Pardon For Libby

New York Sun:

If Ms. Plame didn’t want her identity out, she shouldn’t have gotten her husband a secret mission and then allowed him to wage a public campaign against the president’s foreign policy. The leading prevaricator in this case is Mr. Wilson himself. He has accused Mr. Bush of falsely leading America to war. Mr. Bush had claimed “The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa.” Mr. Wilson drank tea in Niger for a week and said that Mr. Bush’s claim was not true. But even after Mr. Wilson’s objection, the July 2004 report by the British government’s Butler Commission found that Mr. Bush’s comment was “well-founded.” In a July 2004 report by the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, Senators Roberts, Hatch, and Bond said of Mr. Wilson, “The former Ambassador, either by design or through ignorance, gave the American people and, for that matter, the world a version of events that was inaccurate, unsubstantiated, and misleading.”

Read the whole thing.

Tags:


«
»
  • http://kingdomofidiots.blogspot.com/2005/11/links-of-day.html Kingdom of Idiots

    Pardon For Libby You Know How You Can Tell When Joe Wilson Is Telling A Lie? The indictment, take 2 Top Ten Kos Kidz Reactions to the Alito Nomination Before Novak, The Joe Wilson Speech that Made Clear His Agenda

  • richard

    I still find it hillarious that to this day there are still people that not only find credence in the British statement and do not believe that they are going to say their information was correct.

    The information was not correct and was not backed by our own people. Saddam although a bad cat and all that stuff had nothing to do with 9/11 and lumping him in with those terrorists does nothing but take the focus off of the real ones and last but not least NO WMD’s and do not give me that shit about Syria having them.

  • http://feeds.feedburner.com/SayAnything?m=1679 Say Anything – North Dakota&#8

    &heellip; Pardon For Libby By Rob on October 31, 2005 at 10:01 am &heellip;

  • Steve L.

    The information was not correct and was not backed by our own people. Saddam although a bad cat and all that stuff had nothing to do with 9/11 and lumping him in with those terrorists does nothing but take the focus off of the real ones and last but not least NO WMD’s and do not give me that shit about Syria having them.

    You need to lighten up on the crack if you ever hope to make a valid point. How in the world did you make a connection between a British statement about yellowcake uranium and 9/11? Why did you drag Syria into a discussion about pardoning Scooter Libby? I’m afraid your tinfoil hat is no longer working. Some bad rays have gotten into your brain and caused you to rant and rave.

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development