Senate Bill Would Seek Higher Wages For “Guest” Workers

Sigh…

The Senate immigration bill would require that foreign construction laborers here under the guest-worker program be paid well above the minimum wage, even as American workers at the same work site could earn less.
The bill “would guarantee wages to some foreign workers that could be higher than those paid to American workers at the same work site,” says a policy paper released this week by the Senate’s Republican Policy Committee. “This is unfair to U.S. workers, inappropriate, and unnecessary.”

My opposition to any sort of guest worker program aside, we should all oppose the government getting involved in setting any sort of wage minimums for workers in America…be they “guests” or citizens.
The free market should dictate wages. If we do create a guest worker program than those workers should work for what the employers are willing to pay them. If the pay is not adequate for these guest workers than they can return to their own country and find a job at a compensation level more to their liking.
Really, though, this bill should be called the “Guest Worker Unemployment Act” as it will only result in fewer guest workers being hired. If the bill requires a compensation level for guest workers that is higher than what American workers will work for then why would any employer continue to hire guest workers? The only reason illegal immigrants are hired in this country now is that they are willing to work for less than Americans will. If so-called guest workers suddenly become more expensive than citizen workers employers will either begin hiring citizens or continue to hire illegal immigrants who fall outside the guest worker program.
Putting it bluntly: This bill is a bunch of worthless nonsense.
Unfortunately, this Senate plan has the backing of Bill Frist and a few other Republican leaders:

The 11-page, harshly critical analysis of the Senate immigration bill on this one point reveals how torn Senate Republicans are over the larger issue of immigration.
Though the bill was supported by Majority Leader Bill Frist of Tennessee and Majority Whip Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, it was opposed by the rest of the Senate Republican leadership and a majority of Republicans in the chamber. And despite the support of Mr. Frist and Mr. McConnell, this week’s policy paper critical of the wage guarantees for foreign workers marks the official stance of the Republican Policy Committee, which formulates and implements the policies of the caucus.

It is hard for me to imagine any true conservatives supporting a bill that allows the government to mandate compensation levels for workers.

Tags: , ,


«
»
  • http://SayAnythingBlog.com The_Whistler_ofnd

    So the Unions don’t want “unfair competition”. So ultimately this kind of rule will either shut down guest workers, or more likely encourage more law-breaking.

    I believe this is the same “guest” worker program that really amounts to never sending the guest workers home. That’s just plain wrong.

    Immigrants should be American’s not guest workers. There may be room for a seasonal guest-worker program that’s much smaller in scope than the senate bill. This would be for workers that want to live in Mexico but work for a season in the US.

  • aNONOMISLY

    If anything reveals the liberal social agenda any better than this provision of the Senate bill, I don’t know what it is.

    and the funny thing is it was passed by an ablolutely republican controlled Senate, ..backed by a very right wing republican President!

    guess liberals aren’t limited to the left side of the Senate isle.

  • aNONOMISLY

    If anything reveals the liberal social agenda any better than this provision of the Senate bill, I don’t know what it is.

    and the funny thing is it was passed by an ablolutely republican controlled Senate, ..backed by a very right wing republican President!

    guess liberals aren’t limited to the left side of the Senate isle.

  • Pilgrim

    Interesting. So…let me this straight. If I want a job that pays a bit more at than my fellow Americans make at, say, Waffle House or Ernie’s Porn Palace, all I have to do is say my name is Chico Vasquez, pretend not to speak English and provide no documentation that can prove where I’m really from? Wow. No taxes, either. And here I’ve been doing it the right way all these years! Who’d have thunk it? And, by the way, just kidding about those places to work. I’d never work at Waffle House. I have my standards, you know.

  • aNONOMISLY

    One first thought after reading this would be: there are at it again, ..them damn liberals!

    then one smells the coffee and realize this is the initiative of a republican Senate, ..strongly backed by a right wing republican president who campaigned on that exact same issue in 2000.

    this would actually open their eyes to some of Bush’s policies they would see he hasn’t been anywhere near as exreme as they claim him to be.

    they been throughing him kisses on this one all along!

  • http://www.diggersrealm.com/ Digger

    The kicker to this, the amendment was made by Democrat darling Barack Obama.

  • puzzlefeet

    Once again, R108, your hatred for unions is on display.
    I, however prefer this;
    union workers=high wages=more money spent in business=more profits for businesses. I don’t here those businesses complaining.

  • aNONOMISLY

    The Democrats and Unions ..the Republicans and Corporate America.. ..they both suck!!

  • Pilgrim

    Intersting. So…let me this straight. If I want a job that pays a bit more at than my fellow Americans make at, say, Waffle House or Ernie’s Porn Palace, all I have to do is say my name is Chico Vasquez, pretend not to speak English and provide no documentation that can prove where I’m really from? Wow. No taxes, either. And here I’ve been doing it the right way all these years! Who’d have thunk it? And, by the way, just kidding about those places to work. I’d never work at Waffle House. I have my standards, you know.

  • robert108

    aNON: “The Democrats and Unions ..the Republicans and Corporate America.. ..they both suck!!”

    Consider this: Dems=high taxes(suck from your wallet); Unions=high prices(suck from your wallet).
    Reps=tax cuts(you keep more of your own money); Corporate America=creates jobs and prosperity(more for all).

    So, you were only half right.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/ likwidshoe

    I, however prefer this;
    union workers=high wages=more money spent in business=more profits for businesses.

    You “prefer” it, but it is not reality. Here in the real world, unions=high wages and prices=consumers go elsewhere=union worker out of a job=consumers buy cheaper goods made in China.

    I don’t here those businesses complaining.

    You mean the ones that are left? Ever take a trip through “the rust belt” by chance? Happen to know one of the biggest reasons why it is “the rust belt”?

  • Pilgrim

    Sorry. Inadvertant double click.

  • http://SayAnythingBlog.com The_Whistler_ofnd

    That’s a sad but true statement.

  • robert108

    If anything reveals the liberal social agenda any better than this provision of the Senate bill, I don’t know what it is.

  • J.R.

    Yeah everything for the very right wing President part. If the liberals screaming this would actually open their eyes to some of Bush’s policies they would see he hasn’t been anywhere near as exreme as they claim him to be.

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development