<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pelosi: Free Condoms And Food Stamps Better For Economy Than Tax Cuts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/pelosi_free_condoms_and_food_stamps_better_for_economy_than_tax_cuts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/pelosi_free_condoms_and_food_stamps_better_for_economy_than_tax_cuts/</link>
	<description>North Dakota&#039;s Most Popular And Influential Political Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 13:17:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Karl M.</title>
		<link>http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/pelosi_free_condoms_and_food_stamps_better_for_economy_than_tax_cuts/#comment-617938</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 17:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ed-dev.com/sab/entry/pelosi_free_condoms_and_food_stamps_better_for_economy_than_tax_cuts/#comment-617938</guid>
		<description>Why don&#039;t we just give it all to the government and then the government can make sure everyone&#039;s needs are taken care of? 
 
Karl M. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why don&#39;t we just give it all to the government and then the government can make sure everyone&#39;s needs are taken care of? </p>
<p>Karl M.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sayanything-4625</title>
		<link>http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/pelosi_free_condoms_and_food_stamps_better_for_economy_than_tax_cuts/#comment-75714</link>
		<dc:creator>sayanything-4625</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ed-dev.com/sab/entry/pelosi_free_condoms_and_food_stamps_better_for_economy_than_tax_cuts/#comment-75714</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The bush recession started a year ago. President Obama inherited a bush recession and Gawd forbid bush screwed things up so badly that we sink into a depression. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Who said that?  Bush is to blame for the recession.  Congress is to blame for the recession.  That doesn&#039;t negate my point.  The recession is all Democrats now.  They campaigned on fixing the problem.  They asked for ownership, it is now theirs.  Think of it this way, if you buy a bankrupt company and it still goes bankrupt it is your fault too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The bush recession started a year ago. President Obama inherited a bush recession and Gawd forbid bush screwed things up so badly that we sink into a depression. </p></blockquote>
<p>Who said that?  Bush is to blame for the recession.  Congress is to blame for the recession.  That doesn&#8217;t negate my point.  The recession is all Democrats now.  They campaigned on fixing the problem.  They asked for ownership, it is now theirs.  Think of it this way, if you buy a bankrupt company and it still goes bankrupt it is your fault too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeAdamson</title>
		<link>http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/pelosi_free_condoms_and_food_stamps_better_for_economy_than_tax_cuts/#comment-75715</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeAdamson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ed-dev.com/sab/entry/pelosi_free_condoms_and_food_stamps_better_for_economy_than_tax_cuts/#comment-75715</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure how stimulative free condoms are but I agree that government spending is likely to be more stimulative than tax cuts in the present environment. If I thought that tax cuts would be spent rather than saved then I&#039;d be less certain but there aren&#039;t many folks looking for ways to spend money these days. 

And for those who insist that government spending is counter productive by definition, I&#039;ll throw you a bone by hoping that the stimulus is aimed at projects more likely to return a benefit in the long run...that probably excludes free condoms. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure how stimulative free condoms are but I agree that government spending is likely to be more stimulative than tax cuts in the present environment. If I thought that tax cuts would be spent rather than saved then I&#8217;d be less certain but there aren&#8217;t many folks looking for ways to spend money these days. </p>
<p>And for those who insist that government spending is counter productive by definition, I&#8217;ll throw you a bone by hoping that the stimulus is aimed at projects more likely to return a benefit in the long run&#8230;that probably excludes free condoms. <img src='http://sayanythingblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/pelosi_free_condoms_and_food_stamps_better_for_economy_than_tax_cuts/#comment-75716</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ed-dev.com/sab/entry/pelosi_free_condoms_and_food_stamps_better_for_economy_than_tax_cuts/#comment-75716</guid>
		<description>Who is going to fund SS and Medicare? &lt;img src=&#039;http://i36.tinypic.com/2eoab2b.jpg&#039;&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who is going to fund SS and Medicare? <img src='http://i36.tinypic.com/2eoab2b.jpg'/></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/pelosi_free_condoms_and_food_stamps_better_for_economy_than_tax_cuts/#comment-75717</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ed-dev.com/sab/entry/pelosi_free_condoms_and_food_stamps_better_for_economy_than_tax_cuts/#comment-75717</guid>
		<description>If they give out condoms how will they justify funding abortions and as far as food stamps go I thought we were an obese society?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they give out condoms how will they justify funding abortions and as far as food stamps go I thought we were an obese society?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gene</title>
		<link>http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/pelosi_free_condoms_and_food_stamps_better_for_economy_than_tax_cuts/#comment-75718</link>
		<dc:creator>Gene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ed-dev.com/sab/entry/pelosi_free_condoms_and_food_stamps_better_for_economy_than_tax_cuts/#comment-75718</guid>
		<description>Here I am to save the day....

OK, Little economic history.

When GWB was elected the first time, &lt;a href=&#039;http://moneycentral.msn.com/investor/charts/chartdl.aspx?D4=1&amp;DD=1&amp;D5=0&amp;DCS=2&amp;MA0=0&amp;MA1=0&amp;CF=1&amp;showchartbt=Redraw+chart&amp;symbol;=$indu&amp;nocookie=1&amp;SZ=0&amp;CP=0&amp;PT=10&#039;&gt;the market was in a slide.&lt;/a&gt; That continued until the TAX CUTS took effect and the market recovered.  Therefore, according to your rules, the tanking of the market that went on for two years after Clinton ended, we should have properly called it the Clinton Recession.

Then who&#039;s name is on the resurgence.  The uptick. The boom we had up till October of 2007, up until the market was about 6000 points above where it is right now?

Can we call them the Boom Years under the Economic Leadership of GWB?  Goose and Gander here.

AND what if we have an uptick in the market, say a couple thousand points in the next few months.  Optimism returns.

Bush or Obama.  And then if it again tanks, who owns that?

Just want to get the rules straight.  It&#039;s a lot like B Ball.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here I am to save the day&#8230;.</p>
<p>OK, Little economic history.</p>
<p>When GWB was elected the first time, <a href='http://moneycentral.msn.com/investor/charts/chartdl.aspx?D4=1&amp;DD=1&amp;D5=0&amp;DCS=2&amp;MA0=0&amp;MA1=0&amp;CF=1&amp;showchartbt=Redraw+chart&amp;symbol;=$indu&amp;nocookie=1&amp;SZ=0&amp;CP=0&amp;PT=10'>the market was in a slide.</a> That continued until the TAX CUTS took effect and the market recovered.  Therefore, according to your rules, the tanking of the market that went on for two years after Clinton ended, we should have properly called it the Clinton Recession.</p>
<p>Then who&#8217;s name is on the resurgence.  The uptick. The boom we had up till October of 2007, up until the market was about 6000 points above where it is right now?</p>
<p>Can we call them the Boom Years under the Economic Leadership of GWB?  Goose and Gander here.</p>
<p>AND what if we have an uptick in the market, say a couple thousand points in the next few months.  Optimism returns.</p>
<p>Bush or Obama.  And then if it again tanks, who owns that?</p>
<p>Just want to get the rules straight.  It&#8217;s a lot like B Ball.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mickey</title>
		<link>http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/pelosi_free_condoms_and_food_stamps_better_for_economy_than_tax_cuts/#comment-75719</link>
		<dc:creator>Mickey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ed-dev.com/sab/entry/pelosi_free_condoms_and_food_stamps_better_for_economy_than_tax_cuts/#comment-75719</guid>
		<description>what good are tax cuts for people who don&#039;t work?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what good are tax cuts for people who don&#8217;t work?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sayanything-4625</title>
		<link>http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/pelosi_free_condoms_and_food_stamps_better_for_economy_than_tax_cuts/#comment-75720</link>
		<dc:creator>sayanything-4625</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ed-dev.com/sab/entry/pelosi_free_condoms_and_food_stamps_better_for_economy_than_tax_cuts/#comment-75720</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;We are to believe that because the Dems won the election, the recession is now â€˜theirs&#039; in any rhetorical manner you tarts can brandish? Heh. Are you making all the rules in this thread? Man its easy to sound bright when you make up bullshit rules to ply your bullshit logic. Try again, friend.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Hell Sparkie, you do this in every thread you are in.  I thought I would try it out.  Sub par logic.  I just said that since congress was an equal branch of the government then this recesssion is their too.  I then said that since Obama was a member of congress he is to blame for the recession too.  Finally I said that since he (as a congressman) and since he asked for the opportunity to fix the problem it is now his recession by reason that he helped cause it and he wants ownership for fixing it.  How is that sub par?  Because you want to blame Bush and only Bush?  Looks like someone else is making up the rules and brandishing some tarts.  Please point out were I am wrong.  This will be a good one, first explain why the Democrat congress gets a pass on the recession.  THEY control sending, both in amount and what programs receive funding.  They also regulate the banking system.  Please show me where Democrats tried to regulate  Freddie May and Fannie Mac.  I would love to see that.  You can&#039;t do that so I am again talking to a tree or maybe brandishing tarts and making up my own rules.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>We are to believe that because the Dems won the election, the recession is now â€˜theirs&#8217; in any rhetorical manner you tarts can brandish? Heh. Are you making all the rules in this thread? Man its easy to sound bright when you make up bullshit rules to ply your bullshit logic. Try again, friend.</p></blockquote>
<p>Hell Sparkie, you do this in every thread you are in.  I thought I would try it out.  Sub par logic.  I just said that since congress was an equal branch of the government then this recesssion is their too.  I then said that since Obama was a member of congress he is to blame for the recession too.  Finally I said that since he (as a congressman) and since he asked for the opportunity to fix the problem it is now his recession by reason that he helped cause it and he wants ownership for fixing it.  How is that sub par?  Because you want to blame Bush and only Bush?  Looks like someone else is making up the rules and brandishing some tarts.  Please point out were I am wrong.  This will be a good one, first explain why the Democrat congress gets a pass on the recession.  THEY control sending, both in amount and what programs receive funding.  They also regulate the banking system.  Please show me where Democrats tried to regulate  Freddie May and Fannie Mac.  I would love to see that.  You can&#8217;t do that so I am again talking to a tree or maybe brandishing tarts and making up my own rules.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rabid American</title>
		<link>http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/pelosi_free_condoms_and_food_stamps_better_for_economy_than_tax_cuts/#comment-75721</link>
		<dc:creator>Rabid American</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ed-dev.com/sab/entry/pelosi_free_condoms_and_food_stamps_better_for_economy_than_tax_cuts/#comment-75721</guid>
		<description>You&#039;d think that between all the gays and abortions there&#039;d less of these A$$HOLES than there appear to be.... 
       
&lt;img src=&#039;http://i43.tinypic.com/23vgl0j.jpg&#039;&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;d think that between all the gays and abortions there&#8217;d less of these A$$HOLES than there appear to be&#8230;. </p>
<p><img src='http://i43.tinypic.com/23vgl0j.jpg'/></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: docdave</title>
		<link>http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/pelosi_free_condoms_and_food_stamps_better_for_economy_than_tax_cuts/#comment-75722</link>
		<dc:creator>docdave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ed-dev.com/sab/entry/pelosi_free_condoms_and_food_stamps_better_for_economy_than_tax_cuts/#comment-75722</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The irony here is that when the bush recession finally kicks in in full&lt;/blockquote&gt;Bwahaha, boob, it&#039;s Obamas recession now.  Shouldn&#039;t be a problem for The One to solve.  Isn&#039;t that why you elected him, because he can solve problems in his sleep, leap tall buildings without breaking a sweat, etc.  Krips, he has been in office for a month and you are already trying to make excuses for him.  Four years down the road and you&#039;ll still be calling this economic downturn Bushs recession.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The irony here is that when the bush recession finally kicks in in full</p></blockquote>
<p>Bwahaha, boob, it&#8217;s Obamas recession now.  Shouldn&#8217;t be a problem for The One to solve.  Isn&#8217;t that why you elected him, because he can solve problems in his sleep, leap tall buildings without breaking a sweat, etc.  Krips, he has been in office for a month and you are already trying to make excuses for him.  Four years down the road and you&#8217;ll still be calling this economic downturn Bushs recession.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
