Patriot Corporations?

Barack Obama has idea for designating certain companies that adhere to a certain set of criteria as “Patriot Corporations.” These “Patriot Corporations” would receive tax advantages and preference on government contracts.
So what do you have to do to become a “Patriot Corporation?” You have to roll over for the unions, pay out the nose to provide your employees with health care, keep production costs high by not outsourcing parts of your business to areas with cheaper labor and pay what Obama and his fellow liberals define as “decent wages.”
In short, businesses must give up their autonomy on labor and production issues, thus making themselves less competitive both in the domestic and world markets, in order to receive a few tax and government contract scraps tossed down from the liberal table.
Businesses shouldn’t make decisions in order to win favor from politicians. Businesses should make decisions based on what is most profitable and what serves their customers the best.

Tags: ,


«
»
  • http://Array Bat One

    WTF would Obama or any Democrat know about any form of “Patriotism?” The concept is foreign to them.

    The very same thing could be said about Democrats’ knowledge (?) about corporations and the economy.

  • robert108

    Patriot corps would be absolutely fascist, Rob. You got that one right. But then, some of us are aware that the lefties are fascists.

  • Troy_Pineri

    Now here is a Patriot Act everyone can get behind. It’s called the Patriot Corporation of America Act and it rewards the companies that don’t screw their employees and weaken the country by moving the jobs to China and elsewhere.

    From The Nation

    Obviously this would only accelerate the movement of jobs to other nations because it would be too expensive to compete.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/realitybasedbob/ realitybasedbob
  • http://rotstar.blogspot.com/ LifeTrek

    You want to encourage companies to expand and keep workers in the US, cut the corporate tax rate.

    It never ceases to amaze me when I hear voters (just heard one on Fox) say that we need to stop companies from sending jobs overseas but these same voters rail against corporate tax cuts.

    Corporations are nothing but a pass through entity. They don’t actually own anything nor do they have any money of their own. It all belongs to the investors, often retirement plans of the workers.

    Every single corporate tax dollar comes out of increased employment and profits. One causes higher unemployment and the other slows investment activity which slows future employment. A loose loose for workers.
    DKK

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/entry/homosexuality_is_wrong_-_a_compendium move_zig

    Actually, Rob, communism is the most extreme form of socialism, where the State owns everything. No private business, no private capital and no private property.

    Correct.

    For instance under Hitler’s National Socialism, private manufacturers’ such as Krupp, M.A.N., Porsche could and did function as quasi-private entities, but there was little they could do outside the command of Albert Speer (Minister for Armaments)

    For the most part, the Soviets used State Factories (Zavodi) however, some would also keep their names, such as Mikoyan-Gurevich (MiG), Sukoi and Lavochkin.

    But you are right, that it is a major tenet of Marxism for the overthrow of the Bourgosie and seizure of all means of production.

  • robert108

    Actually Robert, Communism is a political system while socialism is an economic system.

    False. They are both integrated socio-economic-political systems that make the economy subservient to social goals, and which feature the political class as the ruling class.
    They are both based on essentially the same concept that perfection of humanity is possible, and that it should be accomplished at the expense of individual freedom. The only difference between them is the degree of subservience to the State.

  • 2Hotel9

    lestupid tried once again to divert attention away from its Party’s Socialist agenda. And once again failed abysmally.

    You think this Patriot Corps Act is something, check this out. It is being quietly pushed by Obama and a cadre of UN supporting Dems and Repubs and is an absolute nightmare for free citizens all over the world. The Tobin Tax on steroids.

  • Lestat

    Actually, Rob, communism is the most extreme form of socialism, where the State owns everything. No private business, no private capital and no private property.

    Actually Robert, Communism is a political system while socialism is an economic system. I don’t even know what the rest of this thread is about. I just like pointing out that you don’t know what the hell you are writing about.

  • skh.pcola

    WTF would Obama or any Democrat know about any form of “Patriotism?” The concept is foreign to them.

  • http://rotstar.blogspot.com/ LifeTrek

    Rob,
    Museum of Communism:

    Communist regimes rejected on principle the economic freedom to own property, engage in business, or choose one’s occupation, although sometimes these have been permitted on pragmatic grounds.
    http://www.gmu.edu/departments/economics/bcaplan/museum/comfaq.htm

    DKK

  • robert108

    I’ll agree that fascism is a form of socialism.

    They’re both leftie collectivism, with the individual subservient to the will of the State. It’s really more a matter of which group is taking away your individual freedom, from the perspective of the citizen.

  • robert108

    Actually, Rob, communism is the most extreme form of socialism, where the State owns everything. No private business, no private capital and no private property.

  • robert108

    Of course, it’s all for the “common good”.

  • http://rotstar.blogspot.com/ LifeTrek

    So, in other words stop running an actual business.

    One key of communism was control of all aspects of economics and business.

    Strange, if this had been proposed under Bush it would have been opposed as punishment for those who don’t, “tow the Neo-con agenda.”
    DKK

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    One key of communism was control of all aspects of economics and business.

    Actually, you’re thinking of fascism. In free markets, private entities own the businesses. In socialism, the government owns them. With fascism, which Mussolini described as a “third way” between socialism and free markets, the private sector owns the businesses but the government say show they’re run.

    So it’d be fair to say that this law is fascist in nature.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    I’ll agree that fascism is a form of socialism. My only point was to say that Obama’s economic plan here wasn’t communism (seize all means of production) but fascism (simply control the means of production).

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    Actually Robert, Communism is a political system while socialism is an economic system.

    Not all socialists are necessarily communists, but all communists are socialists.

    You cannot be communist without being a socialist, lestat, so maybe it’s best for you not to accuse others of not knowing what they’re talking about.

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development