Comments on: Sarah Palin: I Was Right About The Death Panels

By: proof_positive

proof_positive — Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000

Note any pattern there Tranni? Here’s a quarter, buy a clue!

By: proof_positive

proof_positive — Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000

Liberals always labor under the notion that they would be part of the elite ruling class in the coming New World Order. The fact is, they would probably be taken out and shot by their new commie masters as potential troublemakers!

By: sayanything-12

sayanything-12 — Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000

Referring to the rule change of course.

By: sayanything-15427

sayanything-15427 — Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000

I’m sorry Hannitized doesn’t understand how narrow-minded he looks when he refuses to see the truth behind the slogans.

Yes, she said exactly what you posted, that does not mean it was not inclusive of any Government Panel deciding what health care we are “allowed” to have based on some factor (age, cost, disability/deformity, etc). The numbers prove that lowering the recommended age for Mammagrams saved lives. I can understand an argument against recommended Mammagrams but you should still encourage any woman over 30 to do self tests. Have a physician do spot checks on breast tissue (at the same time as lymphnode checks during a regualr checkup) and allow mammagrams to be performed if the doctor and patient agree that there is a concern.

It is drawing a line in the sand and allowing insurers (including govt plans) to reduce benefits based on a government study (thus releasing them from liability) that makes these panels dangerous.

QLI and VST are not far off in our future. The UK already implements similar systems. “Death Panels” will make those decisions arbitrarilly and beforehand, regardless of what they are actually called.

By: proof_positive

proof_positive — Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000

You are like the Mark Sanford of SAB

I think he means your ability to attract a hot Brazilian girlfriend! Heh.

By: proof_positive

proof_positive — Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000

Poor Spammi! If he’s only sign into his account, he wouldn’t feel compelled to sign each of his posts!

What a loon.

Spammi! Heh. Good one!

By: sayanything-5371

sayanything-5371 — Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000

Condemn what? The truth that the eugenicists in your party would determine that someone with a terminal case of herpes like you should be eliminated? You’d better face the facts, herpitized, you have a very low QOLI and VTS quotient. Your own party would do this to you without any qualms. You’d better get used to the idea, since you voted for it.

By: Flame

Flame — Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000

Poor spammi ! Maybe we should show some Christmas spirit and pray for his/her/it’s (just trying to be PC) soul.

By: proof_positive

proof_positive — Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000

Mail clerk? I swear, Wankertized! The stuff you pull out of your arse with no basis in fact (nearly everything you say) is nearly as amusing as you pretending to be smarter than shower mold!
No, my logic impaired friend, the subject was trust or misplaced trust, not the object of that trust. The fact that you could not decipher that simple bit of English speaks volumes about your lack of intelligence! Ask Santa for a brain!

By: proof_positive

proof_positive — Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000

Do you have pictures of them too!!

This from a twerp who thinks conservatives have no sense of humor! I guess I should have put in a little Closed Captioning for the Humor Impaired?