Say Anything Blog

Agree 100% with you Rob.  Not everyone here does, however.
http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/entry/the_real_barack_hussein_obama_worth_a_look/#comments

I thought we ended the war against Mormans a long time ago.

The Debate is over!  Global Whining has been confirmed.

I thought we ended the war against Mormans a long time ago.

not until 1976 in Missouri (thanks to Kit Bond)

Missouri Executive Order 44[1] also known as The “Extermination Order” (alt. Exterminating Order) in Latter Day Saint history was an executive order issued on October 27, 1838 by Missouri governor Lilburn Boggs.  The order was not formally rescinded until 1976.

Link didn’t work:
not until 1976 in Missouri (thanks to Kit Bond)

Alright darn it:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extermination_Order_(Mormonism)

Not everyone here does, however

I thought that Obama stuff was pretty silly.  But, I guess nothing is too low for the Clinton political machine.

If he went to a radical Islamic school that’d be one thing (I don’t think he did) but outside of that who cares if he’s Muslim or Baptist or Buddhist?

The war against illegal plunder has been fought since the beginning of the world. But how is… legal plunder to be identified? Quite simply. See if the law takes from some persons what belongs to them, and gives it to other persons to whom it does not belong. See if the law benefits one citizen at the expense of another by doing what the citizen himself cannot do without committing a crime. Then abolish this law without delay … If such a law is not abolished immediately it will spread, multiply and develop into a system.

Frédéric Bastiat, The Law

Rob’s recently listened-to songs:

I thought that Obama stuff was pretty silly.  But, I guess nothing is too low for the Clinton political machine.

Sen. Clinton had nothing to do with it. The story about Obama AND Clinton was made up by the GOP smear machine and you, naterally, ate it up with a spoon.

Here’s a tip: If it comes from Rev. Moon, it is probably a lie.

Sometimes you guys really crack me up.  It was a short article that basically quoted a couple people and THEIR concerns with his faith. 

Are you now going to tell me there is something wrong with individuals choosing NOT to vote for a candidate because of concerns with his faith ?  Because it wasn’t long ago that it was perfectly acceptable for people to vote FOR GWB because of HIS faith. 

You really should pick one and stick with it. 

I would also point out that in the same way that people love to throw out the verbage of the first ammendment (wrongly so) when being privately admonished for their speech, the “religious test” applies to an actual law implemented by the government, not the individual citizens when they decide how to cast their vote.