Home ND News Mobile Forum Contact Reader Blogs Register Login

Wednesday, October 11, 2006


Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid Didn’t Disclose Real Estate Earnings

Uh oh…

Land deeds obtained by The Associated Press during a review of Reid’s business dealings show:

_The deal began in 1998 when Reid bought undeveloped residential property on Las Vegas’ booming outskirts for about $400,000. Reid bought one lot outright, and a second parcel jointly with Brown. One of the sellers was a developer who was benefiting from a government land swap that Reid supported. The seller never talked to Reid.

_In 2001, Reid sold the land for the same price to a limited liability corporation created by Brown. The senator didn’t disclose the sale on his annual public ethics report or tell Congress he had any stake in Brown’s company. He continued to report to Congress that he personally owned the land.

_After getting local officials to rezone the property for a shopping center, Brown’s company sold the land in 2004 to other developers and Reid took $1.1 million of the proceeds, nearly tripling the senator’s investment. Reid reported it to Congress as a personal land sale.

The complex dealings allowed Reid to transfer ownership, legal liability and some tax consequences to Brown’s company without public knowledge, but still collect a seven-figure payoff nearly three years later.

Reid hung up the phone when questioned about the deal during an AP interview last week. . . .

Senate ethics rules require lawmakers to disclose on their annual ethics report all transactions involving investment properties _ regardless of profit or loss _ and to report any ownership stake in companies.

Kent Cooper, who oversaw government disclosure reports for federal candidates for two decades in the Federal Election Commission, said Reid’s failure to report the 2001 sale and his ties to Brown’s company violated Senate rules.

And it looks like more developments may be coming:

Other parts of the deal _ such as the informal handling of property taxes _ raise questions about possible gifts or income reportable to Congress and the IRS, ethics experts said.

And it looks like this Brown guy is a pretty shady character:

Brown befriended Reid four decades ago, even before Reid served as chairman of the Nevada gaming commission and decided cases involving Brown’s clients.

Brown’s name has surfaced in federal investigations involving organized crime, casinos and political bribery since the 1980s.

This past summer, federal prosecutors introduced testimony at the bribery trial of former Clark County Commission chairman Dario Herrara that Brown had taken money from a Las Vegas strip club owner to influence the commission.

You’ll remember that previously Reid got in hot water for accepting free boxing tickets as he worked on legislation concerning the boxing industry.

This isn’t good for Reid’s “culture of corruption” campaign against Republicans in Congress.

Does this tick you off? Click here to email your elected representatives right here on Say Anything, or comment below.

Comments

Avatar for Chris Brownell

Now I wonder if the mainstream media will pick up on this and in their pseudo reporting, editorialize how this deflates Senator Reid’s sails when it comes to claiming the democrats are the party of ethics.  Somehow I doubt it.  They might drop a very short sound bit, and move on as quickly as possible to another topic, hoping that it will go un-noticed by the general public.
    This is just a long list of elected members of the democratic party who behave unethically, like Nancy Pelosi who will defend unions till her last breath but doesn’t hire union for her family farms in California.  William Jefferson still is sorting out his frozen assets.  The non-elected members of the ludicrous left like Ted Turner doesn’t know if he supports the U.S. or our enemies after they kill 3000 of our citizens.  Talk about being anti-abortion on CBS’s segment called “Free Speech” and you can count on having your views called repugnant. 

  I am glad that you posted the article about Senator Reid. It is a shame that we can not count on his being held to account for it.  If it were Bush they would again be demanding his impeachment. 

C.

Chris Brownell on October 11, 2006 at 11:31 am
Rob
Rob
22123 comments
Send a private message

Good point Chris,

If this were a Republican there would be endless reporting of it.  It would be “Breaking News” all over the place, and it would be the subject of endless discussion on all the talk shows.

As it is, I’m guessing this will move out of the news cycle in a day or two.


The purpose of government shouldn’t be to do good, but simply to refrain from doing evil.

Rob on October 11, 2006 at 11:38 am
Avatar for gregdn

I haven’t heard much of their ‘culture of corruption’ since the William Jefferson thing.  Reid’s a sleazoid.

gregdn on October 11, 2006 at 11:54 am

Like the Republican candidate in Tennessee has had all of his shading dealings plastered all over the media.  Look at: http://www.commercialappeal.com/mca/politics/article/0,1426,MCA_1496_5057186,00.html

Sort of reminds me of Bill Frist’s “Blind Trust.”  What is it with Tennessee politicians and blind trust problems?

bak72 on October 11, 2006 at 12:19 pm
Avatar for Kevin Flanagan

Now, now; I’m sure Harry just overlooked this while he was busy doing the business of the American People.

Kevin Flanagan on October 11, 2006 at 01:37 pm

Chris is right.

If this were a republican the MSM would be on him like starving hyenas. I doubt seriously if this will get the kind of coverage it deserves. I hope I’m wrong and the MSM will be fair this time. Ha!!! Sorry, just daydreaming.


The future ain’t what it used to be…..

(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)

Pilgrim on October 11, 2006 at 03:46 pm

Has anyone dugg this yet. Just curious to hear before I do it. As for Pinky Reid, he, as all the rest of Congress, has the morals of a crackwhore. He has slid from shady deal to shady deal for years. I mean, come on, his primary source of campaign fundraising is Las Vegas, and he lives in DC, in the Morgan Adams area. ‘Nuff said!


Una Salus Victus Nullam Sperare Salutem

2Hotel9 on October 11, 2006 at 03:56 pm

Pilgrim: Here’s the problem with “fair”: On one level, “fair” would be giving Reid’s unethical activity the same coverage that Foley’s non-crime got.  OK? The problem is, the coverage of Foley hasn’t been right, so “fair” would be committing another wrong to balance out the first wrong.  Not good, either.  Instead of being “fair”, why not go for truthful?  Give Reid the attention his behavior merits, and likewise Foley.  That would be a lot of attention for Reid, and very little for Foley.  That would be a fair standard.  “Fair” is totally subjective.


If govt control of the economy were the way to go, the Soviet Union would be the richest, most powerful nation in the history of the world.

Thanks to Obama, America remains the only country where it is illegal to drill our own oil!

robert108 on October 11, 2006 at 03:57 pm

108,

By Jove, I believe your analysis is spot on. All things being “fair” Foley would be a sideshow compared to something like this. That would happen in a perfect world. Of course, in a perfect world you could dry your cat in the microwave, too. That ain’t gonna happen either.

However, I stand most humbly corrrected in the semantics of my post.


The future ain’t what it used to be…..

(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)

Pilgrim on October 11, 2006 at 04:21 pm
Avatar for jpe

Reid transferred his interest to an LLC like any real estate owner would have.  What’s the problem?

jpe on October 11, 2006 at 06:00 pm
Avatar for Bat One

Reid transferred his interest to an LLC like any real estate owner would have.

In exchange for what???  It is already established that Reid violated Senate financial reporting requirements and ethics rules.  We would have to see his various bank statements and tax returns, as well as those of Borwn and the LLC to determine if any state or federal laws have been violated.

Obviosly, Brown’s colorful past will entitle him to closer law enforcement scrutiny.  But I can’t see any viable argument that Reid’s behavior isn’t the same as that of the Keating Five of years past.

Bat One on October 11, 2006 at 06:17 pm

jpe, he lied and obfuscated, then stood in front of the press and his collegues in Congress and put himself forward as a man of high and unquestionable moral and ethical standards. Sound familiar?


Una Salus Victus Nullam Sperare Salutem

2Hotel9 on October 11, 2006 at 06:27 pm
Avatar for jpe

In exchange for what?

Jeebus.  In exchange for an interest in the LLC proportional to the land transferred over the total assets of the LLC.

jpe, he lied and obfuscated

He still owned the property.  It was a paper transfer, and no more.  He failed to disclose that, instead of owning the property, the property was owned by a passthrough corp of which he was the owner; that’s gotta be good for a slap on the wrist, but unless there’s something else going on, no more.

jpe on October 11, 2006 at 07:04 pm
Avatar for Bat One

He still owned the property.  It was a paper transfer, and no more.  He failed to disclose that, instead of owning the property, the property was owned by a passthrough corp of which he was the owner

Re-read the story, jpe.  According to the original published report, the subject LLC was owned by Brown, not by Reid.  And THAT is why I asked “in exchange for what?”

If Reid had set up his own LLC, then he would be guilty of nothing more than obtaining good investment advice and some patently shoddy bookkeeping.

On the other hand, if Brown owned the LLC, then the questions surrounding Reid’s actions, and his financial reporting, are considerably more serious.

Bat One on October 11, 2006 at 07:16 pm
Avatar for jpe

That’s how we know the story is a piece of junk.  The writer clearly doesn’t understand how real estate LLCs work.  They’re partnerships, and owned by the partners in proportion to their capital contributions.

If Reid had set up his own LLC, then he would be guilty of nothing more than obtaining good investment advice and some patently shoddy bookkeeping.

You just nailed it.  (although Reid didn’t set it up; he entered it)

jpe on October 11, 2006 at 07:51 pm
Avatar for Bat One

If Reid “entered into” the LLC as you suggest, however, then there should be documentation to that effect, both in Reid’s tax returns and Senate financial filings, as well as those of the LLC itself, and for that matter, those of Mr. Brown, whose ownership interest in the LLC would have been diminished to the extent of the Reid “contribution.”

All of this is compunded by another fact, as yet unreported… the anonymity of corporate ownership afforded (and encouraged) by Nevada state law.  Without subpoenas the public may never know what has or has not transpired.

Certainly it would make a fascinating court case: federal subpoenas versus Nevada state incorporation law.  And it will probably take just that to unravel the financial dealings of Harry Reid.

Bat One on October 11, 2006 at 08:04 pm
Avatar for jpe

Because the partnership is a passthrough, there’s no tax effect from entering, and Reid’s 1040 would make no mention of it.  It’s been over a year since I’ve had to do personal returns for anyone with K-1s (the partnership equivalent of the W-2), so my memory is a little hazy, but it’s possible that subsequent deductible expenses (like the property tax paid) would require a filing of the LLC’s K-1s. 

And there’s no question Reid should’ve disclosed his interest in the LLC, but absent more evidence of substantive wrong-doing (which is possible; this is Vegas and land deals, both of which are commonly shady), this looks like mere administrative oversight.  By all means, though, the ethics committee should look into it because filings are an important bulwark against worse.

jpe on October 12, 2006 at 02:18 am

jpe, he lied and obfuscated his involvement and how much he profited. That is a crime. You do it or I do it and we go to jail. Why do you not want the members of your party, the Democrat Party, to live by the same laws as we citizens do? Republican Party members are regularly prosecuted for these types of activity, why not your precious Democrats?


Una Salus Victus Nullam Sperare Salutem

2Hotel9 on October 12, 2006 at 02:28 am
Avatar for jpe

No, he disclosed his profit and his ownership (albeit the latter technically incorrectly).  That’s why this whole thing is, at the moment, a pseudo-scandal (more might come out - as noted, this is NV and land, a breeding ground for shenanigans if there ever was one).

jpe on October 12, 2006 at 04:42 am

2H9: Laws don’t matter if you a liberal elitist.  So JPE’s got a point.


1% of Americans pay 40% of the income tax.
5% of Americans pay 60% of the income tax.
10% of Americans pay 70% of the income tax.


The Whistler's signature
The Whistler on October 12, 2006 at 04:50 am

No, jpe, Associated Press disclosed it. Reid lied and obfuscated, in direct violation of Federal laws AND the accepted ethical standards of the Senate. Remeber those ethical standards, the ones Reid and Pelosi, et al are using to beat Republicans over the head. Why are you so determined that your party, the Democrat Party, not be held to the same legal and ethical standard as Republicans and American citizens? What, exactly, is your agenda?


Una Salus Victus Nullam Sperare Salutem

2Hotel9 on October 12, 2006 at 04:58 am
Avatar for Bill

Pretty shady stuff!

Bill on October 12, 2006 at 05:56 am
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

If you want to ignore a fellow commenter, download this.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.

    

By submitting your comment you agree to our terms of service.