Home Mobile Archives Reader Blogs Register Login

Saturday, July 30, 2005

Oh, Sweet Irony…

For those of you who don't know, the Supreme Court recently ruled in the case of Kelo v. New London that the government can use its powers of eminent domain not just for "public use" (e.g., roads, dams, and so on), but also for development by private owners. Their reasoning? Handing the land over to private developers will result in more tax revenue, which somehow qualifies as "public use." In one fell swoop, the 5 more statist justices of the Supreme Court sent our property rights down the toilet, most likely never to be recovered again.

That's why it warms my heart to read this:

PLAINFIELD, N.H. - Libertarians upset about a Supreme Court ruling on land taking have proposed seizing a justice's vacation home and turning it into a park, echoing efforts aimed at another justice who lives in the state.

Organizers are trying to collect enough signatures to go before the town next spring to ask to use Justice Stephen G. Breyer's 167-acre Plainfield property for a "Constitution Park" with stone monuments to commemorate the U.S. and New Hampshire constitutions.

Plainfield will never agree to it, of course; laws only apply to the little guy, never the people who make them or judge them. Still, as a symbolic gesture, I think it does some good.

If we can no longer rely on the system of checks and balances to restrain government power, it's important the people become a check themselves. And if we can use a Supreme Court edict against the very statists who made it possible, all the better.

Comments

Rob
Rob
17182 comments
Send a private message

I hope they succeed, but local politicians (knowing that this huge new expansion of their powers is at stake) aren’t likely to let one of these stunts succeed lest it whip up public sentiment and result in the decision being overturned.

What amazes me (still) is the premise the ruling was based on to begin with.  As though collecting more taxes because the government can (not because they need to) was enough “public good” to legitimize the seizing of property from private citizens.

Government should get taxes when there is an existing need for them, not because an occassion presents itself for them to do so.


The war against illegal plunder has been fought since the beginning of the world. But how is… legal plunder to be identified? Quite simply. See if the law takes from some persons what belongs to them, and gives it to other persons to whom it does not belong. See if the law benefits one citizen at the expense of another by doing what the citizen himself cannot do without committing a crime. Then abolish this law without delay … If such a law is not abolished immediately it will spread, multiply and develop into a system.

Frédéric Bastiat, The Law

Rob’s recently listened-to songs:

robport.gif border=0

Rob on July 30, 2005 at 05:07 pm
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.