Only Rob could say something that pathetic.

The very first comment from the poseur troll is an ad hominem attack.

Man! If I only had a nickel for every time that happened, I’d be a rich man today!

You should change your sig to something more honest, Wankertized, like:

Hannitized: Lying thorough his fecal stained teeth since 2007!

This is a counter attack

BTW, Wankertized: You do realize that the operative word in that sentence is “attack”, don’t you? And you do claim to know what it means…

Instead of finding things to attack each other over, why don’t we find areas where we can agree,

Coming from you, Wankertized, this is pure, unadulterated horse hockey!

But, thanks for adding your hypocrisy and dishonesty to the mosaic that is Say Anything!

Only Rob could say something that pathetic.

Instead of finding things to attack each other over, why don’t we find areas where we can hijack threads like turning a discussion about Reagan’s views on socialized medicine into an argument about whether or not Obama is incompetant without his teleprompter.

There! Fixed it for you Hannitized!

Just because a person speaks using a teleprompter doesn’t mean they can’t speak without one, like the hapless hopeless Obama.

Wankertized’s crystal ball must be as fecal stained as his teeth!

Wankertized: Thanks for not even trying to refute anything Reagan said.

A man’s got to know his limitations!

…as do reality bereft trolls! Now go hijack someone else’s thread!

Sparkless:

(to say nothing of the fact that raygun is an idiot. see his ‘alien invaders’ speach (sic) to the un. he began the republican addication (sic) to spending without paying to create the illusion you aren’t spending while you deliver high rhetoric against spending.)

You’re a fine tribute to the Vermont public schools! /sarc

nothing surprising here.

There never is with you, Spark! There never is!

Hannitized was able to do the same thing in nothing flat

(Make himself look like a petty moron.)

I fugured I’d better throw that in! With Wankertized’s reading skills, he’d still be pondering the meaning into the next administration!

Rob is a douche.

Rob is a clown.

Rob is a hack.

Way to show us you’re all about the honest discussion rather than name calling!

Don’t you ever get tired of being wrong, Wankertized?

Big Ron, he was the man!

He knew more about Socialists and Socialism long before the Democrats started celebrating May Day with all the Communist Nations around the world.

I must say he does look good as a chocolate easter bunny.

I must say he does look good as a chocolate easter bunny.

You may consider staying away from that one.

The very first comment from the poseur troll is an ad hominem attack.

Back Water Boob, I wonders sometimes if he isn’t also Posing as DINO.

Rob didn’t offer anything except partisan stupidity. The Teleprompter myth is a right wing fabrication, and a stupid one at that.

There is really nothing more to say about that. Except for that only Rob is partisan enough to make that totally idiotic remark.

Yes, Reagan gave an ultimate decisions in his time and that is the reason why america on one of the top of the richest nation during his time.

Essentially correct. Obama could never measure up to Reagan.

Who are you going to believe? Hannitized or your own lying eyes?

Obama stumbles badly when teleprompter goes down.

That is a ridiculous argument on many levels.

One, the TelePrompTer didn’t “go down”, he was never using one, much like he does all the time. Everyone who is honest knows Obama delivers great speeches and interviews without the use of a TelePrompTer.

Two, this is the single example the right uses to perpetuate the myth. So he forgot how to present the statistical data….so what, it happens once in a while. It only seemed to have happened once to Obama. Anyone who pushes this as evidence is dishonest.

The right clings to myths like Limbaugh clinged to oxycontin. Heh!

This is a counter attack, Rob’s offense is lying about Obama, and you even corrected him on it, but he still refuses to fix his post.

Rob port is a hack that needs to be thoroughly mocked for his spreading of propaganda.

Thanks for not even trying to defend Rob on his lies.

Rob’s offense is lying about Obama,

You’re quite the delusional troll, aren’t you Wankertized? Rob made exactly one comment on this thread:

Just because a person speaks using a teleprompter doesn’t necessarily mean they can’t speak without one like OBama.

There is ample evidence for anyone with eyes to see and ears to hear, that Obama frequently flounders without the crutch of his teleprompter. Since Rob’s statement is evidently NOT a lie, then you calling Rob a liar for it must me!

Thanks for presenting something we can all agree on!

You, Wankertized, are a liar! And a hypocrite for your bogus signature that you have never adhered to!

If he really was a ‘hack’, you and a number of other commentators on SAB would have banned long ago.

Look up the word, political hack, and try again.

A political hack is a negative term ascribed to a person who is part of the political party apparatus, but whose intentions are more aligned with victory than personal conviction. The term “hired gun” is often used in tandem to further describe the moral bankruptcy of the “hack”.

Political hack may also be used by a political opponent in order to erode confidence or credentials of an opponent or his hired campaign help. Often used to demean well credentialed individuals for political purposes.

BTW, Wankertized: You do realize that the operative word in that sentence is “attack”, don’t you? And you do claim to know what it means…

If you think you are making an argument, or a point, you are sadly mistaken.

My sig suggests that the posts should be about focusing on ideas we both agree and move forward from there before we make up things to disagree about. It has nothing to do with counter attacking partisan hacks who lie and spread propaganda.

You are such a little child.

Hannitized said…

Look up the word, political hack, and try again.

Why would I have looked that up when you simply used the word ‘hack’? Or are you now expanding it to cover your butt?

Use hack in a Sentence
–verb (used with object) 1. to cut, notch, slice, chop, or sever (something) with or as with heavy, irregular blows (often fol. by up or down): to hack meat; to hack down trees.
2. to break up the surface of (the ground).
3. to clear (a road, path, etc.) by cutting away vines, trees, brush, or the like: They hacked a trail through the jungle.
4. to damage or injure by crude, harsh, or insensitive treatment; mutilate; mangle: The editor hacked the story to bits.
5. to reduce or cut ruthlessly; trim: The Senate hacked the budget severely before returning it to the House.
6. Slang. to deal or cope with; handle: He can’t hack all this commuting.
7. Computers. to devise or modify (a computer program), usually skillfully.
8. Basketball. to strike the arm of (an opposing ball handler): He got a penalty for hacking the shooter.
9. British. to kick or kick at the shins of (an opposing player) in Rugby football.
10. South Midland and Southern U.S. to embarrass, annoy, or disconcert.

PP,

You are starting to make yourself look like a petty moron. Please grow up.

Do you seriously think the word “hack” supports your claim that it is a person who doesn’t allow people from an opposing political party post comments on a blog???

It does not, and you know it does not.

Hannitized… you complete missed my point. I wasn’t talking about what I believe took place, nor was I indulging in some attack on you or Rob.

In politics, people believe what they want to believe, and they can, and usually will, find some ‘fact’ to back them up.

‘Yes’ or ‘No’ is a worthless tactic which you frequently indulge in, as though you expected your protagonist to cave in and cede your point, or that you could, thereby, trap them in some outrageous lie.

Am I right? Yes or No.

Am I right? Yes or No[?]

Well….yes…and no.

You know physical events can be fact checked. Political ideologies and the results of them are much harder if not impossible to fact check.

Media matters does a good job of this, as does fact check.org

In politics, people believe what they want to believe, and they can, and usually will, find some ‘fact’ to back them up.

OK….but were TALKING PHYSICAL EVENTS…not political ideologies or policy.

‘Yes’ or ‘No’ is a worthless tactic which you frequently indulge in, as though you expected your protagonist to cave in and cede your point, or that you could, thereby, trap them in some outrageous lie.

There are some discussions where a yes or no response applies appropriately, such as:

Can the date Obama made a speech be fact checked? Yes or no?

Seriously answer that!

PP, you are smart enough to know the word “hack” with the definition sever, cut, chop and slice does not apply to a blogger who bans political opponents.

At least I hope you do.

And while you go about proving words that define Rob as a mutilator of stories, you know the word hack, as used in politics does not literally mean people who use machete’s to cut things or chop things or sever things.

At least I hope you do.

What is wrong with you today?

Hannitized… can you read???

4. to damage or injure by crude, harsh, or insensitive treatment; mutilate; mangle: The editor hacked the story to bits.

You called him a hack. I took you at your word.

Then, in the next post, you insist you meant ‘political hack’.
That’s a very different animal.

Which one did you want to discuss?

Use hack in a Sentence
–verb (used with object)

…. as in…

He [Rob] is a hack.

Nice spin, Hannitized!

But… if

Rob port is a hack

… then he can only be a hack by doing what a hacker does.

Feel free to post the next 10 responses… I am on my way out to dinner.

… then he can only be a hack by doing what a hacker does.

A hacker:

In common usage, a hacker is a person who breaks into computers, usually by gaining access to administrative controls.[1] The subculture that has evolved around hackers is often referred to as the computer underground. Proponents claim to be motivated by artistic and political ends, and are often unconcerned about the use of criminal means to achieve them.[2]

Other uses of the word hacker exist that are not related to computer security (computer programmer and home computer hobbyists), but these are rarely used by the mainstream media.

A hacker…..ok:

Hack has several related meanings in the technology and computer science fields. It may refer to a clever or quick fix to a computer program problem, or to what may be perceived to be a clumsy or inelegant (but usually relatively quick) solution to a problem. The term is also used to refer to a modification of a program or device to give the user access to features that were otherwise unavailable, such as DIY circuit bending.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Musical_keyboard

Over time, the meaning of the word there was expanded, perhaps through contact with the amateur radio community. It came to mean either a kludge, or the opposite of a kludge, as in a clever or elegant solution to a difficult problem. In the term “hack value” it also acquired a meaning of anything that was simultaneously fun and clever.

The initial hacker community at MIT, particularly those associated with the Tech Model Railroad Club, applied this pre-existing local slang to computer programming, producing the variant which first came into common use outside MIT.

[edit]History

The term “hack” was first used by US university computing center staff in the mid-1960s. The context determined whether the complimentary or derogatory meanings were implied. Phrases such as “ugly hack” or “quick hack” generally referred to the latter meaning; phrases such as “cool hack” or “neat hack”, to the former. In modern computer programming, a “hack” can refer to a solution or method which functions correctly but which is “ugly” in its concept, which works outside the accepted structures and norms of the environment, or which is not easily extendable or maintainable (see kludge). The programmer keeps beating on it until a solution is found. The jargon used by hackers is called Hackish (see the Jargon file). This should not be confused with “1337″ or “leetspeak.”

In a similar vein, a “hack” may refer to works outside of computer programming. For example, a math hack means a clever solution to a mathematical problem. The GNU General Public License has been described as[who?] a copyright hack because it cleverly uses the copyright laws for a purpose the lawmakers did not foresee. All of these uses now also seem to be spreading beyond MIT as well.

On many internet websites and in everyday language the word “hack” can be slang for “copy”, “imitation” or “rip-off.”

The term has since acquired an additional and now more common meaning, since approximately the 1980s; this more modern definition was initially associated with crackers. This growing use of the term “hack” is to refer to a program that (sometimes illegally) modifies another program, often a computer game, giving the user access to features otherwise inaccessible to them. As an example of this use, for Palm OS users (until the 4th iteration of this operating system), a “hack” refers to an extension of the operating system which provides additional functionality. The general media also uses this term to describe the act of illegally breaking into a computer, but this meaning is disputed.

The term is additionally used by electronics hobbyists to refer to simple modifications to electronic hardware such as a graphing calculators, video game consoles, electronic musical keyboards or other device (see CueCat for a notorious example) to expose or add functionality to a device that was unintended for use by end users by the company who created it. A number of techno musicians have modified 1980s-era Casio SK-1 sampling keyboards to create unusual sounds by doing circuit bending: connecting wires to different leads of the integrated circuit chips. The results of these DIY experiments range from opening up previously inaccessible features that were part of the chip design to producing the strange, disharmonic digital tones that became part of the techno music style.

… then he can only be a hack by doing what a hacker does.

A hacker:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hacker_(computer_security)

In common usage, a hacker is a person who breaks into computers, usually by gaining access to administrative controls.[1] The subculture that has evolved around hackers is often referred to as the computer underground. Proponents claim to be motivated by artistic and political ends, and are often unconcerned about the use of criminal means to achieve them.[2]

Other uses of the word hacker exist that are not related to computer security (computer programmer and home computer hobbyists), but these are rarely used by the mainstream media.

Or did you mean hacker?

Hack has several related meanings in the technology and computer science fields. It may refer to a clever or quick fix to a computer program problem, or to what may be perceived to be a clumsy or inelegant (but usually relatively quick) solution to a problem. The term is also used to refer to a modification of a program or device to give the user access to features that were otherwise unavailable, such as DIY circuit bending.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Musical_keyboard

Over time, the meaning of the word there was expanded, perhaps through contact with the amateur radio community. It came to mean either a kludge, or the opposite of a kludge, as in a clever or elegant solution to a difficult problem. In the term “hack value” it also acquired a meaning of anything that was simultaneously fun and clever.

The initial hacker community at MIT, particularly those associated with the Tech Model Railroad Club, applied this pre-existing local slang to computer programming, producing the variant which first came into common use outside MIT.

[edit]History

The term “hack” was first used by US university computing center staff in the mid-1960s. The context determined whether the complimentary or derogatory meanings were implied. Phrases such as “ugly hack” or “quick hack” generally referred to the latter meaning; phrases such as “cool hack” or “neat hack”, to the former. In modern computer programming, a “hack” can refer to a solution or method which functions correctly but which is “ugly” in its concept, which works outside the accepted structures and norms of the environment, or which is not easily extendable or maintainable (see kludge). The programmer keeps beating on it until a solution is found. The jargon used by hackers is called Hackish (see the Jargon file). This should not be confused with “1337″ or “leetspeak.”

In a similar vein, a “hack” may refer to works outside of computer programming. For example, a math hack means a clever solution to a mathematical problem. The GNU General Public License has been described as[who?] a copyright hack because it cleverly uses the copyright laws for a purpose the lawmakers did not foresee. All of these uses now also seem to be spreading beyond MIT as well.

On many internet websites and in everyday language the word “hack” can be slang for “copy”, “imitation” or “rip-off.”

The term has since acquired an additional and now more common meaning, since approximately the 1980s; this more modern definition was initially associated with crackers. This growing use of the term “hack” is to refer to a program that (sometimes illegally) modifies another program, often a computer game, giving the user access to features otherwise inaccessible to them. As an example of this use, for Palm OS users (until the 4th iteration of this operating system), a “hack” refers to an extension of the operating system which provides additional functionality. The general media also uses this term to describe the act of illegally breaking into a computer, but this meaning is disputed.

The term is additionally used by electronics hobbyists to refer to simple modifications to electronic hardware such as a graphing calculators, video game consoles, electronic musical keyboards or other device (see CueCat for a notorious example) to expose or add functionality to a device that was unintended for use by end users by the company who created it. A number of techno musicians have modified 1980s-era Casio SK-1 sampling keyboards to create unusual sounds by doing circuit bending: connecting wires to different leads of the integrated circuit chips. The results of these DIY experiments range from opening up previously inaccessible features that were part of the chip design to producing the strange, disharmonic digital tones that became part of the techno music style.

You see PP…….you are playing word games and you are doing a terrible job at it.

Why not just accept my explanation?

Do you really have to be right about everything?

Why do you feel you have to be right about what you think I meant?

This is the usual PP, who has to be right about everything and win at all costs.

From your own source, Hannitized…

Other uses of the word hacker exist that are not related to computer security (computer programmer and home computer hobbyists), but these are rarely used by the mainstream media.

Online Dictionary definition of ‘hack’ as a noun…

n.
1. A rough, irregular cut made by hacking.
2. A tool, such as a hoe, used for hacking.
3. A blow made by hacking.
4. A rough, dry cough.

Your original statement describing Rob as a ‘hack’…

Rob Port is a hack…

Only reasonable conclusion…

None of the noun usages of ‘hack’ makes sense in your original post, nor does a long article from Wikipedia on computer terminology rescue you from your own incredible blunder.

Were Rob a hack, you would not be posting here. Simple as that.

Bye.

Oh, I forgot the best part:

None of the noun usages of ‘hack’ makes sense in your original post, nor does a long article from Wikipedia on computer terminology rescue you from your own incredible blunder.

What noun usages did I provide for hack? I didn’t, I used “hacker”, because you changed your word from hack, to hacker, which are two different things.

So I was provided the definition of hacker, showing you that you used the wrong word, hacker, instead of hack.

Now I know why you are going to impossible lengths to play with the word hack, it was because you screwed up by saying “if Rob was a hack, you wouldn’t be here”, but the VERB hack has nothing to do with partisan jackasses who lie and have a political agenda. But the noun sure does.

You lost a lot of credibility today PP.

Rob, you hack….if Obama can’t speak without a teleprompter, it’s up to you to prove he can’t. All you guys have is one instance of him getting confused on how to present a statistic properly. THAT’S IT.

He has done interview after interview and delivered press conference speech after speech without them.

Don’t be an idiot.

You prove your accusation! It’s not up to me to disprove your lie. FOOL.

Here is part 2 from above

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3wpw6fzfrDQ&NR=1

More press conferences:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3NBv88rG608&feature=channel

TOWN HALLS:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w_dd2xXi6ao&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z7NwsMPMZSg

That should be: “…no proof that he has not stuttered, stumbled and mumbled without one.”

Match my examples Rob…….

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hj1hCDjwG6M&feature=channel

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V7RRBlng8fg

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R83xMWtEp7k&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CB1RJBuWYbA&feature=related

Watch Rob disappear folks….

I will look forward to all of your examples that equal mine!!

So, Obama sometimes answers questions without a teleprompter.

But those answers weren’t great. I hear stuttering and stumbling. And you said “great speeches” without the teleprompter.

You’re linking to press conferences and town halls, genius

yet the left call Bush an idiot.

You’re linking to press conferences and town halls, genius.

In my original statement, genius, I included press conferences because it is DIRECTLY RELEVANT to his ability to speak intelligently and to the issues.

Furthermore, I did provide links to speeches. Genius.

By the way, didn’t OBama have a teleprompter built in to the podium in the White House press room?

When? Timing is everything and no, you confused a monitor that projects locations of journalists and foot notes, not a teleprompter.

I doubt you’ll ever be convinced, Hannitized. Because you start with the assumption that Obama is right and everyone else is wrong and work from there.

One, that is BS, and two, where are your examples of him being a idiot without a telemprompter???

Where are they, hack?

Hannitized claims…

It can’t be used in the way I used it, because I used a noun.

… and yet ‘hack’ only has four meanings as a noun…

n.
1. A rough, irregular cut made by hacking.
2. A tool, such as a hoe, used for hacking.
3. A blow made by hacking.
4. A rough, dry cough.

…none of which would make sense in the context of your original statement…

Rob port is a hack

Wiggle, squirm and dissemble all you want, Hannitized, your blunder is abundantly apparent.

Here PP, read this and grow you you infant.

Hack may refer to:

Hack (technology), a term used in the technology and computer science fields
Hack (masonry), a row of stacked unfired bricks protected from the rain
Hack writer, a writer who is paid to write low-quality, quickly put-together articles or books
Hack (comedy), a joke, or premise for a joke, that is considered obvious, frequently used, and/or stolen.
Hack and slash, a genre of video game or a type of gameplay
Life hack, productivity techniques used by programmers
Roof and tunnel hacking, unauthorized exploration of roof and utility tunnel spaces
What the Hack, a hacker conference held in Liempde, The Netherlands
.hack, a Japanese multimedia franchise
Hack Circle, an amphitheatre in Christchurch, New Zealand referred to as “Hack”
ROM hacking, the process of modifying a video game’s program image
Show hack, a type of show horse
MIT hack, a clever, benign, and ethical prank or practical joke at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Political hack, a term for somebody who devotes him/herself to party-political machinations.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hack

Debating the virtue of teleprompters. Funny.

Reagan was a true leader, Obama is a true fraud.

Well, Hannitized, if only you had used the term “political hack” in the first place, instead of “hack”, we might not be having this discussion, now would we?

Rob is more of a partisan hack, than political….but you get the idea.

Hannitized on July 19, 2009 at 08:33 am

hacktacular
quality of particular hackiness by bloggers or TV commentators who are motivated by their political leaning rather than a desire to present the truth
Hacktacular alert! Read what (fill in your own suggestion) says about (fill in your own favorite) today!

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=partisan+hack

Hack may refer to:

Hack (technology), a term used in the technology and computer science fields

Political hack, a term for somebody who devotes him/herself to party-political machinations.

Hahahaha!

How To Tell A Partisan Hack
By Rob on September 10, 2004 at 08:10 am No Comments Yet

How do you tell when somebody is a partisan hack? When they cling to a party lie in the face of insurmountable evidence.

HAHAHAHAHA!

Raygun: The Ultimate Teleprompter Kid

Just because a person speaks using a teleprompter doesn’t necessarily mean they can’t speak without one like OBama.

Ron’s just whorin for the AMA in that 1961 speech.
Later he and them accept Medicare.

So, Obama sometimes answers questions without a teleprompter.

But those answers weren’t great. I hear stuttering and stumbling. And you said “great speeches” without the teleprompter.

You’re linking to press conferences and town halls, genius.

By the way, didn’t OBama have a teleprompter built in to the podium in the White House press room?

I doubt you’ll ever be convinced, Hannitized. Because you start with the assumption that Obama is right and everyone else is wrong and work from there.

Which is sad. Most of us like things like “reason” and “facts” and “critical thinking.”

Hannitized,

Rob, you hack….if Obama can’t speak without a teleprompter, it’s up to you to prove he can’t.

You said:

Everyone who is honest knows Obama delivers great speeches and interviews without the use of a TelePrompTer.

I’m assuming that you see yourself as honest, and that you see me as a “hack.” So consider this a good-faith effort to get your help in me being less of a hack.

If Obama’s non-teleprompter speeches are great, I’d like to know of one so that I can review it in consideration of your comments.

Seems like a reasonable enough request.