Home Mobile Archives Reader Blogs Register Login

Monday, April 21, 2008

Opposing The Global Warming Scam is “Fearmongering” Now

Grand Forks Herald reporter and Blogger Tu Uyen Tran had a post last night about fearmongering in the public debate. While some of the examples he mentions may be valid, the part on global warming really set me off.

The most powerful argument against global warming is not the counter-facts. It’s the name-calling. The first thing the global-warming deniers point to about “An Inconvenient Truth” is it stars that liberal scumbag Al Gore. The right-wing pundits call global warming a liberal hoax.

What’s ironic is, all through the show, there were these commercials from We Can Solve It, a group fighting climate change. Sitting side by side were Newt Gingrich and Nancy Pelosi and Al Sharpton and Pat Robertson telling you it’s not about politics. Finally.

Why is it that it’s taken so long for everyone to agree that we need to do something about climate change? Because the name-calling has been so effective. The appeal to hate is one of the most powerful argument there is.

Earlier in the piece he talked about how this fearmongering and name calling allowed people to ignore the facts that don’t support your position.  I find it incredible to hear this coming from a proponent that we all have to change to combat “global warming.”

How many facts are the global warming ignoring?

First of all they’re ignoring the fact that we’ve been warming in the past and the current trend looks much like the long term trend.  This graph in itself pretty much shows that we aren’t seeing unprecedented global warming. 

image

You can see that it’s been warmer in the past and we are only on a warming trend correcting for the little ice age.  Usually the global warming activists will show us a graph from 1850, the end of the cold spell until 1998.  Why?  Because we haven’t been warming since 1998?

The activists ignore the fact that the Goddard Institute for Space Studies has misplaced their ground based thermometers, such as above air conditioning exhausts or black top parking lots in order to distort the picture. 

We’re told we must adopt Kyoto when it will do little or nothing to solve the problem.  After all, the worlds biggest emitter of carbon dioxide can’t be expected to live under the same rules the United States does.

To listen to Tu Uyen you have to think that somehow Al Gore is off limits even though he’s the public face of the movement.  So we’re supposed to ignore that Al Gore is flitting around in a private jet or is using 20 times more energy for his home than the average person does in Tennessee.  While skeptical scientists are accused of being supported by the oil industry Al Gore has made nearly an hundred million dollars off of the global warming issue.  But for some reason we can’t bring THAT up.

Don’t you think that if Al Gore really believed in man made Global Warming he’d be living a lifestyle that didn’t make it worse?  Rather than living the lifestyle he’s out calling skeptics names like global warming deniers and akin to flat Earthers.  Others are saying that skeptics of the global warming crisis are as bad as the Nazis.

So what tactics are the global warming activists using to avoid these inconvenient truths?  Why fearmongering and Hyperbole.

We’re told that the only way humans will survive is if a few people can eke out a living in underground cities in the arctic. 

We’re told that the polar bears are going to die, even shown fake pictures of polar bears stuck on a melting mini ice berg.  Turns out the ice was melting because it was summer and the polar bears swam out there and were never in danger.  Meanwhile if it was warmer during the medieval warm period how are the polar bears still around?  If they’re that fragile they wouldn’t be alive today.

The activists are claiming the oceans will rise as much as twenty feet and the south pole is melting.  In fact one small area of Antarctica is melting while the ice is getting deeper in the rest.  In fact the south pole is very cold and is unlikely to melt at all.  On the other hand higher temperatures could actually lead to more snowfall and more glaciers.  The current estimates even given the warming that may not happen is more likely a foot and a half.  (Let’s not forget that right now it looks like it hasn’t been warming in the last twelve years and that undersea probes have found no warming at all.

I find it amusing that Tu Uyen admits that pictures of Florida sinking under the ocean scare the beejesus out of him along with more Hurricanes and the like.  The theory that this will happen under global warming has been pretty thoroughly debunked but the author is scared by them.  That I guess excuses him for accusing the other side of what his side is doing. 

We’re told that global warming will cause more disease, but the facts are the warmer it is the more healthier it is for humans. 

If ever there’s been a case of fearmongering and name calling used to advance a political goal it’s been by the global warming activists.  Saying that the skeptics are engaging in that behavior and ignoring the much worse behavior by the activists is absolutely 180 degrees bass ackward. 

Comments

Wouldn’t telling people that they are going to destroy the earth if they don’t buy your carbon credits real fearmongering?  Silly libs



A political party cannot be all things to all people. It must represent certain fundamental beliefs which must not be compromised to political expediency, or simply to swell its numbers.

dougee on April 21, 2008 at 12:09 pm
Avatar for patriotic

Great post!!! Here in the Peoples Republic of Illinois (home of St. Barack), we have had one of the coldest winters on record.  But never mind, once the enviro-chic crowd is proven wrong (again), they can always revert to their global cooling stance of the ‘70s. Hopefully our economy won’t be wrecked in the interim.

patriotic on April 21, 2008 at 12:48 pm

The herds of sheep who blindly support Barack Obama because he’s soooo cool will remain sightless when presented with the truth about the ‘global warming’ scam. 

Facts are irrelevant to them because only Causes matter.


"Here lies, in honored glory, an American soldier, known but to God.”

The stakes are high. Whether the issue is the economy, or energy, or the federal courts or national security, the right answers are coming not from the Democrats, but from the Republicans. The surge of operations that began a year ago is succeeding. The only way to lose this fight is to quit. Richard M. Cheney, Vice President, 30 May, 2008

pparets on April 21, 2008 at 01:08 pm

Awesome post, Whistler.  You could have gone on a bit, but by then you’d have had a book.

Just a couple of more points:

1) The animations that Al Gore shows of the eastern US seacoast being inundated in roughly 50 years is a pure hoax.  The best estimates suggest the loss of the Western Antarctica Ice Sheet to occur in roughly 1000 years.  It would probably melt if the Earth stays warm, because it is a submarine ice sheet, with its foundations on the ocean floor.  If it were to melt it would add roughly 15-feet of height to the oceans.

2) Although the Earth has been warming since 1850 or so, human generated warming is not considered to have started until circa 1980.  When they show you a picture of where a glacier was 100 years ago compared to now, they are essentially lying, because they are showing the result of 70 years of natural warming followed by 30 years where human activity has played some role in the warming trend.

3) Because the period 1400-1850 was a naturally occurring period (Little Ice Age) in which glaciation increased, it is expected that once the Little Ice Age ended that glaciers would be in retreat.  How much of that retreat would be there even if we humans were to mass suicide?  Hard to say, but it’s a question that is conveniently ignored by the global warming alarmists.  The same goes for the ice loss in the Northern Arctic.  We know that this isn’t a naturally occurring phenomenon associated with the end of the LIA for what reason again?

4) Anybody notice there’s a food shortage?  One of the main reasons for that was the cold winter we had, and the resulting crop failures in China, Australia and Argentina.  Cold weather makes plants more vulnerable to disease and pestilence, just like with humans, when the biosystem gets stressed, they get more vulnerable.  (The same happens in the summer during drought seasons, but that’s a different topic.)

5) You’re also right about disease and cold weather.  Most dread diseases, such as tuberculosis, spread more easily in cold weather, not warm weather.  And other “tropical” diseases, like malaria, used to occur as frequently in the Arctic as in the tropical regions (there’s a reason the mosquito is the Alaskan state bird after all), the reason they don’t is that the wealthy nations can spray for mosquitos, whereas the poorer countries (over represented on the equator) cannot afford to do so.

And this is only the tip of the iceberg, so to speak.

Carrick on April 21, 2008 at 01:26 pm

If a person living in North Dakota still believe in global warming after the last two winters, he is blind to the fact that Al Gore has utterly failed him.

got a little help from rbb. hehe



A political party cannot be all things to all people. It must represent certain fundamental beliefs which must not be compromised to political expediency, or simply to swell its numbers.

dougee on April 21, 2008 at 02:04 pm

...more healthier…

?

electnixon on April 21, 2008 at 02:07 pm

So I can pay more taxes and that takes care of the problem right?  Where to I send the check?  Do I make it out to Al Gore?

electnixon on April 21, 2008 at 02:08 pm

The only reason the liberals are pushing global warming is that its cure is socialism.  Look at the laundry list of things they’ve wanted to do over the past forty years, and each one of them would have to happen NOW if there’s any hope of saving us from the global warming boogeyman.  Means to an end.

Clint F on April 21, 2008 at 03:26 pm

Global Warming is the epitome of fearmongering.


If you don’t know by now, don’t mess with it.

robert108 on April 21, 2008 at 03:36 pm

Washington state is experiencing one of the coldest and snowiness years ever measured… this weekend we had two days of snowfall that blanketed the entire state including the Seattle area.
My trip to the Seattle vicinity took me through some of the more blanketed areas and during a “pit stop” I was hounded and then cornered by a Seattle TV News team seeking interviews about the unusually cold weather we’re experiencing. I tried to dodge them but there was a line at the rest room and I got caught.
Anyway… they asked me what I thought of the unusual snowfall we are experiencing and I responded with my global warming thoughts, which might I add did make the camera man laugh but the reporter politely concluded the interview and informed me they most likely won’t be airing that clip. The camera man winked and thanked me for the fun.
Sheesh.. some just don’t appreciate my unique commentating skills


flag002.gif washC.gif

Anna on April 21, 2008 at 03:46 pm
Avatar for Fred

The liberals/econuts don’t have a clue what real fearmongering is.  Perhaps if the rational people in this country were better at instilling a little real fear in them we’d not have to put up with their crapola 24/7.

Fred on April 21, 2008 at 06:35 pm
Avatar for Fred

The liberals/econuts don’t have a clue what real fearmongering is.  Perhaps if the rational people in this country were better at instilling a little real fear in them we’d not have to put up with their crapola 24/7.

Fred on April 21, 2008 at 06:36 pm

You can say that again.


What’s going to happen to US industry when the global warming extremists like John McCain double the price of electricity?  I would think all these factories will close and set up in countries where they aren’t scared of technology.


The Whistler's signature
The Whistler on April 21, 2008 at 06:40 pm

The Global Warming scam has created a global food shortage. Now that is something to fear.

Mickey on April 22, 2008 at 05:11 am
Avatar for T. Dejmikian

When you do a Google search for “Effects of Global Warming,” one of the top results that always appears is the Wikipedia entry for this subject. Wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia that anyone can edit. Unfortunately, most of the people that sign up to edit this article are pro-global warming evangelists who exhibit a clear pro-global warming agenda. This means that everyone from school children to the media are getting this highly biased view of climate change, when they research this topic via a Google search. Fortunately, however, ANYONE can sign up on Wikipedia free of charge in less than one minute and edit this article. I would encourage everyone to sign up and contribute to this article, to ensure it presents the correct view of global warming. Simply go to: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effects_of_global_warming (or just go to Google and search “effects of global warming” to find the Wikipedia entry right near the top) and start editing! Then you can help to provide the proper balance that is needed in this highly biased article.

-T. Dejmikian

T. Dejmikian on May 24, 2008 at 09:44 pm
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.