Rebutting The Minot Daily News
My hometown newspaper, the Minot Daily News, has issued an editorial endorsing Kent Conrad for the U.S. Senate. Personally, I support Dwight Grotberg’s candidacy, so I thought I’d take the time here on the blog to rebut the Minot Daily’s editorial opinion.
Kent Conrad has earned another term in the United States Senate.
Conrad’s politically inexperienced opponent, Republican Dwight Grotberg, simply cannot match the experience, knowledge and power that Conrad brings with him to the job.
Politically inexperienced? That’s the dumbest argument anyone could aim at a challenger candidate. All first-time political candidates are “politically inexperienced.” Using this logic, we’d never elect anyone but incumbents.
And inexperience isn’t necessarily a bad thing. I, for one, am tired of slick Washington D.C. politicians. I want a real North Dakotan. Someone who (unlike Conrad) actually lives here in North Dakota. Dwight Grotberg is that guy.
Conrad, a Democrat, was first elected to the Senate in 1986. Since his arrival in Washington, D.C., he’s earned a reputation as one of the toughest deficit hawks in the Senate.
Deficit hawk? How on earth can Kent Conrad be a “deficit hawk” when the guy prides himself, and even campaigns on, the amount of federal money he brings to North Dakota? The guy is constantly talking about how North Dakota needs more subsidies, more disaster aid and more grants. I don’t know about the rest of you, but I’ve always thought that one of the things that causes deficits is too much spending. And Conrad is a spender. In fact, just this year the guy proposed $3+ billion in federal spending after he called the President’s proposed budget something only a “deficit lover” could love. Which is interesting. Conrad loves federal spending, but he also hates deficits. So what does that make him?
A tax hiker. And you can bet Kent Conrad will be joining the rest of the Democrats in voting for tax hikes should the Dems get control of Congress in November.
Conrad has worked his way up the seniority chain, and is the ranking Democrat on the Senate’s powerful Finance Committee. If the Democrats manage to gain control of the Senate, he’ll be the chairman of the committee, giving him even more power to help North Dakota.
So Kent Conrad will have a lot of seniority. So what? For one thing, I’m not convinced that he’s as powerful as he’s made out to be. For another thing, if Kent Conrad is so powerful in Washington D.C. then why, after over two decades in office, do our farmers still need emergency disaster aid nearly every single year? What has he done to fix that problem?
Next to nothing, as far as I can tell. But I think that’s because he doesn’t want to fix it. Keeping farmers as “victims” he can then help with billions in federal disaster aid is what helps keep Kent Conrad in office.
Grotberg is a native North Dakotan who farms near Wimbledon. This is his first campaign for political office. We have nothing against Grotberg. In fact, we don’t know him very well – and neither does the rest of North Dakota, which is his biggest obstacle in this race. Win or lose, we hope he stays involved in state issues in the future.
They don’t know Grotberg very well? Aren’t these people supposed to be reporters? I mean, if a guy is running for the Senate wouldn’t it behoove the reporters of the state’s fourth largest newspaper to, you know, do some reporter-work and find out who the guy is and what he’s about? They say that the rest of North Dakota doesn’t know who Grotberg is. Well, whose fault is that? Why do they expect the people of North Dakota to know who he is if they themselves, the people whose job it is to inform the public, don’t know who he is?
And it would be nice if the Minot Daily pointed out why it’s such an “obstacle” for Grotberg to get his message out to North Dakotans. Kent Conrad started this election cycle with millions in campaign money in the bank, over 93% of which comes from out-of-state contributors. Grotberg, not being a slick politician with all sorts of fundraising connections in Washington D.C., is limited. If the Minot Daily News is going to complain about Grotberg not getting his message out to North Dakotans, they should at least point out that it’s hard for him because Conrad can drown him out with his millions from out of state contributors.
The endorsement ends with this:
Now is not the time to replace a sitting senator like Conrad – who has years of experience and political clout – with a political unknown. North Dakota –– and the rest of the nation – needs Kent Conrad’s strong voice and common sense approach to politics in the United States Senate. We believe Conrad is one of the best and most effective lawmakers in the Senate.
Why is now not the time to replace Conrad? Is it because there are still problems he needs to fix? If that’s true, then at what point does he get the blame for being in office for over two decades and not fixing those problems?
I’m tired of endorsements like this here in North Dakota. I mean, you could pretty much sum it up with “This guys been in office forever, so we may as well keep electing him because we don’t really know the other guy and we’re just not that interested in finding out who he is.”
What a disservice that attitude does to North Dakota citizens.













