Senator Dorgan Isn’t Worried About Town Hall Protesters, But Tries To Exclude Protesters Anyway

Senator Dorgan has essentially scheduled his events to be a series of short “whistlestops” at times and locations that seem specifically choreographed to minimize attendance. What’s more, if he manages his events like his colleague Senator Conrad is, only people who are pre-selected and approved by the Senator will be allowed to talk at all.

Sen. Byron Dorgan said Monday he’s not worried about protesters bogging down his series of town hall meetings today through Thursday, saying, “That’s just not the way North Dakotans are.”
Protests over health care reform have disrupted meetings across the nation, prompting Democratic leaders in Congress to accuse the opposition of staging a campaign to misrepresent the legislation and prevent members of Congress from having a civil dialogue with their constituents.
Republican leaders have countered that Democrats are attacking people for their differing opinions instead of answering tough questions about the proposed reforms.
Dorgan said he’s been conducting town hall meetings during the August recess for years and doesn’t expect any difficulties during this small-city tour.
“There’s an old saying: ‘When everyone in the room is thinking the same thing, nobody’s thinking very much,’ ” he said. “And so I’ve always welcomed a diversity of thought. I think it’s healthy. And North Dakotans always do that very respectfully.”

That’s all well and good, but the Senator should remember that actions speak louder than words:

Still, the buzz about the meetings was enough to prompt Dorgan’s office to contact the city of Casselton to express concern that his visit there at 11 a.m. Wednesday “wouldn’t be the environment that needs to happen for a good discussion,” said City Auditor Brandy Pyle.
Dorgan will be at the fire hall for only an hour, so there won’t be a lot of time for questions, Pyle said.
“I think they are a little concerned about it, but I’m hoping it won’t happen,” she said of protests.

The Casselton event, of course, is close to Fargo. Scott Hennen and myself have been urging readers/listeners to attend that event and ask their questions. Clearly, Dorgan doesn’t want any dissent at that meeting and neither do the organizers. But if they’re going to hold a town hall, shouldn’t they be willing to listen to the other side too?
I don’t condone violence or other illegal activities, but Americans are upset. Many of those Americans are Senator Dorgan’s constituents. If they want to give him an earful he should be more than happy to make himself available.
He does, after all, work for us. Remember?

Tags: , , ,


«
»
  • http://www.dartemis.net/blog/ sayanything-42

    Rob,

    Agreed. But what if we staggered the election of Representatives such that half were up for re-election each year? The odd year elections could be very tough on incumbents…

  • Brent

    They “work” for me like the mob “works” for small urban business owners. What if I don’t want anyone “working” for me?

    At least, at the risk of ruining the fairy tale, I think you have to admit, Rob, that it would be pretty absurd for anyone to actually believe that any US Senator is accountable to a Joe Blow average citizen.

  • http://www.moszer.net/ Moszer

    I’m guessing there will be so many people at the Casselton town hall that I’m going to sneak into town from a side road and park a few blocks away, walk up to the fire house.

    If nothing else, it should be interesting!

  • http://ndgoon.blogspot.com/ goon

    Keep hammering them. I still haven’t gotten my response back from Conrad’s aid.

  • Brent

    Let’s just abandon the whole idea of representative government then.

    I was just pointing out that it doesn’t work very well. But isn’t it great when they have to get re-elected? Dorgan hasn’t been this accountable (pathetic, isn’t it?)in six years…

    If you want them to be even remotely represenative, you apparently have to hold elections every six months.

  • TheTodd

    Clearly, Dorgan doesn’t want any dissent at that meeting and neither do the organizers. But if they’re going to hold a town hall, shouldn’t they be willing to listen to the other side too?

    No, he doesn’t want any thuggish hecklers shouting down all discussion between him and the peaceful town hall participants.

    If it’s wrong for liberal protesters to prevent conservative speakers from giving a speech on campus, it’s wrong for conservative protesters to prevent politicians from speaking at town halls.

    But since it’s your pet cause, I guess consistency can go right out the window, eh?

  • robert108

    Todd: Sorry you can’t tell the difference between violent lefties trying to suppress all conservative opinion, and real Americans trying to have their say with their elected representatives. We have already been bombarded with the Party line for a year; now, we want to counter that propaganda with the truth. Big difference, but go ahead with your lying smear; it’s all you have.

  • TheTodd

    Town halls are two-way events. Speeches are not. If the poilticians invite public comment they can’t turn around and say they don’t like how the public is commenting.

    Rob: The right-wing hecklers are DISCOURAGING public comment–they are disrupting discussions between the politicians and the public.

    Politicians don’t like it when thugs shout down down all attempts at a civil conversation. How terrible!!!

    This is just mindblowing that you’re so partisan that you continue to purport that these hecklers are acting with civility.

    I should go to one of John McCain’s town hall discussions, blast a boombox at top volume and shout over everyone with a bullhorn until they leave. I’d be a patriot in Rob’s eyes… It’d be just like the Boston Tea Party!!!

  • bill-tb

    Duck and cover …

  • http://www.dartemis.net/blog/ sayanything-42

    tehtoad,

    Members of Congress are REQUIRED to reside in their state or district for several good and abiding REASONS. One of those being that they are answerable to their constituents and need to hear what THEY HAVE TO SAY.

    Here endeth the lesson.

  • jimmypop

    rob, the people in the town hall really are not ‘protesters’. if they had signs outside, super. call them that. if they cause a fuss inside (like a code pink crew would), fine.

    99% of these people just want to be heard and hear, in person, why the elected folks think they know better…. even if the elected person has not read the bill.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    Rob: The right-wing hecklers are DISCOURAGING public comment–they are disrupting discussions between the politicians and the public.

    Except that they’re not. That’s the liberal characterization, but the truth is that they’re asking questions and reacting to the speakers.

    But reality doesn’t matter, right? Just set up the straw man and attack it viciously, Davey.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    If it’s wrong for liberal protesters to prevent conservative speakers from giving a speech on campus, it’s wrong for conservative protesters to prevent politicians from speaking at town halls.

    Town halls are two-way events. Speeches are not. If the poilticians invite public comment they can’t turn around and say they don’t like how the public is commenting.

    And if Dorgan/Conrad really wanted input, they wouldn’t be hand-selecting who gets to speak and who doesn’t.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    Ah. Ok then.

    Let’s just abandon the whole idea of representative government then.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    An election every six months seems like a recipe for an endless campaign.

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development