjures (tent cities, sleeping under bridges).

This is how liberalism works. Nobody wants to pay higher taxes to have more government in their lives, so there needs to be an excuse. And liberals love inventing excuses. Like, say, exaggerating homeless rates.

Tags: , ,


«
»
  • http://Array jimmypop

    2) More significantly, the report counts as “homeless” families who’ve “doubled up”–e.g., moved in with relatives–apparently on the grounds that while these children in these families do have a home, they don’t have “a home of their own.” That’s not what most people mean by homeless, and not the image Chappell conjures (tent cities, sleeping under bridges).

    this is mind boggling…. i had a friend move last year. he and his wife do this while their home here was for sale. they could have made 2 house payments but were smart enough not to do it ‘just in case.’ what about the lazy dude living in his mom’s basement? is he homeless?

  • Buzz

    There not homeless, they just don’t have a home? So they have a roof over their heads TODAY. Well, problem solved, lets move on.

  • Mickey

    Lousiana had corrupt state and local leadership for decades. These scum bags did nothing for their people during Katrina.
    The whole area needed a good double flush.

  • 2Hotel9

    nunya, you are correct! It was not 60, it is 64, 31 of which have been killed after their return to terrorism. You must be crushed, your child murdering heroes are getting the shit kicked out of them.

    Where are these 1 million homeless children? Produce them. Or shut the fuck up.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/realitybasedbob/ realitybasedbob

    Gee Mick, that would be really bad…if it was true.

    But, as usual, your numbers come from a place the sun don’t shine.

    According to the U.S. Bureau of the Census, the resident population of the United States, projected to 03/26/09 at 22:40 GMT (EST+5) is: 306,089,152

    According to the U.S. Bureau of the Census, the 2007 total pop. under 19 is 82,361,752.

    Should I finish the math for you, or can you handle it from here.

    Good luck, chum.

  • nunya

    It was obviously a made up number, but pretending “liberals” do this to garner support is typical partisan hackery.

    Who was it that tried to claim over 60 gitmo detainees returned to “terrorism”? Yeah, it was Republicans.

    Both sides lie to further their agenda. Being such a partisan hack, and playing into the BS. Congratulations on being part of the problem

  • Mickey

    1 in 50 homeless children!?! At 400,000,000 Americans that comes out to 8,000,000 homeless children…I doubt it.

    We would be tripping over the little urchins.

  • bill-tb

    Well when you get past the obvious Obama jive talk, you realize he is nothing more than a tax and spend liberal, super sized. And doesn’t do math very well either.

  • Mickey

    400,000,000 was just a rough stab in the dark, but as long as you want to be anal about it I’ll use your number.

    That comes out to 1,647,235.04 homeless children. That’s 32,944 homeless kids per state.

    Even with 2007 numbers not including the additional population in 2009 or the millions of illegals the 1 in 50 estimate is BULL SHIT.

    RBB, math lessons from loons are worthless. As usual you don’t make a valid point defending the 50 to 1 claim.

  • Buzz

    lets just wait to see how it all turns out…. i bet you wont find most of us living in fema trailers for two years. you also wont see many waiting in our homes for someone to save us because we just sat there and waited for the world to save us.

    A hurricane is a little different, don’t you think but, I’m with you brother, they are slackers.

    Hey, I’m just giving rob shit for his topic, I don’t wish any harm to come to the good people of ND. OK?

  • Mickey

    Doubling up with family members, staying with friends, living in hotels or sharing rent may qualify these families as homeless. That’s a pretty loose interpretation.

    Under these circumstances many could possibly be living better than if they were on their own. Most of these stats reflect single mothers and their children. Many of these mothers may be children themselves.

    I myself moved out when I was 17 and lived with three buddies. Technically speaking all four of us were homeless under these guidelines.

  • Buzz

    How in the fuck could I forget that. Yea, the flooding that took like 12 hours, not the 4 days they have had to prepare. What is your point?

  • docdave

    children and youths who are sharing the housing of other persons due to loss of housing, economic hardship, or a similar reason; are living in motels, hotels, trailer parks, or camping grounds due to the lack of alternative

    This is pure bullshit. Most young people share lodging to save money. Except for the time I lived in a motel (during the off-season in Virgina Beach) I share lodging with others (a period of about 12 years) until I was married. If the above criteria was used no wonder the numbers were drastically inflated.

    I don’t consider someone to be homeless unless they are living on the street or in a homeless shelter.

  • http://dave1962.wordpress.com/ luv2bbq

    Again, as I had said earlier, we keep voting the same people into congress. If you want change, it won’t happen with the president. Only CONGRESS can create law and policy.

  • jimmypop

    With this rational there wont be anyone homeless in ND because of the floods. Sweet, another problem solved.

    lets just wait to see how it all turns out…. i bet you wont find most of us living in fema trailers for two years. you also wont see many waiting in our homes for someone to save us because we just sat there and waited for the world to save us.

  • http://www.dartemis.net/blog/ sayanything-42

    numeracy is not a strong point of the left.

  • 2Hotel9

    You know Dave, with the username “luv2bbq” you should spam about barbecue type items. Just a hint for future spamboting.

  • docdave

    I’ve traveled up and down the west coast and seen a lot of street people who I guess were homeless in places like Seattle and San Francisco but I don’t remember ever seeing a homeless child.

  • http://www.rabidamerican.net/ Rabid American

    If we subtract illegals… what would the numbers look like then???

  • docdave

    A hurricane is a little different, don’t you think

    What you seem to be forgetting is that most of the damage from Katrina was not from wind but from flooding when the levees broke.

  • Buzz

    With this rational there wont be anyone homeless in ND because of the floods. Sweet, another problem solved.

  • Buzz

    Where did you get 400M? More like 300M.

  • Bottoms Up

    FARGO — Investigators say a woman caused her husband’s death by giving him a sherry enema, leading to alcohol poisoning.

    The enema caused his blood alcohol level to soar to 0.47 percent — almost six times the legal intoxication limit, a toxicology report showed.

    Tammy Jean Barner, 42, was indicted on a charge of negligent homicide. She is also charged with burning the will of her husband, Michael Barner, a month before his death on January 21.

    Michael Barner, a 56-year-old machine shop owner, had a long history of alcoholism but couldn’t ingest alcohol by mouth because of painful medical problems with his throat, said Fargo, ND, police detective Adolf Turner. The enema was a way he could become intoxicated without drinking alcohol, Turner said.

    Turner said police think Barner gave her husband at least two large bottles of sherry, which is stronger than wine, in the enema.

    “We’re not talking about little bottles here,” Turner said, “These were at least 1.5-liter bottles.”

  • SigFan

    Several years ago my wife and I needed to reside in a temporary place as the house we currently owned had been sold and the one we were building was still under construction. So for 6 weeks we stayed in a Residence Inn apartment. I think that by this definition then we would officially be “homeless” no? Just after we moved into the new house we realized we had accumulated enough Marriott points during our extended stay to take a 10-day executive suite vacation at the Marriott on Aruba for free. We did – wish I could be homeless again!

  • http://suitepotato.blogspot.com/ sayanything-4808

    They’ve had a lot longer than 12 hours OR 4 days to prepare Buzz. But as I’ve pointed out, unless there’s a political angle libs don’t give a shit. NO knew the levees were bad and made it known repeatedly. I don’t recall the Dems ever doing jack about it. You can say the Republicans didn’t either, but the Dems were the ones making themselves out to be more caring than thou two minutes later. If they cared so damn much about NO and the rest of the Katrina damages, why didn’t they funnel more of their social spending over the decades to preventative public works projects instead of subsistence welfare, payoffs to the well connected in the form of pointless civil service management jobs, etc., etc.? For crying out loud, even right now with the so-called stimulus package next to none of it was public works jobs of the sort that we rely on to keep the land under our feet livable. More pork and crap and when the shit hits the fan again, those same bungholes will be out there telling us how much they care.

    Where were they before the disaster? Where were they then? Teaching us to fiddle instead of storing food for the winter and then blaming us when we did what they led us to and shaking their finger at us. Total hypocrites. Like usual. They encourage foolishness to empower and ingratiate themselves, then chide us for it and offer solutions that empower them further.

    If they were the slightest bit noble, even one shred of them having redeeming value, they’d work to make a world where they were obsolete. Instead, well, we get more of them. And NO is just waiting for the next kidney punch from Mother Nature.

  • WOOFX
  • WOOFX

    Heck of a job
    Image and video hosting by TinyPic

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development