i wish she could counter sue those bastards

Poor thing!

How much sympathy did you have for the Clintons when the filthy republicans forced them into millions of dollars in legal fees?

How much sympathy did you have for the Clintons when the filthy republicans forced them into millions of dollars in legal fees?

Poor multi-millionaire, ex-Global Empire President with all kinds of taxpayer goodies still pampering him, world traveler playboy with a wife who doesn’t care because she’s a big cabinet secretary for the Regime.

Yeah, it must suck for him.

Yet another reason for tort reform. If you bring charges against an individual, you should pay the entire cost of legal fees. I bet that would go a long way towards ending frivolous lawsuits and accusations.

As for dino the asshat. Remember that Clinton pled guilty to perjury, and admitted to having sexual relations with an employee in the office of his employer. Any where else, and that would be grounds for dismissal. He also admitted to receiving oral sex while on phone calls with the heads of foreign states. A blatant violation of security and a violation that would require dismissal.

Is he talking about the same Bill Clinton that pled guilty to the perjury charge in order to get a lesser sentence.

Operative words: “pled guilty.”

Actually, bohdi stem, you’re wrong.

At the time, US News & World Report had a lengthy story testing the hypothesis that Clinton’s behavior would had gotten him tossed if he were a CEO. They reported on several CEOs accused of harassment whose Boards of Directors simply paid off the complaining party. It concluded that if the CEO was doing good or in favor with the Board, their sexual sins were overlooked and covered up. Some of the cases were truly outrageous.

As for the church lady-like admonishing of Clinton: I’d like to see very last man here having to answer questions about his private sex life under oath. We’d probably ferret out a few Ensigns and Sanfords.

Using a man’s sex life against him for blackmail is as low as men can go. Leave it to republicans to reach that low. Filthy jerks.

Doing well is the best revenge! I hope that really frustrates the republican scum!

I understand why “liberals” (i.e., anti-liberal socialists) like to believe in super hero politicians. They believe that government is The Answer and so they await the Annointed One’s Coming. But why in the world do “liberals” defend the Clintons? After all, the Clinton’s have proved that they are opportunists who will throw the leftist groups in the fire if it suits them at the moment.

The Clintons were guilty of all they were charged with (and a bit more!)

No, they weren’t.

Poor multi-millionaire, ex-Global Empire President with all kinds of taxpayer goodies still pampering him, world traveler playboy with a wife who doesn’t care because she’s a big cabinet secretary for the Regime.

Doing well is the best revenge! I hope that really frustrates the republican scum!

Well, the difference with Clinton is that he actually had an affair – including sex in the oval office – and then actually perjured himself while testifying under oath about it.

Last I checked, a man’s personal sex life is private. Don’t try justifying it with the perjury thing either. They had no business asking him about it. It was a witch hunt. It backfired on Ken Starr and destroyed his political aspirations.

But it sure is good to see Palin toasted!

Last I checked, a man’s personal sex life is private. Don’t try justifying it with the perjury thing either. They had no business asking him about it. It was a witch hunt. It backfired on Ken Starr and destroyed his political aspirations.
But it sure is good to see Palin toasted!

An affair, especially in the oval office, set him up for possible blackmail, if the wrong people found out about it.

Will Palin quit as a lame duck president too, also, if she was ever elected. We must ask ourselves this question now, as she is a proven quitter.

Rob loves to make excuses for the one!

But what is now scary is how some are lying to make Palin look better than the Clinton’s who endured the costs of all of those lawsuits Star could not get to stick.

One big difference, Dinostem: The Clintons were guilty of all they were charged with (and a bit more!), Palin is the innocent victim of a partisan witch hunt.

All that mud they threw at the Clintons didn’t stick, but the Clinton’s didn’t quit.

They finally Got Clinton on his personal discretions, but that is not relevant to how he would lead the country. He shouldn’t have done it in the oval office…..but he is no quitter. The pressure didn’t get to him like it has got to Palin.

Rob is going to look very foolish when a different reason for Palin’s choice to quit, surfaces.

How does this make sense Rob? How is she going to pay those bills now that she is unemployed??

It makes no sense?

She’s doing the practical thing. Between the Dems trashing her and her family and others for their backstabbing who is one to trust. It’s a true shame what the Palin family has to endure compared to other political figures.

If you bring charges against an individual, you should pay the entire cost of legal fees. I bet that would go a long way towards ending frivolous lawsuits and accusations.

Absolutely, this rule would change things immensely.

Actually, he was convicted for perjury and for suborning perjury. It was for lying in court and for inducing snother to lie in court.
Nothing to do with his “sex life”, so another lie gets refuted.

Reports: Palin Resigned Because Of Legal Bills

This was obvious from listening to her speech.

If Palin were an real American, she would not quit.

Look at all the conservative girlymen trying to justify gossip and blakmailing another guy over sex.

Reminds me of guys in high school who would accuse other boys of being masturbators when they all did it.

I am not a lawyer, but something doesn’t sound right about all of these “ethics” lawsuits. Government officials have a certain amount of protection from just any lawsuit happening. If she has is being sued in the course of being a governor, the state should be paying her legal fees, unless she is not following the law.

Maybe she should have practiced good ethics and she wouldn’t have to worry about facing court..

Rez-Tick, apparently the fact that she’s been found innocent in every one of the 15 ethics charges against her didn’t enter your french fry machine addled brain.

dino the asshat,
I am far from wrong. Just because US News and Report ran a story justifying CEO’s having sex on the company property, lying, and harassing female coworkers does not make it right. Justifying the corporate payoffs are further evidence of the corruption that US News and World Report is just pushing along.

One last thing for you, asshat. Clinton’s sex life is indeed private. Had he kept to fondling fat interns in his/her private quarters or at a hotel, it should remain as such. It became an issue when it was found out he was doing it in the oval office. After which he chose to lie about it, and thus perjured himself.

Sadly, I don’t expect you to understand the difference between breaking the law and not, but Clinton broke the law and Palin did not, no matter how much the liberals tried to make it look like she did.

More lies:

One big difference, Dinostem: The Clintons were guilty of all they were charged with (and a bit more!),

This is just another lie, of hundreds from Proof.

Could be.

To you liberal affirmanistas out there, you’ve got her “dander up” and, “SHEE’LL BE BACK”.

By getting a higher profile higher paying job

Like what? A Fox News personality?

Using a man’s sex life against him for blackmail is as low as men can go.

Again, the lib-stems are either totally ignorant of the meaning of the word “blackmail” or they are simply mind numbingly dishonest in its usage.
No one “blackmailed” Clinton into lying about his sex acts! If what he did was natural and “all men do it” (which is another lie, because not every man uses his power to sexually harass his subordinates!), then all he had to do was fess up and pay the penalties.
He lied, because he’s a liar. No one “blackmailed” him into perjuring himself, he did that of his own free will.

As low as men can go? I think that would have to be liberals who can’t seem to stop themselves from lying about everything, sex included!

BTW, in continuing your rant about Clinton, are you admitting that you have no clue or no answer to the actual content of this post, Dinostem?

“Try refuting the content of the post, stem.”

Oh, and for the apostrophobic troll, here is the corrected version:

Where are the verdicts that show the Clinton’s (sic) were guilty Poofie??

You really don’t have a clue when and where to use apostrophes, do you troll?

You may not work for the POTUS, but you certainly are of less importance; secondary the (sic) the POTUS.

That’s why so many of us waste our breath trying to explain things to this brainless doofus: Wankertized can’t tell the difference between being a subordinate and being subordinate.

If this guy Wankertized ever learns English (or finishes the third grade) he could be dangerous!

And it is time to do the same to our enemies. Charges do not have to be true, merely filed.

Not sure if it would work the same way. My guess is a lot of that Stimulus money (e.g. your and my taxpayer dollars) are being diverted into ACORN and kindred organization slush fund kitties.

Whereas Americans spend tax dollars on matters related to legitimate government, Leftists spend tax dollars on obtaining and retaining political power.

Also, no one, and I mean no one, should file legal or even ethics complaints founded on baseless accusations. It perverts and clogs the system. For awhile there, some of the more Constitutional purists (fringe really) were filing baseless claims in so-called common law courts.

But legitimate actions certainly do need to be filed, such as those pursued by organizations like JUDICIAL WATCH and LIBERTY COUNSEL. Others include:

the American Center for Law and Justice

the Center for Law and Policy

the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education

the Rutherford Institute

as well as a raft of others. The big common denominator in almost all Conservative litigation is that they are almost always run on a shoe string and suffer from very thin funding.

Another truism is that the Left are so corrupt that there is no need to manufacture any allegations of wrong-doing against them.

Finally, one of the most difficult obstacles to Conservative litigation is the presence of Leftist judges on the bench.

If you have corrupt judges, like the bribe-taking, but elected to Congress Alcee Hastings, the 2000 Supreme Court of Florida, (We have a specific act of Congress passed to regulate presidential elections to prevent precisely the kind of thing the Florida Supreme Court(did) and the Judges noted in the book The Tyranny of Tolerance.

Maybe she should have practiced good ethics

Or not stood in opposition to a party (the Democrats) with no ethics at all?

“Hannitized” gets stupid, Poofie brought up Clinton…

Awww, that’s cute. So that’s what you call DINO now? “Poofie”? Your little pet name for him? How sweet.

…and what are you talking about third world tactics? That is pretty silly talk.

Using the courts to shut someone up is not third world tactics?

Not with your crowd, eh?

…like you guys used to when you killed all of our leftists leaders like Lincoln, the Kennedy’s and MLK.

Now you’re blaming me for killing Lincoln, the Kennedy’s and MLK?

Wow. Talk about silly talk! Hahahaha. I’m now responsible for killing Lincoln?! Hahahaha.

You’re a silly clown, “Hannitized”. Thanks for the laughs, ya goofball.

Sorry, I meant she resigned her senate seat to take a higher office.

How is that relevant to this topic????

There are absolutely no similarities between the two.

Ok,

Looks like it was Dino. My bad.

Using the courts to shut someone up is not third world tactics?

Not with your crowd, eh?

They used the courts to investigate her for possible wrong doing’s.

She silenced herself, by quitting.

Now you’re blaming me for killing Lincoln, the Kennedy’s and MLK?

Wow. Talk about silly talk! Hahahaha. I’m now responsible for killing Lincoln?! Hahahaha.

Did you eat too much sugar coated cereal or something? Calm down.

You know the side of the political isle you are on is the side that killed the leftist leaders of our country with bullets, and you are whining about Sarah Palin quitting by her own choice.

That is beyond absurd.

Everyone is a subordinate to the POTUS, genius.

More disingenuous claptrap from the Kahuna of the Kiddie Pool!

What else could we expect from someone who recently said I “attacked” the President over his choice of dessert at a “picnic”, when
a) it wasn’t an “attack”
b) it wasn’t I who made the comment he called an attack and
c) it wasn’t a picnic, it was a luau!

Don’t you ever get tired of being wrong, Wankertized?

Given your tendencies to lie, distort, misrepresent the facts and generally obfuscate every issue you address, Wankertized, why should we expect anything different from you here?

Which is why debate with you is useless.

You talking to yourself again, Wankertized? ‘Cause it would be the closest thing to making sense you’ve ever said if you are!

Obama took over a major disaster that nobody thought would be as bad as it was.

Wrong again! Don’t you ever get tired of being wrong, Wankertized?

We were predicting last fall that Obama and the Democrats would go back on their campaign promises because they would “discover” things were worse than they thought!

That’s just a sign of their hypocrisy, not a sign of how bad things really are! (Even though Pelosi, Reid, Frank, Dodd and the Democrats have been screwing things up for years!)

So Liqwid doesn’t really care, but makes a comment in a post demonstrating that he does care, and then attack’s his opponents for using rational thought?

You have gone mad friend.

So the left’s third world tactics worked.

If anybody believes this, then they can not rationally argue that she has what it is needed to be president.

What is she going to do if NKorea and Iran doesn’t follow the rules and makes her a president who can’t get anything done, quit?

Hillary spent her entire (abbreviated) second term as a Senator from NY running for the presidency. Barack Obama spent his entire first senate term doing the same thing. Neither of them had an discernible impact on the “nation’s business’ during that period.

To think that either state’s citizens’ interest was best served by their respective terms in office is nonsense.

Those who oppose Sarah Palin and can speciously convince themselves that she is a “quitter” will likely have the chance to vote against her, regardless of the real reason for their opposition. Those who applaud her principles and support her views on issues and her policy prescriptions will, hopefully, have the chance to vote for her.

“Hannitized” spews, So Liqwid doesn’t really care,…

About Palin deciding to resign.

…but makes a comment in a post demonstrating that he does care…

About the third world tactics used against Palin.

…and then attack’s his opponents for using rational thought?

Where was that at?

You know, “Hannitized”, if you would stop putting words into people’s mouths, this whole debate thing would go a lot smoother.

Suit yourself though. Just know that you look like a jackass as you pat yourself on the back after you assume that you know what the fuck you’re talking about.

Liqwid,

Really, when you arrive to an argument or a battle of ideas, you come with absurdity as your sword and spin and denial as your shield.

It is a very deranged argument to pretend that Palin did not quit by her own choice and instead to conclude that she was forced out by third world tactics.

That is absurd, you know it, I know it.

To make a circus of this site by ridiculing your opponent for having the decency of being honest is beneath those who wish for honest debate.

You can pretend that you are a hero of some sort if it is what you need to feel good about yourself. But we all know the score.

Bat one, good post. For every action there is an exact, and like, reaction. Shee’ll be back, and I can’t wait.

Using a man’s sex life against him for blackmail is as low as men can go. Leave it to republicans to reach that low. Filthy jerks.

He was sued by a woman who was not thrilled with his advances. This was a right given to her by Democrats. Irony.

And who went after prominent Republicans in the party who were just investigating it once it became a House matter? Democrats you say?

Hypocritical moron.

Paula Jones never won a case against Bill Clinton. He was harassed over his consensual relationship with Lewinsky.

Fail.

Before the case reached trial, Judge Susan Webber Wright granted President Clinton’s motion for summary judgment, ruling that Jones could not show that she had suffered any damages–according to Arkansas state law standards of outrage and intentional infliction of emotional distress–even if her claim of sexual harassment were otherwise proven. Jones appealed the dismissal to a panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, where, at oral argument, two of the three judges on the panel appeared sympathetic to her arguments. On November 13, 1998, Clinton settled with Jones for $850,000, the entire amount of her claim, but without an apology, in exchange for her agreement to drop the appeal. All but $151,000 went to pay what were by then her considerable legal expenses. Before the end of the entire litigation, her marriage broke apart and she appeared in the news media to show the results of a nose job paid for by a donor.[11]

In April 1999, Judge Wright found President Clinton in civil contempt of court for misleading testimony in the Jones case. She ordered Clinton to pay Jones $91,000 for expenses incurred as the result of Clinton’s dishonest and misleading answers.
Wright then referred Clinton’s conduct to the Arkansas Bar for disciplinary action, and on January 19, 2001, the day before President Clinton left the White House, Clinton entered into an agreement with the Arkansas Bar and Independent Counsel Robert Ray under which Clinton was stripped of his license to practice law for a period of five years.His fine was paid from a fund raised for his legal expenses.

Guilt by settlement sparky. Guilt by settlement.

To make a circus of this site by ridiculing your opponent for having the decency of being honest is beneath those who wish for honest debate.

You can pretend that you are a hero of some sort if it is what you need to feel good about yourself. But we all know the score.

Mirror, Mirror, On the Wall…

Will Palin quit as a lame duck president too, also, if she was ever elected. We must ask ourselves this question now, as she is a proven quitter.

Obama quit his street activist job because, in his own words, “it was too hard”.

you were saying….

Obama quit his street activist job because, in his own words, “it was too hard”.

you were saying….

I was saying what will Palin do when all of her efforts fall short with Iran and N.Korea???? Quit??

She as a proven track record in American politics. 0 and out.

Consensual…I didn’t realize Bill’s wife had agreed.

It seems that a lot of Bills defenders forget that he was married. But like taxes, I guess the left feels it’s ok to cheat on your wife too.

Just as I excused Sanford for having issues that were private, so too I excused Bill Clinton.

Between the two of us Citizen, one of us has principles.

His personal business, is his personal business, that should not be the focus of a tax payer funded political lynching.

Obama has been president less than half a year and you expect the world to change?

No.. but I think its reasonable to expect something. and obviously there have been no accomplishments to speak of… other than rewarding his supporters with taxpayer money and calling it “economic stimulus.”

He slowed and eventually stopped the economic disaster that most likely would have caused a global economic meltdown, that Bush left behind for him to clean up.

Puh-lease! I don’t believe for one minute that you are anywhere near knowledgeable enough to make a specific, detailed, fact-based, cause and effect argument demonstrating the validity of this wishful nonsense. But I would certainly find it amusing to watch you try.

I’d be remiss if I didn’t note that what you’ve asserted here is at odds with what Vice President Biden said in his marshmallow interview with George Stephanopoulos. Biden was the first to parrot the latest “change the game plan” line, but its clear he doesn’t believe that the “economic disaster” has been turned around as you suggest.

Actually, we have faced two separate, though interlinked financial problems: the recession and the so-called “credit crisis.” They are related, but certainly not the same… though of course, you wouldn’t know that.

What you call “harassment” (erroneously) was Paula Jones’ lawyers seeking to establish a pattern of horndoggery from the Horndog-in-Chief, for Paula Jones’s civil suit.

You mean…..men like women? Gee……………..really? You guys needed a lawyer to establish that fact?

Establishing a consensual relationship between two adults did not prove Paula Jones accusation.

The pattern was about subordinates, which constituted the sexual harassment charge against Clinton.

Everyone is a subordinate to the POTUS, genius. What needed to be established was unwanted advancements, which did not occur with Lewinsky.

So answer the question then Poofie:

Who is not a subordinate to the POTUS?????

Obama offered nothing but platitudes. He is like the underpants gnomes. Step one: you elect me. Step three: Hope and change and problems turn into unicorns.

Although it’s beyond stupid to demand specifics out of a VICE PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE while excusing bigger weaknesses from the Presidential candidate you like. As much as you like or dislike VP candidate…they don’t set policy. They are a backup. The President sets policy. Which is why VP debates are so awkward, as there’s never been a VEEP who agrees all the time with the President.

A perfect example of why I rarely take you seriously. Obama offered much, much more than platitudes. Hell, some people even reviewed his economic policy before he ran for president. But….keep on keepin on Kenny.

And VP’s are the back up, but when the candidate for POTUS is as old as McCain, it matter a lot more than a VP who is in his late 40s or early 50s.

For one, Obama could articulate his opinions and ideas on just about any issue relating to economics or foreign policy.

Not without a TelePrompter.

Who is not a subordinate to the POTUS?????

I’m certainly not! I don’t work for the federal government.

There is only one being that I am subordinate to, and He’s the one Obama keeps confusing himself with. Obama works for us, we are not his subjects nor his employees!

“Hannitized” shows us some of that “liberal tolerance.”

“Liberal tolerance” like all the other leftist buzzwords such as inclusiveness, diversity, compassion, and fairness, only applies superficially. Skin color, for example. A more substantive, in depth application of these concepts is simply beyond most liberals’ comprehension.

Paula Jones never won a case against Bill Clinton. He was harassed over his consensual relationship with Lewinsky.

He settled with her. His consentual relationship was Lewinsky was part of Jones’ proof.

Not that it matters that she was settled with out of court.

Two, there is a difference between offering ONLY platitudes and propaganda, and offering some. Obama did the latter, Palin did the former.

Obama offered nothing but platitudes. He is like the underpants gnomes. Step one: you elect me. Step three: Hope and change and problems turn into unicorns.

Although it’s beyond stupid to demand specifics out of a VICE PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE while excusing bigger weaknesses from the Presidential candidate you like. As much as you like or dislike VP candidate…they don’t set policy. They are a backup. The President sets policy. Which is why VP debates are so awkward, as there’s never been a VEEP who agrees all the time with the President.

Just as i produced facts about Keynesian economics and how they have worked in the past, you ignore everything else.

Even the CBO, who are 100% Keynesian, said the President’s plan wouldn’t work, and would hurt us in the long run. Oops.

I can’t wait for how bankrupting coal will help out our economy though!

Apologies again Pparets…Stupid STD.

A perfect example of why I rarely take you seriously. Obama offered much, much more than platitudes. Hell, some people even reviewed his economic policy before he ran for president. But….keep on keepin on Kenny.

He said he wouldn’t tax people making less than 250k a year. Which was odd considering he was talking about raising the top two tax brackets. To describe that as a platitude is nice. A bold faced lie is better.

His economic policy is hopes and dreams. “We’ll rebuild the economy with green technology.” “We’ll put people to work with the stimulus.” Yea, his “specifics” were a joke. Kinda like his supporters.

And VP’s are the back up, but when the candidate for POTUS is as old as McCain, it matter a lot more than a VP who is in his late 40s or early 50s.

I didn’t say it didn’t matter, fool. I said they didn’t set policy. These are such vastly different statements that it’s impossible to confuse them, so nice straw man. Indeed, my further comments address this more:

Which is why VP debates are so awkward, as there’s never been a VEEP who agrees all the time with the President.

I actually like Joe Biden. Which was why the VP debates were so hard to listen to. Palin nailed him again and again as he tried to toe the new party line…which was different than what he himself ran on. DRAMATICALLY different. To paraphrase my comments at the time:

He lost because he wasn’t allowed to be Joe Biden. He had to be Barack Obama lite. And as little as two months ago he was taking vastly different positions. He doesn’t believe in the platform, and it shows.

When it comes to the ISSUES, the VP is indeed irrelevant. It doesn’t matter what they think. It doesn’t matter what they believe. All that matters is the POTUS. Again this is basic politics, and you’re either ignoring it, or perhaps you’re claiming that you’re just too stupid to know how things work. Either way, your criticism is moot.

You may not work for the POTUS, but you certainly are of less importance; secondary the the POTUS.

Not to me… and not to anyone whose opinion matters to me.

What Robert is suggesting is that we should not elect people to government, but rather some sort of PTA club that organizes things together in a way that reflects the will of the majority.

That is NOT what our founding fathers created.

A perfect example of why I rarely take you seriously. Obama offered much, much more than platitudes. Hell, some people even reviewed his economic policy before he ran for president. But….keep on keepin on Kenny.

He said he wouldn’t tax people making less than 250k a year. Which was odd considering he was talking about raising the top two tax brackets. To describe that as a platitude is nice. A bold faced lie is better.

His economic policy is hopes and dreams. “We’ll rebuild the economy with green technology.” “We’ll put people to work with the stimulus.” Yea, his “specifics” were a joke. Kinda like his supporters.

Saying he will not tax people making less than 250k is not a platitude. His economic policy had some grand ideas, and there certainly was hopefully thinking in it, but it consisted of much, much more than just that, and you know it.

And if you don’t know it, they you have just found out that you are flat wrong. Or, you don’t understand the definition of what a platitude is.

I didn’t say it didn’t matter, fool. I said they didn’t set policy. These are such vastly different statements that it’s impossible to confuse them, so nice straw man. Indeed, my further comments address this more:

They are not different. You said they are a back up. A back up to what? Setting policy.

Your suggestion that a Veep is just a back up is stating that they don’t matter, because they are just a back up, they don’t set policy. It’s the same thing.

When it comes to the ISSUES, the VP is indeed irrelevant. It doesn’t matter what they think. It doesn’t matter what they believe. All that matters is the POTUS.

So you just spent your time telling me that you didn’t say “it doesn’t matter”, only to conclude your point that “it doesn’t matter”???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

That is crazy talk Kenny.

That is crazy talk Kenny.

Only if you’re an idiot.

You keep screaming that Palin didn’t offer policy specifics (which she did, but moving on). But you’re ok with vague innanities such as “Everyone needs health care” “We need to be energy independant” and “The rich paying more in taxes will stimulate the economy.” from the top guy on the ticket.

Simply put, if one held Obama to the standard you want Palin held to, he’d fall flat on his face. If Palin was held to the standard of Obama, she’d look like fricking Einstein. (well, so would Barney the Dinosaur, but whatever.)

Holding a VP candidate to a higher standard than a POTUS candidate is insanely dishonest.

Saying he will not tax people making less than 250k is not a platitude. His economic policy had some grand ideas, and there certainly was hopefully thinking in it, but it consisted of much, much more than just that, and you know it.

His economic plan, what he realeased of it in bits and pieces, was garbage. Even fellow leftists pointed out all the flaws in it. But let’s look at his economic plan:

President Obama signed legislation to jumpstart our economy, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, less than a month after his inauguration. The plan will save or create 3.5 million new jobs, make critical investments in our infrastructure and give 95 percent of working Americans a tax cut.

Besides the fact that “create or save” is a platitude, the “plan” is to just throw random money at whoever has their hands out and the recession goes away! That’s inane, vapid and useless. What a great plan! Bush got criticized when he did it. But when Obama does it, it’s bold, cunning and visionary. Puh-leese.

By making bold and wise investments in healthcare, energy and education, and restoring fiscal accountability to government spending, we will cut costs for American families and businesses, create good jobs that can’t be shipped overseas, give our children the education they need to be competitive in the global marketplace and leave our grandchildren a legacy they can be proud to inherit.

Government health care will save the economy! That’s a platitude. Promising fiscal accountability while giving us the largest deficits ever would be funny if it didn’t affect me.

And of course, his tax plan has gotten businesses saying they’ll just move overseas if he enacts it.

A new housing program has stabilized the market, preventing more foreclosures and helping millions more re-finance at historically low mortgage rates. The Administration is also moving forward with its plans to get credit flowing again to businesses and families, and to reform our regulatory system so we have a set of 21st century rules to match 21st century financial markets.

By encouraging more reckless spending from people who shouldn’t be doing it, we will fix the housing market! Wait? What do you mean that’s how we got here to begin with? If we just make more rules, life will improve.

Just words, just mindless slogans.

Kenny,

Try again. Here Obama’s economic agenda as it was laid out in 08.

http://www.barackobama.com/pdf/issues/economy/EconomicPolicyFullPlan.pdf

Go ahead and read through it. These are all things Obama discussed in interview after interview.

Again, most certainly his speech contained some platitudes, but the red meat was there for anyone who is honest enough to remember it.

Palin could never articulate such matters…..

Remember?

Bat,

You may not work for the POTUS, but you certainly are of less importance; secondary the the POTUS.

After-all, do you get to run red lights when you are traveling? No!

That is all that will be said about that.

One big difference, Dinostem: The Clintons were guilty of all they were charged with (and a bit more!), Palin is the innocent victim of a partisan witch hunt.

Of course this is a lie, from Poofie, who is trying desperately to change the subject from his first statement that was subsequently a lie.

Poofie doesn’t defend his statement from being called a lie,

I don’t have to defend it because it’s true!

The brainless, lying twit Hannitwerp has no concept of actually disproving anything I said! (That might require him having an actual coherent thought in his head!)

The “tantrum” is more projection on his part!

Where are the verdicts that show the Clinton’s were guilty Poofie??

And, to top it all off, the little Wanker who falsely accuses me of stalking him, stopped by my blog again today!

Uhhh…that is because you linked to your Friday night babe obsession with women you could never actually date.

I was amazed at how many pictures of women you gawk over. Why don’t you just get out and date already, liar.

Now, tell us again with a straight face how the Clintons are “innocent” because they were not “found guilty”!

So you WERE talking about file-gate?

You are a better liar than you are a person who can debate with logic. At least when you lie I know what you are talking about.

When you try to make a rational argument, you just screw up words and their meanings.

Bat,

If the Clintons are guilty, then so is Palin. Two can play at that game. But since you are a man who lacks principles and honesty, we know we can rely on you to remain full of it.

The Clintons were convicted of no crimes. Bill was caught lying about sex…..whooopie.

Now, don’t you have some banners to create for quitter GOP princess?

The only thing the two of you accomplish is a retaliatory response from those who will continue to accuse Palin of her crimes.

Congratulations.

Whew….bat is in a rage today.

This one really made little H’s head explode! He just played the race card, the last refuge of leftie scoundrels! He’s really squealing. Good going!

Clinton was found guilty of two crimes, while Sarah isn’t guilty of anything. All phony charges have been dismissed.
Another false equivalence from a usual source of same.

Race Card again, Kid? That was quick… and predictable.

Wow, you all are pulling your hair out and blaming me.

Let’s keep the focus on Princess Quitter.

This whole having a black man as a president has really gotten under their skin.

The only one to mention race on this thread was herpitized. If you don’t like his marxist policies that’s racist? What a fucking idiot.

Go ahead and read through it. These are all things Obama discussed in interview after interview.
Again, most certainly his speech contained some platitudes, but the red meat was there for anyone who is honest enough to remember it.
Palin could never articulate such matters…..

After reading through two pages of ridiculously inane platitudes I was done.

Not a single plan. Just “I will make it easier” or “I will make it less expensive”. HOW? No plans. No ideas. “I passed this law” means nothing. Nothing but wishful thinking.

Things will happen cause I say they will.

Platitudes.

Chump.

Hillary resigned before her term was up in order to run for a higher office.

Palin’s PAC raised $400k without even asking for money.
It’s not about money.

Michael Jackson died Thursday, Palin bails Friday.
Coincidence?
Her Rasputin.
She Got the Silver

The point was resigning before completing her term to take, or run for a higher position.

Consensual…I didn’t realize Bill’s wife had agreed.
It seems that a lot of Bills defenders forget that he was married. But like taxes, I guess the left feels it’s ok to cheat on your wife too.