Home Mobile Archives Reader Blogs Register Login

Monday, August 20, 2007

Post Columnist Michael Skube Blasts Bloggers

Journalists teeing off on bloggers for being a bunch if intemperate, factually challenged posers is nothing new.  But the latest in that genre of screeds penned by Michael Skube at The Washington Post seems a bit ill-timed given this recently put-together list of media blunders put together by Randall Hoven at The American Thinker.

After all, should we bloggers be listening to finger-wagging about “patient fact-finding” from a member of the media when professional reporters are responsible for photo captions like this one?  Or falling for a terrorist video that tried to pass a GI Joe doll off as a real hostage?

Or how about Dan Rather’s fraudulent hit-piece on the President’s national guard record?  Or The National Review’s Scott Beauchamp controversy?  Or even that same publication’s Stephen Glass problem?

Jayson Blair?  Eason Jordan?  The list goes on and on (you really should go down this list at the aforementioned American Thinker article).

Now I’m not saying that bloggers are perfect.  There are a lot of bloggers out there who are totally unprofessional and get things wrong, either through accident or purposeful misrepresentation.  But the recent trend in the media is one where bloggers routinely detect and correct errors made by journalists, who are either making blunders (from minor to major) or outright working to deceive their readers/viewers.

Comments

Avatar for flatandtreeless

I believe Skube is a journalism professor writing for the LA Times, not a Post columnist.

flatandtreeless on August 21, 2007 at 12:15 pm
Rob
Rob
17182 comments
Send a private message

You know, I figured that out while writing the post and actually made changes in the post to reflect that before publishing, but I never changed the title.

That’s what you get for working without an editor, I guess.


The war against illegal plunder has been fought since the beginning of the world. But how is… legal plunder to be identified? Quite simply. See if the law takes from some persons what belongs to them, and gives it to other persons to whom it does not belong. See if the law benefits one citizen at the expense of another by doing what the citizen himself cannot do without committing a crime. Then abolish this law without delay … If such a law is not abolished immediately it will spread, multiply and develop into a system.

Frédéric Bastiat, The Law

Rob’s recently listened-to songs:

robport.gif border=0

Rob on August 21, 2007 at 12:49 pm
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.