Home Mobile Archives Reader Blogs Register Login

Thursday, June 30, 2005

Pelosi Is A Nut

Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) held a press conference today. Usually, I don't write posts to go after their person instead of their content... but I have to make an exception in this case. She's nuts!

On Social Security:
Q Ms. Pelosi, do House Democrats or Senate Democrats plan to offer their own Social Security proposal, and if so, what might it say? And if not, why not?

Ms. Pelosi. Are we going to offer our own Social Security proposal? The big issue with Social Security is solvency. Nothing that the Republicans have done has addressed the issue of solvency. And solvency of course is affected by the budget deficits, as well as the Republicans continued raid on Social Security.

::rambles about coming together::

We have been, I think, very effective in saying our plan is to save Social Security, to stop privatization, to stop the raid on Social Security, and to strengthen solvency. That is our plan.


So what was your plan? Incoherently obstruct? Gotcha...

On the Supreme Court:


Q Could you talk about this decision[eminent domain, the decision of the Supreme Court the other day]? What you think of it?

Ms. Pelosi. It is a decision of the Supreme Court. If Congress wants to change it, it will require legislation of a level of a constitutional amendment. So this is almost as if God has spoken. It's an elementary discussion now. They have made the decision.
...
Ms. Pelosi. Again, without focusing on the actual decision, just to say that when you withhold funds from enforcing a decision of the Supreme Court you are, in fact, nullifying a decision of the Supreme Court. This is in violation of the respect for separation of church -- powers in our Constitution, church and state as well. Sometimes the Republicans have a problem with that as well. But forgive my digression.


Nancy equates the Supreme Court with God....... riiiight.... Why are you a member of Congress, exactly, if you wish to hand the power of gov't to the judicial branch exclusively? And what does the 1st amendment have to do with anything? Nuts...

Comments

Rob
Rob
17185 comments
Send a private message

Just like who’s father, John?

And what are you talking about?  Nobody here is whining about feedback…


The war against illegal plunder has been fought since the beginning of the world. But how is… legal plunder to be identified? Quite simply. See if the law takes from some persons what belongs to them, and gives it to other persons to whom it does not belong. See if the law benefits one citizen at the expense of another by doing what the citizen himself cannot do without committing a crime. Then abolish this law without delay … If such a law is not abolished immediately it will spread, multiply and develop into a system.

Frédéric Bastiat, The Law

Rob’s recently listened-to songs:

robport.gif border=0

Rob on June 30, 2005 at 08:06 pm
Avatar for Aaron

I was gonna ask the same question. I think John is confused

Aaron on June 30, 2005 at 08:07 pm
Rob
Rob
17185 comments
Send a private message

She’s asked a direction question about plans for Social Security...and she can’t answer.  Why?  Because their only plan is to obstruct.


The war against illegal plunder has been fought since the beginning of the world. But how is… legal plunder to be identified? Quite simply. See if the law takes from some persons what belongs to them, and gives it to other persons to whom it does not belong. See if the law benefits one citizen at the expense of another by doing what the citizen himself cannot do without committing a crime. Then abolish this law without delay … If such a law is not abolished immediately it will spread, multiply and develop into a system.

Frédéric Bastiat, The Law

Rob’s recently listened-to songs:

robport.gif border=0

Rob on June 30, 2005 at 08:07 pm
Avatar for John Adams

I am constantly amazed at how much conservatives whine.  You are just like your fahter.  You are both whiners and if you don’t get your own way, you continue to whine. Get over it.  Act like men and take your feedback like men instead of being such babies.

John Adams on June 30, 2005 at 08:07 pm
Avatar for Carl B.

I’m glad to see your site is up and running again rob...I’m very sorry to see you’re still an idiot. Are you really sincere with your critique or are you playing the right wing howard stern/limbaugh bla bla type role for the sake of easy argument on your forum? Are you hoping for some sort of recognition for your unquestioning heed to your party’s call? Do you make an attempt to seperate yourself from party politics and listen to what people are actually saying and doing? I can create complete cohereance in the above interview....but the bullshit game continues because everybody’s (yourself included) just calling everybody else nuts....saying they understand what the other person is saying so well as to say they’re not making any sense at all...it’s a working distraction from real political events on a global scale that you aren’t ready to admit you’re taking part in. Get a clue; you are a stereotypical little right wing cheerleader. Watch out for the bleeding heart leftwing liberals attacking the very foundation of everything this country is supposed to stand for! Those bleeding heart leftwing liberals are doing the exact same thing....Two sides of the same coin.

Carl B. on June 30, 2005 at 10:07 pm
Avatar for Carl B.

be a man? what is this...professional wrestling? You’re a funny read likwidshoe...glad to see you’re still here doing more damage to your own skewed philosophies than I ever could. GO TEAM!

Carl B. on June 30, 2005 at 11:08 pm
Avatar for likwidshoe

I’m glad to see your site is up and running again rob…I’m very sorry to see you’re still an idiot.

Hey Carl B. - take a hike you fucking piece of shit who never has anything worthwhile to say.  Be a man and hold up to your word.

likwidshoe on June 30, 2005 at 11:08 pm
Avatar for likwidshoe

You’re a funny read likwidshoe…glad to see you’re still here doing more damage to your own skewed philosophies than I ever could. GO TEAM!

Dude, are you dense? What are you talking about?  Wait, don’t answer. You said that you would never be back.  What,..are you lonely out there in the rest of the Internet?  Someone ban your incessant carping and you felt the need to slither back here?  You think that we actually like you or something?  What’s your disfunction?  Buzz off you boring, illiterate and insulting piece of shit.

likwidshoe on June 30, 2005 at 11:08 pm
Avatar for ICallMasICM

I think Nancy Pelosi is a fabulous leader for the limousine liberals. Your problem is you want her to support GOP initiatives. Not gonna happen. She’ll have to refrain from using the G- word though. That probably sent about half her constituents into toxic shock.

ICallMasICM on July 1, 2005 at 03:07 am
Avatar for Carrick

Timeline: 

1) Rob posts a piece illustrating the rhetorical ramblings of Nancy Pelosi.  Personally, I’m disappointed because it is a rather softball target to aim at.

2) John “Q” Adams calls us whiners because our fahter because we don’t get our way.  (AKA more incoherent ramblings.)

3) Rob & Aaron illuminate the puerility of Q’s comments.

4) Carl B. posts an incoherent rant, filled with personal attacks and other vile shit.

5) Likwidshoes points out (a bit unfairly) that Carl B never has nothing to say.  This is not true of course, because, for example, Carl has a lot to say (of the paranoid ramblings variety) about the Zionist 9/11 conspiracy.

6) Carl B. then blithely says that likwidshoe is doing more damage to his (likwidshoe) cause that Carl ever could.

etc.

Note that none of the liberals were actually able to address any of the problems with Nancy Pelosi’s logic stew.  All they have done is toss out personal attacks, and do everything they could to distract from the criticism of their Aunt in the Attic.

Thanks for the show Carl B and Q.  Once again you have augmented Nancy’s illustration of the intellectual bankruptcy of the DNC in a most excellent manner.

Carrick on July 1, 2005 at 04:07 am
Avatar for Aaron

I’m glad to see your site is up and running again rob…I’m very sorry to see you’re still an idiot.

First, the aboe post is mine.  So if you want to take issue, take issue with me, not Rob.

Second, what are you talking about?  I mean, that was a great little rant you had there, but seriously… is it too much to ask that the leader of the dems in the house can give coherent answers about her plans for SS and current issues (such as Cornyn’s fighting back at the SC)?

Aaron on July 1, 2005 at 04:07 am
Avatar for 2Hotel9

Wow Carl, you off your meds again? And John, What did any of that have to do with N. Pelosi?  My personal favorite from Nancy this week was her response to W’s address. The woman could not look at the camera because she was reading her prewritten"statement". Just 8 minutes after he was done. We are supposed to believe she wrote a 2 page response in less than 8 minutes. Listening to her blathering, I almost would believe that. Did she write it on one of Ted’s cocktail napkins? As for her"ideas" on SS, they are the same as they have been for 4 years, obstruction, obfuscaton, and reversing blame for the whole situation. More same old same old.

2Hotel9 on July 1, 2005 at 06:07 am
Avatar for Chad Evans

I don’t think my father has ever whined.  He’s been upset about certain things, but at least he knew what they were in order to form his own opinion.

Chad Evans on July 1, 2005 at 01:07 pm
Avatar for Seth Yantiss

Aaron, :::SHHHHHHH HISSSS::: I am your fahter ::::SHHHHHHH HISSSSS:::

LOL.

I love Pelosi.  A more apt representative of the Demoronic party parity, one could not hope for.  Yet, like Jacksonville’s Corine Brown… they keep getting elected… WHY?  For the love of God,… Why???

Seth Yantiss on July 1, 2005 at 01:08 pm
Avatar for Carl B.

hey! I can see myself again! derka derka derka

Carl B. on July 1, 2005 at 02:08 pm
Avatar for Carl B.

spammed out? where IS that damn apocalypse! for everybody’s better, I’m sure....

Carl B. on July 1, 2005 at 02:08 pm
Avatar for Aaron

Exactly, JO.  That’s why at some point the SC is going to have to be reigned in a bit by the other branches of gov’t.  One of these days, they WILL cross a line that will cause public outcry.

Aaron on July 4, 2005 at 10:08 am
Avatar for 2Hotel9

Aaron, I believe they have crossed that line. I hear people who have never uttered a single word about politics within my hearing before, speaking angrily about this decision. To several people in my local area I am known to be political and right of conservative, I have had 19 people in the last 6 days engage me in conversation, all concerning this ruling from SCOTUS. All wanting to discuss what can be done about it. These are not wildeyed backwoods scratch farmers. They are middle of the road, rural bussinessmen and farmers and petro-chem plant workers. Most are Union, and I mean capital U, and Dem. They see this as an assualt upon all they have ever worked for. They are scared this will lead to far worse. I tell them all the same thing, don’t like this?, tell your elected reps! The party is irrelevent, D,R,I, it is all important to hammer home to all of them that this is not what We the People want. And I tell them that Rhenquist is not going to retire, that game mule is going to die in the traces! Sending the whole process higgledypiggledy, like flushing all the toilets in the Pentagon at once. I also believe there will be a 3rd vacancy in the next 12 months. Or sooner.

2Hotel9 on July 4, 2005 at 11:08 am
Avatar for Mark K

How the hell is that in violation of church and state? She’s a raving idiot. I find it funny how they always pull the 1st admendment card when it suits them. CONSITIUTION 101 for Ms. Pelosi-
Seperation of chruch and state works to block any divison of gov’t from establishing a religion, like the CHURCH OF ENGLAND. Not to use whenever you’ve backed yourself into a corner.

Mark K on May 21, 2007 at 01:22 pm

I love it when people hit old threads! Nanny has said far stupider things in the last 2 years. I especially liked her Porky Pigg imitation back in Feb. I thought she was gonna go into a seizure on camera. Priceless.


Una Salus Victus Nullam Sperare Salutem

2Hotel9 on May 21, 2007 at 02:09 pm
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.