On The Brink…

Former Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson’s new book, On the Brink: Inside the Race to Stop the Collapse of the Global Financial System came out this week, It is available at Amazon here, and I heartily recommend it.
What comes across most clearly is just how close we came to a real, cataclysmic meltdown of the entire, worldwide financial system, and how antiquated and ill-prepared our regulatory system was… and still is… to deal with such a crisis. The full scope of what very nearly happened is horrifying.
Surprisingly, Paulson actually anticipated a major credit crisis before he took on the job at Treasury. He just didn’t expect it to be of such a magnitude and velocity, nor did he expect that the regulatory tools available by law to deal with the crisis would be so puny and ineffectual.

I had a pretty clear idea that there would be a credit crisis sometime when I was in Washington. And I told the president I thought there’d be one, and the first major meeting I had with him I spent just talking about that topic. But I did not anticipate a crisis of the magnitude we faced–didn’t anticipate that at all–and I certainly was bordering on naive in my understanding of the regulatory powers and authorities in Washington.

Much of the book is devoted to what should have been done long ago to avoid the “credit crisis” and what we should do now to prevent the next one.

…(W)e need to rethink housing. I spend a lot of time in the book talking about Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the two huge financial institutions that right now are doing virtually all of our mortgage financing, and the government’s behind them. But part of why we got here is we have so overstimulated and overincented housing in the United States that we got homeownership to levels that were unsustainable. And so we need to rethink housing policy: restructure, scale down Fannie and Freddie, but look at a whole series of other things–FHA programs, the mortgage interest deduction–because the combined weight of all of these things I think is just too much.

Mr. Paulson has been giving interviews on network and cable outlets almost non-stop. And the sefl-styled critics, most of whom know next nothing about finance, will no doubt puff and snort that Paulson is merely trying to attract attention to sell books. But Hank Paulson was a very rich man long before he was convinced… reluctantly… to take the job of Treasury Secretary, so its more than a little silly to suggest that he wants or needs the money from book sales.
About writing the book, Mr. Paulson had this to say,

… (W)e tried to write something that’s a fast-paced narrative where you don’t have to have a PhD in finance to understand it, and yet to still be technically accurate and correct: something that the average American can read and understand, and something that finance experts would look at and still think is relevant. To me that was a real challenge.

Anyone who is remotely interested in what happened, and why, should get a copy of Paulson’s book. What you’ll learn is worth many times the price.

Tags:


«
»
  • http://Array sayanything-203

    Badlands4,

    To be fair, there were people who saw this coming. Some had seen the prospect for years in advance.

    President Bush tried for two years to get Fannie/Freddie reform legislation through Congress… to reign in irresponsible underwriting put in place by Clinton HUD Secretaries Cisneros and Cuomo. But the first time around it was blocked by Democrat Barney Frank, whose live-in boyfriend was Fannie’s VP for New Product Marketing (GSE-speak for upper level sub-prime). The second time around, the measure was blocked in the Senate by a filibuster threat by Democrats Chris Dodd and Barack Obama.

    Neiman’s point is a good one. We have spent the past 50 years telling ourselves and our children that life’s decisions need not have bad consequences, that it is okay to have what we want when we want it with little or no thought to actually earning our way to success. Affluence and comfort have been looked upon as a “right”, while our education system continues to deteriorate, becoming less and less rigorous with each new semseter. We’ve become lazy, self-indulgent, and indolent, and instead of learning our lesson and reversing the process, we’ve allowed ourselves to be conned by a smooth-talking teleprompter who continues to tell us what we want to hear, instead of what we need to take to heart.

  • robert108

    Maybe Obama should read this book, so he can stop “blaming Bush” for the “freefall” which was created by his leftie policies in trying to rig the market to get a predetermined social outcome.
    Until he admits that and starts dealing with the real cause, his recession will continue.
    The unspoken part here is also that housing is not a very good financial investment; it’s good for getting a place to live, but it’s not exactly where our investment money should be flowing to create real, sustainable economic growth.

  • Enuf Iz Enuf

    I’m just wondering if Russia did actually try to force the bailout. I remember the day wall street crashed, there were rumors of deliberate manipulation. It sure seems like between his book and the way I remember things happening that day it’s certainly plausible Russia was in fact who they were talking about. What’s the saying, keep your friends close and your enemies closer…

  • sayanything-43

    The problem for the people who knew it was coming was that if they raise awareness they’re going to trigger the event.

    So the responsible leaders on this such as Greenspan, Bush and even McCain were wishy washy asking to fix the upcoming disaster while jerks like Barney Frank were saying all was well and that the reformers only wanted to deny people their own houses.

  • http://SayAnythingBlog.com The_Whistler_ofnd

    Glass Steagal wasn’t repealed. It was modified and that modification,
    signed by Bill Clinton, didn’t help or hurt the credit crisis.

  • sayanything-4124

    The unspoken part here is also that housing is not a very good financial investment; it’s good for getting a place to live

    Exactly, and now astounding obvious, or should be, to every house flipper who crashed and burned.

    A house can be a good financial investment if you buy it for a reasonable price, buy it to live in for 5 years or longer, and don’t use it as an ATM, and it is definitely an investment in family stability, but these people that bought house after house after house and refinanced it every year, are just amazing to me. It is a personal financial investment that can indeed pay off years later, but it isn’t a way to fund your retirement for the average person kwim?

    I remember going home to CA and seeing the price of these houses and the incomes of the buyers and how often they were re-financing these houses to put in a pool or a granite countertops, etc all with these exotic loans that make NO SENSE at all, and thinking “what the h*ll is wrong with you???”

  • sayanything-4124

    My question is why didn’t they know all this was headed our way? It was obvious with the average Joe who could objectively look at things THEN, that there was trouble, big trouble coming our way, and I cannot figure out why they didn’t catch it or did nothing then, when they should have known.

    You are right that hindsight is 20/20 and some things are easy to look back on and think you should have known, when the reality wasn’t so, but some things were just glaringly obvious THEN, particularly the housing market in CA, NV, etc.

  • robert108

    When I said that housing isn’t a good financial investment, I was referring to normal market conditions for housing. Investing money in business gives both a quicker and higher return on your investment, and is better for the economy, since investing in business has a much higher multiplier than investment in housing.

  • robert108

    Actually, Neiman, it is the result of Dem politicians who think they can buy votes in perpetuity by bribing us with our own money, and who think we will never notice what they are doing. We trust them; that’s our mistake.

  • sayanything-287

    Could it all be the result of generations of spoiled Americans that were given everything without any demand to earn what they got and no bills in life for overspending, no work ethic, no passed on lessons from the Great Depression and other hard economic times?

  • sayanything-4124

    I will read it when the library gets it. I find myself wanting to pre-read any books nowadays before I buy them..lol

    I have read books by liberals and conservatives about this meltdown, and they all seem to have one thing in common….lots of people that should have know about this didn’t, or didn’t take it seriously, while those that knew this would happen didn’t seem to scream about it THEN, just now when they have books out.

    I cannot remember the name of one of the books I read that was very harsh on the Bush Administration, but the author was in a position to actually raise the profile of this thing and did nothing, but write a book a year later.

    What I find most amazing about all of this, is how many of those that should have known didn’t have a clue, while there were many schlubs like myself who didn’t need to be a Paul Krugman to see that the housing market in CA was out of control and could not do anything BUT crash.

    It isn’t rocket science to see that a person making 50k in CA, getting a sub-prime loan for a 500k house and re-financing it every year, wasn’t going to be able to make the payments and will NEVER be able to make the payments.

    How could all of these “learned” professionals either miss this, or dismiss it?

  • sayanything-203

    Its worth remembering that the “credit crisis” and the recession were really to separate occurrences. Overlapping, but separate nonetheless. Its also true that while each exacerbated the other, neither neither one caused the other.

    WOOF,

    Your “list” is interesting if only because it seems to suggest that everything was exactly as it should have been in the mortgage and credit markets until Goerge W. Bush became president. Do you honestly believe that everyone else shares your obvious partisan myopia?

  • Enuf Iz Enuf

    As Bat has already said, there were people that seen it coming and tried to stop it. Both Bush and McCain for starters. But Franks and Dodd being on the board dismissed such claims as fear mongering and *no reason to fear*. They’re about as accurate as democrat when it comes to running anything. I keep this link on hand to use anytime people looking back in hindsight say why didn’t they see it coming….people just weren’t listening, i.e. democrats…

    http://sweetness-light.com/archive/timeline-bush-mccain-warned-of-bank-crisis

  • sayanything-287

    I am grossly ignorant of economic theories, macro, micro and whatever else is used to measure our economic picture, but it is nonetheless obvious to me that the debt and orgasmic spending spree of our government must at some near point bankrupt this nation and have a devastating impact on the entire world.

  • http://SayAnythingBlog.com The_Whistler_ofnd

    I read Thomas Sowells book on the meltdown. What was interesting is that
    the real problems came from very few localities in seven or eight states.

    The Democrats are doing their best to create another housing bubble with all
    of their interventions. I guess they’re too stupid to learn.

  • robert108

    “2) Unregulated, non bank, subprime lenders;”

    This is an outright lie; it was the regulations that mandated loans be granted on the basis of race, social standing and neighborhood of residence, under the threat of federal prosecution for illegal discrimination, that was the root cause.
    It was regulation, not “deregulation”.
    You spout the Soros line, as usual.
    The FHA creation of racial discrimination judgments in housing came in 1968. That regulation spawned all the rest.

  • AKA WOOF

    the movie would be
    Financials Gone Wild

    $9.95 + shipping and handling
    easy payments

  • AKA WOOF

    predates GW
    Repeal of Glass Steagal

  • AKA WOOF

    Can you say AIG, Goldman Sachs(Hank Paulson ex-CEO,saved the Gold)), Lehman Brothers no help from Hank.
    The financial industry bought the congress
    the Gramm-Leach-Bilely Act of 1999 passed 90-10 in the Senate ,veto proof
    the act repealed the Glass-Steagall Act’s restrictions on bank and securities-firm affiliations. It also amended the Bank Holding Company Act to permit affiliations among financial services companies, including banks, securities firms and insurance companies.

    Glass-Steagall Act – http://law.jrank.org/pages/7165/Glass-Steagall-Act.html#ixzz0eVodrfYO

  • AKA WOOF

    1) Ultra low rates;
    2) Unregulated, non bank, subprime lenders;
    3) Ratings agencies slapping AAA on junk paper.

    1) The Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000
    2) Net Cap Rule Change of 2004 (aka Bear Stearns exemption)
    3) Repeal of Glass Steagall (1998)

    http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2010/02/causes-of-the-crisis/

  • sayanything-2361

    Thanks. I love his writing I’ll have to track it down.

  • sayanything-277

    Well, hind sight is 20/20 and that’s what I see in most of those books; a dissertation of disasters that have already happened and that few people knew they were imminent.l

  • sayanything-2361

    I largely agree. I’m shocked you do.

    1-”If it wasn’t for ultra low rates, the housing boom would likely have been much more modest;”
    2-”If it wasn’t for the sub-prime lenders, ” I’d say Fannie and Freddi were worst offenders and forced the other banks to try to keep up.
    I plead ignorance on three and the second set of three.

    Actual government action and policies to mold the economy ihelped create the crisis and we’re getting more of the same.

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development