People Leaving Blue States Means More House Seats For Red States
After the 2010 census the seats in the House of Representatives will be re-apportioned among the various states by population. And as of right now that re-apportionment looks good for “red states” as people leave “blue states.”
The population shifts will be felt following the 2010 census, when the nation apportions the 435 seats in the House of Representatives, based on population. Texas stands to be the biggest winner, picking up as many as four seats, while Ohio could be the big loser, giving up as many as two seats, according to projections by Kim Brace of Election Data Services, a Virginia-based firm that crunches political numbers.
Other states projected to lose single seats are Illinois, Iowa, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, New Jersey, New York and Pennsylvania. Brace projects Arizona to add two seats, while Georgia, Nevada, South Carolina and Utah could add one each. Florida could add one or two seats, Brace said.
Of those states, four are solidly liberal-voting states. Four lean blue. Two are swing states, and one leans red.
So what does this mean? Two things, I think.
First, I think this is a commentary on big-government liberal policies. Generally, people are leaving states controlled by liberals. Meaning they’re leaving states with higher taxes and bigger government. They’re “voting with their feet” in what is one of the greatest traditions of our federalist democracy. If people don’t like the policies of one state they can move to another. We should remember this as the agents of big government seek to weaken the states and consolidate power at the federal level.
Second, I’m not sure that this blue state diaspora is necessarily a good thing for the cause of limited government in red states. A blue state exodus tends to turn red states purple. Many of these people fleeing state governments they don’t like will continue to vote for the same sort of leaders and policies in their new homes that made their old homes uninhabitable.
Liberals often continue to be liberals even as they flee the result of their own preferred policies.
(via Paul Ibrahim)



