SCHIP Expansion Would Cover Children Of Families Making Above The Median Income…

…and what’s more, it’s being done at the expense of low-income seniors.
I don’t know how many times this point needs to be drilled home, but I’m going to keep doing it. The Democrats keep selling their SCHIP expansion as providing health care to “poor” children. The problem is that SCHIP already provides health care to poor children. What the Democrats are trying to do is expand that coverage to children who aren’t poor. As Jay Tea notes:

It turns out that the median family income in 2006 was $58,832 per year. The S-CHIP bill defines “poor children” who would qualify for this as those whose families make as much as $62,000 per year.

This is that “pimping victimhood” thing I wrote about a while back. We all know that the Democrats want a larger government with more power. The problem is that advocating for that directly isn’t likely to please a lot of people. After all, nobody likes the idea of more government control of their lives. So in order to sell their big-government ideas, the Democrats frame them in terms of helping people who are victims which they do by making the “victims” in question dependent on the government.
And once they’ve got that working they expand the definition of who is a victim to include pretty much everyone, as they’re now trying to do with SCHIP, and soon they’ve got us all on the hook.
Yet what’s funny is that while the Democrats are busy trying to cast themselves as the great saviors of all these “poor” kids from middle-class families, they’re funding the SCHIP expansion by taking funds from a Medicare program for senior citizens. A reader who would know emails:

Part of it is an additional 83 cents per pack tax on cigarettes. Whether or not that’s OK is another discussion. But that’s not the only thing. Part of the funding for Congressional expansion of programs is a proposed reduction in funding for Medicare Advantage, a program for low income seniors. We should not be offering free health coverage to middle income families while reducing coverage for low income seniors. Shame!

Personally, I’m not sure why it’s the government’s responsibility to provide anyone with health care, but this is certainly a revelation as to the intent of Democrats with this program.

Tags: , , ,


«
»
  • http://www.HealthInsuranceShopper.com/ pat

    SCHIP already provides health care to poor children. What the Democrats are trying to do is expand that coverage to children who aren’t poor.

    Thank you.

  • syn

    I often wonder how many of Pelosi’s Mommies are buying silcone boobs, or lifetime supply of botox, or liposuction before they’ll buy their children health insurance?

  • http://www.valleydeals.com/cgi-bin/board2/YaBB.pl Kevin

    If someone can’t afford to insure their children, they can’t afford children.
    Zip ‘em up!

  • http://observingcommenting.blogspot.com/ Rick G

    Everything the Democrats do now is about the next election. They have no other motives, purpose, or agenda. They want Bush to veto a bill “for the children” so they can campaign against Republicans for being against children.

    Thats why the bill covers illegals, children up to the age of 25, and in one state couples making up to $83,000.

  • Neiman

    Rob is wrong, [i]these children, even at higher income levels are victims, there is absolutely no room for the tiniest doubt in the matter. They are victims of the Democrat Party and liberal agenda to force everyone to accept their vision of a socialist utopia in America with everyone being wholly dependent upon the government for everything in life. Most poverty, most people being irresponsible, most of the ills of our society are the fault of a political party and political agenda that does not demand personal responsibilty from every citizen and wants to rescue them from every pain possible to cause complete dependence upon these liberal leaders for every morsel of bread.

    Sorry to disagree Rob, but I think these people are all truly victims, victims of greed, laziness and a lack of personal responsibility; and of a political party and movement that promotes those failures.

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development