Remember When Obama Said That If We Passed The “Stimulus” Spending Spree Caterpillar Would Re-Hire?

This is what Obama said back in April:

President Barack Obama, campaigning to cast his economic plan in terms of real jobs and families, said Wednesday that machinery giant Caterpillar Inc. plans to rehire some of its laid-off workers if Congress approves a sweeping stimulus bill.
The president sought to offer a clear example of how the legislation would help as House and Senate negotiators reached for a final deal with the White House, trimming the emerging legislation down to below $800 billion. That’s still an enormous package, targeted at an economy that continues to bleed jobs.

Today, however, Caterpillar said that the employees they’ve laid off won’t ever be re-hired:

For the first time since it began massive layoffs eight months ago, Caterpillar Inc. on Friday acknowledged publicly that some of its workers now laid off will not be called back.
In a video message to workers on indefinite layoff, the second such quarterly message produced by the company, Sid Banwart, vice president for human services, said that is “the reality” of the situation at Caterpillar.
While many have believed that to be the case since indefinite layoffs began last December, it’s the first time an official with a rank of vice president or higher has said it publicly, acknowledged company spokesman Jim Dugan.

Meanwhile, today Obama has been saying that the economic recovery to date has been “measurably better than expected.”
The moral of the story? Obama just says whatever sounds good.

Tags: , ,


«
»
  • http://www.dartemis.net/blog/ sayanything-42

    Wow.

    Obama lies more, and less believably, than Bill Clinton did.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/america_is_back/#c397018 DINO

    Yes, presidential predictions. They’re so unreliable……

    Feb 5, 2007 Bush Budget Projects A Surplus by 2012

    The budget that President Bush will submit to Congress today shows the federal deficit falling in each of the next four years and would produce a $61 billion surplus in 2012, administration officials said.

    Democrats yesterday criticized the five-year budget plan as overly optimistic, and predicted that extending the tax cuts past their 2010 expiration date would dig the nation deeper into debt rather than produce a budget surplus.

    And they were right.

    July 11. 2007 Bush predicts U.S. budget deficit will shrink

    The White House report projected that the budget deficit would rise in 2008 to $258 billion but then decline again to reach surplus in 2012.

    Feb 5, 2008 $400 billion deficit to greet Bush’s successor

    The next president will inherit a deficit of about $400 billion, and maybe more. Unless the economy rebounds and revenue pours in, deficits will push the cumulative federal debt past $12 trillion in the next five years.

    Maybe more turns out to be quite the understatement!

    Unless the economy rebounds and revenue pours in

    Anybody remember what happened last fall?

  • http://www.dartemis.net/blog/ sayanything-42

    QueenZel,

    If only he wasn’t about to drag the rest of us over that precipice…

  • http://www.twitter.com/OneAndOnlyZel QueenZel

  • mudcat

    Obama will be in prison by christmas

  • jimmypop

    Yes, presidential predictions. They’re so unreliable……

    big difference. barry outright lied and cats leadership was too cowardly to call him on it.

  • Warm Mountain

    Moving main assembly and paint
    facilities to TX
    Texas got the jobs!

    Updated: Thursday, 18 Dec 2008, 6:33 PM CST
    Published : Thursday, 18 Dec 2008, 4:58 PM CST

    AUSTIN (AP) – Caterpillar Inc. is moving one of its main assembly and paint facilities to Texas and creating more than 1,400 jobs in the state of Texas. Gov. Rick Perry, Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst and Speaker Tom Craddick made the announcement Thursday. The construction equipment maker will get a state investment of $10 million from the Texas Enterprise Fund.

  • Dr. Lead Based Paint

    Obama just says whatever sounds good.

    Yep. That’s what Democrats do. And stupid Americans believe them.

  • mplsbob

    Maybe Obama could talk us into using Brando.You know its got electrolytes.

    Democrats are stupid.

  • Geoguy

    We Texans here in our “right to work” state are going to enjoy all those nice new Caterpillar jobs. In fact, I’m going to order one of those “Rachel Corrie model” DR9 Armored bulldozers from Caterpillar.
    It makes its own pancakes!

  • posh123

    you guys are right!

  • groetzinger

    Economy showing signs of getting better.Bobby talking of what the stimulus money did to create jobs.

  • http://www.rabidamerican.net/ Rabid American

    Anyone who commiserates with Obama has to understand that this is a methodology. Tell a HUGE, outright, LIE about you to get what he wants….. at our cost.

    You must not forget that the narcissist will say what ever they think the target wants to hear…. to gain adulation. A chameleon………

    Whenever the lie is exposed, it will our fault for misunderstanding his intention….. Bobby-Gibbs will get up off of his knees and let you know that you are too stupid to have understood his misspoken words……

    To truly understand “Da’ Preziment” one must only forget what the truth is, and forget that he is a narcissistic LIAR, and understand that your own mind cannot fathom his meaning……….

  • robert108

    Democrats yesterday criticized the five-year budget plan as overly optimistic, and predicted that extending the tax cuts past their 2010 expiration date would dig the nation deeper into debt rather than produce a budget surplus.

    And yet they believed Clinton’s ten year projection of a budget surplus, even though it was a complete fabrication. Nicew double standard.
    Of course, President Bush’s projection could not have anticipated Obama’s insane deficit spending, along with his growth-killing attacks on the private sector, where all wealth is created.

  • http://www.futbolker.com/ Andy

    I live in Ukraine but for every ukrainin man is interesting what happens with America.
    I think Obama is’nt good for USA. If Obama will stay the President of USA this country will loose the name of â„–1 in the world. Look at China with attentin….

  • http://www.rabidamerican.net/ Rabid American

    Andy…

    Some of us understand this all too well.

    Yet, until something impeachable is found we’re stuck with the prodigy of Ol’ Bob Mugabe and the Neo-Marxist Democrats in our Congress………

  • http://Verizon.com/ ND in MD

    “…If Obama will stay the President of USA this country will loose the name of â„–1 in the world…”

    I do believe that is Obama’s goal, to destroy the United States.

  • http://www.webwallpapers.net/ Wallpapers

    Obama is in a tough situation, yet people voted for him to try and fix the economy.

    Hopefully, in time, he will deliver what was promised.

  • http://www.fairytalebaby.com/ jason

    I remember a lot of crap this baffling idiot said, and where is it?

  • ellinas

    Remember When Obama Said That If We Passed The “Stimulus” Spending Spree Caterpillar Would Re-Hire?
    By Rob on August 1, 2009 at 03:52 pm

    Yes I remember. He was wrong. Do we hang him for being wrong? Or lynch him?

  • http://www.fairytalebaby.com/ jason

    WOW, all this obama talk has me fired up! To be honest, I cant stand the guy.

  • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Petraeus Last Best Hope

    Jason…that’s a sentiment spreading like wild fire from coast to coast

    call him THE ONE & DONE

  • robert108

    Yes I remember. He was wrong. Do we hang him for being wrong? Or lynch him?

    Is this an example of what you think is “civil debate”?

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/realitybasedbob/ realitybasedbob

    Big 180 living up to his hero Saul Alinsky’s rules:

    Is this an example of what you think is “civil debate”?

    Saul Alinsky:

    RULE 4: “Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.”

  • robert108

    Yes! I called no one a liar. I was polite.

    I didn’t either, contrary to your false statements. You just didn’t make an argument of any kind, which is essential for any sort of debate, and you are never civil.
    Since you’re always squealing for everyone else to debate civilly, why don’t you set an example?
    We’re waiting.

  • robert108

    LG: How many times have you called RG a liar on this blog, and worse? Do you believe your statements about him are “civil debate”?

  • ellinas

    Is this an example of what you think is “civil debate”?
    robert108 on August 2, 2009 at 01:41 pm

    Yes! I called no one a liar. I was polite.

  • robert108

    Big 180 living up to his hero Saul Alinsky’s rules:

    Wrong again, little parrot! It is you who are the “community organizer”(commie agitator) here, constantly using Alinsky’s techniques of lying smear against real Americans.
    As usual, you accuse others of doing what you are doing yourself.
    I’m just exposing you lefties for the lying hypocrites you are.
    The lying greek is always attacking real Americans for not having “civil debate”, when it is LG who constantly attacks, with no debate in sight. Neither of you can make a factual argument for any of your positions, and deserve to be exposed for lying hypocrites.
    Glad to be able to perform that community service.

  • ellinas

    Yes! I called no one a liar. I was polite.
    ellinas on August 2, 2009 at 01:58 pm

    I didn’t either, contrary to your false statements. You just didn’t make an argument of any kind, which is essential for any sort of debate, and you are never civil.
    Since you’re always squealing for everyone else to debate civilly, why don’t you set an example?
    We’re waiting.
    robert108 on August 2, 2009 at 02:04 pm

    Wrong again, little parrot! It is you who are the “community organizer”(commie agitator) here, constantly using Alinsky’s techniques of lying smear against real Americans.
    As usual, you accuse others of doing what you are doing yourself.
    I’m just exposing you lefties for the lying hypocrites you are.
    The lying greek is always attacking real Americans for not having “civil debate”, when it is Lying Greek who constantly attacks, with no debate in sight. Neither of you can make a factual argument for any of your positions, and deserve to be exposed for lying hypocrites.
    Glad to be able to perform that community service.
    robert108 on August 2, 2009 at 02:01 pm

    So first you tell us you dont call anyone a liar then you proceed to call everyone a liar.
    Nice going. You do tell the truth. NOT!!!!!

    It is a fact of life. You do not know how to be civil.
    Now stop lying.

  • robert108

    So first you tell us you dont call anyone a liar False! I didn’t call you a liar; I asked you a question. then you proceed to call everyone a liar. False! I don’t call “everyone” a liar; I just point out the lies that are told. If you don’t want to be called for your lies, quit lying.

    Nice try at changing the subject, but we’re still waiting for you to set an example of the “civil debate” you are always squealing about. We’re waiting.

    BTW, in your version of “civil debate”(yet to be seen from you), how do you deal with the situation when someone in the debate tells a lie?
    Calling out the lies is absolutely necessary to have an effective debate, if someone lies. You can’t get to the truth through lying; if you don’t know that.
    You have yet to prove that any lie I have pointed out is not a lie. Instead, you attack the messenger of truth.
    Lying “politely” is still not “civil debate”.

  • ellinas

    Nice try at changing the subject, but we’re still waiting for you to set an example of the “civil debate” you are always squealing about. We’re waiting.
    robert108 on August 2, 2009 at 03:16 pm

    And I am awaiting, without holding my breath, for you to point to a link where you have accepted the olive branch.

  • robert108

    And I am awaiting, without holding my breath, for you to point to a link where you have accepted the olive branch.

    Pure narcissistic gibberish! You have been squealing about “civil debate” for at least a week now, while making nasty attacks on other commenters for not doing it. I’m just exposing your lack of followthrough on your own cause.
    We’re waiting for you to lead the way on “civil debate”, or are you just being hypocritical?

    You have never offered an “olive branch” to anyone who exposes you on this blog, so it is simply silly for you to squawk about anyone accepting something you don’t offer.
    Instead, you hypocritically attack on the basis of no “civil debate”, while offering none of it yourself.
    Put up or shut up.

  • robert108

    BTW, if you have proof of anyone lying, it would be dishonest to not call them on it. Identifying lies when they happen is simple honesty. It would be impolite to pretend that a lie has not been told, when it has.

  • ellinas

    I’m just exposing you lefties for the lying hypocrites you are.
    The lying greek is always attacking real Americans for not having “civil debate”, when it is Lying Greek who constantly attacks, with no debate in sight. Neither of you can make a factual argument for any of your positions, and deserve to be exposed for lying hypocrites.
    Glad to be able to perform that community service.
    robert108 on August 2, 2009 at 02:01 pm

    So first you tell us you dont call anyone a liar False! I didn’t call you a liar; I asked you a question. then you proceed to call everyone a liar. False! I don’t call “everyone” a liar; I just point out the lies that are told. If you don’t want to be called for your lies, quit lying.
    robert108 on August 2, 2009 at 03:16 pm

    Reconcile the two above posts.
    I know who a liar is. You sir are a liar.

  • ellinas

    WARNING[/quote]

    Robert180 will call you a liar if he disagrees with you.
    He is a known verbal contortionist and defender of racists.

    WARNING

  • robert108

    Robert180 will call you a liar if he disagrees with you.
    He is a known verbal contortionist and defender of racists.

    So, you think “civil debate” is lying smear?
    I’m not surprised at your hypocrisy. You ask for something you are unable to provide.

    Reconcile the two above posts.

    You are obviously not intelligent enough to understand that no “reconciliation” is necessary.
    You’re just running your ugly mouth, since you have no idea what constitutes “civil debate”. In the time you have been on this blog, you have rarely, if ever, been civil to anyone who disagrees with you, and have never debated anything. At best, you shout slogans with no knowledge of their truth or meaning.

    Again, if you want “civil debate”, show us how it’s done, instead of trying to distract with nonsense attacks.
    Put up or shut up.

  • robert108

    Do you have anything on the topic of this thread, or just narcissistic distraction and self-serving blather?

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development