Home Mobile Archives Reader Blogs Register Login

Thursday, April 06, 2006

School Choice Program Working In D.C. Schools

Excellent...

WASHINGTON, April 5 — As a student at Shaw Junior High School here, Amie Fuwa strained to shut out the distractions of friends cutting up. She struggled through math, and used photocopies or the library when textbooks were scarce.

Now Amie, 14, a child of immigrants from Nigeria and the Dominican Republic, attends Archbishop Carroll High School, a Catholic school near a verdant hill of churches nicknamed the Little Vatican. When algebra confounds Amie, her teacher stays with her after school to help, and a mentor keeps her on course.

"It's a lot of people behind my back now," Amie said.

Before, she said, she "felt like it didn't really matter to different people I know, like my teachers, if I failed."

Amie is one of about 1,700 low-income, mostly minority students in Washington who at taxpayer expense are attending 58 private and parochial schools through the nation's first federal voucher program, now in its second year.

Last year, parents appeared lukewarm toward the program, which was put in place by Congressional Republicans as a five-year pilot program, But this year, it is attracting more participation, illustrating how school-choice programs are winning over minority parents, traditionally a Democratic constituency.


This success dovetails nicely with the success seen with a similar program put in place by Governor Jeb Bush in Florida. Here is a description of what happened in Florida:

Most remarkable has been minority student progress. While the percentage of white third-graders reading at or above grade level has increased to 78% from 70% in 2001, the percentage among Hispanic third-graders has climbed from 46% to 61%, and among blacks from 36% to 52%. Graduation rates for Hispanic students have increased from 52.8% before the program started to 64% today; and for black students from 48.7% to 57.3%. Minority schoolchildren are not making such academic strides anywhere else.


It would seem as though these results are being mirrored in D.C., which is a resounding testimony to the benefit of voucher programs. Unfortunately, the voucher program in Florida was stopped by a lawsuit from (ironically) minority-rights groups like the NAACP as well as teacher's unions.

What is undeniable here is that voucher programs improve education, especially education for those living in poor neighborhoods with public schools that perform below expectations. Why more people don't get that is beyond me.

Comments

Avatar for Bat One

This is exactly what the education lobby, teacher’s unions, and Democrat politicians are so scared of with voucher programs.  They work!

Its hard to justify spending $16,000 per year per pupil to not educate students, when you can spend considerably less and give them a real, competent, and caring education instead. 

Bat One on April 6, 2006 at 12:57 pm
Avatar for Epicurus

Though I understand Milton Friedman’s theory behind this issue (after all, he’s the father of the concept of school choice), it is still fraught with danger, in part because government comingling with private education can lead to a regulatory framework which will destroy private education. 

Epicurus on April 6, 2006 at 01:53 pm
Avatar for Epicurus

I wonder if the school (in D.C.) is named after the Shaw (mid to late twenty-something Col. Robert Gould Shaw) who commanded the Mass. 54th?

Epicurus on April 6, 2006 at 02:01 pm
Avatar for robert108

It would be better to turn the educational system over to market forces and get the govt out, but this is definitely a step in the right direction.  The program will enlarge as it succeeds where the present socialist system continues to fail.

robert108 on April 6, 2006 at 06:03 pm
Avatar for Bat One

It isn’t Dr. Friedman’s "theory" which is fraught with danger at all.  Rather it is the government regualtion itself which presents the danger.  The fact that the DC school district spends so much per pupil, and offers the students such a miserable return on their investment of time and effort and the taxpayers’ financial "investment" only proves the point.

If government-regulated education was even marginally effective, particularly in large, urban districts, there would be no need for any sort of reform… and no call for vouchers. 

Bat One on April 6, 2006 at 07:15 pm
Avatar for Epicurus

Bat One,

Rather it is the government regualtion itself which presents the danger.

Which is necessarily a possible outcome of Prof. Friedman’s proposal.

 

Epicurus on April 6, 2006 at 07:23 pm
Avatar for robert108

It’s a lesser degree of govt regulation than the present system.  The recipients get to choose the school, whereas under the present system, they don’t get to do that.  It’s a step in the right direction, and a crack in the monolithic wall of totalitarian govt education.  Perfection is only necessary under Marxism.

robert108 on April 6, 2006 at 09:02 pm
Avatar for Henry Cate

Until we get a decent voucher system, I think homeschooling may be the best option for parents who live in scary school districts.

Henry Cate on April 6, 2006 at 09:03 pm
Avatar for Epicurus

Actually, its greater regulation, and its regulation expanded to a sphere where it was less intrusive.  As Hayek and Mises have warned, any time that the government is the paymaster, the government sings the tune by which the recepients dance.

Epicurus on April 6, 2006 at 09:07 pm
Avatar for robert108

Henry: I think that is the best option of all.  Starve out the bureaucrats.

robert108 on April 6, 2006 at 09:08 pm
Avatar for Tom_with_a_Dream

I have been away but I got an email from the MD GOP crowd.  In it they list several of the Baltimore schools that are being fought over, the city wanting to continue to preside over them and the state wanting to tak econtrol (and give it over to new leadership, presumably).

I doubt anyone here is disagreeing with the following data, but I figured I would pass it along, jsut in case.  I can forward the email if anyone wants if but what I found interesting was this data, cut-pasted below:

Southwestern High School:

  • 8.9% of students can read proficiently
  • 1.6% of students are proficient at math 
  • For Southwestern’s freshman class of 2005, 99 out of 100 students will not pass their High School Assessment tests because they cannot read or perform math concepts.

 

              Frederick Douglass High School:

  • 15.8% of students read proficiently
  • 3.5% of students are proficient at math
  • 1.4% of students passed the biology component of their 2005 High School Assessment.

 

              Patterson High School:

  • 18.5% of students can read proficiently
  • 9.9% of students are proficient at math
  • 15.9% passed the English component of their 2005 High School Assessment.

 

             Northwestern High School:

  • 21% of students can read proficiently
  • 6.6% of students are proficient at math
  • 8.8% passed the government component of their 2005 High School Assessment.

 

  • With rare exceptions, 80 to 90% of students in these schools failed their High School Assessment Test.  Students were also absent on average 36 days – 7 weeks – per year.

These are the schools that Baltimore Mayor is fighting to keep under that same management.  I’d be embarassed!

Tom_with_a_Dream on April 7, 2006 at 07:49 am
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.

    

By submitting your comment you agree to our terms of service.