Roseanne Barr: Black Voters Are “Bigoted And Ignorant” Because They Voted Against Gay Marriage

Proof • November 11, 2008

The new speech police have arrived. The left, including blathering imbeciles like Barr, will brook no dissent. This is from her blog:

70% of black Californians who voted this cycle voted for prop 8. As they overwhelmingly supported America’s first chance to elect a person of color and strike a death blow to racism, they also went out of their way to misuse their votes (no doubt at the behest of their immoral and hateful pastors and clergy) to isolate and punish a small minority of citizens, and to deny them basic civil rights.
They voted to deny over 70,000 californian children coverage of the insurance benefits of their gay parents. They voted to destroy the constitution that Obama will hopefully uphold against their wishes, by making sure that church and state remain separated. They voted to “uphold the sanctity of marriage” by making a mockery of it. They showed themselves every inch as bigoted and ignorant as their white christian right wing counterpartners who voted for mccain-palin and bush-cheney…..
…..the more things change, the more they stay the same.
REPENT all ye bible blabbers!!!!
babble on babylon

Egads!
So….by exercising the right to vote as they please they were “misusing” their votes? And, note that now that it seems that black voters have a regard for family values that is sorely lacking in liberals that their religious leaders are “immoral and hateful”.
That’s funny, I didn’t hear how immoral and hateful they are when WQright and Farrakhan spew their intolerance.
I wonder if people like Barr ever think anything through before they screech.

Tags: Uncategorized

http://Array HG

Marriage is by definition a union of a man and a woman. There is no current definition of marriage that would bring the union of same sex partners within the scope of marriage. Domestic partners… probably, but not marriage.

The insistence on the left to re-define marriage; that we change a religious ordinance recognized by law into an exclusively secular social status to satisfy the imagined “equality” demands of a very small minority who suffer from a sexual identity crisis; that for the state to acknowledge anything but a secular union re-defined by progressives violates “the separation of church and state”; that homosexuality be normalized and socially acceptable behavior is what we traditional Americans take offense to.
Pilgrim

kidding right , you gave her space on your blog ,shame on you

Heh.

Yeah, I know…..I thought about not including a link but I just couldn’t resist letting people see first hand how the thought processes of the Hollywod enlightened work.
http://www.rabidamerican.net/ Rabid American

I think the liberal view of voting is to have the ballots pre-filled and the designated voters [members of the impacted special interest group] cast them.

Would that then seem “fair” to these squealing ninnies? What would they whine about then?

They are a direct reflection of their probable upbringing….. they didn’t get their way so they are throwing a tantrum.

Geesh….
http://www.DesertConservative.com/ Lee S Gliddon Jr

Ms Barr just as well might have said: ‘You can all go away now, we don’t need you any more.’

LOL
http://www.malice420.com/ malice420dotcom

Hey Rosanne, why don’t you go to a south La black church and protest ? You have the mouth but not the balls.
http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/entry/homosexuality_is_wrong_-_a_compendium move_zig

HG,

Hear, Hear old boy.

I’ll extend those thoughts if I may.

What the State does, is by definition — secular.

What religion does, ought to be left to that religion. But to pressure the government to pressure religion to alter one of its fundamental tenets runs afoul of governmental interference with the Free Exercise of Religion.

Leftists seem to miss this glaring problem.

Secondly, when discussing rights, they are usually judged in Federal Court on three levels:

1) Rational Basis — the easiest to uphold and the most difficult to find un-Constitutional.

2) Intermediate Level Scrutiny — just as it says – but beware of who is doing the defining.

3) Fundamental Right – the toughest test for a law to go through and still be deemed Constitutional, if any infringement is found.

Homosexual marriage — an oxymoron if there ever was one, doesn’t even pass the Rational Basis test.

Homosexuality and its practices have been shown actuarially to be extremely dangerous and has been and remains the leading vector for AIDs and countless other opportunistic diseases.

Any State has a right and duty to look after the Health, Safety, Morals and Welfare of its citizenry. On a Rational Basis test, homosexuality itself is a threat to public health.

Just look at the cost in research and treatment of diseases wrought by homosexual practices and how those costs have diverted funds from other, non-victim-precipitated diseases.

I guess I’ll just have to make re-confirming homosexuality as a mental disorder part of my platform when Move_Zig tosses his hat into the ring.
di butler

I thought all pastors were supposed to be immoral and hateful, aren’t they???
Gregory P Ashley

kidding right , you gave her space on your blog ,shame on you , from canada
Jerry

I know it sounds juvenile..
But;
Roseanne Barr.
Stupid Idiot.
http://massbackwards.blogspot.com/ Bruce

…they also went out of their way to misuse their votes … to isolate and punish a small minority of citizens…

Welcome to the world of a (former) Massachusetts gun owner.
Thomas

Next we will have to elect a gay person to not be a racist country.
Neiman

I agree with Lik, HG and most of what Move_zig have to say; so note that when I add that by her own admission some years ago, she is poor, igorant white trash with money, so consider the source.
http://sayanythingblog.com/ likwidshoe

Actually, Proposition 8 was in support of “traditional” marriage. It was simply called the “California Marriage Protection Act.”

Notice that it makes no mention of gay marriage, bigamy, or polygamy.

It was a partisan Democrat, Jerry Brown, who changed the language of the measure. He said that his language “accurately reflect[ed] the measure.”

The new title because of the Democrat twit, “Eliminates Rights of Same-Sex Couples to Marry. Initiative Constitutional Amendment”.

1. That never was a “right”.
2. Way to assume intent there ya Democrat jackass.

SayAnythingBlog.com

Roseanne Barr: Black Voters Are “Bigoted And Ignorant” Because They Voted Against Gay Marriage

Create a SAB Readerblog

Recent Comments