Home Mobile Archives Reader Blogs Register Login

Wednesday, May 31, 2006

Sensenbrenner: “Path To Citizeship” Is Amnesty And A Deal Breaker

Despite his decision to back legislation that would block law enforcement from executing search warrants on Congressional offices, James Sensenbrenner is still going to be my hero if he backs these words up with action:

WASHINGTON, May 28, 2006 (AP Online delivered by Newstex) -- The Senate plan to provide illegal immigrants with a shot at citizenship probably is a deal-breaker that will prevent passage of a compromise on immigration overhaul, the House's lead negotiator said Sunday.

"The words 'path to citizenship' is a buzzword for amnesty. We ought to be honest, it is amnesty," said Rep. James Sensenbrenner, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee.

The Senate bill passed last week would tighten border security, offer a guest worker program to bring in new foreign workers and provide a chance at citizenship for millions of illegal immigrants already in the country.

The House bill generally is limited to border enforcement and cracking down on employers who hire illegal immigrants.

Negotiators from both chambers will try to reconcile the differences and agree on a compromise.

Sensenbrenner, R-Wis., answered a flat "no" when asked Sunday on NBC's "Meet the Press" whether he would accept any legislation that would put illegal immigrants on a path to citizenship.


Fantastic.

Personally, I'd just as soon see us stay at the status quo with the immigration situation than see us award citizenship, even conditional citizenship, to the millions who have thumbed their noses at our laws and taken advantage of our entitlements without becoming citizens.

As I've noted before, a "path to citizenship" would do nothing more than tell those who would cross our border illegally that if they can stay in our country long enough undetected we will allow them to become citizens. The only way a foreigner should be able to become an American is by entering this country legally and going through the process established by our elected leaders at the will of the people.

Shortcuts to citizenship that bypass that process are illegal, and those who use them shouldn't be awarded in any way.

Comments

Avatar for dilettante

Now, before anybody flames this post, I’d like to point out that I’m totally in agreement with Rob; it makes no sense to reward unlawful behavior. Hey, I’d love to do 95mph on the Interstate, but that’d get me thrown in jail, not congratulated, because it’s illegal. Go figure. Having said that -

Does anyone know how one goes about emigrating to the US legally? For purposes of employment, permanent residence, and eventual citizenship? I have a friend who’s Italian and she’d love to move here, but we don’t seem to be making it very easy on legitimate folk who want to make a better life for themselves and contribute to our country (you know, the way our parents/grandparents, etc...back through history did?) You’d think that we would want to encourage hardworking people to come to the US - legally - when they prosper, so do we all. It seems that even if that’s what we want, it’s not like a hundred years ago; you can’t get on a boat, go through Ellis Island and find a place on the Lower East Side of New York.

How do people nowadays emigrate to the US legally? Anyone?

dilettante on May 31, 2006 at 12:03 pm
Avatar for The Whistler

Seems crazy, we make it harder than we need to to do things the right way.  We then reward those that don’t follow the rules. 

On a related note, I think the very last people we want as residents are those that have shown contempt for our laws.

The Whistler on May 31, 2006 at 12:11 pm
Avatar for WOOF

I’d just as soon see us stay at the status quo with the immigration situation

I think the deal has been made, everyone gets to yell and nothing happens.
Status quo with a little border security. No ones against border security.
WOOF on May 31, 2006 at 12:57 pm
Rob
Rob
17185 comments
Send a private message

Making it easier to legally immigrate should be part of any solution to the illegal immigration problem.

A “tall fence with a wide gate,” (to quote Thomas Friedman) is what I favor.


The war against illegal plunder has been fought since the beginning of the world. But how is… legal plunder to be identified? Quite simply. See if the law takes from some persons what belongs to them, and gives it to other persons to whom it does not belong. See if the law benefits one citizen at the expense of another by doing what the citizen himself cannot do without committing a crime. Then abolish this law without delay … If such a law is not abolished immediately it will spread, multiply and develop into a system.

Frédéric Bastiat, The Law

Rob’s recently listened-to songs:

robport.gif border=0

Rob on May 31, 2006 at 02:01 pm
Avatar for WOOF

It will be made easier, just not right now.
We need workers.

Only easy ways in at this time is to be a Cuban refugee ( necessitates getting off the island) or have a million dollars to buy or start a business that employs 10 Americans.

WOOF on May 31, 2006 at 02:16 pm
Avatar for robert108

Rob: After the border is locked down and order is restored, why not let the market decide how wide the gate is to be?  That might change as conditions change, as well.  I can see a time when we have enough workers, and the gate might be closed again until there is a need on this side.  It should be up to us, not them.

robert108 on May 31, 2006 at 02:16 pm
Avatar for robert108

Woof: I would agree with you if you said we need good workers, not necessarily ones who don’t know how our system works, and who don’t aspire to become upwardly mobile and increasingly productive.

robert108 on May 31, 2006 at 02:18 pm
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.