This was a street-wise young woman.

Even if that were the case it doesn’t make a difference.

Gee, I wonder what a 13 year old was doing at Jack Nicholson’s place? Partying with the Hollywood set? Was the playground closed that night? Maybe her Barbie’s were at the cleaners? I notice you glossed over the topless photos part of her testimony. Or her climbing into the hot tub naked with him. Yep, that right there is virginal behavior.

This was a street-wise young woman. If you had lived back then you’d know that things were different. This kind of thing wasn’t uncommon.

Great, that doesn’t excuse the adults from drugging her, getting her drunk, then having sex with her as she repeatedly said no. That’s rape moron. I don’t care if she is a hooker. If the girl say’s no, you stop. Keep justifying it Dino. It only makes you look bad, not me.

Conservatism has had a grip on this country for 30 years

Whereas Dino has not had a grip on anything* in the last thirty years!

*No. Not going to go there!

Sounds like maybe he wanted to get caught to avail himself of the “horrible” health care available in the US.

It doesn’t matter what the 13 year old was thinking. Legally it’s a crime to have sex with her.

Polanski did, then skipped the country.

He should spend the rest of his days in prison.

So libs support child rape, how interesting

Especially their NAMBLA wing.

The kid was the daughter of some acquaintance and she thought it would be cool. Remember this was the 70s and the outrage culture of sex panickers hadn’t yet emerged with the conservative movement.

Two weeks after Polanski plied her with Champagne and a Quaalude, Samantha Gailey appeared before an L.A. grand jury and recalled Polanski’s predatory behavior in a Mulholland Canyon home owned by Jack Nicholson.

The teenager’s troubling–and contemporaneous–account of her abuse at Polanski’s hands begins with her posing twice for topless photos that the director said were for French Vogue. The girl then told prosecutors how Polanski directed her to, “Take off your underwear” and enter the Jacuzzi, where he photographed her naked. Soon, the director, who was then 43, joined her in the hot tub. He also wasn’t wearing any clothes and, according to Gailey’s testimony, wrapped his hands around the child’s waist.

The girl testified that she left the Jacuzzi and entered a bedroom in Nicholson’s home, where Polanski sat down beside her and kissed the teen, despite her demands that he “keep away.” According to Gailey, Polanski then performed a sex act on her and later “started to have intercourse with me.” At one point, according to Gailey’s testimony, Polanski asked the 13-year-old if she was “on the pill,” and “When did you last have your period?” Polanski then asked her, Gailey recalled, “Would you want me to go in through your back?” before he “put his penis in my butt.” Asked why she did not more forcefully resist Polanski, the teenager told Deputy D.A. Roger Gunson, “Because I was afraid of him.”

He also did many other things to her. She was saying no the whole time.

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/polanskib10.html

Go read the testimony yourself. How you can defend this Dino I’ll never know. It was sick and wrong.

Polanski’s victim, Samantha Geimer, long ago announced that she had forgiven the filmmaker for his transgressions and supported various efforts to have the case against him dismissed.

That’s cute, unfortunately he committed his crime, pled guilty and flew the coop. I”m sure that the state will overlook that! Justice isn’t applied on the whim of the victim.

Perverts think that they’re above the law.

So, this is really a hill you dumb bastards want to die on? She is a sexually precocious 13 year old so its ok to get her drunk, give her drugs and have sex with her as she say’s NO!

My God, I’ve seen it all. You jackasses have lost it!

Lioncourt, you as a “lawyer”, all you could come up with is people on the right get off. This isn’t like he went to trial and they voted him not guilty. I wouldn’t like the verdict but that’s the price you pay to live under our system. THE MAN PLED GUILTY. HE admits he got a 13 year old drunk, drugged her and had sex with her. Yet you defend this like he is some kind of “sex” martyr”. Unbelievable!

Gents, ya see a pattern here?

Leftards defending the indefensible?

That girl was underage, and so far underage that most perps who get prosecuted for the crime, don’t see daylight for many years. Polanski was, however, a darling of the Left, as were Dohrn, Ayers, Rangel, Teddy Kennedy, Clinton (both XX and XY) and so on.

If you are part of the Leftist IN-crowd, those connections are used to block investigations, stop them if they have begun and quash any prosecutions that happen to begin.

Leftists are filth and they are the penultimate hypocrites.

They accuse who they call The Right Wing (Americans, really) of being hateful and bigoted, yet they themselves seethe with internal rage and froth at the mouth over one Leftist cause or another.

They accuse Americans of lying, while they themselves have been caught, time after time after time, lying and fomenting out and out propaganda.

They say they are for the small guy, but they are the Party of George Soros, Bill Gates, Ted Turner, Jane Fonda, Sean Penn, Michael Moore, and the rest of the Hollywood Glitteratti, the MSM and have transferred Billions… no make that Trillions of taxpayer dollars to large, failed banks and corporations.

They support illegal immigration, so as to undercut the working wages from anyone from casual labor, the hotel industry, entry and low-level jobs, as well as make labor cheap for meat-packers, hoteliers, agricultural corporate owners and so forth.

They say they are for children, yet unleash legions of Dr. Mengeles to kill them while they are in or even just emerging from the womb, and if they survive, place them in the lascivious hands of homosexual pederasts. If that is not enough, they call boyhood a mental disease and dope our kids on neural-pathway-killing Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRI’s… Ritalin, Prozac, Luvox, etc… )

Everything they do is calculated to destroy America, from its’ social fabric to its economy, from its educational system to national defense.

So here, once again, they are defending a child rapist and have sheltered him for decades, yet somehow consider themselves to be more evolved and morally superior.

They are the Domestic Enemy the Oath refers to.

Is it almost that time yet?

Seriously guy’s, why all the Sturm and Drang to protect an admitted statutory rapist. I thought you clowns were supposed to be for the “little” people. How much “littler” can you get with a 13 year old girl? I don’t care is she was the sluttiest girl in town, that idiot should have known better. What good can come from you protecting a child rapist? Does it feel good to protect a dirty old man from the mean ole “sex panicker” Republicans that only want to protect 13 year old girls from being fed alcohol, Quaalude and then raped my an older man? I proud to be a “sex panicker” that wants to protect 13 year old girls from dirty old men that would drug them then rape them. Lord people, I understand you want to get under people’s skin and all but damn, pick a better topic than this.

Even if that were the case it doesn’t make a difference.

But if it were a 13 year old black boy who committed armed robbery your kind would be clamoring to try him as an adult.

Hope he has fun in the big house

What does a 13 year old armed robber have to do with Polanski’s crime?

Nothing.

What does a 31 year old encounter between a man and a young woman have to do with a political blog?

Such overwrought drama from the drama-Queeniest on the blog, Zig-stem.

Hey, I thought you were blocking Dino? LOL

Things were different in the 70s, back before the faux moralist conservatives decided to infantilize young adults.

What’s funny is how many upper middle class and upper class Americans are buying their teen girls boob jobs and plastic surgery, letting them dress like little whores. I see it all the time, particularly among the suburban conservatives. It’s all about appearance and perfection.

Your beloved capitalism has sexualized the “underage” far more than any liberal social influence. Most of you would pimp out your own daughters for the right shiny object.

Conservatism has had a grip on this country for 30 years. What do we have to show for it? Debt, division, a coarse, ugly culture of selfishness and greed.

You people have created a very unseemly culture of white trash.

That’s why I enjoy seeing America self-destruct.

Conservatism has had a grip on this country for 30 years.

Actually, America has been conservative since its inception. We left the old monarchial form of govt behind, and made it obsolete. Even the newer form of monarchism, known as socialism/communism, is obsolete.
We have become the richest, most powerful nation in the history of the world due to our conservative ways.
What’s threatening that now is the mistake of leftie ideology.
Little stem is an evolutionary deadend, in more ways than one.

Actually, America has been conservative since its inception.
robert108 on September 28, 2009 at 07:46 am

The above from the wingnut that has famously asserted:

Telling one lie or even consistently lying about one subject…doesn’t make you a liar…

robert108 on May 18, 2009 at 03:23 pm

Lying little e-hole again demonstrates his inability to do any sort of higher thinking. You do nothing but make false equivalences. You parrot my words out of context, without understanding that they established the difference between someone, like Rob, who lies about one or two issues, and you, who lie about everything, all the time.
When you parrot those words of mine, you are exposing yourself as a pathological liar, without even knowing it.

As to the Polanski matter, justice is long overdue.

Gee, I wonder what a 13 year old was doing at Jack Nicholson’s place?

Getting raped.

Gee, I wonder what a 13 year old was doing at Jack Nicholson’s place? Partying with the Hollywood set? Was the playground closed that night? Maybe her Barbie’s were at the cleaners? I notice you glossed over the topless photos part of her testimony. Or her climbing into the hot tub naked with him. Yep, that right there is virginal behavior.

This was a street-wise young woman. If you had lived back then you’d know that things were different. This kind of thing wasn’t uncommon.

Reality is that the victim was a model hired with her mom’s consent for a photo session, not a streetwise woman of the world. Despite clear knowledge that she could not legally give consent, pederast Polanski started hitting on her almost immediately, and on the second session of modeling drugged and raped her. He didn’t get the (legally nonexistent) consent of a mature woman; he drugged a naive girl.

It’s quite telling how Dino and others are standing up for this pervert, even stooping to the level of slandering the young lady.

And yes, I want Polanski punished. I have daughters, and I don’t want the perverts of the world thinking they can get away with this kind of thing.

If you had lived through the 70s you would know how different things were.

Wrong is wrong in any time and place. Your moral equivalency is nauseating, dino.

Whether a 13 year-old clearly understood what she was doing is debatable. Polanski KNEW what he was doing. That much is not debatable.

Lioncourt, you as a “lawyer”, all you could come up with is people on the right get off.

As said he should be prosecuted.

What I was pointing out was that him not being extridited had nothing to do with him being a “lefty”. It was due to him being rich and famous.

That social morays change over time and that 31 years ago a young woman in LA hanging out with rich, older men and posing nude for them, taking drugs with them and climbing into a hot tub naked with them was not what it is today.

I had sex with an older person when I was 13. I initiated it. I wanted it. Many of you, particularly the older ones among you, were initiated at around that age by an older person or a peer. It only becomes a problem when it is exploited by adults who can’t deal with sexuality among the young.

Life is messy. We’re sexual creatures. Denying it won’t change that.

Dino, do you really want to have a society where people can assault, rape, or kill someone with impunity because the victim is seen as foolish and immoral? Knowing that a large portion of your fellow citizens view your homosexuality as foolish and immoral, I would think that you’d hesitate to endorse this.

As do I. Think about this, Dino, for just a minute, OK?

Dino tries again…

That social morays change over time and that 31 years ago a young woman in LA hanging out with rich, older men and posing nude for them, taking drugs with them and climbing into a hot tub naked with them was not what it is today.

What Polanski did 31 years ago was illegal then and wrong, and he knew it!

No 13 year-old is a “young woman”.

If you had children of your own, you might understand. Thank God you don’t.

You better watch your 13 year olds. Often they’re ready for sex and can be attracted to adults.

Personally, I’ve always liked older men (and women back when) so the gay pedo thing just doesn’t stick.

Speaking of stick, that’s what you’re doing with your head and the sand by pretending that Lolita was a virginal victim.

But looking ahead, what will be the next faux outrage du jour?

Roman Polanski death panels for illegal alien gun rights funded by Barney Frank and Freddie Mac?

Yes, you moralists are the true guardians of “the children”. That is unless they’re poor and need health care, are attending shitty underfunded schools or are a little browner than you.

Then you say, “FUCK EM.”

Figuratively, of course.

More lies and bullshit from dinothefakehomo.

Keep defending child molesters, you are so good at it. And you do it so often.

You better watch your 13 year olds. Often they’re ready for sex and can be attracted to adults.

Personally, I’ve always liked older men (and women back when) so the gay pedo thing just doesn’t stick.

Dino, in this thread, you’ve admitted that you were seduced at age 13 by a pederast and defended the actions of a pedophile by saying that 13 year olds are ready for sex. It’s not quite a NAMBLA brochure, but those of us who can read rightly infer that you’ve come into contact with, and are sympathetic to, the portion of homosexuals who do believe in sex with children.

And again, views like this are, for most Americans, perverse and foolish. For this reason, you have every reason to be frightened of a legal system that denies justice to those deemed perverse or foolish.

(we all do, but you especially)

Really? Then why is it that so many men are busted for soliciting young boys for sex? What a conundrum, for the child molester defender, at least.

While my early lover may have been older than me, they were not THAT old. The funny thing? He went on to get married and live a pretty ordinary straight life. Like a lot of men who experiment. Ah, the world of sex. So hard to corral into neat little categories of social acceptance.

If you want to brand me as a pedophile-sympathizer, be my guest. There’s little I can do and really, it’s one of the nicer impressions I’ve left here.

I also suspect that most of you, if not all, don’t care about what happened 31 years ago. You just love the idea of someone getting punished. And I thought I was punitive.

Again, the girls age is irrelevant. Statutory rape demands consent, and here there was none. She asked to be taken home, he refused. She said no to oral sex and asked him to stop, he forced himself on her. She said no to vaginal sex, and asked him to stop, he continued. She said no to anal sex and asked him to stop and he raped her anally too.

13, 30 or 300 this is horribly wrong.

Being a French citizen didn’t help him much now did it Todd?

Try knowing what you’re talking about next time.