Rep. Jeb Hensarling: If We Lose Our Ability To Fail, We Lose Our Ability To Succeed

Rep. Jeb Hensarling makes the case (via email) against the bailout:

“My top responsibility as an elected official is to protect the families and people who trusted me to represent their interests in Washington. I do not take lightly the critical nature of the credit crisis that our capital markets face today and the grave situation that every American will face should our credit markets freeze and remain frozen. Inaction has never been an option, but the Paulson plan should have never been the only option.
“In my heart and in my mind, I believe that this plan is fraught with unintended consequences, would force generations of taxpayers to pick up the tab for Wall Street losses, and could permanently and fundamentally change the role of government in the American free enterprise system. Once the government socializes losses, it will soon socialize profits. If we lose our ability to fail, we will soon lose our ability to succeed. If we bail out risky behavior, we will soon see even riskier behavior.
“I also believe that this Congress, in a rushed effort to provide stability to a troubled credit market, did not adequately discuss or investigate potential alternatives that would have constituted a work out and not a bail out. Even at this moment, it still remains more important for Congress to do it right than to do it fast. I stand ready, as do many of my colleagues, to stay here for as many days as it takes to do this right.
“For the last week, House conservatives have fought to protect innocent taxpayers from an unprecedented government raid on their wallets to bail out Wall Street from their bad decisions and financial losses. Principled Republicans like Paul Ryan and Eric Cantor helped improve the legislation before us by adding increased taxpayer protections and additional Wall Street accountability. But mere improvement is not the test for support. The test is whether, after weighing both the good and the bad, you believe that the plan ultimately leads America in the right direction. Using that test, I cannot in good conscious support this legislation.”

I think Hensarling’s point is an important one. We talk a lot about what the dire consequences will be if we don’t do the bailout, but what happens if we do the bailout? Do we fix this problem? Or do we just delay an inevitable collapse?
Delay it so that our children and grand children end up paying for it?
This bailout rewards risky behavior. And yes, a lot of that risky behavior (such as mandating loans on low-value homes to borrowers with marginal credit backgrounds) was caused by the government, but what incentive is there to change those things if we bail the mortgage industry out?
I think we have to face this, because I think we’ll eventually have to face it no matter what we do, and better now than later.
Update: “A slippery slope to socialism.” Jeb Hensarling on the floor of the House just a bit ago:

Tags: ,


«
»
  • http://Array Brady

    As with most issues the truth or solution is sometimes somewhere between the two sides of an issue. I believe this is one of those times. Congress artificially screwed up Fannie/Freddie and now they need to do something to prevent chaos, but I believe these companies, the market, and the American people needs to take some hit on this. There needs to be some correction in the market or these speculation addicted junkies will be right at it again and the next time it will be Armageddon.

  • Brady

    In the movie National Treasure, the Secret Service agent in charge told Nicholas Cage, star of the movie, “someone needs to go to jail”. Someone from Fannie/Freddie needs to go to jail, because what they did and allowed was criminal. If someone did go to jail, that would do much more to correct the ills of unethical financial and executive officers in our corporate world than all the regulations congress will pass.

  • http://SayAnythingBlog.com The_Whistler_ofnd

    They cooked the books at Fannie Mae. That’s not really in dispute.

    Why the inJustice department didn’t get involved as quickly as they did with Enron is beyond me. We only recently heard that there was an investigation.

    Justice takes time, but there’s no excuse for the Bush administration to have drug their feet.

  • tothestars2

    In 2004, republicans tried to reel in fannie and freddie but the arrogant ones denied their was a problem. The “media” is hiding this, but, go to Breitbart.com and watch the video on the “illegal bookkeeping hearing”.

  • http://www.willisms.com/ Zsa Zsa

    It seems like our financial institutions and Liberal Housing Politician Keepers are getting away with robbery to me. Knowing what we all know today we the people need to make sure this is not going to continue. Barney Frank and Chris Dodd appear to have dodged the bullet.

  • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MGT_cSi7Rs Charissa

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MGT_cSi7Rs

    This is the clip on illegal bookkeeping that was mentioned. It is unbelievable.

  • HG

    Justice takes time, but there’s no excuse for the Bush administration to have drug their feet.

    Exactly. The dems own much of the blame for the poor lending practices, but Bush did nothing about it ’til now, and what is being done don’t cut it.

  • HG

    I don’t think liberals understand what it means to “face” this problem. They think they are facing it. They are the only fair and equitable solution. Just ask them.

  • WOOFX

    Give us the money or
    Image and video hosting by TinyPic

    An opaque “plan” (AKA , Con),
    combined with the transparency
    of its desperation and the desires of
    every SOB to cut off a share
    before everything blows up , bodes no good
    for my interests.

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development