Pelosi: Most Americans Won’t Mind More “Stimulus” Deficit Spending

Sigh…

Building the case for a brand new jobs-creation bill, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi says most Americans would not mind inflating the already-gaping deficit in exchange for more jobs.
The California Democrat said on a conference call Tuesday that Americans could “absorb” the hit to the federal budget, and she argued that their biggest complaint is not that the deficit is big — it’s that they’re not seeing any benefit in return for increasing the U.S. debt load.
Despite the $787 billion stimulus package passed in February, unemployment climbed to 10.2 percent in October. While critics cite the jobless rate as a sign that the stimulus has failed, Pelosi argues that the federal government is just not trying hard enough.
“We have to shed any weakness that anybody may have about not wanting to be confrontational on this subject for fear that we’d be labeled not sensitive to the deficit,” Pelosi said, in a recording posted by Think Progress.
“The American people have an anger about the growth of the deficit because they’re not getting anything for it.”

So, the massive deficits that have accelerated in growth since Democrats took office in 2006, and since Obama took office earlier this year, would be ok if Americans were getting something for all the spending?
That’s like saying it’s ok to max out your credit card as long as you got a nice new television for it. Forget that you’ll eventually have to pay that credit card balance. With interest.
Our children and grandchildren are staring down the barrel of a lifetime of punishing taxes to pay off these deficits. Our international creditors are considering an end to their financing of our deficits. But Nancy Pelosi?
All she can think of is more spending.

Tags: , ,


«
»
  • http://Array sayanything-2

    Really, who is writing this crap for her, there is no way she is thinking all this bizarreness up on her own.

  • sayanything-2

    That ain’t cynical, troop, that is a simple statement of the facts as they exist. Period.

  • sayanything-203

    While there might actually be an argument to be made for a package of REAL economic stimulus proposals, the kind that would encourage private sector job growth, its ludcrous to think that Obama, Pelosi and company are the ones to do so.

    After all, under their watch, between the original Obama “stimulus” legislation and the misappropriation of TARP funds, Obama, Pelosi, and the Dems have already put the American taxpayer on the hook for roughly $1 trillion we don’t have, while driving the unemployment rate over 25% higher than they said it would be without their so-called “stimulus.” The only jobs that have been created are more economically unproductive, non-profit government bureaucrats… exactly what the economy does NOT need.

    They’ve already demonstrated, with $1 trillion that we didn’t have, that they don’t understand how to create private sector jobs. Why would any rational individual to spend even more money?

  • sayanything-203

    Politicians will print, borrow or tax, more money hoping to create jobs.

    I disagree. I don’t believe Pelosi and company give a damn about creating jobs… much less productive, private sector jobs. Their only concerns are creating dependence on government and buying votes.

    And you thought you were the “cynical” one.

  • sayanything-7743

    And let us not forget, while you are paying the debt and interest on the TV, there will come a time the TV will need to be repaired or replaced, more money spent. What happens if the original debt is not retired before replacement or repair costs are encountered?

    That is why I cringe when I hear politicians says it is okay to go into debt and expect future generations to help fund infrastructure (roads, utilities, bridges, school buildings, etc) projects because future generations will use and benefit from them. It may be true future generations will benefit or use the improvements; however, with a design life of 20-25 years for most improvements, they may also have to repair or replace the improvements while still paying on the original debt. Some benefit, huh?

  • spartacus

    so much Botox that even her neurons are now paralyzed!

  • sayanything-6485

    What if you could print the money at home to pay off the TV loan or the repairs or just buy a new TV?

    That’s their thinking. Politicians will print, borrow or tax, more money hoping to create jobs.

    They think they have UNLIMITED SUPPLY of money… Which is absolutely TRUE!

    They can print as much as they want!

    One problem with the scenario above is that, if the TV manufacturer, know that you can print the money at home he will increase his price cause he would think you can pay any price that you are asked for a new TV set.

    And right now the whole world know that the US government is giving away money for anything and to anyone to prop up the economy.

    The only result will be hyperinflation later.

    And since you cannot print money at home, but the government can – products and services will continue to become more expensive in the future for all of us and we will need even more money to buy things (food, gas, utilities, everything)

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development