Pawlenty: The Only Thing Growing Faster Than The Fed Deficit Is Chris Matthews’ Man Crush On Obama

I wonder if Chris Matthews has seen this quote from Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty:

Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty offered up his own round of sharp-edged zingers in remarks to the College Republican National Committee Friday night, POLITICO’s Zack Abrahamson reports.
“The only thing growing faster than the federal government’s deficit is Chris Matthews’ man-crush on Barack Obama,” he said.

I can see Matthews now, face red with righteous indignation, stamping his little foot in anger. Why, I’ll bet he’d want to give Pawlenty such a pinch over that remark.
Heh.
Thanks to Weasel Zippers for this one, from whence I also stole borrowed the pic.

Tags:


«
»
  • http://Array Hannitized

    Here’s the gushing…and Obama bashing:

    HANNITY: Let me ask you this question. I’ve had the great honor of meeting you and interviewing you here. There haven’t been many interviews in this office. There have only been a couple. Tim Russert was, I think, the only real sit-down interview you ever did in this office.

    HANNITY: But when people come here, you give them a little bit of a tour. Now I’m not going to be back for four years. Barack Obama doesn’t like me. He’s mentioned me a couple of times, so — but there may be some people that have never had that experience.

    Because Barack is a big ol meanie, who doesn’t like Sean…so hell never get an invite.

    It certainly has nothing to do with Sean asinine and unfair attacks….right?

    Please.

  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    Oh poof, you are a pip!

    And were I a better dance, Gladys would have had me on stage with her and not just singing back up!

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/realitybasedbob/ realitybasedbob

    Thank a god that NO fox talker was/is in love with the previous president, because that would just be so unbalanced.

  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    well (sic) be waiting with baited (sic) breath Pilgrim.

    The term is “bated breath”, Stupidtized!
    However, knowing how close you live to the surf, Han-job, you may have baited breath! Heh.

    Just in case Pilgrim didn’t get your “challenge”, why don’t you stomp your little foot again, but this time, hold your breath until you turn blue! (It will make a nice contrast with the damp, yellow “boardies”!) Heh.

  • pparets

    if God put him in office…

    No problem.

    Just link us, cut & paste.

  • Pilgrim

    rbb:

    One small point – it’s press secretary’s job to sing the praises of the president. He isn’t paid to be non-partisan, he’s paid to support his boss and his policies.

    The press is supposed to be objective, not subjective.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/realitybasedbob/ realitybasedbob

    Poof:

    Wow! The lefty trolls are all off their meds this AM! Could this be an organized boycott of their psychiatric care?

    Poof again:

    Projection. It’s all the left has got!

    Oh poof, you are a pip!

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/realitybasedbob/ realitybasedbob

    P, I am interested in reading what you thought of bush’s press sec. interview.

    Care to comment?

  • http://ndgoon.blogspot.com/ goon

    It’s pathetic and true, MSNBC isn’t objective at all.

  • robert108

    Bat: Since facts and valid logic are not on their side, the poor lefties have no other choice, other than to abandon their corrupt ideology. Apparently, they are unable to do that, no matter how much harm it causes.

  • pparets

    Hannity used the words you are a man of great faith.

    Yes, he did, because that’s a fact in describing Bush.

    “Hannity Gushes over Bush/trashes Obama, after asking if God put him in the office…”

    No, he didn’t, but you put those words in his mouth to support your political bias.

    On the Other hand, Joe Scarborough and Spike Lee actually indulge in cult-like speculation that God caused the economic crisis to get Obama elected… and that’s apparently ok with you.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/realitybasedbob/ realitybasedbob

    thought

  • Mickey

    Considering Mathews outward hate for Palin and even Hillary and his obsession for both Clinton and Obama, I would guess that he is gay. Not that he can’t be a fart knocker but he is.

  • andophiroxia

    “The only thing growing faster than the federal government’s deficit is Chris Matthews’ man-crush on Barack Obama,” he said.

    The thrill up Matthew’s leg was a huge indicator.

  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    Wow! I made boob’s day with a typo. Now maybe he’ll take his meds?

  • Hannitized

    pp,

    Why? Because Hannity never used the word God or divine or almighty.

    You are entitled to your own opinion regarding what you think Hannity meant, but you are not entitled to put words in his mouth which he never said – and for all we actually know – never meant.

    Basic logic is based on fact, not on your opinionated bias.

    What relevance does Bush’s deep faith have to do with Sean Hannity’s question.

    And Bush’s response shows that it was easily understand, to anyone honest enough to admit it to themselves. not you..

    Helllooooooooo.

    In other words, you can’t cut & paste, link, or copy anything to support your accusation that

    Um….I did cut and paste, you just ignored it, or refuse to admit what you saw.

    Why?

    You are a hack.

  • Hannitized

    HANNITY: And Bill Clinton right here. And I was thinking about this very elite club that you’ve been a part of. And do you think there’s a certain destiny? Because I know you’re a man of deep faith. Is it a destiny

    Your inability to read context, is not my problem.

    Your becoming trite and irritating with this charade.

  • J.L.

    Boy, still no refuting Matthews is gay.

  • pparets

    Well, Hannitized, you claimed that Hannity asked…

    if God put him in office…

    If Hannity said that, why can’t you provide the quote, the link, the cut & paste?

    You can’t because he didn’t.

    You are entitled to your own opinion regarding what you think he meant, but you are not entitled to put words in his mouth and call it a fact.

    And yet you have no problem with Joe Scarborough and Spike Lee talking about how God caused the economic crisis to guarantee the election of President Obama.

    Why the double standard?

    Could it be this?

    Yes, I am arrogant

    Hannitize on 7 July 2009

  • pparets

    PP,
    Thanks for the debate, but there isn’t much of it. You are missing basic logic skills.

    In other words, you can’t cut & paste, link, or copy anything to support your accusation that

    “Hannity Gushes over Bush/trashes Obama, after asking if God put him in the office…”

    Why? Because Hannity never used the word God or divine or almighty.

    You are entitled to your own opinion regarding what you think Hannity meant, but you are not entitled to put words in his mouth which he never said – and for all we actually know – never meant.

    Basic logic is based on fact, not on your opinionated bias.

  • pparets

    Playing word games again PP?

    Destiny may be envisaged as fore-ordained by the Divine (for example, the Protestant concept of predestination) or unfolding through the exertions of human will (for example, in the American concept of Manifest Destiny).

    There’s the complete quote which you cherry-picked for your own convenience.

    Now, that’s what I call “word-games’.

  • pparets

    That it is even a possibility in Hannity’s mind shows almost a cult like following.

    Really? So now, Hannity not only said that God put Bush in office, but he’s a cultist as well. And you can PROVE that?

    Here’s a genuine example of cult-like adoration between Spike Lee and Joe Scarborough…

    Controversial filmmaker Spike Lee revealed he thought the economic difficulties that are presently plaguing the country were ordained by God to help get Barack Obama elected president. Lee appeared on MSNBC’s Jan. 10 “Morning Joe” and, in an interview with co-host Joe Scarborough, he made the revelation.

    “I’ve always believed, and it seems naive, that God’s had a hand in America,” Scarborough said. “And I get a real sense you feel that God has had a real hand in this.”

    “So many things have happened — all of a sudden, the economy goes south at that moment, and then McCain,” Lee replied. “There were so many things. It was almost a movement that had to be ordained, I think.”

    http://www.businessandmedia.org/articles/2009/20090119124854.aspx

    Notice that I didn’t have to make up false statements or put words in their mouths which they never said.

    So, let’s hear some more of your empty prattle about my ‘partisanship’ or ‘playing word-games’.

    What you did was wrong. You know it and I know it.

  • robert108

    r180, please feel free to comment on bush’s press secretary’s interview.

    Squawk! This thread is about Chris Matthews’ “man crush” on Obama.

    Or perhaps you would like to tell us how you came to vote for McCain again.

    Squawk! Look at that straw man over there! Keep squawking, little parrot!

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/realitybasedbob/ realitybasedbob

    Jesus did want Obama. That’s why he was elected.

    Just ask Gene when he shows up, he’ll tell ya.

  • Hannitized

    Hannity Gushes over Bush/trashes Obama, after asking if God put him in the office:

    http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,479918,00.html

    HANNITY: Let me ask you this question. I’ve had the great honor of meeting you and interviewing you here. There haven’t been many interviews in this office. There have only been a couple. Tim Russert was, I think, the only real sit-down interview you ever did in this office.

    HANNITY: But when people come here, you give them a little bit of a tour. Now I’m not going to be back for four years. Barack Obama doesn’t like me. He’s mentioned me a couple of times, so — but there may be some people that have never had that experience.

    Hannity asks about the super secret intelligence that would realllly reallly help the public understand why Bush is so great:

    HANNITY: What year will it be when — when the intelligence reports are finally released for historians? Maybe the things that you saw every day that we didn’t see?

    BUSH: I’m not sure when that will be. I think it’s 15 years after the presidency? You know, whatever.

    HANNITY: Do you expect people to have that different perspective, seeing what you saw?

    BUSH: Well, I’m going to write a book to try to help them understand it. And part of the book, part of the purpose of the book is to — is to set history straight.

  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    Why did Sean Hannity ask if it’s (sic) was devine (sic) destiny

    Change your sig to “Damn, I’m Stupid”, and you might be on to something, Hannitized!

  • Neiman

    rbb: Sorry, first of all even if FOX, which I deny as being true, did show some degree of biased reporting in favor of Bush-II; considering that CNN, ABC, CBS, certainly MSNBC/NBC and over 90% of all newspapers are openly liberal and express undying, limitless adoration for every utterance of Lord Obama and they have absolute hatred for everything about Bush-II during and after his eight years, by numbers alone Bush pales in comparison to favorable reporting compared to the Messiah.

    However, as a conservative I believe that FOX is fair and balanced in all their reporting, proven by the fact I and a huge number of conservatives get angry on a regular basis at FOX for their attempts to support Obama at the expense of the truth.

  • Hannitized

    HANNITY: And Bill Clinton right here. And I was thinking about this very elite club that you’ve been a part of. And do you think there’s a certain destiny? Because I know you’re a man of deep faith. Is it a destiny…

    That is all that is relevant to establish that the destiny he speaks of is related to God and divinity, otherwise, it makes no sense to remind Bush of his deep faith.

    You are going nowhere PP.

  • Hannitized

    Really? So now, Hannity not only said that God put Bush in office, but he’s a cultist as well. And you can PROVE that?

    That is not what I said….re-read my word choice.

    Here’s a genuine example of cult-like adoration between Spike Lee and Joe Scarborough…

    No, that is an example of someone just like those who believe God put GWB in office.

    THIS is a cult like following:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fxdt_f0hwUg&feature=related

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zEhaA9BU9as

    You are being disingenuous and you know it. Hannity used the words you are a man of great faith.

  • Hannitized

    Here you go sunshine……i recommend clicking on the link of the video.

    http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,479805,00.html

    FABULOUS JOURNEY

    I defy you to show any news host or commentator who showed the same level of out and out adulation for Bush that Mathhews et al has shown for the Annoited One.

    Hannity questions: “This is your walk everyday”.

    Hannity: “When you know you have a few days left, do you get emotional”?

    Did God Put Bush In Office:

    HANNITY: And Bill Clinton right here. And I was thinking about this very elite club that you’ve been a part of. And do you think there’s a certain destiny? Because I know you’re a man of deep faith. Is it a destiny…

  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    BTW, boob: Why don’t you crow as loudly over the typos you try to correct that aren’t, like the headline you stupidly misunderstood over on the forum?

    If you want to make a big deal out it, trollboy, try for a little consistency!

    Otherwise, take your meds and don’t bother the pretty nurses!

  • andophiroxia

    herpetized must be getting lessons from an infamous cut-and-paster here.

    Here’s the rest of it.

    BUSH: Yes.

    HANNITY: … or can you aspire to be president?

    BUSH: I think — first of all, I think that those who say — you know, I am very reluctant to say, of all the people in the world, I have been picked out by the Almighty. And the reason I’m reluctant to say that is, one, I don’t know. Secondly, far be it for me to put myself in the Almighty’s shoes or position.

    I mean, that — I have received a lot of comfort as a result of my faith, but never have I felt like I was any better than anybody else as a result of my faith, or I was, you know, “the” person as a result of my faith.

    Some — some believe that. I have real trouble, as I repeat, I have real trouble, you know, saying, “Well, I know what God was thinking,” because I don’t. And so, no, when you run for president, it’s a combination of, obviously, the experiences you’ve had in life, the principles you believe, and the desire to get something done.

    And we all come with different philosophies and different backgrounds. But I would say the common — the common — the common ground with all of the people who have been president is there has been a desire to get things done on behalf of the American people.

    And, you know, I — there’s a lot of talk about faith in politics. I always say one of my favorite Bible passages, when it comes to political figures, is I should not be taking a speck out of your eye when I have a log in my own.

    HANNITY: That’s good for everybody, though.

    BUSH: It really is important.

    HANNITY: I mean, it’s important. As you look in this office, and I look around this office, a lot of tough decisions were made in here. And you once told me that the job of the president is to make decisions.

    BUSH: Yes.

    HANNITY: What were some of the toughest moments you’ve had in this office?

    BUSH: Well, by far the toughest moment is to make the decision to put men and women of our military into combat.

    HANNITY: Did you make that decision here, do you remember?

    BUSH: Well, I’m sure — I’m confident — I know a lot of the processes was done here in the Oval. This is where I spend a lot of time. And a lot of the meetings that went into, you know, whether or not it was necessary to remove Saddam Hussein, or whether or not it was important to rid Afghanistan of the Taliban were discussed here and the decision.

    A decision, by the way, on an issue of this magnitude, takes a while to arrive at. In other words, before you put people in harm’s way, you want to listen to a lot of voices, at least I wanted to, and a lot of opinions, and to think through all of the different circumstances as best as you possibly can before you make the commitment.

    And so the toughest call would be — calls have been made, you know, here in the Oval, would be that of war — war, of sending our troops into war.

  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    boobs pathetic attempt at relevance (and an admission from him that Obama is America’s number one nutter) is here.

  • Hannitized

    Yes, he did, because that’s a fact in describing Bush.

    Yes, and because it relates to destiny….being in the white house as God pre-ordained.

    Bush knew what he meant. Are you saying Bush screwed up by answering the question wrong, like i understood it wrong?

    You are a dishonest hack….bordering on trash.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/realitybasedbob/ realitybasedbob

    Has the point been made that bush though God wanted him to be president?

  • ellinas

    realitybasedbob. You may offer a sick man life saving medicine, but it is up to him to medicate himself.

  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    Who let the cuckoo out of the closet?

    And why is he wearing damp, yellow “boardies”???

  • pparets

    Let’s try and cut through all your bullshit, Hannitized.

    You stated that Hannity asked…

    if God put him in office…

    You never qualified it with “in my opinion”, or “I am paraphrasing here”. You said he asked it.

    He didn’t. You lied.

  • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Petraeus Last Best Hope

    Get outta the house boob….geez, I’m getting cabin fever just thinkin’ about your 24/7 SAB existence. You’re wrong on the issues, you’re wrong on the facts, you’re wrong to waste your life blogging on things you know so very little about.

    Maybe if you went out and actually DID something, you could then write from the actual experience and not just cut & paste someone else’s experience.

  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    Wow! The lefty trolls are all off their meds this AM! Could this be an organized boycott of their psychiatric care?

  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    I’m glad you are the bestest spelling bea Poofy…..because you have to have something in life….after all.

    Wouldn’t bother me at all if the pin headed morons in damp, yellow stained “boardies” went back to the third grade and learned how to spell, or at least when to use an apostrophe!

  • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Petraeus Last Best Hope

    comparing Dr. Krauthammer to Chrissy Matthews is like comparing Albert Einstein to Pee Wee Herman

  • Pilgrim

    rbb,

    I defy you to show any news host or commentator who showed the same level of out and out adulation for Bush that Mathhews et al has shown for the Annoited One.

    Sqirm all you want….NBC is way, way in the tank for Obama.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/realitybasedbob/ realitybasedbob

    P, can I assume you did not watch the video?

  • Bat One

    When all else fails, attack the messenger.

    pparets,

    I disagree. Attacking the messenger seems to have become the first resort rather than the last for the self-styled “progressives.”

    Granted, its shrill, irrational, and hopelessly adolescent. But on the other hand, it does save them the trouble of using facts and logic to make their point.

  • robert108

    It’s fascinating how desperate the lying lefties are to spin away from the fact of Chrissy’s mancrush on Obama, and its implications for the integrity of his reportage.
    When you can’t handle the truth, spin and distract!

  • Hannitized

    Correct reasoning is that Hannity asked if it was destiny that brought GWB to the white house, of if one can aspire to it.

    We know that Hannity asked the question of destiny with Bush, before following up with “because your a man of deep faith”.

    Hannity: …And do you think there’s a certain destiny? Because I know you’re a man of deep faith. Is it a destiny…

    It is impossible for the conjunction to be anything other than relating to divinity.

    Basic logic demands that we take from Hannity’s question, that he was asking Bush if God had pre-ordained him to be in the White House………….

    ………..that is, after all why Bush answered the question accordingly.

    Nice try PP……..EPIC FAIL.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/realitybasedbob/ realitybasedbob

    And were I a better dance(sic), Gladys would have had me on stage with her and not just singing back up!

    OOOHHHHHHHhhh Em are I tiss….ooooohhhhhh

    poof, there is no way that you could be a better dance.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/realitybasedbob/ realitybasedbob

    boobs pathetic attempt at relevance

    Did it again, huh, Em are I tis?

  • sayanything-5371

    That picture is a riot! I can’t stop laughing. And it is so true. Brian Williams also seems to have a man crush on Obama. We don’t have a real press anymore, they are all propagandists for The One.

  • http://insanereindeer.blogspot.com/ Kenny

    Hannity Gushes over Bush/trashes Obama, after asking if God put him in the office:

    Hannity criticized Bush on 9/11:
    http://www.debatebothsides.com/showthread.php?t=8649

    Hannity criticized Bush on deficits, the DREAM act, and more.

    Fail.

  • Hannitized

    When all else fails,

    Be a partisan hack? Look, Bush answered the question as it was posed to him.

    Hannity brought up his faith to specifically tie into the divinity/destiny from our creator. Bush responded appropriately.

    You and I both know you are playing games.

    Sorry…t’aint workin.

  • Hannitized

    I’m a little confused here. Are you claiming that Hannity said it was God’s will, or that God that put Bush in Office?

    Why did Sean Hannity ask if it’s was devine destiny that put him in the White House? Bush wasn’t going to say yes, but she sure wanted to.

    Did you click on the links and read the transcript of the link I provided?

    When did that happen?

    Look at the link.

  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    Woof seems to know of what he speaks…

    Projection. It’s all the left has got! (Well, that and the whole fear thing!)

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/realitybasedbob/ realitybasedbob
  • http://www.rabidamerican.net/ Rabid American

    Woof seems to know of what he speaks…… ;-)

    Now go wash you hands…….

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/realitybasedbob/ realitybasedbob

    Mr. Hope, you must break out in hideous hives and bay at the moon when you start ta thinkin bout r180, whistler or poofs’ 24/7 SAB existence.

    Mr. Hope, would you care to comment on bush’s press sec’s interview?

  • pparets

    You are a dishonest hack….bordering on trash.

    When all else fails, attack the messenger.

  • Hannitized

    I’m glad you are the bestest spelling bea Poofy…..because you have to have something in life….after all.

    Well, you have Rob…..so….it’s not all bad. Right?

  • pparets

    But, Hannitized… Hannity [whom I personally detest] never asked Bush if the ‘Divine’ or “God’ or ‘Amighty’ put him in office. Yet you were so bold-faced as to say…

    Hannity Gushes over Bush/trashes Obama, after asking if God put him in the office

    Print the exact quote where Hannity says what you claim.

  • Hannitized

    PP,

    I know that you personally cling to your inability to be honest, but at least Bush didn’t.

    BUSH: I think — first of all, I think that those who say — you know, I am very reluctant to say, of all the people in the world, I have been picked out by the Almighty. And the reason I’m reluctant to say that is, one, I don’t know. Secondly, far be it for me to put myself in the Almighty’s shoes or position.

    I mean, that — I have received a lot of comfort as a result of my faith, but never have I felt like I was any better than anybody else as a result of my faith, or I was, you know, “the” person as a result of my faith.

    Some — some believe that. I have real trouble, as I repeat, I have real trouble, you know, saying, “Well, I know what God was thinking,” because I don’t. And so, no, when you run for president, it’s a combination of, obviously, the experiences you’ve had in life, the principles you believe, and the desire to get something done.

    I mean, if anyone from the left had asked Obama if he thinks the Almighty placed him in office….y’all would be going nuts.

    PP….your dishonestly knows no bounds.

  • Pilgrim

    comparing Dr. Krauthammer to Chrissy Matthews is like comparing Albert Einstein to Pee Wee Herman

    heh.

  • robert108

    r180, isn’t that an ad hominem attack you whine incessantly about?

    No “whining”, little parrot; just accurately describing your method of spreading your extreme far left wing propaganda. Ad hominem is all you do, so describing what you do is describing ad hominem. Duh.

    If you should ever tell the truth, I’ll agree with you.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/realitybasedbob/ realitybasedbob

    Yet another ad hominem attack on me, r180?

    Care to comment on bush’s press secretary’s interview?

    Or shall we review your voting comments and their irregularity?

    The more I investigate McCain, the more firmly I am convinced that I cannot vote for him, as a matter of principle. He’s a shit sandwich I just refuse to eat.

    By robert108 on June 22, 2008 at 03:50 pm

    I voted for him…

    robert108 on November 7, 2008 at 08:41 am

    Unlike you, little parrot, I type everything myself when I comment here…

    robert108 on May 26, 2009 at 08:56 am

  • Hannitized

    PP,

    You are really off your rocker today:

    Basic logic is based on fact, not on your opinionated bias.

    Show me where fact is mentioned in this training module, on basic logic!

    MODULE: Basic logic
    TUTORIAL L01: What is logic?

    L01.1 A preliminary definition

    The term “logic” came from the Greek word logos, which is sometimes translated as “sentence”, “discourse”, “reason”, “rule”, and “ratio”. Of course, these translations are not enough to help us understand the more specialized meaning of “logic” as it is used today.

    So what is logic? Briefly speaking, we might define logic as the study of the principles of correct reasoning. This is a rough definition, because how logic should be properly defined is actually quite a controversial matter. However, for the purpose of this tour, we thought it would be useful to give you at least some rough idea as to the subject matter that you will be studying. So this is what we shall try to do on this page.

    L01.2 Logic is not the psychology of reasoning

    One thing you should note about this definition is that logic is concerned with the principles of correct reasoning. Studying the correct principles of reasoning is not the same as studying the psychology of reasoning. Logic is the former discipline, and it tells us how we ought to reason if we want to reason correctly. Whether people actually follow these rules of correct reasoning is an empirical matter, something that is not the concern of logic.

    The psychology of reasoning, on the other hand, is an empirical science. It tells us about the actual reasoning habits of people, including their mistakes. A psychologist studying reasoning might be interested in how people’s ability to reason varies with age. But such empirical facts are of no concern to the logician.

    L01.3 The principles of logic

    So what are these principles of reasoning that are part of logic? There are many such principles, but the main (not the only) thing that we study in logic are principles governing the validity of arguments – whether certain conclusions follow from some given assumptions. For example, consider the following three arguments :

  • http://www.rabidamerican.net/ Rabid American

    The media complicity just confirms all that is wrong with the Leftoid Marxists in D.C.

    Instead of investigating the illegal activities of this new “regime“, they chose to satisfy themselves by having lunch at the crotch of the White House…………..

    The media is nothing more than a propaganda organ of the DNC………..

  • robert108

    Squawk! Look at that straw man over there! Squawk!
    Little parrot is really squawking up a storm this morning.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/realitybasedbob/ realitybasedbob

    r180, isn’t that an ad hominem attack you whine incessantly about?

    r180, please feel free to comment on bush’s press secretary’s interview.

    Or perhaps you would like to tell us how you came to vote for McCain again.

  • http://www.rabidamerican.net/ Rabid American

    What’s that on Chris’s chin?

    and you thought it was coincidence that their cologne smells the same….

  • robert108

    When his bullshit gets exposed for what it is, little parrot frantically tries to change the subject. Look at that straw man over there!

  • robert108

    The lying greek faggot sent me a personal message yesterday, and so continues to lie. I blocked it, to avoid yet another threat of homo sexual assault from him(?).

    LGF also discloses his(?) menu preferences.

    You keep lying, faggot, and you will keep getting smacked with the truth.

  • Hannitized

    You never qualified it with “in my opinion”, or “I am paraphrasing here”. You said he asked it.

    He didn’t. You lied.

    He asked it using different words. So what.

    You are making a distinction, without a difference.

    Epic fail.

  • Hannitized

    I don’t think Rbb is saying the goals should be moved, I think he is crediting you for a twofer.

    And by the way, that was not a “criticism” any more than saying, after a baseball game: “That play to first was nice, but they should have thrown to second for two outs”.

    Hannity might critcize Bush over his spending…but that doesn’t mean he doesn’t gush over him. Libs criticize Obama too. Fail…..epic…..fail.

  • Hannitized
    if God put him in office…

    If Hannity said that, why can’t you provide the quote, the link, the cut & paste?

    You can’t because he didn’t.

    Umm….how do I say this? It’s called…………paraphrasing. He asked it, I just spelled it out more directly.

    You are entitled to your own opinion regarding what you think he meant, but you are not entitled to put words in his mouth and call it a fact.

    There is no separating the question from the follow up “because your a man of deep faith”. It’s a fact. It’s not an opinion.

    If it wasn’t the question he asked, why did Bush answer it, in the way it was asked.

    Your games are petty.

    And yet you have no problem with Joe Scarborough and Spike Lee talking about how God caused the economic crisis to guarantee the election of President Obama.

    Why the double standard?

    A) Because Spike Lee is not the President of the USA. Nor is he a politician, or a talking head.

    B) Because it is news when a black director thinks the same type of silly things many liberals mocked conservatives for.

    Personally, I think Spike was doing his ole reverse psychology thing. You know, to show whites how it feels to say such stupid things.

    I use that same approach when trying to expand the mind of my opponents. It’s usually lost on them, because they have no idea what it is that they do.

  • http://insanereindeer.blogspot.com/ Kenny

    Kenny, thanks for linking to a site that states:

    Oh, so we’re moving the goal posts now?

    First it was “Hannity never criticized Bush…” Now in light of that (and yes I chose a deliberately liberal site), we change?

    I doubt the rest of the quotes, and find your change to them a weakness in your debate. Try again, Bob.

  • Pilgrim

    rbb:

    The commenters you mentioned were far more often critical of Bush administration actions and policies that any of the MSNBC clowns are of Obama.

    Their fawning adulation of Obama is an embarrassment to journalism.

  • pparets

    Hannity… I’m a little confused here. Are you claiming that Hannity said it was God’s will, or that God that put Bush in Office?

    When did that happen?

  • pparets

    Hahahaha, Hannity. I can glean context far better than you.

    I just don’t make up false quotes and put words in people’s mouths to satisfy my political bias.

    if God put him in office…

    If, as you claimed above, Hannity said this, you should have no problem proving it with a cut & paste or a link. Go ahead. We’re waiting.

  • Hannitized

    So the challenge is now to Pilgrim…..we are begging you to find anywhere in the MSM where they ask if Obama was put in the WH by God’s destiny.

    Huuuhmmm……..well be waiting with baited breath Pilgrim.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/realitybasedbob/ realitybasedbob

    Oh please P…Cavuto, Hanty, Krauthammer, Barnes..heck that whole 6pm cast. The babblers on the morning show…I mean come on now P, you can’t be serious, can you?

  • pparets

    “Hannity Gushes over Bush/trashes Obama, after asking if God put him in the office…”

    Print the exact quote where Hannity says what you claim.

    btw… Hannity never used the word “divine” either.

    Are you able to cut and paste where Hannity says what you claim he said?

  • andophiroxia

    Seems like every day is TROLLING day with these folk!

  • ellinas

    realitybasedbob. r180 is not worthy of the energy expanded on keystrokes when you engage her in serious debate. I no longer respond to her as she is a crazed old woman totally devoid of decency,truthfulness and humanity. If you haven’t noticed, there are only a few people here who take her seriously.
    PS: She loves to eat shit sandwiches

  • rog

    Bill Maher, you have got to be kidding!!! What a dipshit

  • Mickey

    Clinton as in Bill

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/realitybasedbob/ realitybasedbob

    Kenny, thanks for linking to a site that states:

    Bill Maher was on the show last night and he brought up the now-infamous seven-minute delay. Challenging Hannity to admit the obvious, Maher asked the ultra-conservative — whose reputation as a partisan hack is well deserved – to comment. Here’s the exchange:

    Here are a few Hanty lowlights:

    HANNITY: “Colin Powell just had a great piece that he had in the paper today. He was there [in Iraq]. He said things couldn’t have been better.” (9/19/03)

    FACT: “Iraq has come very far, but serious problems remain, starting with security. American commanders and troops told me of the many threats they face–from leftover loyalists who want to return Iraq to the dark days of Saddam, from criminals who were set loose on Iraqi society when Saddam emptied the jails and, increasingly, from outside terrorists who have come to Iraq to open a new front in their campaign against the civilized world.” (Colin Powell, 9/19/03)

    HANNITY: “And in northern Iraq today, this very day, al Qaeda is operating camps there, and they are attacking the Kurds in the north, and this has been well-documented and well chronicled. Now, if you’re going to go after al Qaeda in every aspect, and obviously they have the support of Saddam, or we’re not.” (12/9/02)

    FACT: David Kay was on the ground for months investigating the activities of Hussein’s regime. He concluded “But we simply did not find any evidence of extensive links with Al Qaeda, or for that matter any real links at all.” He called a speech where Cheney made the claim there was a link “evidence free.” (Boston Globe, 6/16/04)

    Again, thanks Kenny.

  • Stewartized

    And no one has yet refuted the topic of the origional post- that Chris Matthews would love to be Obama`s tail-gunner.

  • Hannitized

    But, Hannitized… Hannity [whom I personally detest] never asked Bush if the ‘Divine’ or “God’ or ‘Amighty’ put him in office.

    Well, you may require that those words be included in his sentence, but for others, who are honest, we know what it was he asked.

    Destiny is envisaged as foreordained by God, or through divinity. This is why Bush responded in the correct context of Hannity’s question.

    Playing word games again PP?

  • pparets

    Hannitized.. is this what you’re refering to?

    And I was thinking about this very elite club that you’ve been a part of. And do you think there’s a certain destiny? Because I know you’re a man of deep faith. Is it a destiny…

    … because if it is, it’s a far cry from your expanded claim…

    Hannity Gushes over Bush/trashes Obama, after asking if God put him in the office:

  • Hannitized

    PP,

    Thanks for the debate, but there isn’t much of it. You are missing basic logic skills.

    Hannity asked Bush a question, it could either be choice a), or choice b). Hannity mentioned that Bush is a man of deep faith.

    Why does Hannity need to pose the question if it is not a possibility? That it is even a possibility in Hannity’s mind shows almost a cult like following.

    Are you kidding me? I had said from the beginning, if any Lib asked Obama if he was placed in the white house by god, or other, you would be going nuts.

    Give me a break….you are realllllly showing your partisan side.

  • Hannitized

    I think he knows Sparkie….he just hates it when we are right. PP is more concerned about being the teacher, rather than the student.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/realitybasedbob/ realitybasedbob

    P, you’re in way deeper than I ever imagined.

    Good luck to you, my friend.

  • robert108

    Keep squawking out your straw men, little parrot! Squawk! Squawk! Squawk!

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/realitybasedbob/ realitybasedbob

    A statement is a lie if it’s not true… If you make a statement without knowing it’s true, and it isn’t true, you have lied.

    robert108 on December 14, 2008 at 12:48 pm

    fox TEEVEE morning bunglers

  • Hannitized

    The real reason the libtards are out of the woodwork on this is because…

    Anytime someone starts off their argument with: “The real reason my opponent does this”…..they have lost the argument.

    Who let the cuckoo out of the closet?

  • WOOFX

    Go gargle

    Now go wash you hands…….

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/sparkiearbuckle sayanything-81

    debate. yep.

    bwa ha ha ha ha.

  • WOOFX

    The Republican Lilliputians are sure that what they hear from their dark closet is an icky homo sex fest.
    Deeply they sniff the dirty underwear in their cramped basement closet .

  • http://suitepotato.blogspot.com/ sayanything-4808

    The real reason the libtards are out of the woodwork on this is because they are always this way when you point out the truth behind the delusion. The delusion is that media is objective and as long as people believe that, it is the information in background that people will be uncritical of and make part of their world construct. This is why the media was so effective at accidentally building a stand alone complex which resulted in Obama’s election.

    However, if the people stop believing the press to be objective and to actually have an angle of their own, it will be looked askance at and no longer uncritically absorbed.

    They know what I am saying is exactly true, but not consciously. Their instinct knows it and they sense a threat to that influence. Since the truth of the lack of objectivity is being told, and they know that to be the truth, they have only lies and deception to offer to defend against the inevitable unveiling in an attempt at emotional distraction.

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development