And yet you are the one who continually spews lies. Why is that, lying bitch?

Note quite applicable here, but …

“First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win.”

They’re a bit mixed up on the order, but hey? Communists are always a little mixed up.

And more lies from dinothefakehomo’s suckpuppet.

“If this were a Republican President the liberals would be screaming from the rooftops about fascism and the crushing of dissent.”

Republicans have been making this claim for about 40 years–basically, starting with the Nixon Administration. Repeatedly claiming the “mainstream media” was liberally biased is what allowed Fox News to exist.*

*Much more importantly, it’s what forced the New York Times and the Washington Post to spread the Whitewater conspiracy during the Clinton Administration. It’s what forced MSNBC to spread lies about Al Gore during his campaign.

You’re pissed that liberals have finally decided to play your game.

like your hero Obama is a joke, trying to make this about Bush is absurd.

Was that supposed to be english?

So comparing how they treated Bush to Obama is absurd??

Idiots.

Curious though, isn’t Fox news considered a business and if it is a business does this mean the government is singling out and attacking a business?

Would it be similar to the government telling people not to buy Ford cars and trucks because they don’t like Ford?

Again, Fox News never covered Bush negatively, like MSNBC, CBS, NBC, CNN covered covered Clinton.

And not a single example to prove your lie, lying bitch. Why is that?

If this Saviour would work on the real problems of the country, instead of inflating his ego, maybe something would get done.

More “control” of the media by Barri? What a joke!

You live in an alternate reality.

Alternate from you is good.

Thanks,

Seth Yantiss

And yet more lies from the lying bitch.

Where were you from 1992-2007? Did Vince Foster, Whitewater, and “earth tones” just not exist for you?

Our “liberal” newspapers pimped the Whitewater lies. The “liberals” at MSNBC spent 2 years bashing Al Gore at every opportunity, making up “lies” about trivial topics (“Love Story, 3 Mile Island, etc.). Chris Matthews repeatedly compared him to Hitler. Maureen Dowd wrote column after column expanding on the trivial lies her paper pimped about Gore and how they were indicative of “character flaws.”

Fox News has never done that to Bush and would NEVER do that to a conservative.

Robs response to this is comical.

What a joke.

The difference is that Fox News only tears apart Democrats….period…end of story. MSNBC tears down both, but has a leftward bent.

Rachael Maddow even attacks Obama……i mean…who does that for Bush on Fox?

You lie again, H. Geraldo and Shep Smith bash Republicans all the time. Geraldo even participated in the terrorist attack on Rush.
You’re wrong, as usual.

Hint: Obama is the President, George Bush is a regular citizen. Get it?

“Meanwhile, Fox continues to trounce all comers in the ratings.” Naturally. They’re the most biased.

DO you really want to talk balance?

If Fox News is so biased, please explain the following:

The Pew (PEJ) report for the 2008 election cycle is out.

Among the findings?

FOXNEWS provided the most balanced cable coverage of the 2008 presidential election among major news outlets (CNN, MSNBC, FOXNEWS) and likely the most balanced of all six outlets (NBC, CBS, ABC included), although they oddly didnt release the latter three network’s numbers. Keep in mind, while Pew bills itself as Independent, it certainly leans to the left, which is probably why they didnt release all the numbers. God forbid they stated FoxNews was the most fair of any television network, as it’s doubtful any network bested the Fox numbers below since the Fox positive/negative are almost a perfect match. Interestingly, while they released the numbers for MSNBC and FOX, they didnt release individual CNN numbers, choosing to say it closely reflected the “Total Coverage” numbers below, putting it somewhere between MSNBC and FOX.

The Best (least biased) and the Worst (most biased) news coverage?

BEST (FOXNEWS)
Positive Obama Stories 25%
Positive McCain Stories 22%
Negative Obama Stories 40%
Negative McCain Stories 40%

WORST (MSDNC)
Positive Obama Stories 73%
Positive McCain Stories 10%
Negative Obama Stories 14%
Negative McCain Stories 43%

TOTAL COVERAGE (all media added together – 2,412 stories from 48 outlets)
Positive Obama Stories 36%
Positive McCain Stories 14%
Negative Obama Stories 29%
Negative McCain Stories 57%

Link

See Graph HERE

Among the findings:

- MSNBC stood out for having less negative coverage of Obama than the press generally (14% of stories vs. 29% in the press overall) and for having more negative stories about McCain (73% of its coverage vs. 57% in the press overall).

- On Fox News, in contrast, coverage of Obama was more negative than the norm (40% of stories vs. 29% overall) and less positive (25% of stories vs. 36% generally). For McCain, the news channel was somewhat more positive (22% vs. 14% in the press overall) and substantially less negative (40% vs. 57% in the press overall). Yet even here, his negative stories outweighed positive ones by almost 2 to 1.

- CNN fell distinctly in the middle of the three cable channels when it came to tone. In general, the tone of its coverage was closer than any other cable news channel to the press overall, though also somewhat more negative than the media overall.
The distinct tone of MSNBC—more positive toward Democrats and more negative toward Republicans—was not reflected in the coverage of its broadcast sibling, NBC News. Even though it has correspondents appear on their cable shows and even anchor some programs on there, the broadcast channel showed no such ideological tilt. Indeed, NBC’s coverage of Palin was the most positive of any TV organization studied, including Fox News.

- At night, the newscasts of the three traditional broadcast networks stood out for being more neutral—and also less negative—than most other news outlets. The morning shows of the networks, by contrast, more closely resembled the media generally in tone. That might surprise some who imagined those morning programs were somehow easier on political figures. Overall, 44% of the morning show stories were clearly negative, compared with 34% on the nightly news and 42% in the press overall.

Heck, Obama was on Fox with O’Reilly doing an interview. For those that never saw Obama on O’Reilly, see the 4 segments below.

Part 1 (War on terror) – Click Here
Part 2 (Economy) – Click Here
Part 3 (Associations) – Click Here
Part 4 (Energy) – Click Here

The phrase about those things at the time that the news media was in a rush
to be second. In other words Whitewater was all over the conservative press
well before the msm was forced to cover the story.

In general they acted like members of the defense rather than an impartial
media.

You seem to be the only idiot on Earth to remember such a thing there Toad.

When only one person “remembers” and cannot produce any evidence whatsoever, that’s called delusional.

How long has it been since you were evaluated, anyhow?

Meanwhile, Fox continues to trounce all comers in the ratings. Predictably, the arrogance of the left rears its head and tries to dismiss the opinion of the public, condescend to them and tell them what is and is not worthy of their time, and only make the backlash against the government worse.

I love the human capacity for self-fulfilling prophecy. Liberalism won’t stop, like a child having a tantrum, until like that child being grounded by talking his way into his parents’ anger, the public will ground them by turning them off and turning their backs.

Study up on Hugo Chavez. This is what the beginning of tyranny looks like.

So, we’re just supposed to believe that liberal media bias doesn’t
actually exist?

Personally, I think that all reporters are biased. I actually wish
that reporters would wear their biases on their sleeves. But to deny
that the bias in the media is overwhelmingly liberal is to deny
reality.

Not that you and reality see much of each other these days.

Two words….Joe Scarborough.

He excoriated Obama on Monday.

And the other day Glenn Beck went after President Bush for abuse of power in the war on terror.

What’s your point?

Yea right, state run media duped,
http://www.bluegrasspundit.com/2009/10/state-run-media-gets-duped-fox-news.html

All totalitarian regimes need absolute control of the national media. Seemingly Fox is the only major network not bowing to ‘the one’ so if it can’t be controlled it must be marginalized.

What a joke.

Redundant as always H.
You don’t have to sign with your Nom De Plume, it says “Hannitized right in the upper left hand corner of your post.