Home Mobile Archives Reader Blogs Register Login

Wednesday, December 20, 2006

Republicans For Raising The Minimum Wage

It’s looking like President Bush, with some backing from Congressional Republicans, is ok with raising the minimum wage as long as it is coupled with “coupled with tax and regulatory relief for small businesses.”

Which is a total joke.  This, coupled with the President’s apparent support for raising taxes in exchange some Social Security reform (which I’m a little more open-minded about) has me worried.  It’s beginning to seem to me like the President is willing to exchange core conservative principles (low taxes, less regulation on businesses) for some nominal progress on issues he could then claim as a legacy.  Like Social Security reform, etc.

Now that the Dems have control of Congress I don’t want a “go-along-to-get-along” president.  This is something I became worried about around the time of the President’s joint press conference with the resigning Donald Rumsfeld.  At that time I was worried about the President letting the Dems have their way with domestic policy to get them off his back when it comes to foreign policy and the war in Iraq.

And I think that’s pretty much what we can expect from the President over the last two years.  He’s going to pick a couple of key issues to promote for his legacy (the war, Social Security) and then pretty much let the Democrats do as they please outside of that.

Not a very heartening reality for principled conservatives.

Comments

Avatar for Stormy70

Republicans lost in states where minimum wage increases were on the ballot. This does not bother me as it is good politics to raise it, especially if we get more tax relief.

Stormy70 on December 20, 2006 at 01:54 pm
Avatar for Steve

Missourians voted to raise the minimum wage, which I found bizarre. The bizzrre part being that the state allows people to get something like the minimum wage on a statewide ballot initiative. Apparently, they collected enough signatures to get the state law changed, but fell short of the number needed for a constitutional amendment, since, you know, the minimum wage belongs in the constitution.

This is clearly a state issue. The federal government just needs to get rid of the federal minimum and tell the states to do their jobs. All these clowns that keep complaining about congress not raising it need to talk to their state legislatures instead. $6.50 (or whatever) goes much further in North Dakota than it does in San Francisco.

Steve on December 20, 2006 at 02:40 pm
Avatar for Steve

And I think that’s pretty much what we can expect from the President over the last two years.  He’s going to pick a couple of key issues to promote for his legacy (the war, Social Security) and then pretty much let the Democrats do as they please outside of that.

Which really pisses me off because no Democrat would play that game with a Republican Congress. How many times did Clinton veto welfare reform and the partial birth abortion ban?

Steve on December 20, 2006 at 02:41 pm
Proof
Proof
12890 comments
Send a private message

Republicans lost in states where minimum wage increases were on the ballot.

That’s because the Dems prefer the minimum wage as a political football. During the first two years of Clinton’s presidency, the Dems controlled the White House and both houses of Congress, yet no effort was made to enact a higher minimum wage until after the Dems lost the House.



Better to have it and not need it than need it and not have it.
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

Proof on December 20, 2006 at 02:58 pm

I thought that the House was willing to pass a minimum wage bill as long as we got tax breaks (death tax in fact) with it.  The Demoncrats would have nothing to do with that.


What’s going to happen to US industry when the global warming extremists like John McCain double the price of electricity?  I would think all these factories will close and set up in countries where they aren’t scared of technology.


The Whistler's signature
The Whistler on December 20, 2006 at 03:04 pm
Avatar for aNONOMISLY

a sad but true, ...

raising the minimum wage is so wildly popular amongs the voters (even amongst registered Republicans, which shouldn be confused with fiscal conservatism) that the Democrats won’t bother to take Bush’ announced compromise on the issue.  They realize its a good political move to send Bush a minimum wage hike, dare him to veto it, and then dare Repulbican in Congress to vote not to override said veto. ..it’s politically better for them to keep is as an issuie for the next election. ..my opinion is that Bush’ comment was all bluff and nothing much, i.e. the Dems will write it ..won’t compromise much.  Bush will sign what they send him.

aNONOMISLY on December 20, 2006 at 04:52 pm
Avatar for LoadTheMule

I’ve said from the beginning that President Bush is a Republican, but not necessarily a conservative.  I’m a conservative, but not necessarily a Republican.  I vote Republican more often than not, but that’s something of a Hobson’s Choice.  Neither of the parties has my overall interests at heart and both are taking us to hell in a rowboat.  The only difference is the Republican are rowing slower.

Regards…

LoadTheMule on December 21, 2006 at 04:46 am
Avatar for aNONOMISLY

Neither of the parties has my overall interests at heart and both are taking us to hell in a rowboat.  The only difference is the Republican are rowing slower

aNONOMISLY on December 21, 2006 at 07:57 am
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.

    

By submitting your comment you agree to our terms of service.