Reid Gets In Dig At Bush

Sigh…

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid on Tuesday urged President George W. Bush to “swagger” less and show more honesty and humility in his annual State of the Union speech to the nation next week.
In a speech at a liberal think tank, Reid gave a scathing assessment of the state of the nation under Bush and the Republican-controlled Congress.
“Republicans run good campaigns, but when it comes to actually governing and protecting Americans, they have a record of incompetence,” Reid told an audience at the Center for American Progress.
Reid’s speech was part of an effort to lay the groundwork for the November congressional election in which Democrats hope to win control of Congress or at least shrink the Republican majority.
Reid took aim at the president’s national security record, saying Bush “must unite the nation behind our most important goal — keeping our people and way of life safe. We need to hear honesty and humility from the commander in chief, not swagger from the campaigner-in-chief.”

Yeah, yeah, yeah. Republicans suck. Bush is a swaggering cowboy. Blah, blah, blah.
You know what would be nice to hear from Democrat leaders for a change? Some substantice criticism. Something other than invective and subtle insults. Seriously, what have the Democrats offered by way of solutions in Iraq? Accusations of “Bush lied?” Murtha’s cut-and-run? Please. Another Vietnam-esque retreat is not what this country needs, and reviewing the pre-war intelligence yet again isn’t going to help us deal with the realities we are facing in Iraq now.
Reid did make one good point:

Noting that the government will breach the $8.184 trillion debt limit next month, Reid accused Bush of “bankrupting our country and placing an enormous tax on our children and grandchildren, simply so he can hand out tax breaks to special interests and the wealthy.”
The White House has asked Congress to raise the credit limit by mid-February, saying the Treasury would have to take extraordinary measures to keep paying bills for everything from Social Security and national defense. Since 2002, Congress has raised the debt ceiling by $2.2 trillion.

He’s right. We’re spending too much money. Of course, Democrats accuse Republicans of wanting to starve the poor and keep America’s kids stupid every time they try to cut back so it isn’t like they’re offering a lot of alternatives.
This country would be better served if we had a strong opposition party that cared more about the issues facing the nation than simply getting back in power.

Tags:


«
»
  • http://Array Zsa Zsa

    Iraq is Americas war wheather we like it or not! … Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi and the rest of their gang are screaming anti Bush hate mongers! If President Bush said the troops are coming home they would still disagree with him! … That is what Nancy Pelosi’s office has issued! They are all about paying back the GOP for Clinton’s impeachment…They will not be satisfied until they impeach GW. In other words they are not going to work for the American people and our needs. They are going to play political antics! It is really too bad because there is alot of work needing to be done…

  • http://magyartruth.blogspot.com/ Chief RZ

    The President thoroughly outlined the plan for victory. The point of the article is that democrats only criticize, but offer no alternatives.

    The Global War On Terrorism is proceeding extremely well. Elections and a new, permanent government have just been completed in Iraq. Just today the Kurds and Sunni are cooperating. Amazing, since some were killing Kurds during Sadam’s Terror. The Kurds are intelligent people, able to discriminate between Tikritis and Sunnis. Some here in the USA are unable to do the same, or attempt to generalize too much and make simplistic arguments.

    The DoD did not overlook the “insurgent” problem, nor any other “problem”. A good read is: Every Man a Tiger with General Horner, 9th Air Force, CENTAF from Shaw AFB. It gives a good indication of the amount of planning going on continually without divulging any classified secrets.

  • http://www.ski-blog.com/ Justin B

    I love the fact that Harry Reid is cross referenced to “Friday’s Babe, Tara Reid”. I was actually hoping for more information on the Democrats plans for winning the war on terror and keeping us safe or for reforming government spending, but when I accidentally clicked on the first link, all I got was a nipple shot of Tara’s sister.

    For once the Democratic Strategy makes perfect sense. Don’t talk about real problems, but rahter dazzle the voters with celebrities and their nipples. Sounds like a Kerry Campaign rally to me. Where is Tim Robbins or Sean Penn? At least it wasn’t Susan Sarandon or Bab’s nipples.

    Thanks Rob for linking to the true Democratic plan for winning in 2006.

  • mcair

    Seriously, what have the Democrats offered by way of solutions in Iraq?

    This is a ridiulous statement.

    Iraq is Bush and the Republicans’ war, 100% Republican idea, 100% Republican responsbility in failure to plan for an insurgency, 100% Republican responsibility for having no other exit strategy than “victory” – and then avoiding a definition of “victory”.

    But you castigate the Democrats for not having a plan. That’s incredible, even for your usual mode of projection.

  • mcair

    Seriously, what have the Democrats offered by way of solutions in Iraq?

    This is a ridiulous statement.

    Iraq is Bush and the Republicans’ war, 100% Republican idea, 100% Republican responsbility in failure to plan for an insurgency, 100% Republican responsibility for having no other exit strategy than “victory” – and then avoiding a definition of “victory”.

    But you castigate the Democrats for not having a plan. That’s incredible, even for your usual mode of projection.

  • Zsa Zsa

    Just out of curiosity? I wonder if the Michael Moore, Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosis of the world would like for us to let Saddam go and let him go back to torturing, raping and killing innocent people?…

  • http://SayAnythingBlog.com The_Whistler_ofnd

    Speaking of Harry Reid we want the babes back! Maybe just posting links would be good enough!

  • Carrick

    McAir:

    This is a ridiulous statement.

    How typical. You pretend that all the problems in the world started in 2001.

    Iraq has been a problem for a long time before 2001.

    Now I’m expecting the usual progressive litany about how it’s not really Iraq that was the problem, and if the US wasn’t the Great Satan that it is, then Iraq and everybody else would get along peacefully.

    Barf.

  • http://www.ski-blog.com/ Justin B

    Iraq is Bush and the Republicans’ war, 100% Republican idea, 100% Republican responsbility in failure to plan for an insurgency, 100% Republican responsibility for having no other exit strategy than “victory” – and then avoiding a definition of “victory”.

    But you castigate the Democrats for not having a plan.

    Yep. All 93 of the Senators that voted to go to war were Republicans. Seems that the only branch of government McAir is familiar with is the executive. There are three other branches that share responsibility Asshat. But typical Democratic Applogists who run behind the blame bush mantra.

    If the Democrats didn’t support it, where was the opposition in 2001, 2002, and 2003 and why did Clinton bomb Iraq in 1998?

  • http://magyartruth.blogspot.com/ Chief RZ

    Zsa Zsa,
    They already have one of their stripe, Clark Clifford, the Defense secretary under Lyndon Johnson defending Sadam Hussein !!

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development