Second In Command Of American Ship Captured By Somali Pirates Accuses Rush Limbaugh Of Hate Speech

Meet the latest anti-Rush Limbaugh meme from the left.

SEEKONK, Mass.—Shane Murphy, the second-in-command aboard the American merchant ship seized by pirates, lashed out at Rush Limbaugh for the talk show host’s racial characterization in discussing the rescue of the ship’s captain by the Navy.
Murphy, who returned to his Seekonk, Mass., home Friday, called Limbaugh a purveyor of “hate speech.”
In commenting on the rescue of Capt. Richard Phillips by the Navy Seals who shot and killed the three Somali pirates who were holding him captive, Limbaugh generated controversy when he called the pirates “black teenagers.”
“There you have it, three teenagers shot on the high seas at the order of President Obama,” said Limbaugh according to a transcript of an April 14 broadcast on his Web site.
“Just imagine the hue and cry had a Republican president ordered the shooting of black teenagers on the high seas,” Limbaugh said.
Murphy said Limbaugh’s remarks were unacceptable.
“It feels great to be home,” Murphy said. “With the exception of Rush Limbaugh who is trying to make this into a race issue. It’s disgusting.”
“The president did the right thing. It’s a war. It’s about good versus evil. And what you (Limbaugh) said is evil, that is hate speech. I won’t tolerate it,” Murphy said.

I agree that the President did the right thing. If liberals would bather to listen to what Rush says, instead of just cherry-pick quotes out of his daily monologues to make his opinions appear to be something they’re not, they’d know that he thinks Obama did the right thing too.
What Rush was skewering, rightfully, was the left’s double standard on national security. How Bush was held to one standard by the left while Obama is held to another.
But Rush’s point, taken out of context here, was that for all the hue and cry about Bush ordering the water boarding of committed jihadis (something that resulted in actionable intelligence which saved American lives), nobody seems to be saying a word about Obama ordering the Somali pirates shot in the head.
Or, at least, giving our military the vague order to do something about the hostage situation thus leaving himself plenty of room for plausible deniability had the operation ended with a something less than optimal outcome. But I digress. I’m guessing those pirates would rather have been water boarded.
The funny thing about this situation is that Murphy accuses Rush of a “hate crime” that he’s not going to “tolerate.” Everyone is entitled to their opinion, but my guess is that Rush is going to tolerate Mr. Murphy’s opinions. Would that people like Murphy were capable of extending the same courtesy to people who disagree with them.
On a related note, Murphy talks of the effort against Somali pirates being “a war” that represents “good versus evil.” That sounds suspisciously like what a conservative might say about the war on terror. Are we saying that it’s ok to shoot Somali pirates to save American lives, but it’s not ok to water board jihadis to save American lives?

Tags: , ,


«
»
  • http://Array robert108

    …torture of a terrorist?

    No matter how many times you repeat that lie, H; it will never be the truth. We interrogate terrorists to defend our lives and our country; we don’t “torture” them.

  • robert108

    There is no evidence that this admirable Captain is a liberal.

    The evidence is his hateful statement. As usual, you miss it entirely, H.

  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    You guys are idiots. Buzz post (sic) vile things to get a rise out of you

    And we call him to account for his racist, misogynistic and homophobic statements. You have a problem with that?

    I notice that many on the Left will jump with both feet onto the slightest whiff of a discriminatory sentence from a conservative but don’t seem to mind to overwhelming stench of a racist as long as that racist is a liberal.

    We are not “idiots” for pointing out the blatant hypocrisy and double standards of supposedly “enlightened” liberals.

    you defend Move_Zig and his racism and hatred towards homosexuals as if it some noble thing he does.

    Care to provide a link where I have defended anyone for racism or hatred? Or do you merely like pulling stuff out of your ass?

  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    You are a terrible liar, and apologist for racism.

    Projection on your part, witless troll!

  • http://www.dartemis.net/blog/ sayanything-42

    pussycat,

    Just as there’s a difference between the legal protections due to United States Persons and those other persons within the sovereign territory of the United States, the legal protections under the Customary Laws of Warfare due to legal combatants, and finally the legal protections due to illegal combatants, with that final case (legal protections due to illegal combatants) being “none”.

  • carrick

    Lioncourt:

    You guys are idiots. Buzz post vile things to get a rise out of you and you guys take the bait every time.

    It’s who he is. He’s one of yours.

  • http://norseberserker.blogspot.com/ Rugby Reader

    Rush Limbaugh is a competent entertainer. The masses are amused.

  • http://www.rabidamerican.net/ Rabid American

    I heard the segment mentioned, IN ITS ENTIRETY!

    This has been taken completely out of context to once again bash Rush……

    “The president did the right thing. It’s a war. It’s about good versus evil. And what you (Limbaugh) said is evil, that is hate speech. I won’t tolerate it,” Murphy said.

    No need to ask who your masters are,sir……….

  • http://www.dartemis.net/blog/ sayanything-42

    1. The President did not order the shot taken.
    2. Normal ROE went back into effect, supplanting the previous Executive Directive to have the FBI negotiate.
    3. There would have been a cry of racism under a Republican Administration, even had that Republican Administration been headed by Condoleza Rice.

    QED

  • http://www.twitter.com/OneAndOnlyZel QueenZel

    There would have been a cry of racism under a Republican Administration, even had that Republican Administration been headed by Condoleza Rice.

    Mr. Graves ~ excellent point. She’s not considered “black” because she doesn’t “act” the role assigned to blacks BY all the racists, be they black or white. THIS is called PREJUDICE.

  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    Besides, the record for all to see, is that when I call racists to account for slurs against minorities, Hannitized is right there defending the racist!

  • Hannitized

    And notice how Rob paints this guy as a liberal, simply because he thinks Rush is harmful.

    There is no evidence that this admirable Captain is a liberal.

  • Hannitized

    If liberals would bather to listen to what Rush says, instead of just cherry-pick quotes out of his daily monologues

    Spelling Bea??

    This has got to be one of Angry Rob’s dumbest arguments. How in the hell can anyone be so stupid as to argue that there is a similarity between shooting someone who took an innocent person hostage, and torture of a terrorist? It’s not even close to being the same thing.

    Rob doesn’t have the smarts, or the courage to compare how lefties would respond had Bush killed, or ordered the killing of the terrorists who had any of our innocent hostages who had their heads removed by terrorists and Rob knows it.

    Rob is a pathetic dope.

  • Neiman

    Little sparkie misses it again; the United States made rights into something bestowed by our Creator, not kings or govts. Big difference.

    Absolutely right! Absent reliance on an all-powerful Creator (Nature’s God) as the sure Guarantor of our Lioberty, we are left, as we are mostly today, to the whims of a ruling political elite that subscribes to situational ethics and relative morality to the extent that neither true Ethics or real Moral Standards exist within America and that to our peril.

  • Marion

    I believe Rush Limbaugh has great character and common sense, which we are in very short supply of these days. As for hate speech, have you been listening to the “tin horn dictators” that our President has been hanging around with lately. Rush doesn’t mince words, but he does not propagate hate speech.

  • Buzz

    “It feels great to be home,” Murphy said. “With the exception of Rush Limbaugh who is trying to make this into a race issue. It’s disgusting.”

    If rush were killed this morning, the world would be a better place. Nothing buy a over sized piece of shit, with absolutely no value on this Earth.

  • http://www.dartemis.net/blog/ sayanything-42

    And we don’t give a shit what a whiny racist apologist soi dissant “counseleor”, “jd”, and “veteran” who never, ever, backs up his assertions with verifiable facts thinks or “feels” on any subject of substance.

  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    grapeshot keeps lots of links on the more virulent racists, lest he need to make himself appear angelic.

    Hardly! ‘Twas I first composed that set of links (you’ll note the corrected spelling!), because I was getting extremely tired of certain trolls (Buzz among them) who would say the most foul and odious things, full of racism and misogyny, and then pop up in some later thread, pretending to be pure as the driven snow, full of faux indignation over what someone else had said.

    Rodney is just trying to keep the record straight, Spark.

    But, if you don’t want to be held accountable for what you say here, don’t say it.

  • carrick

    Proof:

    Care to provide a link where I have defended anyone for racism or hatred? Or do you merely like pulling stuff out of your ass?

    I was wondering the same thing.

  • http://www.twitter.com/OneAndOnlyZel QueenZel

    Murphy talks of the effort against Somali pirates being “a war” that represents “good versus evil.” That sounds suspisciously like what a conservative might say about the war on terror. Are we saying that it’s ok to shoot Somali pirates to save American lives, but it’s not ok to water board jihadis to save American lives?

    I think you’ve got them there!

  • carrick

    You can link to the specific comments, Lioncourt, since none of us are mind readers.

    Which comments “defended anyone for racism or hatred?”

  • Hannitized

    So Rush’s hateful statement makes him a liberal?

    Knobert the Gundle is off is rocker as usual.

  • Neiman

    The fact that a great many people believe something is no guarantee of its truth.

    W. Somerset Maugham was a very liberal writer absent any sure moral standards, so not the most reliable source of information.

    That was my point! Even if everyone agrees with your rejection of the existence of absolute Truth or your rejection of objective morality, will never make YOUR position the truth; however, time has tested certain Truth and certain standards of absolute morality and that is a much more solid ground on which any society or person can stand than your ever shifting and even hypocritical views on moral issues.

    My objections to your positions above are not meant to be disrespectful, though my direct manner can sometimes make it appear otherwise!

  • Mickey

    I suspect Murphy just misunderstood the sarcasm in Rush’s statement.

  • robert108

    Using false charges of “racism” and labeling speech that makes you uncomfortable as “hate speech” is the typical leftie tactic to deprive real Americans of their free speech rights.

  • jimmypop

    “Just imagine the hue and cry had a Republican president ordered the shooting of black teenagers on the high seas,”

    the irony here……. does everyone realize hes was actually taking a shot at the perceived racism that republicans are always hung with and this guy just validated that in this story?!?!?!?! this dude and the writer just proved rushs point with this comment!!! its amazing how stupid these people are.

  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    Only a fool would defend the statement that THE way to solve racial tensions is to rid the world of pure black people by having the females mate with white men.

    Only a fool (or a mind numbingly stupid and dishonest troll) would be unable to detect the hyperbole (another word you do not quite comprehend!) and attack it as if it were something else entirely. Sorry, humorless troll! No cigar!

    Besides, I have pointed out your hypocrisy in not attacking Buzz who made the same point, only not in jest.
    Try again, mind numbingly hypocritical and mind numbingly dishonest troll!

  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    Nothing buy (sic) a over sized piece of shit, with absolutely no value on this Earth.

    Buzz’s autobiography in fifteen words.

  • Michael K.

    Free speech isn’t “racism”.

    Unless the speaker is “white”.

  • http://www.dartemis.net/blog/ sayanything-42

    sparkless-arse-fuckin-buckle the “pandering ninny” and apoligist for racists notes my careful documentation of buzzardbreath’s serial blatant racism, but can’t be bothered to condemn it.

    Any remaining questions about his motivations?

    Didn’t think so.

  • http://www.dartemis.net/blog/ sayanything-42

    Why look!

    The grand kleagle of SAB racists (buzzardbreath) puts in an appearance. Let’s roll tape on buzzardbreath with regard to race:

    I would never try to defend these sub-humans. I said earlier im [sic] no nigger loving liberal. They are animals, pure and simple. Stay out west… its not safe here. -Buzz

    “Sand niggers”

    “Porch monkey”

    “kike”

    “knee deep in shines”

    “less than stellar minority’s (sic)”

    The only good hood nigger, is a dead hood nigger.

    Let’s see who had the balls to get an army of 1.2M gooks pissed off.

    “towlhead” [sic]

    Isn’t it odd how our leftard players of the race card can pull shit out of their asses against a figure they hold to be to their right, yet can’t find time to condemn a blatant and disgusting racist and bigot such as buzzardbreath? It rather leads one to believe that their interst isn’t really defeating racism, somehow…

    Oh yes, and leave us not forget sparkless-arse-fuckin-buckle the “pandering ninny” and notorious apoligist for racists trying to throw the race card as well.

  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    So your factless, baseless charge that I “defended anyone of racism or hatred” is based solely on the fact that I challenged the integrity of the known liar and defender of racists Hannitized?

    Pretty lame, Lyin’courtesan. Pretty lame.

  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    Ah! Lyin’courtesan hates it when we justly accuse his fellow travelers of dishonesty!

    That must be a “hate crime” to him!

  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    Poor Lyin’ass! I noted that one of Move_Zig’s detractors had himself a record of blatant dishonesty and that makes ME a “defender of hatred”? Puh-leease!

    Was there a specific comment you would care to stake your claim on, or was my very presence on the thread de facto proof in your tiny, little mind that I was defending anyone of hatred?

  • Hannitized

    Only a fool (or a mind numbingly stupid and dishonest troll) would be unable to detect the hyperbole

    People aren’t practicing hyperbole when they start of with the words “for the record”, and finish with “In fact, I think”.

    You are a terrible liar, and apologist for racism.

    I condemned Buzz statement, you didn’t accept it.

  • Hannitized

    Knobert the gungle that is…

  • docdave

    Nothing buy(t)a over sized piece of shit, with absolutely no value on this Earth.

    That would describe you. Nice piece of reflection.

  • robert108

    We don’t torture people when we interrogate them to protect our national security. Torture is simply sadism, whereas interrogation is for the purpose of national defense. Big difference.
    Lefties continue the “1984″ type redefinition game.

  • Lioncourt
    Hawk is accurate to label Move_Zig as the most hate-ful. (sic) Who cares if you agree or not, it’s the truth.

    says the mind numbingly dishonest troll, who wouldn’t know the truth if it bit him on the seat of his damp, yellow swim trunks!

  • http://norseberserker.blogspot.com/ Rugby Reader

    Gotta love our sailors! Great work and great words, Mr. Murphy!

    Peace and Semper Fidelis…

  • dfwpike

    What Rush was skewering, rightfully, was the left’s double standard on national security.

    What Rush was skewering was the left’s double standard on racism.

  • Hannitized

    You don’t have any intelligence to insult. You asked for your racist apologia, i gave it to you. Now you are squirming and making excuses.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/entry/homosexuality_is_wrong_-_a_compendium move_zig

    However, you defend Move_Zig and his racism and hatred towards homosexuals as if it some noble thing he does.

    Well first off, I have to thank the rest of the lads for their responses in my absence.

    Secondly, Lie-in-Court once again shows us how the Left consistently substitutes the word HATE for TRUTH.

    Truth is a real bitch against your side, isn’t it, Lie?

    Hahahahaha!

  • Hannitized

    Thanks for making that distinction Neiman.

    I believe, as in, it’s my opinion it is torture because of the definition provided by the UN. That is the law I wish us to respect:

    Torture, according to the United Nations Convention Against Torture, is: “any act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a male or female person for such purposes as obtaining from him, or a third person, information or a confession, punishing him for an act he or a third person has committed or is suspected of having committed, or intimidating or coercing him or a third person, or for any reason based on discrimination of any kind, when such pain or suffering is inflicted by or at the instigation of or with the consent or acquiescence of a public official or other person acting in an official capacity. It does not include pain or suffering arising only from, inherent in, or incidental to, lawful sanctions.”[1

    ]

  • Lioncourt

    You guys are idiots. Buzz post vile things to get a rise out of you and you guys take the bait every time.

    However, you defend Move_Zig and his racism and hatred towards homosexuals as if it some noble thing he does.

    Just as there’s a difference between the legal protections due to United States Persons and those other persons within the sovereign territory of the United States, the legal protections under the Customary Laws of Warfare due to legal combatants, and finally the legal protections due to illegal combatants, with that final case (legal protections due to illegal combatants) being “none”.

    You act as if the Customary Laws of war are anything more than a legal framework among nations. They are not some holy thing. Torture isn’t wrong because it is illegal, it is wrong because it is immoral.

  • Lioncourt

    Care to provide a link where I have defended anyone for racism or hatred? Or do you merely like pulling stuff out of your ass?

    This thread: http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/bill_could_allow_religious_leaders_opposing_homosexuality_to_be_prosecuted_/

  • Lioncourt

    Are we saying that it’s ok to shoot Somali pirates to save American lives, but it’s not ok to water board jihadis to save American lives?

    There is a difference in being on the battlefield and being in custody.

  • robert108

    Free speech isn’t “racism”.

  • Hannitized

    Care to provide a link where I have defended anyone for racism or hatred? Or do you merely like pulling stuff out of your ass?

    I will provide [url=http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/uncomfortable_moments_in_politics_obama_mouth_kisses_bidens_wife/#c330968
    ]one[/url]!

    For the record: I’m totally in favor of interracial relationships. In fact, I think they’re the solution to racial tensions. Let’s keep interbreeding until we’re all the same color. – Rob Port

    Proof defended that ALL DAY LONG.

    Only a fool would defend the statement that THE way to solve racial tensions is to rid the world of pure black people by having the females mate with white men.

  • Neiman

    (1) Morality is subjective. (2) Some here view homosexuality as immoral. (3) Does that necessarily make it wrong, liberals?

    (1a) That is your subjective opinion based on your atheist views; but throughout human history, even atheists, like Mortimer Adler, while still an atheist, said that certain Truth exists in all times, geography and social settings, these moral laws are NOT subjectyive at all. Take murder, it is immoral and that is not my subjective opinion.

    (2a) We do not use a subjective measurement to declare homosexuality immoral, it is by objective observation a violation of natural design (for you atheists) and a violation of Divine Design (For Christians), which makes it immoral as virtually every society, in every time in human history and every geographic setting have established.

    (3a) It is wrong for the reasons mentioned and your atheist views, no matter if 99.999999% of all human beings agreed with you, it woud remain just as wrong!

  • Hannitized

    That link did not work. Here it is again.

  • docdave

    Buzz post vile things to get a rise out of you and you guys take the bait every time.

    Abd that would equally apply to you???

  • Hannitized

    What, suggesting that you actually listen to what a person your criticizing is saying before you criticize him/her?

    No, that you argue there is a similarity between shooting hostage takers and torture.

  • Hannitized

    What the truth is that Rush was called on his hateful speech, and the 2nd in command has brought the proper shame upon him.

  • Neiman

    No matter how many times you repeat that lie

    Robert108: Does he absolutely know what he says to be absolutely false and then states it anyway, which would be required for him to be a liar; or, is he, in your opinion simply wrong on this or that matter?

  • robert108

    Care to provide a link where I have defended anyone for racism or hatred?

    Depends on your premise, Proof. To you, defending free speech is a basic ingredient of being a conservative, but to a leftie, that makes you a racist and a hater. They have different standards for those who don’t agree with their political ideology.

  • Lioncourt

    Just as there’s a difference between the legal protections due to United States Persons and those other persons within the sovereign territory of the United States, the legal protections under the Customary Laws of Warfare due to legal combatants, and finally the legal protections due to illegal combatants, with that final case (legal protections due to illegal combatants) being “none”.

    I don’t give a shit. Torture is wrong and we shouldn’t do it.

  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    I condemned Buzz (sic) statement, you didn’t accept it.

    You compared to a piece of imaginary racism you were taking exception to.
    Please don’t insult our intelligence!

  • robert108

    So Rush’s hateful statement makes him a liberal?

    Rush’s statement was truthful; you are the hater here, H, or whoever you really are.
    Maybe you should just stick to juvenile namecalling; it seems to fit your intelligence level. You sure don’t know how to make a valid point.

  • robert108

    Buzz post vile things to get a rise out of you…

    I think that makes little buzzy a troll, actually. Most of us enjoy some trollsmacking, and you hateful lefties give us ample opportunity.

  • carrick

    Torture isn’t wrong because it is illegal, it is wrong because it is immoral.

    Waterboarding is not torture.

    It’s stupid and counterproductive, and if immoral, only because of that.

  • robert108

    Little sparkie misses it again; the United States made rights into something bestowed by our Creator, not kings or govts.
    Big difference.

  • http://cannedjam.com/ cannedjam

    The people we waterboarded were involved in an ongoing conspiracy, therefore they were still in the process of perpetrating their crimes, holding the safety of Americans hostage with their actions, I see no difference in warderboarding them to reach a non-lethal resolution to said conspiracy saving lives, to say shooting a hostage-taker at the scene of the crime to save a life.

    If a conspiring member of a group is in custody then any killings as a result of that conspiracy being carried out after his apprehension, would be charged to him, therefore he is capable of committing murder while he is in custody – the crime was still in progress and the waterboarding was a non lethal resolution to an ongoing conspiracy to commit murder.

    Why is shooting dead the pirates justified but dunking a dude’s head in water not, to reach the same outcome?

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    This has got to be one of Angry Rob’s dumbest arguments.

    What, suggesting that you actually listen to what a person your criticizing is saying before you criticize him/her?

    Wow, I sure am dumb.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    Torture isn’t wrong because it is illegal, it is wrong because it is immoral.

    Morality is subjective. Some here view homosexuality as immoral. Does that necessarily make it wrong, liberals?

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    The fact that a great many people believe something is no guarantee of its truth.

    – W. Somerset Maugham

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/sparkiearbuckle sayanything-81

    dang. da wiz ‘racist ballerina apologista‘ grapeshot keeps lots of links on the more virulent racists, lest he need to make himself appear angelic.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/sparkiearbuckle sayanything-81

    da wiz – apologist for racists. (create your bookmarks, folks!)

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/sparkiearbuckle sayanything-81

    a rare ray of honesty from rob. a temporary break in the fog.

    Morality is subjective. Some here view homosexuality as immoral. Does that necessarily make it wrong, liberals?

    Rights as something we have were conceptually created by Hobbes. Before Hobbes it was ‘right conduct’ and ‘wrong conduct’ – natural law from augustine vis-a-vis grotius. hobbes turned it into a right to self defense. we never got it though. it was posited to be immediately given to the government for protection. nothing more than a rationalization for the kings to retain some perceived legitimacy of their control. locke and kant worked it up to close to its current form, but the historical origins tend to betray the surreality of a lot of these ‘concepts’.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/sparkiearbuckle sayanything-81

    also, doesnt milt friedman have a quote to the effect of:
    “facts are discernible, values are what men go to war over”

    the interesting thinkers take the fact/value distinction to be superficial.

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development