Palin Nails Obama For Missile Defense Cuts After North Korea Test

She may not be able to see Russia from her porch (not that she ever really claimed to be able to), but at least Sarah seems to get national defense better than Obama does.

“I am deeply concerned with North Korea’s development and testing program which has clear potential of impacting Alaska, a sovereign state of the United States, with a potentially nuclear armed warhead,” Governor Palin said. “I can’t emphasize enough how important it is that we continue to develop and perfect the global missile defense network. Alaska’s strategic location and the system in place here have proven invaluable in defending the nation.”
Governor Palin stressed the importance of Fort Greely and the need for continued funding for the Missile Defense Agency. The governor is firmly against U.S. Secretary of Defense Robert Gates’ proposed $1.4 billion reduction of the Missile Defense Agency. Greely’s isolated location in Alaska as well as its strategic location in the Pacific allows for maximum security and development of the country’s only ground-based missile defense complex.
“Our early opposition to reduced funding for the Missile Defense Agency is proving to be well-founded during this turbulent time,” Governor Palin said. “I continue to support the development and implementation of a defensive missile shield based in Alaska. We are strategically placed to defend the critical assets of the United States and our allies in the Pacific Theater.”

I am a staunch proponent of limited government, but national defense is a legitimate function of government. I fail to see why we can give AIG and General Motors and Citigroup and banks all across the nation trillions in bailouts, but we can’t spare a few billion for missile defense.
Especially given the renewed threat posed by North Korea, among other nations.
Obama’s wrong on missile defense, and it’s not a partisan issue.

Tags: , ,


«
»
  • http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/america_is_back/#c397018 Dino2

    It’s all your kind have because the human spirit refuses to give up in the face of the darkness you sell. Eventually, they will rise up against it, and have enough of people like you. Repent before your neighbors tire of the left telling them to abandon ambition to better things.

    Geezus, Potato. You are such a drama queen.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/ likwidshoe

    Lioncourt – Part of that plan is that it actually works.

    Test after test is showing that it is working.

  • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Petraeus Last Best Hope

    Israel successfully tests Arrow 2 | Israel | Jerusalem Post

    As THE ONE cuts spending on US missile defense, Israel increases its efforts to defend its people. Don’t you wish we had a POTUS that had our national defense as his top priority instead of preaching to the world about a NO NUKES on earth political fantasy?

    they are laughing at US

    http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1238562933063&pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull

  • carrick

    Dino:

    It’s fairly obvious that the right is abandoning domestic policy in favor of what they see as their “winning formula”: FEAR.

    What an idiotic argument to make. North Korea is a rogue state, as is Iran, both are developing nuclear capabilities and ICBM capabilities.

    And all Dino can do is tell us the winning formula is “FEAR”.

    Nope. Got it backwards. The lefts formula is YOU LEFTIES ARE DUMBER THAN HELL.

  • Bat One

    It is worth noting that in the old Soviet Union, dissident moral equivocators such as Melvin Goodman, particularly those within the intelligence community, most often wound up with a bullet in the head, rather than an assortment of speaking engagements and a book contract.

    How odd too, that in spite of Mr.Goodman, I don’t recall an uprising of Hungarians, Czechs, Poles, Latvians, Estonians, Lithuanians, Azerbaijanis, Uzbeks or Georgians clamoring to return to Soviet Communist servitude.

    Goodman’s bullshit is easily dismissed.

  • sayanything-4625

    I didn’t offer that Sparkie, the article did, I see you didn’t actually read it, just ignored it and offered up a little snark. PAC-3 wasn’t in service during the first Gulf War. Accuracy of the first Patriots during the war is a little misleading, one the Patriots were not designed to hit the missile. They were proximity fused and blew up before they hit the missile. They did succeed in hitting the missile body, deflecting the missiles into the desert or off target most of the time. The standard figure was that the Patriot had a hit rate of 25% or 33% depending on the source. We launched them in 3 to 4 missile salvos giving us 100% interception rates. In at least one case it was not enough because a missile body fell onto a barracks containing West Virginia National Guard members, killing 28. I know this because we had just left that barracks to move to another site. PAC-3 was a perfect 11 for 11 in hits/kills during the second Gulf War.

    I don’t really understand the hatred of missile defense. Even if it only has a 25% chance of hitting/intercepting an incoming nuclear missile I would rather have that chance than no chance at all. I guess Bush thought the same way because all of those GMD silos are in California and Alaska.

    http://www.cdi.org/issues/bmd/patriot.html

  • Lioncourt

    Test after test is showing that it is working.

    Really? When have we hit anything? Was it due to a homing device?

    A convenient strawman argument. Whether we give the technology to others or not is a separate question… one which has no bearing on the necessity for building the system in the first place.

    It’s not a strawman idiot. In this hypothetical I am willing to give you the fact that we could shoot down their missile. I am asking if we should? Is it worth showing that capability for the simple missile that NK deploys.

    But I have noticed that you have criticized my approach while offering nothing. What is your strategy for NK?

    Should we attack NK? Should we use sanctions? Should we shoot down their missile?

    Give me an answer of what we should do, not what we shouldn’t do.

    By the way your SDI argument is the definition of a strawman. NK has is no foreseeable threat to the US. It’s just a scare tactic.

  • robert108

    Sarah smacks Barack Hussein’s lies with the truth. You go, girl!

  • Lioncourt

    1. Any additional tests should be forcefully terminated in the boost phase with immediate counterbattery to the launch site.

    Even if successful, this will accomplish what? Does it actually discourage NK?

    2. A close embargo should be established against North Korea. All unpaid aid should cease.

    There are already embargos against NK.

    3. Russia and China should be apprised of 1 and 2. We should work with the RoK and Japan to ensure they are prepared to counter any
    further DPRK provocations.

    If you actually knew anything about the ROK, they want to give NK aid. They see them as brothers. The ROK wants to reunite with the DPRK.

    4. China is already rather displeased with the DPRK, while the Russians view the DPRK as a catspaw at best.

    That doesn’t mean they want us militariy involved on their border.

    You are truly clueless.

  • Lioncourt

    Of course we should shoot it down.

    What does shooting down accomplish?

    We show our capabilities to Russia and China. Do you really think it discourages NK.

    Perhaps the best idea would be to find a way to eliminate Kim and re-unify the North with with the South.

    Wow, you don’t think you are the first person in America, China or Russia to want to assassinate him? That surely is an original thought. BRILLIANT!!!

    When I say you buy him off I don’t mean you give him money without conditions.

    We give him aid on the condition that we have monitors in his nuclear facilities. We have had them before. Basically we wait for Kim Jong Il to die.

  • carrick

    Lioncourt:

    What would you have us do? Take into account it is far less than certain that we could have shot a missile down.

    It’s pretty certain we can shoot down one or two missiles, or soon will be able to. More than half a dozen would not be practicable for the near future.

    I am asking if we should? Is it worth showing that capability for the simple missile that NK deploys.

    If it’s carrying nuclear weapons, you bet.

    As to what else I would do?

    There isn’t much you can do with insane leaders. You basically either have to tolerate his actions, or decide you can’t. We can continue to hold a dialog with them (one party or many, idk), but truthfully it has a zero percent chance of working.

    Sanctions will do nothing. They are a complete waste.

    The North Korean government is inherently dishonest and will break every treaty that they make. They’ve proven this time and time again.

    Our best bet is to try and establish economic ties with them, and slowly undermine their government that way. Kind of like what we did with China.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/america_is_back/#c397018 Dino2

    It’s fairly obvious that the right is abandoning domestic policy in favor of what they see as their “winning formula”: FEAR. They call it “foreign policy” but it’s really just xenophobia and jingoism. Conservatives remember what a winner it was after 9/11. Like the guy with the lucky underwear that he thinks gets him laid when he wears them, cons have wrapped themselves in belligerent nationalism.

    Problem is, there’s no 9/11 and most people are more concerned with the economy that republicans destroyed. That’s precisely why cons would rather NOT discuss domestic issues. They lose on those BIG TIME.

    Better hope for another attack, cons. We know you are.

  • Bat One

    As I recall, the Clinton administration has already tried bribing the North Koreans as you’ve suggested. The interregnum was used to develop a nuclear weapons capability (under the “watchful” eyes of UN inspectors stationed there!) to which the North Koreans have now added a long range ballistic missile capability. Obviously then, recycling a policy that has previously proven a failure is not the way to go.

    Besides, your approach is at best short-sighted. After all, is it rational to assume that North Korea is the only potential enemy of the US which will develop nuclear weapons and the means to deliver them? In fact the real threat isn’t just the North Koreans, but who else they will offer that technology to at a handsome price.

    In any event, you have yet to offer an acceptable reason for not investing in the defense of the US by continuing the development of an anti-ballistic missile system.

  • Bat One

    Test after test is showing that it is working.

    Lik,

    Isn’t it astounding that those who bray that the US doesn’t spend nearly enough on embryonic stem cell research, which has yet to show any hint of progress, insist that we are wrong to spend money to research and develop a system to protect our country from the most formidable weapons on earth… a system which clearly can be developed and proven effective.

  • Lioncourt

    How about you Bat1? What is your plan?

    Do you really think that if we have the capability of shooting down that type of missile we should give that intelligence up for nothing?

  • Bat One

    consider STAR WARS. how expensive? did it work? no. it was dumbasses throwing money away on faith, paranoia, and buzzwords.

    The very same argument could be made against embryonic stem cell research funding, couldn’t it? And it could just as easily be applied to the massive Keynesian deficits Obama has so disingenuously insisted will revitalize our economy.

    Its amazing how selectively those on the Left apply that “Yes, we can!” drivel they’re so famous for.

  • http://magyartruth.blogspot.com/ Chief RZ

    Greg. Good summary. Hillary is just a bit better than Madeline IMO, but about as worthless.

  • http://magyartruth.blogspot.com/ Chief RZ

    Just for the sake of argument. You define STAR WARS. Years. Money spent. Deterrent.

    Some weapons, like a gun for example may never be used, but their mere potential defers many from attempting a break-in at night or even during the day.

    The absence of the weapon has caused many other to be killed like the U of VA. Had that school allowed CWP, the “shooter” may have been dispatched before he was able to kill more.

    At what price do you assign life?

  • http://magyartruth.blogspot.com/ Chief RZ

    Are you calling the USSR a petty communist regime? Or N. Korea perhaps.
    If the latter, many like you tend to diminish threats with adjectives. The fact remains that the UN, US and about a million men died during the Korean War. Many of our men are still held by the communists there.

    Was Germany a petty regime? How about the JAPS? Romans?

    The point is that N. Korea not only poses a threat, but they now have fired a missile across Japan and potentially have the ability to weaponize that missile.

    Neither you nor I know for certain their capabilities just like we did not know the USSR’s capabilities in the 80′s.

  • http://norseberserker.blogspot.com/ Rugby Reader

    Palin?

  • http://magyartruth.blogspot.com/ Chief RZ

    No whining, just telling The Truth. The Truth about the communists there and here who would murder millions for their fantasies. Heard of the 25 million proposed murders by Ayers?

    Yes, with 20/20 behind sight, we now know that the Soviet Union did not have quite as many missiles as some thought. Nice to know. We also know now what the JAPS did eating our Airmen.

    We have talked before.

    The thread is about BHO’s apparent ‘naiviety’ just like Bill Clinton’s trying to treat acts of war as alleged crimes that might need to be referred to the UN for prosecution.

    You and I disagree on these salient points.

  • Steve

    Palin wants to continue a program that dumps billions of taxpayers dollars into her state? Shocking. She’s proven to be quite the lover of pork.

    Now, when she says, “the system in place here [has] proven invaluable in defending the nation,” … um, did I miss the Red Attack in the news at some point? Maybe it wasn’t carried on FoxNews, ’cause I missed it.

  • Lioncourt

    Isn’t that basically the same thing that didn’t work out so well for the Clinton administration? I believe it was called the Agreed Framework.

    Actually it was working fine until Bush was President.

    Apparently those of you on the Left have yet to figure out that doing the same thing that hasn’t worked in the past isn’t exactly the sort of change that anyone is going to believe in. You are advocating doing the same thing in the foreign policy realm that Obama is doing with out economic and fiscal policy… that is dressing up an old, discredited idea from the past and selling it as something new and workable. Problem is, the rest of us read history. We know better.

    Actually you can’t show that you do know better. Your brilliant idea was assassination. As if that was never thought of by China, Russia or America.

    You absolutely have no clue what action to take. Your opposition to Obama is reflexive. You don’t even care if he is right.

  • http://magyartruth.blogspot.com/ Chief RZ

    Greg. Thanks for doing the research and helping to define STAR WARS. Your personal presence in country may help to education those who seem to have trouble with The Truth.

    Since I did not get an answer, let me guess. “Star Wars” was a term coined by some in the print and broadcast media so they could use it as a straw man when they determined that it was unsuccessful.

    The Soviet Union fell because of President Reagan’s strong stand against that evil empire.

    I am glad, Sparkie that you at least acknowledge the evils of communism to the tune of some hundred million murdered innocent civilians.

    We must not allow this evil ideology to advance in our country.

  • Bat One

    Do you really think that if we have the capability of shooting down that type of missile we should give that intelligence up for nothing?

    A convenient strawman argument. Whether we give the technology to others or not is a separate question… one which has no bearing on the necessity for building the system in the first place.

  • Lioncourt

    The whole point of having a missile defense system is that it is a strictly defensive system.

    Part of that plan is that it actually works. The second part of that plan is that we give it away to Russia and China, which I doubt we will do.

    My plan is to set up relations where the next NK leader may possibly agree to a reunification with SK. If it takes us to buy NK off with rice until Kim Jong Il dies so be it. Sk will willingly pay that.

    The end game is reunification.

    What is your endgame, war with China?

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/ likwidshoe

    Lioncourt – Really? When have we hit anything? Was it due to a homing device?

    Come on, man. You argue against that of which you have no clue about? Good grief.

    Here, take a gander and educate yourself. That blog is alright for reporting on the tests this nation has done in regards to anti-ballistic missile technology. We’ve had a lot of successful tests recently and no, there were no homing devices on them. There were at first, naturally.

    A couple of weeks ago:

    San Diego-based Aegis destroyer, USS Benfold (DDG 65) engaged multiple targets during this multi-event exercise with Standard Missile-2 (SM-2) Block IIIA and modified SM-2 BLK IV missiles.

    During the event, Benfold’s Aegis Weapons System successfully detected and intercepted a cruise missile target with a SM-2 BLK IIIA, while simultaneously detecting and intercepting an incoming short range ballistic missile (SRBM) target with a modified SM-2 BLK IV. This is the first time the fleet has successfully tested the Aegis system’s ability to intercept both an SRBM in terminal
    phase and a low-altitude cruise missile target at the same time.

    We’re quickly getting there in terms of technology. And no, this won’t do well against an all-out attack from Russia or China today, but it will protect us from the rogue porno-loving dictators like Kim Jong-il today.

    As for tomorrow, well, why couldn’t it protect us from an all out attack of multiple rockets and missiles from China or Russia? Those who argue that it wouldn’t and couldn’t, and that argument usually comes from the left, are a bit short-sighted. The only thing limiting us from doing it is us.

    I just don’t get why so many on the left are calling the anti-missile system “unproven”. Keep up with the news, guys. It’s proving itself.

    Mar 18, 2009

    WASHINGTON (AFP) — The US military successfully shot down a short-range ballistic missile near Hawaii in a test of its ground-based missile defense system, the Pentagon said on Wednesday.

    In the test, the warhead on the target missile was separated from the rocket motor, requiring the interceptors to distinguish between the two.

    The dummy warhead was shot down in its last minutes of flight, Lehner said.

    The soldiers who operated the system did not know when the target missile would be launched and more than 20 radars and sensors were employed on the test range to collect flight test data from the interceptor and the target, Lehner said.

    The exercise was a test of the Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD), which is designed to intercept short to medium range ballistic missiles.

    The US anti-missile defense system has come in for criticism from some lawmakers over its reliability and cost, with skeptics charging the tests are not based on realistic conditions.

    And why are those skeptics, including you Lioncourt, charging that the tests are not based on realistic conditions? Because you’re not paying attention.

  • Lioncourt

    The lefts formula is YOU LEFTIES ARE DUMBER THAN HELL.

    I’m a leftie. Do you think that the fact that NK shares a border with Russia and China is immaterial

    What would you have us do? Take into account it is far less than certain that we could have shot a missile down.

    You’re not shy about letting us know how brilliant you are Carrick, what the fuck would you do with a rogue country on the border of Russia and China?

  • http://ndgoon.blogspot.com/ goon

    I am a staunch proponent of limited government, but national defense is a legitimate function of government. I fail to see why we can give AIG and General Motors and Citigroup and banks all across the nation trillions in bailouts, but we can’t spare a few billion for missile defense.

    Especially given the renewed threat posed by North Korea, among other nations.

    Obama’s wrong on missile defense, and it’s not a partisan issue.

    Rob amateur hour said he wasn’t going to weaponize space 1.4 billion is a drop in the barrel compared to the 12 trillion he has spent in 72 weeks in office. NOBAMA’s priorities are all screwed up. Seems that he is sticking to his word.

  • erick1740

    We would be safer with Palin as president than this clueless buffoon.

  • jimmypop

    FEAR.

    neither side has a monopoly on that.

  • carrick

    Sparkie:

    easing of centralized power

    And what precipitated that?

  • http://magyartruth.blogspot.com/ Chief RZ

    Gustave776. You are spot on. Glad to see another logical, adult thinker here. Remember what the Communist Russians said about our first missile defense? They called it an offensive weapon system. The USSR collapsed about a decade later.

  • Bat One

    We give him aid on the condition that we have monitors in his nuclear facilities.

    Isn’t that basically the same thing that didn’t work out so well for the Clinton administration? I believe it was called the Agreed Framework.

    Apparently those of you on the Left have yet to figure out that doing the same thing that hasn’t worked in the past isn’t exactly the sort of change that anyone is going to believe in. You are advocating doing the same thing in the foreign policy realm that Obama is doing with out economic and fiscal policy… that is dressing up an old, discredited idea from the past and selling it as something new and workable. Problem is, the rest of us read history. We know better.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/ likwidshoe

    When are you fucking morons going to give a plan for NK?

    Nice language.

    Stop the BS. Even if our missile defense was perfect, what would you do?

    None of you will answer this question.

    It looks like it has been answered. Repeatedly. You just don’t like the answer and are now resorting to insulting. *shrugs* You’re being pointless.

  • http://www.dartemis.net/blog/ sayanything-42

    pussycat proves beyond doubt that it knows naught of that which it comments upon:

    I had proposed:
    1. Any additional tests should be forcefully terminated in the boost phase with immediate counterbattery to the launch site.

    pussycat replied:
    Even if successful, this will accomplish what? Does it actually discourage NK?

    What this accomplishes is that it denies the DPRK any useful telemetry from the bird (since it goes “boom” early in flight). The counterbattery fire makes the launch site an unhealthy place to be, and makes subsequent launches more difficult.

    Jaw Jaw (the left’s preferred method) has accomplished nothing.

    I had proposed:
    2. A close embargo should be established against North Korea. All unpaid aid should cease.

    pussycat replied:
    There are already embargos against NK.

    Look up “close embargo” and “strict embargo” and their close cousin “blockade” and get back to us when you have the first clue on the subject.

    I had proposed:
    3. Russia and China should be apprised of 1 and 2. We should work with the RoK and Japan to ensure they are prepared to counter any further DPRK provocations.

    pussycat replied:
    If you actually knew anything about the ROK, they want to give NK aid. They see them as brothers. The ROK wants to reunite with the DPRK.

    pussycat, I lived in the ROK for a little over three years. Over those three years the popular support for the DPRK essentially evaporated. The shows for the press have gone on (with the expected impact on the usual credulous fools, such as pussycat), but the ROK saw what happened to West Germany’s economy when they incorporated East Germany, and that cooled the reunification craze quite thoroughly.

    I had proposed:
    4. China is already rather displeased with the DPRK, while the Russians view the DPRK as a catspaw at best.

    pussycat replied:
    That doesn’t mean they want us militariy involved on their border.

    Then they’d best deal with the crazy little fuck who lives nexrt door, hadn’t they?

    Buy a clue, pussycat, one with handles so you can hang onto it.

  • sayanything-5371

    Sarah, the Woman that all liberals fear.

  • Bat One

    When are you fucking morons going to give a plan for NK?

    Your vile, intemperate tantrum is not only juvenile, but demonstrates once again that few of you on the Left can be counted on to carry on an intelligent, rational discussion.

    You seem to fit in quite nicely close between Dino and Buzz. And even that may be more credit than you deserve.

  • docdave

    By the way your SDI argument is the definition of a strawman. NK has is no foreseeable threat to the US. It’s just a scare tactic.

    Just because there is no foreseeable threat doesn’t mean there isn’t one. The 9/11 attack on the World Trade Center was not foresaw either but it did happen. Imagine what would have been the devistation if the projectiles that hit the buildings had been nuke missiles rather than conventional airplanes. One may not know whether we will be targeted with nuclear missiles but it is incumbent that we protect ourselves from that eventuality the best way we know whether it be preemptive strikes, SDI or something else. If we wait for a clearly defined threat it will probably be too late to do anything to protect the nation.

  • Mickey

    The Dali-Bama is foolish to believe that his “words” will vanquish the little troll, Kim the Pyrotechnic. China and Russia have the Dali-Bama all figured out. It is simple really. All they have to do is let “Himself” speak profoundly of “Himself” and all will be well. Feed the ego of this fool boy leader and he will walk away satisfied that his impact was great. Why would two super powers fear a man who has publically claimed he wants to reduce and remove American nuclear weapons program.

    The world is in a far more danegerous position now that the jestor is king. But fear not, the Dali-Bama will teach us all how to bow.

  • http://www.dartemis.net/blog/ sayanything-42

    Lioncurt you ignorant git, there are several articles on the progress of the missile defense system on this blog.

    Try doing some research before spouting off for a change.

  • http://www.dartemis.net/blog/ sayanything-42

    sparkless-arse-fuckin-buckle: the ugly evidence of what happens when you let a hydrocephalic imbecile loose on a keyboard.

  • http://www.dartemis.net/blog/ sayanything-42

    pussycat you ignorant fuck,

    All of our Ballistic Missile Tests and Anti-Ballistic Missile Tests are conducted with open (as in un-encrypted) telemetry so the whole world can see that yes, we really can do that.

    At least eunuchized has a clue on those rare occasions he delivers a surf report. I’ve not seen you comment yet on any subject in which you demonstrated clue one.

  • sayanything-4625

    Actually it was working fine until Bush was President.

    If by fine you mean it allowed the North Koreans to do as they wished, then yes, it was working fine.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2003/05/01/opinion/a-surprising-success-on-north-korea.html

    The current crisis began last October when North Korea admitted that it has a program to produce highly enriched uranium for nuclear weapons. In doing so, it tacitly confessed that it had been cheating on the so-called Agreed Framework of 1994. In the ensuing weeks, North Korea took increasingly provocative steps, including expelling the international inspectors who were monitoring its nuclear facilities, restarting a nuclear reactor that could produce more plutonium, and withdrawing from the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty. With each step, it moved closer to becoming a full-fledged nuclear weapons state.

    http://www.cfr.org/publication/13593/

    Bush included North Korea in the “Axis of Evil” during his 2002 State of the Union address and, that October, the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) concluded that Pyongyang was pursuing a uranium enrichment program. According to Washington, this violated the spirit of the 1994 Agreed Framework, in which the United States pledged to provide fuel oil and construct two light-water reactors while North Korea promised to end a plutonium enrichment program in exchange.

    North Korea admitted to the uranium enrichment program but refused to end it unless the United States agreed to hold bilateral talks and normalize relations.

    So Bush called them out when we discovered that they were enriching Uranium in violation of the “Agreed Framework”. They admitted they were and this is Bush’s fault how? They were cheating on the Framework from the beginning.

    Former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright admitted for the first time on Sunday that under the Clinton administration’s Agreed Framework arms control treaty with Kim Jong-il, North Korea “cheated.”

    Asked point-blank if North Korea developed nuclear weapons during the Clinton administration, Albright told NBC’s “Meet the Press,” “No, what they were doing, as it turns out, they were cheating.”

    “The worst part that has happened under the Agreed Framework,” Albright said, was that “there [were] these fuel rods, and the nuclear program was frozen.” …A 1999 congressional study determined that Pyongyang was cheating on the agreement, but Albright disregarded the warning and continued to claim that the Agreed Framework was a success.

  • docdave

    If this country is going to idly stand by doing nothing while unfriendly nations develop nuclear weapons and the method of delivering them, we better have a way of killing them before they kill us.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/america_is_back/#c397018 Dino2

    I’d say the right has a commanding lead on using fear. They’re unmatched for fear of foreigners and attack.

  • gustave776

    Dino2, You say the right is using fear tactics, and I say they are only speaking the truth. Palin has it right on, Alaska carries the resources we need to keep our country on the road. Korea needs to be watched carefully and we need to intercept if the time comes when these missiles are used against us or our allies.
    Dino, I am speculating your Momma was a peace nick hippy and only GOD knows who your real daddy is, but in reality these issues need to be dealt with. Also Dino, Portland is on the west coast of the USA and in a few more tries, Kim Jong-il could be providing the fireworks for your next celebration of this country falling in around you.

  • Buzz

    Sara who?

  • Mark

    Palin is so cute. I wonder why she thinks North Korea wants to bother dropping a nuke on a bunch of bumbling idiots who hunt in the middle of nowhere?
    There is nothing to do in Alaska except pretend to be important and make babies at a premature age……..oh, and shoot large creatures of god for pleasure sake.

    Can anyone tell me where this bumbling idiot is from? I’d like to compare his state with Alaska!

    Might have to send an Alaskan down to him to show him what a true American is all about!

    Moron!

  • sayanything-4625

    “Star Wars” was a term thought up by Senator Kennedy’s staff to heap as much scorn a possible on SDI.

    http://books.google.com/books?id=qRbOQtm75ioC&pg=PA309&lpg=PA309&dq=who+coined+the+term+“star+wars”+for+SDI&source=bl&ots=kMpspaP2lp&sig=Zl2e16_kgFQE8N7yptEjQsMsrTM&hl=en&ei=e8jbSY7XEI6stgfZlp2LCA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1#PPA309,M1

  • Hannitized

    Palin is so cute. I wonder why she thinks North Korea wants to bother dropping a nuke on a bunch of bumbling idiots who hunt in the middle of nowhere?

    There is nothing to do in Alaska except pretend to be important and make babies at a premature age……..oh, and shoot large creatures of god for pleasure sake.

  • bill-tb

    Meanwhile Barack “the naive one” Obama’s teleprompter launch never made it off the pad.

    This is beginning to get scary silly.

  • Rezistik

    515 Billion.

    Yeah…sorry that they only the scraps…

  • Lioncourt

    When are you fucking morons going to give a plan for NK?

    You can criticize everything.

    China and Russia share a border with NK.

    For this question I will give you that SDI is perfect. What would you do?

    Stop the BS. Even if our missile defense was perfect, what would you do?

    None of you will answer this question.

  • Bat One

    Is it worth showing that capability for the simple missile that NK deploys.

    What a silly question! Of course we should shoot it down. Obviously bribing them (your “plan”) hasn’t worked when it was tried, so that’s out. And waiting for Kim to die is too risky given the man’s well-documented instability and their current nuclear capability. Perhaps the best idea would be to find a way to eliminate Kim and re-unify the North with with the South.

    Incidentally, I notice that when cornered you resort to petty name-calling. And while I don’t much mind, considering the source, I wonder if this is some sort of congenital defense mechanism for those of you on the Left that kicks in when you realize that your bullying is being ignored?

  • sayanything-4625

    consider STAR WARS. how expensive? did it work? no. it was dumbasses throwing money away on faith, paranoia, and buzzwords.

    Define work, Sparkie. Many of the programs developed in SDI are ongoing (research) or deployed. As a matter fact SDI was renamed the Ballistic Missile Defense Organization in 1993 and is known as the Missile Defense agency today. SDI developed three main missile defense technologies. They are the Extended Range Interceptor (ERINT), the Homing Overlay and the Exoatmospheric Reentry-vehicle Interception System.

    ERINT is in service as the PAC-3 Patriot missile. The Homing Overlay system tested successful and went on to become the Exoatmospheric Reentry-vehicle Interception system. It is currently being fielded as the THAAD (Terminal High Altitude Air Defense) system and the GMD (Ground Based Mid course Defense) system.

    The X-Ray laser. Complete failure from a military standpoint. The research led to lab lasers that were useful in other fields. Medicine advanced imaging techniques and 3d holograms useful for early detection of breast cancer. Advance materials-SEAgel and AERogel.

    The Chemical laser. Relatively successful. It destroyed its target in tests, had success against target cruise missiles and is currently being tested as the THEL (Tactical High Energy Laser) to shoot down artillery shells.

    The Mirrors-research into the mirrors the lasers would need led to many advances like adaptive optics that civilian telescopes use to minimize atmospheric distortion.

    Brilliant Pebbles-a set of mini missiles that were cost effective and worked.

    http://www.missilethreat.com/missiledefensesystems/id.13/system_detail.asp

    If we would have had brilliant pebbles deployed in the first Gulf War we could have shot down every SCUD. It was canceled during the Clinton administration because Les Aspin wanted to take the “star out of star wars.”

    So Sparkie, if you leave out the three deployed missiles systems, lots of beneficial research and a working system that was canceled before it was deployed, I guess you could say SDI didn’t work.

  • http://magyartruth.blogspot.com/ Chief RZ

    Read it. One person’s perspective from the Vietnam era? Communist Russia actually took over and enslaved quite a few countries including Hungary. They actually murdered millions of people including seven million Ukranians.

    No propaganda, just statistics. Remember Stalin’s remark regarding murder and statistics.
    The communists are past masters at propaganda. Remember the two newspapers?

    one was called ‘truth’. A communist lie.

  • Steve

    Apparently this comment area is filled with short-sighted fools, idiots, ignorant gits, drama queens, and fucking morons. That’s in your own words.

    This is the first day I’ve looked at this blog, and I must say, I agree with the way you people assess yourselves. You’re spot-on.

    You deserve one another, and I won’t be back. Have fun, kids.

  • Lioncourt

    Palin is an idiYoot who is posturing without any plan.

    NK has both a border with China and Russia. You can’t attack NK without dealing with them.

    If anybody thinks attacking NK is worth destroying our relations with Russia and China is a fool.

    However, I am sure there are plenty of fools here. I’m looking at you Robert108.

  • robert108

    “Steve” appears to be yet another leftie narcissist who thinks everything is about him, and that everybody cares what he thinks.

  • Mickey

  • http://magyartruth.blogspot.com/ Chief RZ

    OK. We disagree. In the 80s, the USSR still held several countries as virtual slaves. I visited some of those countries and saw the results of a communist regime. They were not petty.

    Petty is worrying about a few people on horses chasing a fox, or some African country trading slaves, or trying to deliver food to another backward country run by gangs.

    The USSR murdered millions of people. This continued during the 80s behind the iron curtain. Merely mentioning the words got people actually tortured and killed.

    I do not follow group’s ideas, but have exposed The Truth for many liberals to confront—or ignore. Noam Chomsky still says that two million people were not murdered by communists after the Democrats defunded in 1975 the S. Vietnamese. He calls it a “complete fabrication”.

    On topic, the debate is about missile defense cuts. The Truth about what BHO does must be documented so that citizens of the USA can make an informed decision at the next election.

  • http://www.dartemis.net/blog/ sayanything-42

    pussycat,

    Where is your plan, or for that matter, the administration’s plan? “Hoping” the leopard will “change” his spots is NOT A PLAN.

    Here’s what I think we should have done, and should do:

    This test should have been forcefully terminated in the boost phase by SM-3′s.

    On to what should be done going forward.

    1. Any additional tests should be forcefully terminated in the boost phase with immediate counterbattery to the launch site.

    2. A close embargo should be established against North Korea. All unpaid aid should cease.

    3. Russia and China should be apprised of 1 and 2. We should work with the RoK and Japan to ensure they are prepared to counter any
    further DPRK provocations.

    4. China is already rather displeased with the DPRK, while the Russians view the DPRK as a catspaw at best.

    QED.

    Where’s your plan, pussycat?

  • robert108

    SDI took down the Soviet Union, dumb little sparkiestem. Even though the commie Dems have obstructed it since the beginning, we still have an effective weapon against aggression from those who wish to destroy us.

  • Bat One

    Palin is an idiYoot who is posturing without any plan.

    And your plan was what exactly? Or are you just posturing?

    The whole point of having a missile defense system is that it is a strictly defensive system. That is, it attacks no one. Not North Korea, not the Chinese, and certainly not Russia.

    And only a REAL fool would suggest otherwise.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/sparkiearbuckle sayanything-81

    good ole wine-stain.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/sparkiearbuckle sayanything-81

    chief
    consider STAR WARS. how expensive? did it work? no. it was dumbasses throwing money away on faith, paranoia, and buzzwords.

    lets not repeat that.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/sparkiearbuckle sayanything-81

    after her families cameo appearances in the last two ‘funtime roundups’, palin had best nail someone for something, lest she become totally relegated to the celebrity-dirtbag gossip sphere.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/sparkiearbuckle sayanything-81

    chief rz
    i am not debating that. i am debating the propaganda that fuelled our arms buildup in the 80s which was madeup and released by team b. you know the charts — future projections of the pathetic ruskies kicking our asses. it was all bullshit and so is this whining about the DPRK. They are just trying to keep the masses from feeding on the leaders by creating external tensions to provide internal solidarity.
    you, chief, are providing that cohesion and solidarity with you whining. the DPRK thanks you immensely.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/sparkiearbuckle sayanything-81

    Also Chief, I will not define. Just because you are getting slapped around… you fall back on the “Define it…” bullshit. We all know what the STAR WARS program was. Don’t be coy.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/sparkiearbuckle sayanything-81

    The presence of a gun? STAR WARS never bore any fruit. Nice strawman.

    Bat
    I whole heartedly agree. You are, at times, just as irrational as Obama.

  • sayanything-2483

    That Sarah!

    ]

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/sparkiearbuckle sayanything-81

    Perhaps Drudge can show Palin how to two-step to “If it don’t fit, don’t force it”?

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/sparkiearbuckle sayanything-81

    gustave

    Kim Jong-il could be providing the fireworks for your next celebration of this country falling in around you.

    Heh. That would be like you providing cognitive content. It aint happening.

  • http://suitepotato.blogspot.com/ sayanything-4808

    No Dino, the left operates on fear and division. You sell fear of everything to the point that people no longer really believe actions have consequence or meaning either positive or negative. They begin to act like it and soon society gets worse and fear is engendered in the society quite understandably and in your self-aggrandizing greedy spiteful way, you teach them to fear and that only you can fix it, and you go on to make it worse, purposely, so that you can step in and claim to save them from that, and so on.

    Ronald Reagan brought hope by standing up to communist aggression. He brought hope by addressing the idiotic socialistic twaddle infesting government and calling it the bad mistake it was. Bush went after terrorists and a dictatorial thug giving hope to the belief that we could be victorious.

    Your way is to cower in fear and encourage others to do the same. You should get used to cowering in fear Dino. It’s all your kind have because the human spirit refuses to give up in the face of the darkness you sell. Eventually, they will rise up against it, and have enough of people like you. Repent before your neighbors tire of the left telling them to abandon ambition to better things.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/sparkiearbuckle sayanything-81

    Are you calling the USSR a petty communist regime?

    Do you read? I have been talking about the 80s chief. i have made that clear. you are ignoring my points to misconstrue what I am saying willingly.

    in the eighties, the USSR was a petty communist regime. yes.

    by ignoring what I am saying you are adopting the leftwing ‘ransom note’ debate tactic. feel free to cut it out, provided your aim actually is rational debate, as you often claim.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/sparkiearbuckle sayanything-81

    Chief RZ
    The propaganda about the Ruskies in the 80s was bullshit too.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/sparkiearbuckle sayanything-81

    mickey
    see the link a/o team b above.

    don’t mix your paranoia with so much reality, you might overdose.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/sparkiearbuckle sayanything-81

    Also, I thought North Korea had an utterly failed attempt to launch a satellite. Palin is barking because she would have us enter a pissing contest with NORKO commie flunks? Heh. Isn’t that the sort of knee-jerk, dumbass reaction that NORKO commies are trying to illicit?

    Does Palin have any other plans besides entering a pissing contests with jokers or playing into the plans of NORKO commies?

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/sparkiearbuckle sayanything-81

    not that she ever really claimed to be able to

    that’s debatable, rob.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/sparkiearbuckle sayanything-81

    easing of centralized power and the corruption of local leaders ended up leading to the end of the USSR.

    you can jock your revisionist histories all you want.

    greg — that shit didn’t shoot down the SCUDs as planned. you offer counterfactuals like “of we had done X then it would have worked” and only reinforce my point.

    any failure of anything is the other side of the partisan divides fault. c’mon man.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/sparkiearbuckle sayanything-81

    we disagree on many salient points. like whether or not it is worthwhile to pump up a petty communist regime with rhetoric. you think that’s fine and should be done to score domestic political points. i don’t. we’ll just have to differ on that because I will never fill the commie sails with propaganda wind like you and Rob.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/sparkiearbuckle sayanything-81

    Rodney Randy Graves
    I’m sorry, did you say something?

    I think Matt ‘If it don’t fit, Don’t force it’ Drudge wants to get together for a screening of ’300′. I know you love that film…

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development