You obviously didn’t even read my last message, except for the last sentence.

What DO you stand for????

I just explained how his campaign as sabotaged by the media and how fools like you were brainwashed to believe he didn’t have a chance, and to not take him seriously.

And already told you that a higher percentage of his supporters than any other candidate’s actually cares and are informed, but you have said nothing to counter my argument. Need I say more. . .

What a joke. You can repeat yourself all you want, ignore my questions, and fail to respond to my statements. What do you not understand about the media playing favorites and marginalizing

Do you deny that the way media portrays people will affect the viewers opinion?

P.S. What do you stand that’s so great if it’s not sound money, non-interventionism, states rights an individual liberty?

Exactly Old Pal, I couldn’t agree more.

Now tell MoRtiS_NoCTu who your candidate is.
That will show him!

Old Pal, if you can’t think of a candidate you’d vote for, just say so.
The name calling is just silly.

You are part of the reason Paul has no chance, you are an arrogant ass! If anyone disagrees with you and Paul they are ignorant fools, unable to comprehend the wonderfulness of Paul and his message. Tell me, if he is so beloved and revered around the world and has such a grass roots movement, why doesn’t he win any real contests? You are enamored of him and his message, but it is like any radical group, you think it is unfair that others keep your side from winning and you demean them all for not agreeing. Just your arrogance alone would tell me and many millions more that there is something wrong with Paul and his message.

Granted the media is powerful, but George W. Bush, George H.W. Bush, Ronald Wilson Reagan, Newt Gingrich, Sarah Palin and many GOP/Conservatives have broken through that wall because they had the personality, appearance and well crafted message that together were able to garner enough support among the voters. Paul fails that test, it is his fault, he is a failed messenger with a faulty message. Maybe he will get better before he gets too old, change his appearance, get better at delivering a more popular human centered message and win; but win or lose it is up to him and you are not doing him any good.

As I said, you are Ron Paul’s worst enemy – I would never vote for him because of Storm Trooper followers like you. He will never become POTUS!

Do you really think your attack language approach is winning any Ron Paul converts?

Don’t you believe in personal responsibility for Ron Paul for his failure to win last times around?

Exactly what did I say that indicated any hostility to free speech, exact words please?

You only came here to SAB to campaign for Ron Paul and advance the Libertarian Party agenda and all you have done is sound like a wild eyed storm trooper and you are turning people off to Ron Paul. That just isn’t very smart. You are Ron Paul’s worst enemy.

If you want to know what anyone here at SAB stands for, stick around and debate the issues. I’ll tell you one thing I oppose Paul because he does not share my moral/family values as far as I can tell; or my desire to only seek to elect Christians that are willing to end abortion, not permit homosexual marriage or allow special laws to protect gays.

Do you really think your attack language approach is winning any Ron Paul converts?

Don’t you believe in personal responsibility for Ron Paul for his failure to win last times around?

Exactly what did I say that indicated any hostility to free speech, exact words please?

You only came here to SAB to campaign for Ron Paul and advance the Libertarian Party agenda and all you have done is sound like a wild eyed storm trooper and you are turning people off to Ron Paul. That just isn’t very smart. You are Ron Paul’s worst enemy.

If you want to know what anyone here at SAB stands for, stick around and debate the issues. I’ll tell you one thing I oppose Paul because he does not share my moral/family values as far as I can tell; or my desire to only seek to elect Christians that are willing to end abortion, not permit homosexual marriage or allow special laws to protect gays.

Old Pal, is this MoRtiS_NoCTu your new pal?
If he’s not, whyja call him pal?

I understand, Old Pal.
You’ve been caught and you can’t face it.
Good luck with your shame.

Yeah, he is still a giant turd!

He voted for the original AUMF which authorized the President to declare war against anyone without Congressional approval. It is the single most unconstitutional bill that has ever passed, and he was part of it. He refused to reform welfare. He voted against the Partial Birth Abortion bill, etc.

As a libertarian, I spent a lot of time researching him before the election, even posting a comprehensive article here about how worthless he was as a candidate.

Spare me, you clearly have no idea what you are talking about. As with most Ron Paul supporters, you seem to be sorely uneducated.

Paul voted for the original AUMF which allows the President to declare war without Congress. So, that one’s out. He voted against the PBA bill because it “said that abortion was sometimes legal”…which it is, And he refuses to reduce the size of government.

The dude sucks. And like most Paul supporters, you have no clue what you’re talking about.

I said plenty, but you are lying and denying.

You claim he’s a “neo-isolationist” but can’t name 1 thing off the top of your head to prove it?

Please tell me what you interpret as isolationism so I can show you why it is not isolationism. You are obviously confused.

Why don’t you just look up Ron Paul on YouTube explaining why his policies aren’t isolationist. I’ve heard him explain the difference between isolationism and non-interventionism at least a dozen times.

Where are the 6 links you are talking about??? I didn’t receive any links in your response. Is it up higher in the Comments section????

Just looked at all your links and didn’t see anything isolationist.

The founding fathers advised us against entangling alliances and meddling in foreign affairs. There’s no reason we couldn’t trade and communicate with nations without getting all involved with their business and using taxpayer money to try to influence events.

We don’t have jurisdiction outside of our country and if we don’t want foreign troops in our country, we shouldn’t have our troops in other countries.

Trade and travel and communicate with all, no policing the world with taxpayer money.

You linked to videos that you are not aware of the content to support your claim? A rather odd way of trying to CYA.

You should just give up and hide, we know insulting all you’ve got anyway. Well, that and only personal insults. You could at least try and pepper your insults with some facts and evidence. Well see how well you do.

I agree with Hannitized. I’ve seen all the vids in your links, did read all the commentary and know exactly what I’m talking about.

There is nothing isolationist about any of what he says. You are either misinterpwreting what he says or outright and intentionally spinning it.

I bet no one ever visited your blog long enough to read all the commentary and watch the videos, because your blog SUCKS.

You’re just a disinfo shill who pretends to partially respect Ron Paul for his “adherence to the Constitution” on “domestic policy” to try to make yourself look more credible and disguise your true identity of a disinfo shill.

And on the off chance that your not CoIntelPro then your analysis is just garbage. Dimwitted, mentally stunted, garbage.

You’re not a horrible person for “disagreeing”. You’re a horrible person for misrepresenting Ron Paul’s views and slandering him for no reason other than that you are a horrible person.

GO FLOCK, SHEEPLE!!

BTW, Are you so mind numbingly stupid that you did not see that I replied two minutes before your asinine factless rant?

Ever since I outed him for his man purse, NTTAWWT, Hanni has been a little testy.

This is the first time ive ever been on this shit site. And I found I through google news so I’m not any alias on this site other than this one.

How about the first one?

Let me preface this by saying that I admire Ron Paul for (most of) his views on the Constitution. He is a strong proponent of the Second Amendment, and his views on domestic policies are largely in alignment with mine. But on matters of foreign policy, the Congressman and I part ways. I heard this interview early this AM and have not been able to get it out of my mind. At around 4:35 into the video, Congressman Paul says the US is an empire. This is either hyperbolic on his part or he is badly mistaken. This may be due, in part, to what I call Paul’s neo-isolationism. Our military projects the power of the US beyond our borders. Congressman Paul sees this influence as some kind of “empire”, though not one classically defined*. I see it more as “deterrence” and “influence”. We want to encourage other countries to embrace freedom. We want to discourage other countries that would take freedom away.
*The US has defeated a number of enemies and we have seized neither their lands nor their resources, which is what empires typically do. On this point, Congressman Paul is wrong.

Then, he goes on to speak about how we don’t need to be the cops of the world and how we don’t need nine hundred plus bases around the world, and both those things may be true! There are certainly areas around the world where we could reduce our presence while still projecting our power. However, when asked about coming to the defense of our allies, Paul said this at 5:08:

“No, I’d treat Israel like all the other countries.”

Really? I have heard this from Mr. Paul’s mouth before and I am still no less incredulous. The idea that we should treat all countries as equals strikes me as either naively idealistic or borderline insane. The idea that we would treat Great Britain and Israel the same as we would Iran or North Korea is preposterous.
I believe, in theory, we should treat all people equally as well. But, if I see two men coming at me on the street and one is carrying a Bible and the other is carrying a switchblade, I’m going to treat those two individuals differently. Refusing to aid our allies until the enemy is at our doorstep is a good way not to have any allies when the enemy is at our doorstep.

…we don’t get involved in their internal or external squabbles and we just stay out of it

“Squabbles?” My dictionary defines “Squabble” as a petty quarrel. Does Congressman Paul believe that Israel fighting for its very survival is a “petty quarrel”? Is smuggling rockets to Hamas indicative of a petty quarrel? A petty quarrel might be the neighbor playing the stereo too loud or too late at night. The first RPG I lob through my neighbor’s window escalates that up from a “squabble” to something more.
But, if it’s just a squabble, then let’s not send warships to the gulf, let’s send guidance counselors! A couple of good shrinks with a PhD in psychology and we can solve all the problems in the Middle East. After all…they’re just “squabbles”, right?
One would think that after so many years of public service that Mr. Paul could be more precise in the words he uses to describe the US and our allies’ plight in the world than “empire” and “squabbles”? Unless, that’s what he really believes…

All that just to prove you don’t understand the meaning of the word “isolationist” or “isolationism”?

Thanks Poofy, for showing us you can put words in other peoples mouths, and still not understand what they mean.

You are dismissed! Now talk about me some more, like an obsessed freak.

This, from the guy who thinks he proved Ron Paul is an isolationist simply because you have cut and pasted another person who wrongfully accuses Paul of isolationism. Too funny.

You haven’t proved MoRtiS wrong, by any stretch of the imagination. And trust me, the only way you get by on a daily basis is based on your imagination of who you think you are, and what you think you have said.

You proved nothing, except you don’t understand the word isolationism.

Clueless Wanker: Do you type just because the clicking noises echo nicely in the vast, empty canyons of your head?

Who would know? You didn’t link to your own stupidity and wrong conclusions.

I should have known you were quoting yourself. Nobody else could bet that stupid to come to the same conclusion.

You seriously tried to prove your point by linking to your own comments as a source of supporting evidence? Lord, you really suck at blogging.

No, I linked to the analysis of a video that brain dead morons such as yourself are too lazy or intellectually impaired to watch, much less understand. Try educating yourself and maybe you won’t sound so stupid all the time, Wanker. Start with second grade.

Have someone read my last comment to you. You clearly cannot understand written English.

I’m sorry! Did you bleat something?

Have someone read my last comment to you, and explain it to you this time. You clearly cannot understand written English.

As I pointed out to Dimwititized, the copy was an analysis of Paul’s own words in the video I posted. For you half wits to claim you understand what I am saying when you haven’t watched the video for any clue to the context is laughable!

Congratulations Poofy. You have now shown us that you can look a word up and still not know what it means. Pathetic!

Paul is suggesting that our military not be involved in supporting them, but he can still participate in an economic participation. Thus, destroying your lame-brainded idea that Paul is an isolationist

As I recall, you looked up the expression “ad hominem” and still didn’t understand what it meant. You used the common expression “du jour” and had no clue what it meant, and then there was the famous hanni-ism “knit-picking”, which you defended until you were a walking, talking pile of stupidity. “Pathetic” seems to be a rather strong word for an illiterate such as yourself to be using to describe anyone.

Heh.

Unfortunately, none of what you claim is true.
“Combined words?” Like “ugly American?” Flamemeister is a combined word. “Dumbsh!t” is a combined word. Keep trying, Dumbsh!t.

I fear for you. (Well, actually not.) Do you feel cyberbullied? A band of tightness around your head? A sensation of tears coming to your eyes, watery snot to your nose?

Do you really, really, mean really? Of course combined and combination are related—but they don’t mean the same. (Hint: to start with one is an adjective, the other a noun.) Are you really, really that vacant in the head?

You are so busy making a cut-and-paste fool of yourself that you failed to even notice a truly large mistake that I made! Hee-hee-hee! When you find yourself stuck in a hole, quit digging.

I don’t comment on half of your idiotic mistakes. The difference between Poofy and I.

Nail on the head, again. All Paul is saying is avoid unnecessary international military affairs.

Wrong

Dumbass. I already told you I read all of them in their entirety, and watched all the videos. And note that I didnt have to watch the videos on your page. I open separate YouTube windows, so that time doesn’t reflect on the time I spent on your page.

And if you pay real close attention to my previous posts, I say I’ve already seen the videos. I didn’t exactly specify, but I had already seen 4 of the 6 links.. So for the 2 videos that I hadn’t seen, I opened them up in separate youtube windows and . . . What a suprise, your an idiot who can’t correctly interperet the English language! You don’t understand the difference between isolationism and non-interventionism, and instead of addressing that, or the actual issues we are talking about, you throw names around and try to personally attack the character of the people who are calling you out as a fool.

I had a comment yesterday that laid out specific philosophical reasons for non-interventionism, and you never addressed a single point I made. And then accused me of lying (falsely and failingl in the process) and claiming that I didn’t read YOUR previous commentary on the subject (which proves how pathetic you are because only a fool would refer someone to their own commentary and fail to remember any specific reasons their beliefs on the spot) .

And if you think your own confused commentary proves any point you are trying to make, you are sorely mistaken.

Like I stated before, you are a moron. You should change your name from “proof” to “propaganda”.

And if you actually believe anything you are saying then you are completely retarded. Like I stated before. YOUR ANALYSIS IS GARBAGE. Don’t get pissed at me because you don’t understand the difference between non-interventionism and isolationism.

Why don’t you just watch one of the dozens of videos of Ron Paul explaining the difference between his position and isolationism and straighten yourself out once and for all?

Oh right, because you are an un-American, Co-Intel-Pro, Trolling, disinfo SHILL.

proof-positive MY ASS. More like mouth-running, war-mongering, foreign internal affairs-meddling, Fake extraordinaire. I’m done with you.

GO FLOCK, SHEEPLE!

So instead of debating his argument and facts, you go all “private dick” on him?

That’s not strange. /sarcasm

Scroll up and tap on the shoulder of an adult who is next to you at the public library, where you obtain computer and network access, to read to you what it says.

The answers are there, you just don’t understand the definition of the word “isolationist”.

Says the guy who can not undersand the definition of the words “and”, “or”.

As an idiot, you portray the lunatic fringe quite well.

As an idiot, you portray the lunatic fringe quite well.

The sock puppet extraordinaire speaks of “class”.

Poor larry. Can’t think of any decent response.

Trying reading the entire piece in its context and actual [sic] watch the video before your knee jerks …

You should try and finish the entire word before you ask anyone to complete anything. You may now get back to your references of “jerking”…it’s about the only thing you are good at.

You know what they say about blind squirrels. Even with you’re possessing a barbed wire jock strap he still wants your nuts in his mouth and will stop at nothing until he achieves his goal…a real “tea bagger”!

Seriously, you had to flag your typo??? You are that pathetic? Hilarious!

Hit the nail on the head

Hanni, the Master (bater) of ad hominem demonstrates his projection with yet more name calling.

Hannitized, What Proof Scrapes off His Shoes Should he Step in It, accuses me of “forgetting” something he has never achieved. Jealosy ill becomes you, Tiny Wankertized.

Give yourself a cookie, Tiny Wanker. What is that? Nine typos of mine you’ve caught over the last three years? You catch as many of my typos in a year as I do in a single sentence of yours Dimwititized.

Nice projection, Wankertized. You’re either lying through your fecal stained teeth, or your ADD has kicked in and you just can’t remember that the last time you caught one of my typos was the eighth time.
Find any other place where I said you caught “nine typos” and we all won’t laugh at you as the pathetic obsessed loser with the typo in his screen name.

Wee Willie Wankertized: If there are three constants in your comments, it’s your lies, projection and if not ADD, then mind numbing hypocrisy as you pretend outrage over things you yourself do constantly.

It’s not the repetition of my remarks that gets to you, Wanker…it’s the accuracy.

Wankertized: Thanks for both illustrating your ADD and your projection in the same comment! You say that I need to come up with “new names”, when you have maybe three for me and two of them you parrot from rbb and Sparkie. While I, on the other hand, have come up with literally dozens of names for you, Wankertized. You see, Wee Willie Wankertized, had your ADD not kicked in, you might have remembered Tiki Troll, Tiki Twerp, Tranni, Kahuna of the Kiddie Pool, Full-of-crapitized, Little Kahuna, ,and dozens of others. (Not even to mention the names I came up with for many of your sockpuppets as well, Party of ADD.) I will admit that “Bloggerman100″ is rather hard to parody!
“You simply look like a pathetic, loser.” Hannititzed’s autobiography in seven words.

Too funny! I call the pedestrian Pinheaded Parrot of the Pacific on his empty mimicry of others, in lieu of argument, and his response is more unintelligible squawking.(Note for those of you with ADD: “Pinheaded Parrot of the Pacific” is a NEW name for the Tiki Troll and Oaf from Oahu and Kahuna of the Kiddie Pool, not something regurgitated from fellow travelers, like…well, you know!)

You might say that this comment is Hannitized’s Projection Dejour*.

*How the Poseur of the Pacific might spell “du jour” if he were only an empty headed birdbrain.
Oh, wait. He did. He is.

Wee Willie Milli Vanilli has the attention span of a mildly retarded sand flea.

I did write names, but I meant “lines”,

Yeah, Priscilla Queen of the Surfers writes stuff, meant something else entirely and still no one cares.
BTW, that’s not a “typo”, that’s a mentality that loses arguments with shower mold.

I see you’re still parroting rbb whenever you can get your lips off his backside long enough to type.

All that just to prove you don’t understand the meaning of the word “isolationist” or “isolationism”?

Thanks Poofy, for showing us you can put words in other peoples mouths, and still not understand what they mean.

You are dismissed! Now talk about me some more, like an obsessed freak.

Hey asshole, maybe you’re a slow reader but I read all the commentary on each of your pages and have seen the videos.

You obviously either don’t understand Dr. Paul, are intentionally misrepresenting his views, or just don’t give a shit about the Constitution, how taxpayer money is spent, or wether the gov has the right, obligation, or ability to continue to afford most of their overseas activity.

I don’t really care, because honestly I think you are moron.

And Hannitized has more projection than a multiplex!

Poofy the Private Dick, did you have to investigate how long people spent on your pages, their IP’s and seek out private information when they challenge your stupidity? Or do you actually argue the points they are making, that prove you are an incompetent?

You should stop doing less investigations as to how long they spent on your website and more time arguing their points.

Poofy The Private Dick’s work:

You meant the pages you spent twenty seconds or less on, you had time to both read the commentary AND click over to You Tube? And since the timestamps tell me you viewed one page right after the other, you want us to believe NOT that you are lying through your fecal stained teeth, but that you digested all the commentary on six pages in four minutes without first viewing the videos the commentary was based on? No wonder you’re a Paulbot!

You finished page six, four minutes and ten seconds after you started. The video on the first page is nearly ten minutes long. Your uber lame explanation doesn’t fit the facts. Much like another troll who visits these pages, who has a penchant for sockpuppeting…(Assuming you really did visit all six pages. There’s only one entrance on the log who did and “Guest” is claiming he read all six pages, too. At least one of you is lying. Or maybe you and “Guest” are the same “person”?)

Uh Oh!! Careful Proof, little man willie bonilla is now fixated on YOUR dick. His boss(s) must be pissed at him and cut him off.

And you’re every bit as sweet natured as Hannitized. Let’s recap: You’re both liars. You’re both foul mouthed. Only one of you is an Obama loving, Reagan/ conservative hating flaming lib and one of you at least pretends to be a supporter of a conservative/libertarian Ron Paul. That about sum it up?

Poor trannitized, you want to lose that fight all over again. Why don’t you post more pics and claim they are of the interiors of secure facilities, and then post the names of people and claim they are your close personal friends and work associates. Then you can vanish for a month or so and then return and screech that people are picking on you.

Go ahead, trannitized, prove to us yet again that you are truly stuck on stupid.

Yep, you paulettes continue to sheeple along, too stupid to think for yourselves. Here is a question you can not think about. If Luap Nor is such a great man why has he NEVER done any of the things he keeps screeching about? He has been in Congress since 1979 and done nothing but ram his pockets full of tax payer’s money. Why is that, paulette? But don’t think about it, just continue to sheeple along, bleating the same moronic sh*t you sheeple always bleat.

AOL? Always Only Liberal?

neocon=Jew, always has and always will.

The term “neo-conservative” was coined by Midge Dector who co-founded the movement with Irving Kristol in response to the crime, corruption, and filth brought about in NYC by a succession of liberal mayors. Their definition of a neo-conservative was “a liberal who has been mugged back to reality,” an exquisite slap in the face of self-delusional liberal ideology.

Yep, you nail it. Democrats and other racist c*nts hate Jews because of the mental and moral superiority to Democrats and other racist c*nts. Once again you have clearly defined the basic concept. And I distilled it down to its basic essence. Which will piss off the racist Democrat a$$holes, as it always does. F*ck them. LOL