Home Mobile Archives Reader Blogs Register Login

Friday, April 29, 2005

“Please Close Our Military Base”

ND NEWS

Call it bizarro-North Dakota. In lieu of the upcoming base closures the city of Concord, CA is working overtime to see to it that their military base will be closed.


USA Today- This city of 124,000 northeast of San Francisco has taken the unusual step of asking the Defense Department to close a naval weapons station here. Its sprawling acres are far more valuable for development in the USA's priciest metropolitan housing market than the station's 100 civilian jobs, the city says.

That's hard to fathom given the hoopla in this state about fighting tooth and nail to keep our 3 bases around. As crazy as it sounds, it is a pretty wise decision on the part of the city. This rarely used base looks like it has a lot of potential of development and real estate. How ironic would it be if they kept theirs and we lost one of ours??

Comments

Avatar for JG

Rob: To the contrary, I don’t chime in on matters I know nothing about.

The problem with Joshua’s post is that he attempts to make a connection with the weapons depot in CA and the AFBs in ND.  It’s comparing apples and oranges.

The fact is not all military bases/facilities are equal or interchangeable.  The particular facility in CA is a WWII-era weapons depot that has long outlived its usefulness and could easily have its functions consolidated elsewhere.  The jobs that are there are largely DPW functions.

The bases in ND are a completely different matter.

JG on April 29, 2005 at 05:04 am
Rob
Rob
17408 comments
Send a private message

That doesn’t stop you from chiming in about things you don’t know anything about.

And, really, what is it here that Josh is wrong about?  He is essentially agreeing with the community in California.  I agree with him.  If developing the property the base sits on has a more positive economic impact than the jobs created by the base itself...why not push for the base being closed?  Seems like a win-win situation all the way around.  The military gets to close a base without a lot of hassle from the community and the community gets to develop new property.


When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

Rob’s recently listened-to songs:

robport.gif border=0

Rob on April 29, 2005 at 05:04 am
Avatar for JG

Really, Josh, this is yet another instance why you shouldn’t opine on matters you know nothing about.

JG on April 29, 2005 at 05:04 am
Avatar for Marc

I say give’em what they want… almost.

One week they see the trucks rolling out with military equipment.

The next week they see trucks rolling in hauling refinery equipment.

When their finished there point them in the direction of ND.

Marc on April 29, 2005 at 07:04 am
Avatar for likwidshoe

JG spit out, Rob: To the contrary, I don’t chime in on matters I know nothing about.

Hahaha!  That’s a good one.  Keep talking JG, someday you’ll say something intelligent.

likwidshoe on April 29, 2005 at 07:05 am
Avatar for WOOF

These deals always seem to wind up with somebodies friend getting a great deal on discount real estate.

WOOF on April 29, 2005 at 08:05 am
Avatar for JFH

I’m not saying that these conversions won’t happen, however, it’s just that the developers will be lucky to make a profit.

JFH on April 29, 2005 at 09:04 am
Avatar for JFH

WOOF - I used to think that too, but most developers don’t want to touch most military bases.  In Charleston, for example, former base land still sits mostly undeveloped even though the Naval base was closed 10 years ago.

The problem is that older bases (especially those before the military became environmentally conscience) are brown-field nightmares.  The only thing that usually replaces them is heavy industry which the nearby residents don’t want… so we get a stalemate.

JFH on April 29, 2005 at 09:05 am
Rob
Rob
17408 comments
Send a private message

The problem with Joshua’s post is that he attempts to make a connection with the weapons depot in CA and the AFBs in ND. It’s comparing apples and oranges.

Actually, no he wasn’t.  He was pointing out the irony of some communities pushing to have their military bases closed while others are fighting to keep them open.  He made no commentary on the relative missions of each base.

You really need to stop with these knee-jerk reactions.  I know you’re angry because Josh called you on some B.S. in an earlier post about military service.  There’s no reason to be angry at him because he is truthfully serving his country while you only lie about it.


When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

Rob’s recently listened-to songs:

robport.gif border=0

Rob on April 29, 2005 at 10:05 am
Avatar for marc

JFH: the Naval base was closed 10 years ago”

And it should be a good candidate for the “bases as refineries” idea floated by Bush.

But it may be the only one. The Long Beach naval shipyard has been converted to a container port. All the rest aren’t near the ocean, a requirement for the supply of crude oil.

Bush’s idea sounds good, but unfortunately is unworkable I believe.

marc on April 29, 2005 at 01:04 pm
Avatar for JG

Clue to JFH: The base is in Charleston. South Carolina. Dixie. Yahoo Central.  Bob Jones U.  Snakehandling on Sunday.

It’s that rare southern state that can’t even atone for its abysmal university system with a decent college football program.

JG on April 29, 2005 at 01:05 pm
Avatar for JFH

Heh, Jadegold tries and fails to get my goat, meanwhile, I am, or at least my wife is, laughing all the way to the bank… I’m sure JG knows (’cus he knows EVERYTHING) that Bob Jones U. is much closer to Charlotte, than Charleston, not that that proximity has anything to do with either city’s economy or for that matter even Greenville’s.

marc - while a refinery makes logical sense (port city, good rail and highway system to support a venture), It’s container traffic that will likely fill the void.  Again the problem is that the local residents don’t want industry though that’s the only sector that can afford to take on the brown field.

JFH on April 29, 2005 at 05:04 pm
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.