Home ND News Mobile Forum Contact Reader Blogs Register Login

Friday, May 05, 2006


Pat Kennedy Going To Rehab

This is the public-figure-who-has-screwed-up's "get out of jail free card."

Rep. Patrick Kennedy will enter rehab for addiction to prescription pain medication Friday evening after a highly publicized car crash near the Capitol.

Kennedy, D-R.I., plans to seek treatment at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn.

The congressman was announcing his decision during a new conference Friday afternoon, then planned to travel to Minnesota later in the day.

Kennedy, who has struggled with addiction and depression, said he had checked into the Mayo Clinic over the Christmas holidays and returned to Congress "reinvigorated and healthy."

"Of course, in every recovery, each day has its ups and downs, but I have been strong, focused and productive since my return," Kennedy said in a statement obtained by The Associated Press.

The congressman said he became concerned about his condition after the Thursday morning car accident.

"I simply do not remember getting out of bed, being pulled over by the police, or being cited for three driving infractions," Kennedy said. "That's not how I want to live my life. And that's not how I want to represent the people of Rhode Island."


I still think he was drunk, and the Boston Herald is reporting that he was seen drinking Wed. evening in the Hawk & Dove bar on Capitol Hill. Also, the paperwork filled out by the officers who first responded to the incident (and were nearly hit by Kennedy's car) seems to indicate that they thought he was drunk.

Sadly, this will probably be the extent to which Kennedy is held responsible for his actions. Most of us would have gotten a breathalyzer at the scene of the accident then would have been put in jail. Kennedy gets let go, a few weeks at a cushy rehab center, then right back to work. And plus, because he's a Democrat the media will just let it all go. They'll carry water for him (they already are with in-depth analysis on prescription drugs and how they can make you look and feel like you're drunk) and then bury the story as soon as they can.

Pathetic.

Does this tick you off? Click here to email your elected representatives right here on Say Anything, or comment below.

Comments

Avatar for Bat One

By all means let the pathetic Mr. Kennedy… this one… do his rehab thing.  After he serves 30 days for DUI, and willful reckless driving.  This is the same self-serving drivel his father used after killing Mary Jo Kopeckne.  And it is every bit as much bullshit today as it was back then.

Bat One on May 5, 2006 at 12:22 pm
Avatar for Seth Yantiss

We do not need a Congress-person who gets addicted!  If you are so weak of character, you do not need to be representing the people. 

Seth Yantiss on May 5, 2006 at 12:54 pm
Avatar for FreeRepublicans.com

Why is it that the half-way decent Kennedy’s are the ones cursed to fateful ends? 

FreeRepublicans.com on May 5, 2006 at 01:01 pm
Avatar for FreeRepublicans.com

What I mean by that is, by the Teddy wing of the family’s standards, John and Bobby were saints.

FreeRepublicans.com on May 5, 2006 at 01:02 pm
Avatar for Seth Yantiss

What I mean by that is, by the Teddy wing of the family’s standards, John and Bobby were saints.

Again…  do you EVER know of what you speak?

John was NOT a "good" person. 

Seth Yantiss on May 5, 2006 at 01:04 pm
Avatar for Seth Yantiss

The MSM would have you think that John and Bobbie were nice, decent people.   They just didn’t live long enough to do more harm, and the history was written without all the negatives of the day.  In many ways they were worse than Teddy. 

John had the benefit, like Clinton, of a golden tongue.

Seth Yantiss on May 5, 2006 at 01:13 pm
Avatar for FreeRepublicans.com

John was NOT a "good" person.

Compared to Teddy he was "less worse." 

FreeRepublicans.com on May 5, 2006 at 01:19 pm
Avatar for Robert Perry

To flesh out what Seth and others note, JFK was well-known to be one who found himself in bed with a lot of different women, and was nearly court-martialed during WWII after bedding a German spy, according to Marvin Olasky’s "The American Leadership Tradition."  While President, the same source records him bedding Mob mistresses and (again) East German spyettes.

So morally speaking, the Kennedy family history is not one exactly to brag about.

Robert Perry on May 5, 2006 at 01:20 pm
Avatar for Zsa Zsa

Is it just me, OR does Phenegran seem like an odd drug to abuse? Isn’t that a suppository??? ...

Zsa Zsa on May 5, 2006 at 01:21 pm
Avatar for diane

We do not need a Congress-person who gets addicted!  If you are so weak of character, you do not need to be representing the people. 

I thought you NeoCONS liked your heros and leaders addicted…aka Blobbo Limbaugh.  Doesn’t he represent you as your voice in the media?  I guess even who should be addicted is partisan with you?

diane on May 5, 2006 at 01:22 pm

 "I guess even who should be addicted is partisan with you?"

Dhiane with Yoda, english did study.

Ken McCracken on May 5, 2006 at 01:31 pm
Avatar for Robert Perry

Zsa Zsa, he’s actually admitted painkillers, not whatever you mention.   Every time I’ve needed something stronger than aspirin (or my wife has), we’ve been warned about how addictive they are.  Never had a problem personally, but a lot of people do.

 

Robert Perry on May 5, 2006 at 01:32 pm
Avatar for diane

Hey, McCrackpot, what’s shakin’?

You criticize my grammar when there are SO many better targets here?  Of course, they’re NeoCONS, like yourself, so I wouldn’t expect anything different.

Nice that there’s nothing more you can try than hitting misspellings or grammatical ‘errors’.

 

diane on May 5, 2006 at 01:42 pm
Avatar for diane

I’ll bet Blobbo Limbaugh has downed alot more pills than the Kennedy heir.  Of course, that incredible pain explains it.  What a hero to golf his ‘brain’ off anyway, eh?

diane on May 5, 2006 at 01:44 pm

I’ll bet Blobbo Limbaugh has downed alot more pills than the Kennedy heir.  Of course, that incredible pain explains it.  What a hero to golf his ‘brain’ off anyway, eh?

Hate, hypocrisy, and more hate.

The diane diet.

likwidshoe on May 5, 2006 at 01:56 pm
Avatar for diane

Hate, hypocrisy, and more hate.

The diane diet.

 

likwidshoe on May 5, 2006 at 4:55 PM Out of the mouths of duplicitous babes and sucklings….
diane on May 5, 2006 at 02:06 pm

Sorry Dhiane, just picking on your syntax there.

Yes, this is a target-rich environment, it is just so much more fun to pick on you.

Ken McCracken on May 5, 2006 at 02:09 pm
Avatar for TwoHotel9

In the pill popping category I will always put my money on the Kennedy. Booze, drugs, unwilling women! It’s their forte’.

TwoHotel9 on May 5, 2006 at 02:10 pm

diane spews, Out of the mouths of duplicitous babes and sucklings….

Don’t presume to know me diane. I am not duplicitous, nor a babe, nor a suckling.

Do you ever actually have anything besides juvenile insults? Just asking, because I sure as hell don’t see it.

likwidshoe on May 5, 2006 at 02:12 pm
Avatar for ...

Don’t presume to know me diane. I am not duplicitous, nor a babe, nor a suckling.

I disagree with #1, agree with #2, don’t know about #3.

Do you ever actually have anything besides juvenile insults? Just asking, because I sure as hell don’t see it.

Oh sure you do.  You just don’t have good answers to my points in many threads, so you throw this crap out.  I have to work my way around the dhimmi’s, sluts, etc., to say anything at all.  I’ve made excellent points about Isreal breaking U.N. SC resolutions, for one, which were not answered in any meaningful way.

If you don’t like my style, then rein in your dogs here, or expect me to jump into the dogfight biting and scratching.

P.S.  Do you like my new poster name?  Inspired by another thread here.

..."the President has failed..." on May 5, 2006 at 02:15 pm

I disagree with #1, agree with #2, don’t know about #3.

Then put up or shut up. If you’re going to sit here and call me names, back up your juvenile antics with some reference. Or else I’m just going to conclude that you’re talking shit just for the sake of talking shit. Egh…what am I saying. That’s all you’ve done since you’ve gotten here.

Oh sure you do.  You just don’t have good answers to my points in many threads, so you throw this crap out.

Now you’re assuming. Why, you’re on a roll.

I have to work my way around the dhimmi’s, sluts, etc., to say anything at all.

Who the fuck cares? "He did it too mommmy!" Great defense. You don’t notice that you vehemently insult those who’ve never labelled you a dhimmi.

I’ve made excellent points about Isreal breaking U.N. SC resolutions, for one, which were not answered in any meaningful way.

Actually they were. You just refused delivery.

If you don’t like my style, then rein in your dogs here, or expect me to jump into the dogfight biting and scratching.

They’re not my dogs. I don’t control anybody here. And nice use of the, "but he did it too mommy" defense. Very mature.

P.S.  Do you like my new poster name?  Inspired by another thread here.

Hey,..if you want to advertise your maturity and put yourself on the same level as many on democracyunderground.org, be my guest.

likwidshoe on May 5, 2006 at 02:24 pm
Avatar for diane

Sorry Dhiane, just picking on your syntax there.

Yes, this is a target-rich environment, it is just so much more fun to pick on you.

Ken McCracken on May 5, 2006 at 5:08 PM No problem, Kenny.  Feel free.  I’ve got my favorite targets here too, like Troll Bobby, HotelBoy, likmyshoes, etc.Hey lik, you folks set the pace, I just keep up with it.And I always refuse delivery of junk.
diane on May 5, 2006 at 02:42 pm
Avatar for diane

Stranger to the culture asks:

"What do you mean by ‘childish’?

Answer:

I disagree with #1, agree with #2, don’t know about #3.

Then put up or shut up. If you’re going to sit here and call me names, back up your juvenile antics with some reference. Or else I’m just going to conclude that you’re talking shit just for the sake of talking shit. Egh…what am I saying. That’s all you’ve done since you’ve gotten here.

Oh sure you do. You just don’t have good answers to my points in many threads, so you throw this crap out.

Now you’re assuming. Why, you’re on a roll.

I have to work my way around the dhimmi’s, sluts, etc., to say anything at all.

Who the fuck cares? "He did it too mommmy!" Great defense. You don’t notice that you vehemently insult those who’ve never labelled you a dhimmi.

I’ve made excellent points about Isreal breaking U.N. SC resolutions, for one, which were not answered in any meaningful way.

Actually they were. You just refused delivery.

If you don’t like my style, then rein in your dogs here, or expect me to jump into the dogfight biting and scratching.

They’re not my dogs. I don’t control anybody here. And nice use of the, "but he did it too mommy" defense. Very mature.

P.S. Do you like my new poster name? Inspired by another thread here.

Hey,..if you want to advertise your maturity and put yourself on the same level as many on democracyunderground.org, be my guest.

 

likwidshoe on May 5, 2006 at 5:23 PM Stranger:  "Oh, very good.  Now I understand."
diane on May 5, 2006 at 02:44 pm
Avatar for diane

By the way, lik, the ‘babes and sucklings’ comes from a verse "Out of the mouths of babes and sucklings you have ordained praise’.  Means ‘babies and those still nursing’.

Sorry you didn’t recognize it.

diane on May 5, 2006 at 02:46 pm

diane spews, I’ve got my favorite targets here too, like Troll Bobby, HotelBoy, likmyshoes, etc.Hey lik, you folks set the pace, I just keep up with it.And I always refuse delivery of junk.

One day you say that I am "gentle and nurturing" and now you’re insulting me. Okay. Heh.

Talking to yourself doesn’t look good.

By the way, lik, the ‘babes and sucklings’ comes from a verse "Out of the mouths of babes and sucklings you have ordained praise’.  Means ‘babies and those still nursing’.

Sorry you didn’t recognize it.

My knowledge and interest in Christianity is nil, so I didn’t get the reference in that regard. I know what a "suckling" is so I gathered what kind of insult you were throwing my way. I knew you were insulting me because it is about all you have in your bag of limited tricks.

likwidshoe on May 5, 2006 at 02:54 pm

btw - you’re the one who is setting the angry and hateful pace here.

likwidshoe on May 5, 2006 at 02:55 pm
Avatar for diane

Oh, contrare.  I never got personal until the dhimmis and dhummis and sluts and whores and watercarriers and the rest started up.

El Presidente le gusta La Anthem Nacional en espanol. 

Adios.

diane on May 5, 2006 at 03:06 pm

Oh, contrare.  I never got personal until the dhimmis and dhummis and sluts and whores and watercarriers and the rest started up.

Oh. So now you just take it out on people who had nothing to do with the above. Like me.

Great logic diane.

Alert me to when you take responsibility for your own actions.

likwidshoe on May 5, 2006 at 03:12 pm
Avatar for Chief RZ

On the other hand, a six-term Republican congressman from one of the northern tier states resigned when he ran a stop sign speeding.  No drugs, no alcohol.  Time to end this farce of the "kennedy" dynasty that his grandfather began with bootlegging booze and buying JFKs election in Chicago. 

Chief RZ on May 5, 2006 at 03:34 pm
Avatar for diane

Lik, Mr. Nice Guy, been ever so pollite.  How could I have not noticed?

 RepubliCON, Democrap, black and white, us and them, lib conserv, blah blah blah

diane on May 5, 2006 at 04:45 pm
Avatar for diane

By the way, where can someone post a real story like this

Judges challenge Internet wiretap rules
‘Your argument makes no sense,’ appeals judge tells FCC lawyer

The Associated PressUpdated: 7:38 p.m. ET May 5, 2006

WASHINGTON - A U.S. appeals panel sharply challenged the Bush administration Friday over new rules making it easier for police and the FBI to wiretap Internet phone calls. A judge said the government’s courtroom arguments were “gobbledygook.”

 http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12645488/

Instead of either weepy empathy threads for Blobbo Limbaugh or ‘get Kennedy’ nonsense?  NeoCON addict/liberal addict….what’s the difference.  Hopefully they’ll both stay in rehab and get some help for their parallel problems.

diane on May 5, 2006 at 04:48 pm
Avatar for realtiybasedbob

I wonder if the nutter’s golden child, Dumbya, got any preferential treatment when he was actually popped for drunk driving?

After all, his family name is in some circles prestigious.

 

realtiybasedbob on May 5, 2006 at 05:34 pm
Avatar for realtiybasedbob

Didn’t the new tricky Dick get popped twice for drunk driving?

realtiybasedbob on May 5, 2006 at 05:51 pm
Avatar for robert108

How many times has Patrick Kennedy been in and out of rehab in his young life?  Nice statement of character there.  When he gets caught, he blames the drugs.  Another statement of character.

robert108 on May 5, 2006 at 06:00 pm
Avatar for diane

  When he gets caught, he blames the drugs

Blobbo blames his bad (golfing) back.

Hey RBB, Bush’s girls have had a bit of a problem with the sauce as well.

diane on May 5, 2006 at 06:02 pm
Avatar for diane

Okay, I’ll play:  Black/white, us/them, lib/conserv, Repub/Demo:

http://archives.cnn.com/2001/US/04/27/bush.daughter/index.html

April 27, 2001
Web posted at: 7:58 PM EDT (2358 GMT)

AUSTIN, Texas (CNN)—Jenna W. Bush, one of President Bush’s 19-year-old twin daughters, was cited for alcohol possession by a minor Friday morning, the Austin Police Department said.

Plainclothes officers, carrying out a patrol of the downtown area, witnessed Bush, a freshman at the University at Texas at Austin, and an unnamed friend drinking alcohol in the nightclub Cheers, located on Austin’s popular Sixth Street, at 1:30 a.m. Friday.

After officers questioned the women and determined they were under the legal drinking age of 21, the women were issued a "field release citation," according to a release from the Austin Police Department.

Bush and the friend were not arrested, the police said. Two other people were cited during the sweep of bars.

The Secret Service, which provides round-the-clock protection for the first family, said it does not comment on its "security methods and means" or on the "personal lives of our protectees."

 

Shall we keep playing?

diane on May 5, 2006 at 06:04 pm
Avatar for realtiybasedbob

Hasn’t Noelle Bush been in and out of jail for crack

realtiybasedbob on May 5, 2006 at 06:05 pm
Avatar for realtiybasedbob

John Ellis Bush got his badge for public drunkenness

realtiybasedbob on May 5, 2006 at 06:06 pm
Avatar for diane

Do any of them have bad backs?

diane on May 5, 2006 at 06:08 pm
Avatar for realtiybasedbob

I think there is a bush family curse

realtiybasedbob on May 5, 2006 at 06:17 pm
Avatar for realtiybasedbob

Let’s not forget about Neil Bush and the Silverado Banking, Savings and Loan Association…we might still be paying that one off.

realtiybasedbob on May 5, 2006 at 06:20 pm
Avatar for diane

Here’s Granny’s dream world state:

http://www.snopes.com/politics/quotes/barbara.asp

Claim:   Former First Lady Barbara Bush said of the war in Iraq: "Why should we hear about body bags and deaths? It’s not relevant. So why should I waste my beautiful mind on something like that?"

Status:   True

The remark in question occurred early in the three-way conversation, following a line of query directed at Mrs. Bush regarding whether she found herself studying her son for verbal or visual signs of how well he was holding up under the pressure. (Sawyer: "As a mother, do you watch for strain on him?") Mrs. Bush replied that she looked for such indications in all five of her children and remarked on the family’s propensity for having hair that turns white earlier than is the norm. An additional query about whether the senior Bushes, who do not normally watch a great deal of television, found themselves watching more TV during this period than was their usual custom fetched from Mrs. Bush the quote that has since earned a measure of notoriety:
I watch none. He [former President Bush] sits and listens and I read books, because I know perfectly well that, don’t take offense, that 90 percent of what I hear on television is supposition, when we’re talking about the news. And he’s not, not as understanding of my pettiness about that. But why should we hear about body bags, and deaths, and how many, what day it’s gonna happen, and how many this or what do you suppose? Or, I mean, it’s, it’s not relevant. So, why should I waste my beautiful mind on something like that? And watch him suffer.

Avatar for realtiybasedbob

God bless Al Gore’s internets. Just type in some words and look what comes up.

MotherJones.com | News

realtiybasedbob on May 5, 2006 at 06:25 pm
Avatar for realtiybasedbob

are we having fun or what?

 The Smoking Gun: Archive

realtiybasedbob on May 5, 2006 at 06:26 pm
Avatar for robert108

Here’s a comparison between the treatment of Kennedy and the treatment of Rush in the MSM:

http://levin.nationalreview.com/ 

robert108 on May 5, 2006 at 06:28 pm
Avatar for realtiybasedbob
realtiybasedbob on May 5, 2006 at 06:28 pm
Avatar for diane

Lies, lies, all lies, I tell you, RBB!!!

Well, my hub will soon be here so I’ll sign off.  He’s been playing a little twilight golf tonight with some friends.  His back’s been bothering him but the pills someone gave him are helping.

diane on May 5, 2006 at 06:29 pm
Avatar for realtiybasedbob

Uh oh, Mr. Potty mouth has something to say… and he gives us a link to a radical right wing media outlet too boot…

OK ok let’s check it out

realtiybasedbob on May 5, 2006 at 06:30 pm
Avatar for realtiybasedbob

From the radical right wing article;

 

If Patrick Kennedy, who is not a first offender, is addicted to painkillers, from where did he get them?—- a good point—- Rush, a confessed drug addict got his drugs from where and what is the pending charge Rush is burdened by?

 

And there are news reports that he had been drinking earlier at a Capitol Hill bar and alcohol was later smelled on his breath.—- good point—- “some people say” is very popular these days.

 

So, why was the officer on the scene prevented by more senior police officers from performing a routine sobriety test?—- good point—- an investigation of the capitol police is in order
realtiybasedbob on May 5, 2006 at 06:38 pm
Avatar for WETBACK

oops sorry people Tecumseh’s curse

WETBACK on May 5, 2006 at 06:39 pm
Avatar for robert108

No factual disputes from any of the haters, I see. 

You can’t have it both ways. They persecuted Rush for "doctor shopping" which means that he got his drugs from doctors(seems obvious, doesn’t it?).  They couldn’t prove that he got them illegally, even after wasting two years trying to persecute him for it.  It is a good question for Kennedy, though, I agree. 

robert108 on May 5, 2006 at 06:42 pm
Avatar for robert108

"From the radical right wing article…" 

Well, it does dissent from your radical left-wing views.  I guess you only like dissent from one side.  Typical.

After all your smear attempts, no factual disagreement, I see. 

robert108 on May 5, 2006 at 07:14 pm
Avatar for Tom_with_a_Dream

(Posted on multiple SA threads ...)

I liked Jay Tea’s analysis on the treatment of Rush v. Kennedy.  

Tom_with_a_Dream on May 6, 2006 at 10:44 am
Avatar for Jay Tea

(Blush) Why, thanks, Tom. It helps that I don’t like either of them.

 

J. 

Jay Tea on May 6, 2006 at 01:00 pm
Avatar for lipitor

Pharmacy with the cheapest prices for lipitor

lipitor on May 10, 2006 at 03:47 am
Avatar for lisinopril

Pharmacy with the cheapest prices for lisinopril

lisinopril on May 10, 2006 at 06:40 am
Avatar for lorazepam

Pharmacy with the cheapest prices for lorazepam

lorazepam on May 10, 2006 at 02:01 pm
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

If you want to ignore a fellow commenter, download this.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.

    

By submitting your comment you agree to our terms of service.