Rathergate Was About More Than Dan Rather

CBS took all the hits for Dan Rather’s forged smear attempt at the President shortly before the election, but a couple of other players in that story have slipped through the cracks.

Media Monitor – In some unfinished business from the “Rathergate” scandal, we continue to come across people who don’t know that USA Today ran the same virtual story as CBS News, based on the same bogus Bush National Guard documents. CBS apologized and fired four. USA Today hasn’t apologized or fired anybody. It hopes the scandal will simply go away. But we won’t let it.

Read the whole thing.
Via INDC Journal where Bill also points out that The Boston Globe‘s participation in the scandal is worthy of some scrutiny as well. I agree, and would note that during the Rathergate media circus there was one issue I felt was worthy of more coverage was that the Globe‘s coverage of the Bush AWOL story was headed up by a man named Walter V. Robinson, who was found guilty of libel against John R. Lakian, a Republican up for the party’s Presidential nomination in 1982.
The Globe is often credited with “breaking” the Bush AWOL story and was heavily involved in the Killian memos story that was at the heart of the Rathergate controversy, yet their news team responsible for this coverage was being lead by a man with a history of libel against Republican candidates.
If that’s not worthy of scrutiny, I don’t know what is.
Here are some of my previous posts about The Globe‘s coverage of Rathergate:
Checkered Past
The Media Is Trying To Close The Door

Tags:


«
»
  • http://Array Jadegold

    Not true, Rob. Who to believe? You, who won’t serve or people like COL Lechliter, MGEN Weaver (fmr Director of the Air National Guard), COL Silliman, Lawrence Korb (Asst Sec Def for Manpower), COL Currie, Eugene Fidell (military law expert)?

    Hmmmmmm.

    “The fact that the ANG chose not to penalize him is irrelevant.”

    As Lawrence Korb put it:

    ”If I cheat on my income tax and don’t get caught, I’m still cheating on my income tax,”

  • Jadegold

    Rob, I realize you’ve never served, so let me explain a few things to you. When you’re in the military–active duty or reserves–you compile a service record. Mine is about 4-5 inches thick.

    From this service record, it can easily be determined exactly when and where you served, what your billet (position) was, what ranks, awards, commendations you earned, what schools or training you received, the results of FITREPs (evaluations), results of physicals and medical attention you received, your pay records, etc. IOW, it’s a detailed log of your service.

    We have Bush’s service records and it doesn’t match up with the requirements of his commitment.

    BTW, everyone who has ever served in the military has had their records ‘analyzed’ by people who were not party to their situation. After all, that’s exactly how things like retirement and other post-service benefits are determined.

    “faced active duty as a punishment?”

    What part of the word “penalty” don’t you understand?

  • Jadegold

    Lakian was up for the GOP party nomination for President. He was nominated. I misspoke when I referred to him as a nominee. I will fix that error.

    Not in 1982. Please review your history. Additionally, Lakian was never up for nomination for President; at least, not any more than you were.

    This does not change the fact that the charge of libel was upheld by a jury.

    And it does not change the fact Lakian had fabricated his resume.

    “Fake…but accurate.”

    Can’t refute the facts, can you?

  • Jadegold

    Again, untrue.

    If you read the articles I linked to, that’s just one small part. The larger part that’s been proven is that Bush didn’t accumulate the necessary points *and* he was given credit, or points, when he should not have received them.

    That Bush failed to honor his obligation is beyond dispute; what is in dispute is by how much Bush failed to meet his requirements to the NG.

  • Jadegold

    Citing INDC Journal is a bit like citing the Weekly World News; IOW, it’s long on hyperbole and very short on facts.

    Now, let’s take on Rob’s significant errors, shall we? John Lakian was never a GOP Presidential candidate in 1982. Since the presidential elections were held in 1980 and 1984 (both won by GOP idol Ronnie Reagan of tripling the National Debt fame), one might have expected Rob to pick up the error. Lakian was a GOP candidate for Governor of MA in 1982; a race he withdrew from because, well–he fabricated huge chunks of his resume. Lakian claimed he attended Harvard (he didn’t) and claimed he received a battlefield promotion (he did not).

    And while Walter Robinson was sued for libel by Lakian, the jury found his article was largely correct and refused to award damages. In fact, what the jury found defamatory was the following:

    A month ago, Lakian told The Globe that his investment management firm generated annual fees of between $ 4 million and $ 5 million. Pressed on that point this week, he conceded that those fees last year may have been under $ 3 million.”

    “Just last month, Lakian told The Globe that his firm, Fort Hill Investors Management Corp., earned fees of $ 4 million to $ 5 million a year.”

    “Lakian, pressed on that point this week after a Globe review of US Securities and Exchange Commission documents showed that his fee schedules were lower than he had stated, acknowledged that those figures were too high. He initially said a more correct range would be $ 2.5 million to $ 4 million. Later, he said that $ 2 million to $ 3.3 million ‘would be a better bet.’

    Back to AWOL Georgie’s story. The fact is that Killian’s personal secretary–while saying she did not type the questionable memos–maintains their content is accurate. That, Bush was the subject of NG concern that he wasn’t fulfilling his duties.

  • Jadegold

    That’s not true, Rob. Military personnel experts have examined Bush’s record and said otherwise.

    http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/articles/roane040908.htm

    A new examination of payroll records and other documents released by the White House earlier this year appear to confirm critics’ assertions that President George W. Bush failed to fulfill his duty to the Air National Guard during the Vietnam War.

    Most of the documents, which have been reviewed by U.S. News, and former military and Defense Department personnel, were released last February, when reporters raised new questions about Bush’s service during the Vietnam War.

    ………………..

    After a reporter cited the Air Force regulations from the period governing how many drills had to be attended, when drills could be made up and how many months of service could be missed, an exasperated Lloyd added that if the entire unit was judged by such standards, then “90 percent of the people in the Guard would not have made satisfactory participation.”

    But others who have reviewed the records insist that the rules must be followed. “A regulation is meant to be complied with. Period,” says Scott L. Silliman, a retired colonel who was legal counsel to U.S. Air Force commanders during the first Gulf War and now directs Duke Law School’s Center for Law, Ethics and National Security. “It is there to be fulfilled, and it is meant to apply to everyone, whether you are the son of a prominent politician, or me. There is no sometimes we have compliance and sometimes we don’t. That is a nonsensical statement and an insult to the Guard to suggest it.”

    And even LLoyd admits Bush reneged on his service:

    http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2004/09/08/bush_fell_short_on_duty_at_guard?mode=PF

    Even retired Lieutenant Colonel Albert C. Lloyd Jr., a former Texas Air National Guard personnel chief who vouched for Bush at the White House’s request in February, agreed that Bush walked away from his obligation to join a reserve unit in the Boston area when he moved to Cambridge in September 1973. By not joining a unit in Massachusetts, Lloyd said in an interview last month, Bush ”took a chance that he could be called up for active duty. But the war was winding down, and he probably knew that the Air Force was not enforcing the penalty.”

  • Jadegold

    Well, Rob, Bush brought a lot of this on himself. The fact is Bush’s story regarding his NG service became an issue because he kept changing his story. For instance, if you Bush’s autobiography–it contains several very identifiable errors and falsehoods regarding his TANG service.

    Additionally, Bush’s failure to honor his obligation to the NG isn’t new—it actually goes back to about 1980 when the RNC, under Bush the Smarter, tried to attack Lloyd Bentsen–whose son served in the same unit as AWOL George.

    There is seriously no speculation that AWOL George blew off his commitment to the NG.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    President Bush accumulated the required credits and left service with the permission of his commander.

    Upon leaving he did not sign up with a reserve unit as he was required to do and risked being penalized. The fact that the ANG chose not to penalize him is irrelevant.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    John Lakian was never a GOP Presidential candidate in 1982.

    Lakian was up for the GOP party nomination for President. He was nominated. I misspoke when I referred to him as a nominee. I will fix that error.

    And while Walter Robinson was sued for libel by Lakian, the jury found his article was largely correct and refused to award damages.

    This does not change the fact that the charge of libel was upheld by a jury. They found that Robinson lied in his reporting about Lakian. They did not award damages becuase the jury felt that the overall reporting was not that damaging to Lakian, but that’s irrelevant. This case establishes that Robinson is known to lie in his reporting, specifically when targeting Republicans.

    The fact is that Killian’s personal secretary—while saying she did not type the questionable memos—maintains their content is accurate.

    Fake…but accurate.

    Keep telling yourself that. Maybe it will make you feel better.

    Coincidentally, here’s some additional information about Mr. Robinson and how he likes to “flood the zone” with innuendo. I know you won’t read it because Robinson is on your side, but I offer it just in case.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    More after-the-fact analysis by people who were not party to the original situation.

    And your quote from Lloyd is silly. Bush didn’t join up with a reserve group in Mass. and faced active duty as a punishment? That’s not exactly in keeping with your calling him “AWOL” George.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    Bush earned enough credits in his previous years with the National Guard to complete his obligation. He left service early with permission from his superior officer.

    What part about this don’t you understand?

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    I wish I had some facts to refute. Instead we’ve got speculation and half-truths.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    That’s the only thing you can prove. That he didn’t sign up for a reserve group in Mass. and faced active duty.

    Color me underwhelmed.

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development