Rasmussen: 66% Of Americans Prefer Smaller Government That Does Less

I want to believe these results, but I’m withholding judgment until the public starts actually casting their ballots this way.

Sixty-six percent (66%) of U.S. voters prefer a smaller government with fewer services and lower taxes over a more active government with more services and higher taxes.
That’s the second highest finding of the year: In August at the height of the congressional town hall controversies over the health care plan, 70% felt that way.
A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that just 22% prefer a government with more services and higher taxes. Eleven percent (11%) aren’t sure which is best.
Eighty-eight percent (88%) of Republicans and 63% of voters not affiliated with either major party like a smaller government better. Democrats are more narrowly divided: 51% favor a smaller government, but 37% opt for a larger, more activist government.

Maybe we’re seeing a new shift in the American electorate. Maybe this is that awakened “sleeping giant.” I could be persuaded to believe that, but in the past most Americans are only nominally against big government spending. When you talk about spending (and the debts and deficits that spending creates) in general terms its hard to find a single American who isn’t in favor of less. But when you start talking about specific spending, well suddenly that’s a different matter.
Because, sadly, far too many in this country seem more than happy to receive “services” and other goodies from the government as long as someone else pays for them.

Tags: , ,


«
»
  • sayanything-7134

    I would like to see an honest debate on what is acceptable gov’t involvemnet.

  • MarkSD

    And still they won't listen. We may have to turn up the volume even more!

    It's not about what the people want anymore, it's all about more government contrtol.

  • AKA WOOF

    As long as the services THEY receive are not curtailed.

  • sayanything-287

    I heard last night that the Tea Party people are not going to try for a third party, it is too high a hill to climb; but, they will field candidates in the GOP that share their limited government, low debt beliefs and take over the GOP. That might be conservatives only answer!

  • sayanything-6955

    The Tea Party folks have a voice, the GOP will listen! Rubio?

  • sayanything-203

    At the moment, the loudest "voice" is that of Obama and the cacaphony of "progressive" statist shrews. The more Obama pontificates and the more the Left shrieks and squeals, the more the GOP is forced to listen to their constituents.

  • sayanything-13784

    The tea party needs to control the RNC so they don't field a candidate like that psycho woman in upstate new york again.

  • sayanything-106

    That is what the republican party should be like, not Liberal lite.

  • http://Array sayanything-3960

    Well I hope all of you join the Tea Party and not the Republicans.

    But you won't, because you are liars.

  • robert108

    It's already been done; read the Constitution.

  • sayanything-7134

    How about something simple, roads, bridges.

  • sayanything-7134

    and interpreted how many ways. Maybe that is why there is a Supreme Court

  • robert108

    The Constitution established the Supreme Court to make sure that all legislation was constitutional, not to make new law or to create new rights. Like wasteful social spending, it's out of control, due to not following the Constitution. No more debate is necessary, just following what the Constitution says, not what greedy politicians want it to say.

  • sayanything-7134

    I will play it your way. Does it specify the roads and bridges should be financed by fed. Gov't

  • robert108

    You know the answer, so why are you asking? Such a matter could be redecided, since it's not specified in the Constitution. BTW, is there a problem with roads and bridges, or are you just trying to distract?
    The real spending problem is with wasteful social spending at the federal level, which is definitely not authorized by the Constitution.

  • robert108

    There is no "Tea Party", and you know it. As it is, the Republican Party is the only one which can be brought back to American principles; the Dems are lost to communism and fascism.
    What we will see is that conservatives will again run the Republican Party, so we can save the country from Obamunism.

  • sayanything-7134

    Not trying to distract. I am trying to find out what the limits are that gov't should be involved in our lives. I honestly believe that the populace is not aware of how intertwined the gov't is with every day life. When you see a poll like the one quoted it is meaningless without the followup questions of where should gov't end and individual responsibility take over. Bridges and roads is and easy question but yet you can't answer it but with some parroting pap. So are you saying that gov't is not responsible for bridges and roads at any level, Local, state, federal ?

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development