Rally On The Mall Tea Party A Roaring Success

This evening I MC’d what I consider to be the largest protest event the state of North Dakota has ever seen. On the capitol mall in Bismarck we had easily over 1,000 people gathered, signs in hand, to protest big, intrusive government.
There will be more pictures coming out shortly, but here’s a quick one I snapped from the steps during Public Service Commissioner Kevin Cramer’s speech:

image

The energy and passion on display at this event was nothing short of amazing. And it wasn’t just coming from the stage. While we had a number of intelligent, passionate, fired-up people speaking at the event what really stole the show were the comments from the crowd. Veterans. Business owners. Laborers. School bus drivers. Plumbers. You name it, they were on hand to have their say. Some of the comments brought gales of laughter. Others were so poignant people were visibly choked up.
It was an emotional event, all the way around.
I’m not sure there are many moments in my life that I will ever be more proud of than having the opportunity to organize this event with some of my fellow conservatives, and having the honor to add my voice to theirs in an effort to get this country back on the right course.

Tags: , ,


«
»
  • Mark

    So what did you accomplish? What’s the game plan? Give the republicans the wheel and let them take the rest of your money and give it to Wall Street?

    You’re scared! I love it!

  • http://www.donkephant.net/ donkephant

    It was very well done, Rob. Here's the shots that I took: http://www.flickr.com/photos/thatedeguy/sets/7215…

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    Hey thanks! And nice to finally meet you!

    We're going to have more of these. Red River Valley next, I think. Grand Forks and Fargo in one fell swoop.

    "Rally in the Valley" has a nice ring to it, and neither town has had even one tea party yet.

  • JuneBug

    I hope one of the speakers didn't include the nut job Steve Cates, he set back the ideals of conservatism 50 years each time he comes up with yet another conspiracy theory about WSI. He is a joke (and I have interacted with Steve and feel comfortable stating this).

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    Uh, right. Steve Cates set back conservatism five decades by having an opinion about WSI.

    Steve was there, handing out copies of his excellent magazine
    The Dakota Beacon (which I write for), and is certainly no nut.

    And he was right about pretty much everything at WSI. It was a partisan hit-job set off by malcontents like Jim Long, who was canned after revelations of an affair with a subordinate (complete with favorable treatment like raises given to that employee) and accusations of racial discrimination.

    And, unlike you Junebug, Steve never lowers himself to accusing o

  • http://www.donkephant.net/ donkephant

    It was nice to finally meet you too, Rob. And you're wonderful family.

    I'll have to keep an eye out and see if I can't make it to the Fargo rally.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/america_is_back/#c397018 DINO

    So what did you accomplish? What's the game plan? Give the republicans the wheel and let them take the rest of your money and give it to Wall Street?

    Fools.

  • Kay

    I wish I could have met you Rob… We were sitting on the ground, to the left facing the steps/speakers' stand, etc… There just didn't seem to be enough time to run up there, but we sure heard you!!

    Also, I truly enjoyed hearing Kevin Cramer's speech….was really impressed.

  • http://www.donkephant.net/ donkephant

    Actually, Dino, it was refreshingly non-partisan. Every body got razzed equally.

  • http://insanereindeer.blogspot.com/ Kenny

    Actually, Dino, it was refreshingly non-partisan. Every body got razzed equally.

    Don't bother donkey. Dino is incapable of doing anything logical, except to blame Republicans, because he has an IQ of 60, well below the normal level for mental retardation.

  • Brent

    It's all political bullshit. Liberals (and Robert108)…

    Kenny, your signature is redundant.

  • Brent

    Dino brings up a good point. There is a lot to complain about, but until the elected members of the republican party govern as though America actually has two political parties, nothing will ever change.

  • robert108

    Looks like I have another little groupie who keeps trying to get my attention with adolescent lying smear.

  • http://Array robert108

    …until the elected members of the republican party govern as though America actually has two political parties…

    Wrong, little groupie! It's the Dems who want totalitarian, one Party rule; the communist Party.

  • conundrum

    Did you feel the presence of the jack booted thug, homeland security, keeping an eye out for Right WIng Conservative Terrorists?

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    No jack booted dhs agents in sight. The capitol security was on hand but did a great job. Of course they weren't really needed.

    There was supposed to be a counter protest but outside of one idiot who drove through the parking lot honking his horn there wasn't a counter protest that I saw.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    And yes it was a very non-partisan event. Both parties were razzed about equally. Obama got a lot of attention….and so did nort dakota republicans.

  • http://reaganiterepublicanresistance.blogspot.com/ Reaganite Republican

    It's about damn people people woke-up to this Bolshevik PT Barnum and his rotten, anti-American agenda. As Levin said "he's taken a wrecking-ball to this society"

    And Obama thinks everyone is as stupid as the people that voted for him. He makes the loosest, most general statements possible, to attempt to imply that Bush is responsible for all the rampant spending because it started under him.

    He lies and changes his story at-will on everything from his cabinet's ethics to whether or not he ever met with Blago to discuss his senate seat, meanwhile the press is occupied with stories on his puppy vetting process and how Barack likes to play basketball.

    Obama wants the state to be your mother and father- and it's his right to lie to you if he wishes… just like your parents when you were five. Government will be one you come to for money, ask permission when you want to think or speak, and who handles all your finances for you since of course you can't be trusted.

  • badlands4

    Was the news there Rob? KFYR didn't mention it at all, but the cbs out of Minot mentioned there would be one(it was either yesterday morning or the day before) however I don't know if they covered it.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/america_is_back/#c397018 DINO

    If it was non-partisan you would have had these ridiculous events when bush was spending us into this recession while allowing Wall Street to raid the Treasury.

    No one is scared. I don't care if this country dissolves, remember? Nothing would please me more than to see it bankrupt and split into pieces. "United" has never been applied more erroneously.

  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    If it was non-partisan you would have had these ridiculous events when bush was spending us into this recession while allowing Wall Street to raid the Treasury.

    If Bush had quadrupled the national debt in the first few months of his administration, we probably would have!

  • Kay

    Rob brings up a good point. This was NOT a republican event.. It was a conservative event. The Republicans got picked on plenty–Rob made some good points about Gov. Hoeven (very appropriate we were sitting and standing in his back yard…

  • pparets

    If it was non-partisan you would have had these ridiculous events…

    If its so ridiculous, Dino, then why does it bother you so much? Hmmm?

    Although I do agree with you – in part – about splitting up the country. I suggest that the army of "shovel ready" workers amassed by President Obama hie themselves to the west coast and begin at once to dislodge Portland from the continent.

    By doing so, you would have your own independent island nation and we would be rid of one of our less attractive urban ghettos replete with crime, violence, drugs, gangs, ignorance, welfare-addicts, dirt, disease and sexual deviants – your mayor, chief among them.

    Once independent, you could then fall upon one another in a battle to the death over food, shelter and little boys.

    Not only that, but real tax-payers would be spared the burden of providing further multi-millions of dollars in federal aid and grant money to your sleezy little town.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/realitybasedbob/ realitybasedbob

    What a turn out!

    There must be at least a quarter of a thousand people in that picture alone!

  • studakota

    Obama and his group don't hate America, they love what America has produced. They have come to believe what Liberal America has been teaching them these last sixty years, which is, if not for Whitey, they would be the instruments, and recipients, of the wealth of this Nation. The Blacks have been deluded into thinking that, had they been in charge, World War two would have been won far sooner and without the use of the A Bombs, for instance. Spike Lee has already produced a revisionist history of Iwo Jima. Simply put fourteen percent of our population feels they are entitled to what amounts to a free ride. This group, along with their friends, the Enviromentalists, would rather we all lived in unheated caves. They want to take from the producers, ninety five percent of which are of the Caucasian race, and distribute the produce to the "Accomplish Nothings" of our country or, as is obvious, the world. And yet, for stating these facts, one is labeled a racist. BTW, why no Black people at the Mall? You racists probably turned them away at the entrances, didn't you? Happy Fourth of July.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/america_is_back/#c397018 DINO

    If Bush had quadrupled the national debt in the first few months of his administration, we probably would have!

    See, that's why you people deserve the descriptive term "stem" though in this case "retard" might be more appropriate.

    Show me where Obama spent $33 trillion in 6 months (debt is $11 trillion now, quadrupling would necessitate adding at least $33 trillion). Bush, however, did spend us $6 trillion more into debt in good times, before the Fed had to start pumping trillions into the financial markets to keep them solvent.

    Yes, you people are some stupid stems.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/america_is_back/#c397018 DINO

    PP, without the liberal parts of the country most of you cretins would be living in some feudal hell and still shitting outdoors.

    You're savages who haven't got a clue what it means to be human.

  • http://www.donkephant.net/ donkephant

    without the liberal parts of the country most of you cretins would be living in some feudal hell and still shitting outdoors.

    But at least we would have the Freedom to do that. You're issue is that you believe that it was the liberal handouts that brought us out of the "fuedal hell". If you've ever done any studying of fuedal societies, you'd know that in a fuedal society, the people were required to give a majority of their earnings (or what they produced) to the local lord in exchange for protection and peace. If they didn't do that, they were thrown in a dungeon somewhere. In the end, they were taxed so heavily that they all depended on handouts from the lords and ladies in order to keep their families fed. Thus was born the first liberal outreach program.

    Don't try and feed me your bull****. And don't try and compare the free society that we strive for with the model liberal society. They don't jive.

  • Bat One

    You're savages who haven't got a clue what it means to be human.

    And you are a cowardly parasite who hasn't a clue what if means to be free.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/america_is_back/#c397018 DINO

    There has never been a culture, society, country, city, town, village or any assemblage of humans living together that has survived by an every-man-for-himself paradigm. People who insisted on pursuing that way of life were ostracized and cast out to be eaten by predators.

    The only reason you stems can afford to pretend to want such a culture is because you are spoiled by the historical work of the collective who has made it possible for you to become selfish and ignorant. Like toddlers who believe the world is their oyster and they get the pearl.

    Working together, cooperating for the greater good, is not "handouts". It's how civilized people behave. You, stems, are not meant for the civilized world.

  • pparets

    Dino misreads history and politics again…

    There has never been a culture, society, country, city, town, village or any assemblage of humans living together that has survived by an every-man-for-himself paradigm.

    No shit, Sherlock.

    If that's what you assume conservatism is, then you are far more stupid than even I thought.

    STD slug

  • http://www.donkephant.net/ donkephant

    spoiled by the historical work of the collective

    Did you just call the liberals Borg?

    Working together, cooperating for the greater good, is not "handouts". It's how civilized people behave.

    You're right, of course. Working together, cooperating for the greater good is not "handouts". But shouldn't I get the choice as to whether I want to work with your or cooperate with you? Where's the choice when the government taxes my money and then decides where it will have the "greatest good"? That's not civilized at all. That is Feudal…

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/america_is_back/#c397018 DINO

    If that's what you assume conservatism is, then you are far more stupid than even I thought.

    That's exactly what conservatism is. An ideology based on the never-ending search to justify selfishness and greed while supporting an aristocracy.

    But shouldn't I get the choice as to whether I want to work with your or cooperate with you? Where's the choice when the government taxes my money and then decides where it will have the "greatest good"?

    No, you want to live here, you live by the rules of those who run the show. Do you get to tell your boss what you will or won't do? You probably can't even do that with your wife.

    The people who make the decisions are democratically elected. Vote. I can't help it your guys fucked up the country so bad that we had to spend a ton (mostly before that asshole fratboy piece of shit left office) to keep things from crashing. That's why they LOST.

    For most of my life I paid taxes so conservatives who ruled could do what they wanted with it because my guys kept losing the elections. Of course they sent most of it to the rich, the corporate and Wall Street. They sent yours there too, you're just too stupid to see. Now your guys, after fucking up badly, are out of power and mine are in power. Time to pay up or try and unseat my guys. You people are just asshole sore losers.

    Good luck with that. Too bad your guys are criminals that should be in work camps (and would be if people like me were in power) and will have a hard time convincing people to give them back the wheel.

    You people wish it was like Honduras where the stupid cons in the military can just remove whoever they want. (Military people like many of the ex-military people here, are authoritarians who worship the status quo and the preservation of it- comes from being brainwashed and simple.)

  • http://www.donkephant.net/ donkephant

    to keep things from crashing

    Great! When are they gonna start doing something about it? Last I checked, it's only gotten worse since January.

    they LOST

    By "they" I'm going to assume you mean the republicans. And no, they didn't lose because of Bush (although he certainly didn't help much), they lost because they ran a moderate for a candidate.

    they sent most of it to the rich, the corporate and Wall Street

    And I suppose that you're a pauper? And you have no investments? You don't get to call the kettle black, Mr. Pot.

    Time to pay up or try and unseat my guys

    Oh, don't you worry. We'll all be paying up soon enough. And come 2010, you'll see some things start shifting.

    and would be if people like me were in power

    Perhaps you should move to somewhere that people like you are in power… Maybe Cuba? Or perhaps Venezuela. Or Iran? I can think of lots of places where the Elite go about talking equality while they tax the people to feed the government.

    comes from being brainwashed and simple.

    Underestimating your enemy is the surest way to lose.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/america_is_back/#c397018 DINO

    Last I checked, it's only gotten worse since January.

    Hey dumbshit, you can't turn around a failing small business in such a short time much less a government. He also has to deal with the fucking republicans undermining him, stopping him from doing what needs to be done. Many economists felt the stimulus should have been even larger but the fucking shitstain republicans simply want to see things get worse. They're evil and treasonous. They wouldn't even vote for that in the middle of a meltdown that they caused. I'd round them up for chain gangs.

    He's not an emperor. That you people even expect him to wave a magic wand and make 30 years of cumulative bad conservative economic policy go away instantly while your party does everything it can to stop him makes me hate conservative the most.

    they lost because they ran a moderate for a candidate.

    Speculative and incorrect. Why did they lose in 2006? They lost by a cumulative SEVEN MILLION VOTES then which is HUGE.

    Perhaps you should move to somewhere that people like you are in power

    Fuck off, pal. My guys ARE in power or as close as we're going to get in this shithole country. You move to one of your low tax, small government shithole countries. Bring plenty of money for security because the 40-60% of the people in those places living in poverty will kill you for the change in your fucking pockets.

    And come 2010, you'll see some things start shifting.

    What will be their platform? More tax cuts for the rich? Deregulation of the financial markets? More of the same policies that took us down? Wait and see how the democrats use the meltdown against the republicans. It'll be a fucking BLOODBATH. Your wet dreams of 1994 don't take into account the fact that your shitstains already HAD control and FUCKED UP BAD. There's no new ideas coming out of the filthy republicans, just old ones that FAILED.

    Underestimating your enemy is the surest way to lose.

    He's still got 3.5 years to create so much policy that you'll hate you'll go NUTS. Your hopes of further decline will backfire as people in pain vote for MORE socialism, not less. In a way I wanted McCain to win so we could have a much more violent backlash against conservatives. Things would have gotten FAR worse considering the indifference of conservatives to peoples' suffering. I'm thinking the street filled with poor people holding tire irons to use on rich Wall Street conservatives. I envisioned conservative churches as firewood for the newly poor. Yes, I am twisted but honest.

    It's almost a shame the pendulum swung without giving liberals their pound of flesh from conservatives. But I guess that what makes us better than the less civilized places.

  • jimmypop

    hey dinorob youve been in total control for almost three years….

  • http://forums.kikizo.com/ Eddie_the_Hated

    What a turn out!

    There must be at least a quarter of a thousand people in that picture alone!

    Half the population of North Dakota ain't too shabby…

    It sounded like it was really something Rob. Wish we had something like this in the area.

  • http://www.donkephant.net/ donkephant

    He also has to deal with the fucking republicans undermining him, stopping him from doing what needs to be done

    Must be more powerful than you're letting on to if they can do that when the dems have a 60 vote majority…

    make 30 years of cumulative bad conservative economic policy go away instantly

    30 years?!? Obviously, Clinton, Kennedy, et all were largely ineffective then? What makes you think Obama will be able to help the situation if they couldn't?

    Why did they lose in 2006

    I thought we were talking about presidential elections? Even so, a few local landslides does not make a national landslide. There are certain areas that are prone to blind voting that usually come out as overwhelming victories for each party, so you have to discount that somewhat.

    Bring plenty of money for security

    I won't need to bring any. The government won't be taking 30% of it anymore, so I'll have a surplus. You see, if you would cut the governmental apron strings and accept that people are capable of ethical, moral living without the government telling them to, then we wouldn't need all those unnecessary programs that you're so fond of.

    What will be their platform?

    How about "you thought we were bad, look what Obama did!"

    There's no new ideas coming out of the filthy republicans, just old ones that FAILED.

    Who said anything about the republicans? They aren't much better anymore. I think the swing will be more towards the unaffiliated or third parties.

    He's still got 3.5 years to create so much policy that you'll hate you'll go NUTS. Your hopes of further decline will backfire as people in pain vote for MORE socialism, not less. In a way I wanted McCain to win so we could have a much more violent backlash against conservatives. Things would have gotten FAR worse considering the indifference of conservatives to peoples' suffering. I'm thinking the street filled with poor people holding tire irons to use on rich Wall Street conservatives. I envisioned conservative churches as firewood for the newly poor. Yes, I am twisted but honest.

    You're right, they do tend to vote for more socialism. That's largely because the socialist left has done everything that they can to make them dependent upon it. And, really, do you want those weaklings that can't do anything for themselves and instead depend on the government to do it for them, on your side?

    It's not indifference. It's an expectation that they behave as adults and become independent. It's a recognition that the ones that won't help themselves can't be helped at any cost. But you folks keep sinking the money into them anyways. Making career welfare cases is all you've done.

    I'd love to see the left riot. I don't think they have it in them, however. Just don't have the determination for it. Well, that, and they've been trained to depend on the government for that. Perhaps you should ask Uncle Obama for a little military intervention for you. A couple of tanks ought to take care of wall st pretty quickly, don't you think?

  • AR-15

    DINO on July 3, 2009 at 05:18 pm
    "He also has to deal with the fucking republicans undermining him,"

    Huh?!!( pulling my hair out) The Dems have total control of everything right now you brain dead asshole. Exactly how the FUCK is B.O. getting undermined?

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/america_is_back/#c397018 DINO

    hey dinorob youve been in total control for almost three years….

    There was a one vote majority in the Senate and a republican president.

    You are a stupid stem.

    30 years?!?

    Yes, 30 years. For 30 years both parties pursued a conservative economic agenda. The Fed was run by a conservative since 87. The dems were pulled to the right because they people wanted that. The dems kept losing elections so went along with the republicans who controlled the country for most of the period since 1980. The people are to blame for being seduced by conservative. That's what makes their suffering so enjoyable to me.

    The tea parties make me gleeful in that they're simply people with a bad case of buyer's remorse and I'm not talking Obama. They're pissed that they were taken in by the conservative message that they could "have it all" and no one had to pay for it. Now they're FUCKED. Their kids are FUCKED. And if they manage to force civic society (government) to wither with their calls for reduced government spending they'll lose even more. The country will begin to look like an ineffective, brutal, South American-style shithole which it's well on its way to becoming. The people will lose services, protections and opportunities that they took for granted and the top 10% will ride herd over the rest.

    That's how civilizations looked before liberalism brought equality and egalitarianism through policies that leveled the playing field. Teabaggers are flirting with disaster. You already hear complaints of public school cuts, even the cutting of fireworks displays on the 4th. FUCK EM. Let the people pay through the nose for private schools. Bring on that every-man-for-himself culture and let the brutality begin.

    The world under savage conservatism is an ugly place. Uglier even than the communist block countries. No one working together for the common good, just a land mass of people who happen to all live there. Fuck thy neighbor will rule the day. A nation of pimps and whores who don't do a thing without a financial incentive. That's how most cons live already.

    It's an expectation that they behave as adults and become independent.

    You stems all say that until you have an handicapped kid (Palin), find yourself in need, see your parents needing health care (you all take Medicare and unemployment and anything else you can take from the collective). Then you run for help.

    What is wrong with people who don't want to contribute to the greater good but gladly take from it?

    I don't think they have it in them, however.

    Go ask Stalin and Castro how the people can be whipped up to destroy the capitalists. But that won't happen here unless things get really bad. You think that a huge spike in poverty is going to help conservatives??
    ————

    The Dems have total control of everything right now you brain dead asshole.

    Our system is designed to give the minority some voice, that's how the republicans held up the stimulus and got it weakened. We didn't get 60 votes until yesterday. And, Obama has this need, as Clinton did, to reach across the aisle. I wouldn't. I wouldn't piss on a republican on fire much less try to work with one.

    Watch out. We're going to cram as much up your ass as the moderate democrats will allow. Watch and see how much the country is changed despite the roadblock set up by republicans. You want to cajole the democrats for not changing the world in 6 months? In 6 months they passed the stimulus (without republicans), passed the SCHIP legislation (without republicans), got cap n trade past the House, are working on a huge overhaul of healthcare that will probably include a publicly run option and will be bringing much more of that kind of legislation up in the next session.

    You should all get your passports and fucking leave. That's what you told us to do when you had the wheel and were driving us over a cliff.

    Oh, do enjoy watching your home values drop or remain stagnant for the next 10-15 years. When you look at your 401k statements, remember who you voted for that promised you great things with your "individual" account that their deregulation fucked you out of. Who needs pensions or unions they said. It's better to be radically individual because you're smarter than everybody else and you'll do better. Now 90% of you are FUCKED out of a good part of your retirement AND your biggest investment, your house. But you were "independent".

    Turning away from the civic and embracing the corporate was a big mistake. Radical individualism fucked you too.

  • Who Won?

    Here is the response I got when asking KFYR why they didn't cover the story.
    "We covered the earlier tea party in Bismarck and did not see a reason to cover the same event all over again. I'm sure there are going to be many "tea parties" in the future and we will not be covering all of them either. Repeating the same information over and over again is not news."
    Dick Heidt

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    "We covered the earlier tea party in Bismarck and did not see a reason to cover the same event all over again. I'm sure there are going to be many "tea parties" in the future and we will not be covering all of them either. Repeating the same information over and over again is not news."

    With that logic, they wouldn't cover the Republican or Democrat conventions. Or the state basketball championships. Or the World Series. Or the Super Bowl.

    Why not just be honest about it? They didn't cover the tea parties because they're a bunch of liberals and they're too scared to give this movement any attention.

    This is called "whistling by the graveyard."

  • pparets

    Exactly, Rob!! How many repetitive, no-news-there stories have they aired on Obama, Gov. Sanford, Sotomayor, Michael Jackson and on-and-on…

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/realitybasedbob/ realitybasedbob

    Darn those privately owned conglomerates for giving us stuff they think will increase their listenership/readership/viewer ratings and thereby increase their profits from advertising!

    Is that anyway to run a free market?

    Harrumph

  • pparets

    None-the-less, highly suspicious, lying, lefty moron.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/realitybasedbob/ realitybasedbob

    It's all about the Benjamin's you kowtowing slave to whatever your gop overlords demand.

  • robert108

    Little parrot: Any facts to back up your claims? Leftie newspapers and news stations are losing readers and viewers due to their unbalanced coverage, and they're not responding to market forces, while Fox is increasing its viewer numbers. The NYT continues to be leftie biased, even though they are losing business big time. Do you even know what "market forces" are, little parrot?
    This kind of censorship is killing the left wing media.

  • Daffy

    Little parrot: Any facts to back up your claims? Leftie newspapers and news stations are losing readers and viewers due to their unbalanced coverage

    Are you some kind of retard? It's not because of unbalanced coverage, it's cause of the internet.

  • Bat One

    It's not because of unbalanced coverage, it's cause of the internet.

    But then that doesn't exactly explain Fox News phenomenal success, does it?

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/ likwidshoe

    DINO – Too bad your guys are criminals that should be in work camps (and would be if people like me were in power)…

    You'd be killed with a judicious quickness if you were in power.

    Not gonna happen anyways. You're a clown.

    Fuck thy neighbor will rule the day.

    With the Democrats and Obama in power, it already is.

    Now why don't you continue crying about others being "greedy" as you demand their wealth while crowing about the destruction of the country that you attribute to others. You're a broken hateful record.

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development