and after three generation will send nuclear-suicide bombers into suspecting nothing happy America, and it will be the last day for 90% americans, including your descendents.

Oh! So that’s what happened in Japan after WW2.
================================/
We ‘ll never know, who/what actually inspired 9/11, but you most likely are right: looks very alike two filled-with-death airplanes above Japanese cities in 1945…
==============================/
Of course, there is no way that anybody can talk with the hysterical crowds as it is there now. Any messenger of peace will be killed indeed with the utmost cruelty and satisfaction, as it was done before in the history and now. Later on crowds may sincerely repent about that, but for that we need, that the messenger’s words be heard before they die.
This only possible if they come there before (instead) or after the war. We have lost the chance of peace interference there INSTEAD of the military interference. We still can STOP the intervention and send volunteers there after hysterical peak has gone.
Anyhow these must be absolutely conscious people, with very high intellectual level, who studied the situation well enough to know all the view-points of opposed sides and all their argumentation. If the government dares to support this action, it should allow to these people the maximal access to the secret information before they go to Palestina. Beside, they will need at least 2 years to learn one of Muslim languages — without it the understanding will be impossible, and they be killed almost immediately. In addition, each such volunteer must be accompanied by an interpreter — the best option, if American government pays to the local volunteers-interpreters as much money as they want if they will be able to find someone. Interpreter is needed, since even 2 years of foreign language study is not enough to express yourself and to understand what is said, good enough for developing a contact with the crowd. Without this contact they will be killed after first few inevitable misunderstandings or miswordings. After these conditions are met (stopped war, sufficient amount of highly informed volonteers, a period of peace enough to learn language and calm down + the local interpreter), still the risk of being killed will be high enough, but at least they will surely gain some time to TALK and be heard. Christ had three years to talk, and he WAS heard and admired and sorried for, though still disobeyed by all Christian worlds then and now.
The time came to bring HIS words to power.
=======================
well, if my participation here is not welcome I go. Otherwise I could past couple of responses from other believes (Hindu and Buddha).
Be peace with you.

Thanks for a great movie which should be required in our high schools. This movie is a history lesson. Perhaps should be shown on TV screens in this country. I have lived through many wars since WWII, and it is so frustrating to see so many citizens of this great country totally oblivious to what is going on. It’s as if they are ostriches. They just stick their head in the sand and hope all this Islamofacists will disappear. It’s time to wake up if you care about our children’s future. If we don’t act now we will be cursed by our future generations for not doing anything about it.

Well said AWAKENED WARRIOR!! I was happy to see that you mentioned the hippy professors that are not running our universities. Many dont even know what these professors are teaching and saying. I like what you say about “truth”. What a world it would be, if we could get off the hook because we did what we did in out truth.

Likwid: Yes, I’m sure. It is true, IMO, that we do have to have a shell of govt on some levels; the less, the better, and if there were no military threats in the world, probably unnecessary, but the ability to mobilize quickly does require some central govt. Check Otto von Bismarck.

bobocopy: Since I have done none of the things you mentioned, I agree. RBB came out with his usual threadjack away from the real subject, and I called him on it. You accused me and Rob of using straw man arguments, when in fact we were just pointing out rbb’s egregious change of subject, which is a usual tactic by him.
As far as being “a literalist”, if you mean that I say what I mean and I mean what I say, that is absolutely true. I take that as a compliment, not as a mental illness(if you want to be so polite, why the smear?).
Precisely due to the anonymity of blogs, I find it much more efficient to say what I say, and take others at their word. An occasional winky face does break things up a bit, and I am guilty of the occasional humorous remark with those who I already know, but I am not obligated to interpret your remarks, for any reason. Whether you realize it or not, that is asking me to take care of you, and that’s not my job. On this blog, we stand or fall by our words, and the burden of credibility is on the commenter, not everyone else. It’s just about being honest, or dishonest, as is the case with some commenters.
Whether you are a man or a woman is irrelevant to me. I only care about your ideas. This is written text, after all.

Nineteenth Century Marxist economic thinking. Inability to understand the real relationship between capital and labor. Oh, well!

You sure about that one? That book is against the Federal Reserve Bank. You know,..that entity that is not federal, not a reserve, and not a bank? Too much central planning for my tastes.

likwid: That was great!

Yeah? Well, I’m about to e-mail you something then. Check your inbox in a few.

While this video was, to say the least, entertaining, it’s ALL a lie! 9-11 was an INSIDE JOB!!

9-11 was an inside job!! It was “controlled demolition”, people . They had a crime scene there and what did they do to it even before an investigation started? They hired “CDI” to clean up and ship off the wreckage to foreign countries (like China for one) never to be seen again. By the way, ya know who “CDI” is? “Controlled Demolition Incorporated” folks!

Do your damn homework instead of simply believing all this crap about Jihad. Sure, the events continued an Islamic jihad (of sorts) but, Jihad was already underway. Look at The USS Cole. Look at flight 800. Remember the bombing of the marine barracks that killed many of our boys and Oklahoma’s A. P. Murrah building where it was said for months afterwards that there were middle eastern men involved but not caught! John Doe number 2??? He don’t look NOTHING like who they got, Terry Nichols!!!

WAKE UP!!!

Ordered myself a copy yesterday.

“the victory against Hitler meant very sad thing: it taught Stalin to kill in order to achieve the desirable.”

Small prob. Stalin killed because of his adherence to Marxist ideology. He also killed in the thirties, before Hitler started his mass killings, way before we killed Hitler. You lack the moral sense of right and wrong, good and evil. Freedom is good, slavery is evil. Get it? When we killed the evil Hitler and the evil Tojo, it was not the same as when they killed millions to gain control and influence over the world. If you can’t see that, you are truly a disadvantaged person. Typical flawed leftie equivalency/moral relativism.

It is true, IMO, that we do have to have a shell of govt on some levels; the less, the better, and if there were no military threats in the world, probably unnecessary, but the ability to mobilize quickly does require some central govt.

That requires a central bank?

I figured you would be against the unaccountability and possible simple manipulation of the market. Best to leave these sorts of things to the free market.

loya – be original and write your own comment. Any more copy and pastes will be considered spam and treated as such.

I can’t understand why this documentary is not shown on national television. I have known for a long time that our mortal enemy is radical Islam. Most Americans, on the other hand, are oblisious to the threat. We must wake up and marshal our forces to protect the Western world from Islamofacism. History is repeating itself. My father was part of the Greek army that liberated northern Greece from Islam in 1912. I am seventy-four years old and the old problem has reared its ugly head again.

We must warn the world that we are in mortal danger of losing our heritage, our lives and our Judeo-Christian civilization.

+Fr. Constantine J. Simones

“R108 reacts like a poodle on linoleum running for the door when the mail is delivered.”

Now, there’s a reply packed with substance. Nice refutation, rbb! Right up there with your usual stuff. When you have nothing, attack the other guy on a personal level.(or at least make a feeble attempt)

“You and your ilk are fooling yourselves about this administrations capability to conduct foreign policy. They are failing miserably. Their policies are vulgar, disrespectful and day after day proven wrong.”

Speaking of dreaming things up… What you really hate about today’s reality(and the reason you try to distract from it) is that we are succeeding, which protects your disloyal butt as well. Your ability to spew your lies on this blog comes from innumerable patriots shedding their blood for your right to speak out your ideas. Try saying that about the administration in Iran, or Venezuela, or on the Daily Kos. Just give it a try.

Here’s kitten site for you:

Very cute!

http://www.catsthatlooklikehitler.com/

Every American should at least see this and make up his mind. Its either then or us. I prefer us.

bobocopy: You just don’t get it. In your lust(?) to defend rbb, you omit the most important fact: He brought up his whine about Republican misspending on a thread about murdering terrorists. Of all the replies he could have made, he chose to ignore the subject completely and to launch a completely irrelevant partisan attack. Rob and I called him on his distractive shite, as we should have. rbb is trying to distract attention from the obvious savagery and real threat of terrorism to attack a target more in his agenda. Talk about straw man tactics! RBB is the champ at that one, btw.

“I will also agree that rbb was using a common and unfair debate tactic: changing the subject.”

“I agree with you.”

A sliver of honesty from you, rbb. Congratulations! That was my entire point in the first place.

The uneducated people of the world look to leaders for instruction and tend to believe that a leader is all wise, has all knowledge and actually communicates with his God on a personal level unknown to the uninitiated. The left tends to believe that their is some special power granted only to the left that makes them all wise, all knowing. The educated left leads the uneducated into eventual oblivion. The educated left knows how to keep themselves from becoming a martyr however. You don’t see the Sheiks, Ayatollahs, Bin Ladens or Zarkawis “sticking thier necks out” for the sake of Allah. Instead they cower in tunnels (holes) in the earth, in religious buoildings and behind the bodies of women and children…all the while knowing that Christian westerner Christians would not slaughter innocents to simply get at the animals that call themselves Hezbullah. Hezbullah counts on this trait of Christians to stay effective and alive. They are nothing more than traitorous cowards, afraid to make it known just how cowardly they are.

In my opinion and as far as I am concerned, every muslim is a potential target since every muslim swears unwavering allegiance to Allah and Allahs minions. They should NEVER be trusted and watched closely. Your muslim neighbor my also want to be your executioner.

Excellent video – should be hsown on television and NOT necessarily on cable.

Marian Panzer on July 31, 2006 at 3:33 PM

Exelent Idea, It will never Happen. CBS,NBC, CNN and all the other are more concerned with Humiliateing a poor Murdering Terrorist by putting a pair off panties on his head. The Main Stream Media is on the side of the Muslims (Death Cult)

We need to stop argueing with each other and start seeing what is happening in this world. All of this is in the bible, the end times. Read and see prophecy unfolding right before your eyes. This war started back in Abrahams day, when Isaac and Ishmael was born.(Gen 17:19) Isaac the father of Isreal and us, and Ishmael the father of the Palestinian people.
This war is ancient and it will affect America, The bible states that there will be a one world government and a one world religion. This one world religion will cut off your head if you do not join and worship the beast. What does muslims do is you are not a muslim,,,,cut off your head!!!!!
We need to be watchful and alert to what is happening around us…pray, put on the whole armour of God.

bobocopy: The last time I held hands with a guy was on a battlefield, and here’s a hint: I wasn’t the one who was dying. Don’t be so anxious about the handholding thing, if you get my drift.

I will also agree that rbb was using a common and unfair debate tactic: changing the subject.

I agree with you.

Please compare those two paragraphs, one sent to me by one of my opponents, and another – the paragraf from Koran, sent to me by another opponent. I do not see much difference between them. Do you? No. Both passionately want to kill people of another believe. So, we are not better than them! Why we are if we want to kill them same cruelly, wiping away even their children???Yes, they are wrong and do not have an excuse for killing, but same wrong we are and do not have an excuse for killing. And still we do, and interfere to the lands which are thousands miles away from us, and kill people NOT FOR OUR OWN DEFENCE, but to convert people to our believe, to our understanding of “justice”, by fear, by bombing, by very same Muslim approach – “if you do not accept our way of justice, we bomb you on your own land and we kill you” .

–
me: you can’t kill them ALL. Each fallen soldier has 5 to 10 children who will dream to revenge for his father after they are adult. You do not invite to kill children, do you?
he: our “softness” makes things worse. They are breed to hatred since birth. We must kill them ALL.
me: oh, you do, sorry.
==========================================

Koran 8:37
In order that Allah may seperate the impure from the pure, Put All the impure ones (Non-Muslim), one on top of the another in a Heap and cast them into Hell. They will be the ones to have lost
The “All-Merciful Allah” is now specifically instructing all “peace-loving Muslims” to heap up a mountain of corpses of the non believers. Of course, in order to do this holy task for Allah, the Muslim must first go out and attack innocent Non-Muslims and massacre them so that Allah’s wishes are fulfilled. Allah seems to have an inexhaustible thirst for the blood of innocents. Note that the reason given to massacre non-believers is that “Allah may seperate the Impure from the Pure”. It has nothing to do with self-defense or protection as Muslims try to argue.

You’re a literalist, aren’t you? I don’t at all mean this as an insult; I just seel that maybe you suffer from something like Asperger’s syndrome that prevents you from understanding that not every word every person on the Internet says should be taken at face value all the time. Sometimes, strangers lie. Sometimes, people joke. Sometimes, there is a different semantic meaning than literal meaning to the words people use.

When I asked what made you so sure I was a dude, I wasn’t witholding the fact that I was a male. I was simply making light of the Internet’s anonymity and the assumptions we make about the people we interact with.

When I said that I was a wishy-washy liberal, I wasn’t witholding the fact that I was a male. I was simply making light of my fellow liberals with a light-hearted joke.

When I said we could all go back to being friends and holding hands, I wasn’t suggesting that people who hold hands should not be allowed to do so, nor was I suggesting that we should literally hold hands. I was simply making light of the fact that this blog is rife with people hurling insults at one another, so to have a moment where people aren’t (angrily and anonymously) saying rude things to one another was a relief.

To say that someone is scared of his masculinity because he doesn’t start every post with, “BY THE WAY I’M A MAN” is a bit of a stretch. (And before you criticize, I’m using hyperbole here to illustrate a point; I’m not actually implying that you literally suggested I do that.)

(Absolutely all kidding aside: if you are truly a veteran, as you claim to be [I believe you], I wish you all the best. There is not a greater hero in this country than a person who is willing to lay down his life to stand for what the country was founded on. Sincerely, I salute you.)

Let’s not be angry. I truly respect what you have to say. I didn’t come here to insult you or your beliefs. I came here for a real discussion and to deal in honest debate tactics. So far that’s what I’ve gotten, today. If it’s all the same to you, I’d really rather not sling personal insults or call into question the masculinity of others. Sound good?

“Christ Message” continues to vomit in this comment thread, What do those people go through now – is this very same kind of psychotic disease – mass psychosis. Which is a very infectious disease, and its danger increases tremendously in time of total despair.

Let’s kill it!

You cant heal it by weapon, this only aggravates it.

Sure you can. Dead is dead dude.

Can you imagine the crazy woman standing on the 5-th floor open window with her children on her arms?

To be really analogous, the crazy bitch’s kids would have bombs strapped onto them and she would be telling them to walk to me.

Would you talk to her with a gun in your hands or with the soothing softness?

Blow that crazy bitch away!

If you can’t talk with them, why do not you ask Indian people? They have much longer history of accommodating to different religions.

Yeah,..how are those Muslims treating the Indians? Not so well, are they? Kind of blows your message away, doesn’t it?

Now answer honestly, “Christ Message”.

To be a “Christian” is to never help anybody with military “interenference into foreign countries”.

Thanks for the new definition.
=================================/
You welcome
————-

Care to explain how you came up with this new definition?
=======================

1/At Jesus’ birth, the angels sang: “Glory to God in the highest and on earth PEACE, GOOD WILL toward men (Luke 2:14).
2/He told Peter who cut off the ear of the high priest’s servant, “Put your sword back into its place; for all who take the sword will perish by the sword” (Matt 26:52).
3. while dying He prayed for those who mocked and crucified Him: “Father forgive them for they know not what the do!” (Luke 13:34).
4.You have heard that it was said (By Moses and Jewish God-CM), “You shall love your neighbor and hate your enemy.” But I say to you, Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, so that you may be sons of your Father who is in heaven; for he makes his sun rise on the evil and on the good, and sends rain on the just and on the unjust. For if you love those who love you, what reward have you? Do not even the tax collectors do the same? And if you salute only your brethren, what more are you doing than others? Do not even the Gentiles do the same? You, therefore, must be perfect, as your heavenly Father is perfect.

===========================/
So, do you want it or not, if you consider yourself Christian, you must protect a sufferer or help free a slave BY DISARMED HANDS (if you can), otherwise your are not Christian.
You may think that killing one in order to save 100 is good, – then you may be right or not right, – but you are CERTAINLY NOT CHRISTIAN. So, choosing for blood and bombing you must honestly announce in front of the whole world that you withdraw yourself from Christianity, before you started the war

Gee thanx for the rosey outlook for the week Gene … does this mean I should max out my credit card?

Where can I get a copy of this video?

Since these extremists only have courage to fight when they are using innocent civilians as human shields (by firing their rockets from within their own communities)(surrounded by people who are predominately similarly brainwashed) – or – by inflicting their wrath on unarmed civilians – there are those that would (somewhat convincingly) argue that the only way to combat this threat is to “nuke’em all & let God sort them out”…

Sadly, even this won’t work. Although, it does have its merits…

This video should be required homework for all network executives. Perhaps one of them might have the cahones to shrug off the politically correct suits they’re all wearing and give the rest of the nation the info we need to properly understand and combat this malignantly cancerous human “growth”..

All I know is I’ve had this funny feeling for the past few months and have been loading up on guns and ammo. I don’t know exactly what’s coming, but this ‘funny feeling’ tells me it’s not going to be good and it’s going to be right here. For a while I thought it might come from the illegal aliens, but I’m not quite positive that’s it.

Get ready, folks. America is not a country someone can take over by taking Wahington, DC. It’s each individual they will have to defeat.

Well, except for the liberals. They’re gone anyway.

GOD bless America!

Christ message (which by the way I question the depth, meaning, use, context and sincerity of your name):

You go first.

To bobcopy –

Your argument that our prosecuting the war in Iraq has made us the most hated nation in the worls is fallicious at best. You assume that our actions have spawned their hatred and, hence, their terrorist acts. How do you then explain terrorist acts before our invasion? Terrorist acts were rampant during Clinton’s appeasement years. Remember – he had Yassir Arafat to the White House more times than almost any other foreign leader. Radical Islam existed long before our invasion of Iraq. They simply see “The West” as their enemy and seek to destroy us any way possible.
Your assertion that Iraq had nothing to do with 9-11 attempts to shift the argument and misses the point entirely – perhaps deliberately. Iraq was exporting terrorism, had acquired weapons of mass destruction (read General Georges Sada’s book if you doubt that), and had a number of terrorist training camp dotting its landscape. This doesn’t take into account the pervasive rape and mass murder that took place during Hussein’s reign. Obviously, we needed to take out this threat. Incidentally, we did not need an “excuse” to invade Iraq as their repeated violations of the UN resolutions after the first Gulf War (i.e., shooting at our aircraft) was enough to justify another invasion. Too bad you libs don’t know your history. Or do you just ignore it?

I am grateful to see this posting about radical Islam – I have followed the progress of these lunatics for many years through Zola Levitt Presents, a show that has revealed this information for about the last 20 years, telling the truth where the ‘media’ has refused and refused. This is most convenient to forward around for more people to see, which is probably the only way many people will become aware of the danger we now face. I wish there were a way to force the media to reveal things they refuse to reveal – or hold them responsible for deaths and destruction that comes about due to their irresponsible and treasonous behavior.

“Christ Message” bastardizes the message, So you choose whether you bomb Khirosima/Nagasaki/Belgrad/Vietnam/Iraq – then you believe in Juish destructive God, which is not better than islamic God AT ALL,
or you vote AGAINST military interenference into foreign countries – and then, only then you are Christian

So to be a “Christian” is to sit back and watch evil regimes run supreme over their subjects. To be a “Christian” is to never help free a slave from his chains. To be a “Christian” is to never help anybody with military “interenference into foreign countries”.

Thanks for the new definition.

Care to explain how you came up with this new definition?

What’s the matter? Too damn lazy – eh! I thought so. Yer probably too damn stupid to know how to copy-n-paste em – eh, Moron!!

edit from likwidshoe – No, I am quite aware on how to copy and paste. Please tone down your attitude.

bobocopy: So far, we haven’t had any semantic misunderstandings. You seem to be a bit of a “literalist” yourself, btw. To my way of thinking, we have had differences in our way of thinking, not semantic differences at all. To me, it seems disingenuous to imply that someone is suffering from a mental illness because they speak the truth as they know it, and I wonder what you were trying to accomplish by your statement. I don’t use any such debate tactics, and won’t, no matter what ones you might use. By trying to label me so, you distracted from giving a substantive response, which is very poor debate, unless you don’t have a substantive response; then it’s understandable. I run into this tactic from lefties all the time. They try to substitute smear and personal attack for substantive argument. If you differ with me on the facts of any matter, please say so, but personal attacks will avail you nothing with me.

No, I won’t loan you a dollar, no matter how you ask me.

Who and why is the video being yanked from this website? And thanks for the tip on where to order it!

Generally Lik doesn’t mince words so it’s perhaps unwise to translate his stuff.

Oh no, that was me. I was letting “TruthSayer” there know that I do know how to copy and paste and really didn’t appreciate that comment in response to my helpful suggestion.

You think he got the point?

With all due respect Rube, please show me where I have ever written that we should not fight terrorist.

Make clickable links man!

Good grief.

I would point out to those of you that claim to be christians and advocate the use of kindness and consideration for the enemies of Christianity even in the face of eminent destruction that God/Jesus Christ/Holy Spirit do not advocate such actions. God kills!…on purpose…and tells us to fear him!! Jericho comes to mind right off the bat. Joshua was charged to have his men tramp around the walls of Jericho which he did and the walls “came tumbling down” and Joshuas army won the day…not with flowers and offerings of monetary help and understanding but with death and destruction. You folks had better wise up real quick or you are going to become a statistic amongst the tortured/murdered in the worls. Islam is a dangerous religion regardless of who is practicing it and Christians and other “infidels” are the target of it destructive powers. Beware.

Ok, this is the thing. According the readings in the Bible, God was a jealous and vengeful God. He destroyed those that did wrong or were against His “people”. Christ, His son was the total opposite; he taught love, kindness and patience. He never hurt anyone; he healed the sick and helped the poor. Loved the children! MORE SO, Christ came to preach God’s word which was to SPREAD the Gospel so that everyone would know it, accept (maybe) and turn to God and be Christ like. The only negative thing was that if you did not accept God’s word, you would not go to heaven in the life after;that would be the punishment You would not be killed, murdered or slaughtered. Now with Allah and the teaching of the Koran; if you are not a believer, you are in “infidel” they are taught to HATE YOU, not convert you. Killing the infidels is the way to go with these extremist. So, is religion to blame? Is God to blame for giving Israel land? Because that has always been a fight.

These extremist have infiltrated out country and soon will wage war on us HERE on our land. 911 will be nothing when they start attacking us in numerous cities throughout our country. Who is to say that this current attack/war is an excuse to begin things here.

Why don’t we just go over, carpet bomb their asses and eliminate them like cockroaches? Will that solve the problem? And we can take over the oil too. How does that sound? Sound harsh? Do you think if the US was not the super power it is said to be, they would not have done that already to us? If not, think again.

Yeah, like the “War On Poverty” started by LBJ(the peace candidate). It’s trillions and counting, and no discernable reduction in poverty. Nice cherry-picking, rbb. He’s not partisan; oh, no!

“realitybased”bob spits, What the war on terror is really about…part two

It’s “really about” fraud? Did you miss the teams of Muslims who blow themselves up in public?

WOW, I see it really riles up the poodles when fair criticism of the “fiscally responsible” gop make the news.

Don’t be an idiot. What we “poodles” object to is the moonbat position that this war is about fraud.

You and your ilk are fooling yourselves about this administrations capability to conduct foreign policy. They are failing miserably. Their policies are vulgar, disrespectful and day after day proven wrong.

Then make an argument for once.

bobocopy says, What people object to is sending off our greatest heroes (U.S. Troops) to fight a war that leads to us being the most hated nation in the world. What people object to is the lack of a preponderance of evidence for such a war.

How much evidence do you need?

I’m not saying they were the sole reason for the war, but do you think we invaded because of WMDs?

That was one of many reasons.

I’m sure you know this, but Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11.

If true, who cares? It’s a war against terrorism and is not limited to a war against those who committed 9/11.

The War on Terror and the the war in Iraq are competely separate entities.

And now I know that you’re not an honest person. How could anybody look at Saddam Hussein and say that he wasn’t running a terrorist state? How could anybody look at Saddam Hussein and say that he wasn’t enabling and sponsoring terrorism?

Link doesn’t function.

You can’t win those who dream to die in the war against America. You cant by any violent weapon. As more you fight them, as more hatred you get.
The only way to peace goes through disarmed communication. America needs to stop any military interference in the world, and we also need volunteers who will want to go to Muslim world and talk to their people. Volunteers, who will be same ready to die, as THEY, but without any weapon in their hands. Many of them will die. But their words will be heard and respected. This is the only way to change the terrorist ideology. There is no way to change it by weapon. May be USA government must redirect all finances, which go now to the war, to the families of those volunteers who dare to go to Muslim countries and talk about peace and love with bare hands and no body-guards.

AW: Very good stuff. Keep it coming. Inquiring minds want to know.

http://www.geostrategy-direct.com/geostrategy-direct/wnd.html

Iraq-al-Qaida links go back decade
CIA reports show nearly 100 examples of cooperation

http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/articles/2395416?source=Evening%20Standard

Yossef Bodansky, author of “The High Cost of Peace,” says joint preparations by Hussein, Yasser Arafat and al-Qaida for a new wave of anti-U.S. terror began last spring. The model for the terrorism campaign is Arafat’s Black September Organization of the 1970s.

Judge Awards Iraqi Assets to Families of Sept. 11 Victims by Robert Siegel (All Things Considered, May 7, 2003): http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=1254725

Note: This allows you to listen to the original broadcast.

9-11 panel discovers Saddam-Osama link
Documents show Iraqi possibly plotted attacks on U.S. http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=39061

In ’99, Clarke saw
Iraq-al-Qaida link
But Bush critic told ’60 Minutes’ Sunday there was ‘absolutely’ no evidence ‘ever’
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=37704

rbb: Your own words, please! Stop this cowardly use of mouthpieces. You cherry-pick, and masquerade as giving real information, when all you do is selectively quote others to try to prop up your sagging agenda.

docdave: the son of the Jewish God was not a pacifist so you’re barking
=======================/
To whom are you talking, docdave? People do not bark. Dogs do. But dogs hardly can discuss whether Christ was a pacifist or not. Of course barbarian who talk with people like with dogs, certainly did not heard about Christ’s pacifism. So, just for you a bit more knowledge about Christ is below. If you have patience enough to read it to the end, you probably will stop treating people like dogs.
======================
A CHRISTIAN RESPONSE TO ISLAM (by Ibrahim Mansoor, Ph.D., Cambridge)
Christ is rightly called “THE PRINCE OF PEACE” (Is 9:6), because he offers us PEACE WITH GOD by bearing the penalty of our sins, PEACE WITH OURSELVES by offering us the power to overcome sin in our life, and PEACE WITH PEOPLE by granting us the capacity to love even those who hate us. He told Peter who cut off the ear of the high priest’s servant, “Put your sword back into its place; for all who take the sword will perish by the sword” (Matt 26:52).
At Jesus’ birth, the angels sang: “Glory to God in the highest and on earth PEACE, GOOD WILL toward men (Luke 2:14). Thirty three years later while dying He prayed for those who mocked and crucified Him: “Father forgive them for they know not what the do!” (Luke 13:34). And to all who trust in Him and accept His gracious provision of salvation, Christ promises: “My PEACE I give to you; not as the world gives do I give to you. Let not your heart be troubled, neither let it be afraid” (John 14:27).

What contributions can Christians make toward a resolution of the threat of terrorism, sponsored by Muslim organizations? It is naive to think that anyone can offer a magic solution to the complex conflict between Islam and Christianity that has been going on for the past 14 centuries? The most we can hope to accomplish is to start a thinking process leading toward a solution. With this in mind I am submitting three suggestions:
1) Christians Need to Understand the Root of Terrorism To resolve the problem of terrorism, which is causing a paralyzing fear in the American society and many Western countries, besides costing billions of dollars to the international community of nations, it is vitally important to understand that the root of Muslim terrorism is theological, not merely political or territorial. By this I mean that the acts of terrorism we are witnessing daily are inspired, not merely by the desire to get a larger share of the land controlled by Israel, but by the clear teaching of the Koran “to fight and slay” the infidels until the whole world is under Islam’s rule.
Keep in mind that 99.9 percent of the Middle East lands are controlled by Muslim countries today. Only one-tenth of one percent is controlled by Israel. The Muslims, whose original homeland is Saudi Arabia, have succeeded through the centuries to systematically subdued all the countries of the Middle East, by practically uprooting all the Christians and Jews living there.
What this means is that the Arabs are not satisfied with the 99.9 percent of the Middle East lands they have occupied. They are fighting for the one-tenth of one percent of the landmass which is controlled by Israel. Will territorial concessions on the part of Israel bring about a lasting peace? Absolutely not, even if Palestinian received all the land they claims as theirs! Why? Simply because history teaches us that no matter how much territory the Muslims conquered, they still wanted more. What has been true in the past, is still true today. The want all the land of Israel.
Am I suggesting that Palestine does not belong to the Palestinians? There is no question that the Palestinian have the right to a homeland in Palestine, but they can hardly claim that historically Palestine has been their own country, governed by the Palestinians, with a distinct Palestinian culture and language. The fact is that Palestinians are Arabs who have occupied what in Bible times was known as the land of Canaan. They are indistinguishable from Jordanians, Syrians, Saudies, Lebanese, Iraquis, Iranians, etc.
Prior to the 1967 Arab-Israeli war, there was no serious movement for a Palestinian homeland. The territories that Israel captured during the Six-Day War, did not belong to Yasser Arafat or the Palestinian Authorities, but to Jordan’s King Hussein. It is only after Israel won the war that these Arabs discovered their national identity as Palestinians.
The truth is that term “Palestine” was coined, not by native Arabs to designate their homeland, but by the Romans after they captured Judea in 70 A. D. After committing genocide against the Jews and smashing the Temple, the Romans decided that Judea would no longer exist as the land of the Jews. To add insult to injury they changed the name from Judea to Palestine, a name derived from the Philistines– tribal people living in the southern costal region and conquered by the Jews at the time of David.
Palestine as a State Never Existed
What this means is that Palestine as a state with its own language and culture, has never existed. Its territory has been ruled alternatively by the Romans, Islamic and Christian crusaders, the Ottoman Empire, and briefly by the British after World War I. The British agreed to restore part of the land to the Jewish people as their homeland.
From a historical perspective, the Jews have a 4,000-year-old birthright to Palestine. It is the land of their religious, ethnic, and historical roots. The fact that in the past they were expelled from their homeland by Romans, Christians, and Muslims, does not mean that they should be forced out of their homeland again today! After all, they have no other land which they can rightfully claim as their homeland.
This is not the case with the Palestinians. From a historical perspective they can legitimately claim several Arab countries as their homeland, because that is where are found their religious, cultural, ethnic, and linguistic roots.
Some try to prove the Muslim’s roots in Palestine by appealing to the Al Aqsa Mosque and the Dome of the Rock in Jerusalem, which are popularly regarded as Islam’s third most holy sites. In my reading I found that the Koran says nothing about Jerusalem. It mentions Mecca and Medina countless times, but never mentions Jerusalem. In fact there are no historical evidences to suggest Muhammad ever visited Jerusalem.
How then did Jerusalem become the third holiest site of Islam? Largely as a result of a gratuitous interpretation of a vague passage found in the seventeenth chapter (sura) of the Koran, entitled “The Night Journey.” It relates that in a dream Muhammed was carried by night “from the sacred temple to the temple that is most remote, whose precinct we have blessed, that we might show him our signs….”
In the seventh century, some Muslims identified the “temple that is most remote” as being the Mosque in Jerusalem. It is hard to believe that Muhammad would be carried away in a dream to the Mosque in Jerusalem that did not yet exist at the time of his death in 632 A. D. By contrast, the Jews can trace their roots in Jerusalem back to the days of Abraham (Gen 14:18).
Recently Arab leaders met in Beirut to find a solution to the conflict between Israel and the Palestinians. They adopted the proposal of the Saudi Crown Prince Abdullah to persuade Israel to return certain territories to the Palestinians in exchange for granting to the State of Israel the right to exist.
Why Arab Leaders Do Not Give Some of the Land to Palestinians?
What I find difficult to understand is why all these Arab leaders who control 99.9 percent of the vast landmass of the Middle East, and have incredible financial resources from oil exports to the West, do not open the doors of their countries to the relatively small Palestinian population of only 2,895,683 people, according to the 1997 census ? After all the Palestinians are their own Arab brethren. They share the same religious, ethnic, cultural, and linguistic heritage.
Why do Arab leaders prefer to finance refugee camps in the West Banks rather than inviting Palestinians to settle in their own countries? Why Arab countries don’t follow the example of America who has given asylum to persecuted people of all races and creeds, including many Arabs? Why are Arab leaders more interested to take away some land from Israel–an extremely small country– than give some of their own land to their Palestinian Muslim brethren?
I believe that answer is to be found in the call of the Koran “to fight and slay” the infidels until the whole world is under Islam’s rule. For Arab leaders to offer asylum to their Palestinian brethren, would mean to stop the ongoing conflict with Israel–an enemy of Islam that must be ultimately driven out of the land. By fueling the present conflict, especially with financial subsidies to the families of suicide bombers, they hope to achieve their objectives. What is at stake, then, is not more land for the Palestinian, but total Muslim control of the Middle East.
Some may feel that I am not fair to the Muslims. Let me repeat the issue is not the Muslims people as such, most of whom are peace-loving people whom I love and respect. Rather, the issue is the teachings of the Koran which call for the suppression and extermination of those who practice a different religion. This is the root of the problem that needs to be addressed by Christians and the international community of nations.
Suicide bombers are inspired by the teaching of the Koran. Muslim religious leaders indoctrinate young Arab men and women to become martyrs by killing the enemies of Islam. They are told that the Koran guarantees them the forgiveness of their sins and admission into the pleasure of paradise. Such an appalling, immoral, and senseless teaching is firing up poor young Muslim men and women to become suicide bombers. By killing the enemies of Islam, whether it be at the World Trade Towers in New York City or in the shopping centers in Israel, they become immortalized as martyrs for the cause of Islam who have gained admission into the pleasure of Paradise.
2) Christians Need to Expose the Immorality of the Koran’s Teachings on the Use of Violence To deal with the root problem of Muslim terrorism, it is imperative to embark in a worldwide educational program designed to expose the immorality of the teachings the Koran which calls for the suppression and extermination of those who practice a different religion.
This strategy of exposing the immorality of the Koran’s teachings on the use of violence to advance the cause of Islam, may not be politically correct. It can alienate moderate Moslems living in the USA and overseas. But I am persuaded that the truth that “hurts” is better than a lie that “soothes.”
To minimize a backlash it is important to distinguish between the teachings of Koran about the exterminations of the “infidels,” and the Moslem people themselves who ignore or openly reject such teachings. The same principle applies to any religion. For example, most Catholics know very little about the historical teachings of their church regarding he suppression of the heretics.
Most Catholics would be appalled to read what Thomas Aquinas, the most influential Catholic theologian, teaches in his Summa Theologica about the extermination of the “heretics.” He wrote: “With regard to heretics two points must be observed: one, on their own side, the other, on the side of the church. On their own side there is a sin, whereby they deserve not only to be separated from the Church by excommunication, but also to be severed from the world by death. For it is a much graver matter to corrupt the faith which quickens the soul, than to forge money, which supports the temporal life. Wherefore, if forger of money and other evildoers are forthwith condemned to death by the secular authority, much more reason is there for heretics, as soon as they are convicted of heresy, to be not only excommunicated but even put to death” (Question 11, Article 3).
This fundamental Catholic teachings that “heretics,” if they do not recant, must be not only excommunicated but also exterminated, is found in numerous documents of the Inquisition. When the immorality of such teachings are exposed, most Catholics openly reject them, choosing instead to accept the teachings of the Gospel to “Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you.”
What is true for the Catholics is also true for the Muslims. We need to help our Muslim friends understand that the teachings of the Koran on the use of violence to advance the cause of Islam, are immoral and to be condemned by all peace-loving people. We need to help them understand that the sword of itself never brings peace to the world. Above all, we need to help them discover the beauty and power of the message of the Gospel–which is a message of love and forgiveness, a message of peace through internal transformation, rather than through external suppression of enemies and territorial expansion.
3) Christians Need to Become Involved in Meeting the Needs of Suffering Muslims Exposing the immorality of the teachings of the Koran on the use of violence, is not enough. Actions speak louder than words. Christian relief organizations need to become actively involved in relieving the pain and suffering of Muslims living in desperate situations.
Christian relief centers need to be established where Muslims are suffering today. Muslims need to see Christian love in action. This should happen not only in the Palestinian refugee camps, but also in Afghanistan–a country which has been devastated by 22 years of fighting, three years of famine, and five years of Taliban rule. Christian relief and assistance in Afghanistan cannot stop at the end of the military operations. The presence of dedicated Christian doctors, nurses, social workers, teachers, and technicians involved in developments programs, can go long way in giving credibility to the Christian witness.
Ultimately the most compelling example of the difference between the teaching of the Koran and that of the Bible on the use of violence, is the unselfish and compassionate service offered by dedicated Christians even to Muslim terrorists. The manifestation of Christian love in action, has the potential for changing the Muslim world today as it did change the Roman world twenty centuries ago.

WOOF,

The fact that one is awakw enough to recognize the lack of a pattern in one set of instances does not excuse the somnambulent stupidity of not recognizing a rather obvious pattern in another set of instances.

4.”You have heard that it was said (By Moses and Jewish God-CM), “You shall love your neighbor and hate your enemy.” But I say to you, Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, so that you may be sons of your Father who is in heaven; for he makes his sun rise on the evil and on the good, and sends rain on the just and on the unjust. For if you love those who love you, what reward have you? Do not even the tax collectors do the same? And if you salute only your brethren, what more are you doing than others? Do not even the Gentiles do the same? ” Matthew 5.43-48

CORRECTION: 3rd paragraph: OUR country not OUT

THIS should be shown on TV….PRIMETIME so everybody can see it.
Some folks don’t even realize there is a problem

“Christ Message” continues to bastardize the message, So, do you want it or not, if you consider yourself Christian, you must protect a sufferer or help free a slave BY DISARMED HANDS (if you can), otherwise your are not Christian.
You may think that killing one in order to save 100 is good, – then you may be right or not right, – but you are CERTAINLY NOT CHRISTIAN. So, choosing for blood and bombing you must honestly announce in front of the whole world that you withdraw yourself from Christianity, before you started the war

I’m an agnostic, so you can piss off with your self righteous talk that doesn’t make sense to begin with.

But I say to you, Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you

Screw that. I got a better one for you: fuck my Muslim enemies and may they burn in Hell. I will not pray for the wicked. Instead, I advocate killing them.

You can sit there and bastardize Christianity under the protection of strong men. I will sit here and support the strong men who grant you the freedom to spout off your insanities.

Besides, if you read Maliki’s speech to our Congress, he connects the dots between Saddam, 9/11 and world terrorism, as well as the war in Iraq. A lot of us knew it from the beginning, but some are slower than others…

Here’s a simple test for liberal, apeasement minded folks. It’s multiple choice to make it esaier for them to understand and complete with a passing grade (on a curve-like in middle-school bobocopy):

1. In 1968 Bobby Kennedy was shot and killed by:

a. Superman

b. Jay Lenno

c. Harry Potter

d. Muslim male extremist between the ages of 17 and 40

2. In 1972 at the Munich Olympics, athletes were kidnapped and massacred by:

a. Olga Corbett

b. Sitting Bull

c. Arnold Schwarzenegger

d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

3. In 1979, the US embassy in Iran was taken over by:

a. Lost Norwegians

b. Elvis

c. A tour bus full of 80-year-old women

d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

4.During the 1980′s a number of Americans were kidnapped in Lebanon by:

a. John Dillinger

b. The King of Sweden

c. The Boy Scouts

d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

5. In 1983, the US Marine barracks in Beirut was blown up by:

a. A pizza delivery boy

b. Pee Wee Herman

c. Geraldo Rivera

d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

6. In 1985 the cruise ship Achille Lauro was hijacked and a 70 year old American passenger was murdered and thrown overboard in his wheelchair by:

a. The Smurfs

b. Davy Jones

c. The Little Mermaid

d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

7. In 1985 TWA flight 847 was hijacked at Athens, and a US Navy diver trying to rescue passengers was murdered by:

a. Captain Kidd

b. Charles Lindberg

c. Mother Teresa

d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

8. In 1988, Pan Am Flight 103 was bombed by:

a. Scooby Doo

b. The Tooth Fairy

c. Butch Cassidy and The Sundance Kid

d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

9. In 1993 the World Trade Center was bombed the first time by:

a. Richard Simmons

b. Grandma Moses

c. Michael Jordan

d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

10. In 1998, the US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania were bombed by:

a. Mr. Rogers

b. Hillary Clinton, to distract attention from Wild Bill’ s women
problems

c. The World Wrestling Federation

d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

11. On 9/11/01, four airliners were hijacked; two were used as missiles to take out the World Trade Centers and of the remaining two, one crashed into the US Pentagon and the other was diverted and crashed by the passengers. Thousands of people were killed by:

a. Bugs Bunny, Wiley E. Coyote, Daffy Duck and Elmer Fudd

b. The Supreme Court of Florida

c. Mr. Bean

d Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

12. In 2002 the United States fought a war in Afghanistan against:

a. Enron

b. The Lutheran Church

c. The NFL

d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

13. In 2002 reporter Daniel Pearl was kidnapped and murdered by:

a. Bonnie and Clyde

b. Captain Kangaroo

c. Billy Graham

d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40
Nope, …..I really don’t see a pattern here to justify profiling, do you?

What did you think of th

I mean, you guys still think Saddam and Osama are buddies?!?

Who has claimed that? I’m sure you’ll have no problem telling us.

John Kennedy, George Wallace ,Ronald Reagan, 168 persons Muir Bldg Oklahoma City, Gerald Ford.

See a a pattern?

Screw that. I got a better one for you: fuck my Muslim enemies and may they burn in Hell. I will not pray for the wicked. Instead, I advocate killing them.

Lik,

This is no time to allow yourself to be goaded into becoming so emotional and distraught as to start thinking within the confines set for you by liberal apologists for terror. Stop it!!!

This is not an “either/or” type question. Nor is this the sort of issue that must be thought of in terms of black and white. To limit yourself in such a manner is to fall into the trap set for you by leftists. Think nuance. Think broad picture. Think in terms of an array of options.

Kill them! Kill every jihadi motherf***ing one of them! Then pray for them once they’re dead!

Nice setup for the terrorists. Compliant victims. Great propaganda. The truth is, we can and will wipe them out, if they don’t relent. Whether or not the terrorist nations survive another ten years is up to them. They must grow up and join the rest of the world. It’s either that or mass destruction.

Awakened Warrior, Yes I am aware of what goes on in the universities as well. Thanks for putting all that into light, because not too many know about that.

Like Robert108 said, “Very good stuff. Keep it coming. Inquiring minds want to know.”

Pacifist liar christ message, tote your ass to Iran,Syria,Bekaa Valley or any terrorist hotspot you choose and tell them about love and peace. We will all be sure to watch the video of them cutting off your head, and the best part will be we will never have to listen to your lying shit ever again. Need a plane ticket? I am sure we can take up a collection and get you there.

To: “Christ Message”,

Your radically misinterpreted views of Christian Doctrine have nothing to do with what Jesus taught and are more closely akin to Marxist ideology.
Here’s some food for thought (if you have that ability)

(Friends–please bear with me for a few seconds while I instruct “Christ Message”):

“Do not think that I came to bring peace on the earth; I did not come to bring peace, but a sword. For I came to set a man against his father, and a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law; and a man’s enemies will be the members of his household.”

Matthew 10:34-36

“Do you suppose that I came to grant peace on earth? I tell you, no, but rather division; for from now on five members in one household will be divided, three against two and two against three…”

Luke 12:51-52

Jesus elsewhere acknowledges the legitimate use of force, telling the apostles, “let him who has no sword sell his mantle and buy one” (Luke 22:36).

Peace is the goal, but when it cannot be achieved without force, force must be used.

To: Awakened Worrier “Jesus elsewhere acknowledges the legitimate use of force, telling the apostles,…”
===================
Thank you for a good question. Im sorry a year ago I had no time to answer in details, since was leaving USA, and now Im writing from an opposite part of the world
========================
“Do not think that I came to bring peace on the earth; I did not come to bring peace, but a sword. For I came to set a man against his father, and a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law; and a man’s enemies will be the members of his household.”Matthew 10:34-36 “Do you suppose that I came to grant peace on earth? I tell you, no, but rather division; for from now on five members in one household will be divided, three against two and two against three…”Luke 12:51-52
===========================
OF course. Look our discussion above. We are one family. Yet we are fighting and divided. However, I do not want to kill you and hopefully you do not want to kill me. The subject about which we passionately disagree is how to make our enemy to behave. And this is what Christ predicted and foresaw saying “members in one household will be divided”
=================================
“let him who has no sword sell his mantle and buy one” (Luke 22:36).
==============================
To understand this, read a few more verses around this one:
————-
35: then Jesus asked them: “When I sent you without purse, bag or sandals, did you lack anything?”
“nothing” they answered
36: he said “but now IF YOU HAVE A PURSE, and also a bag… sell it and buy a sword”
—————
So, Jesus knew that NOT EVERYONE of his disciples had a valuable to sell, since he himself asked them to NOT HAVE valuables. Then, this means, Jesus did not ask EVERYONE to have a sword, he asked ALL together to unite their scarce valuables and find something to sell in order to get AT LEAST one sword for all. Verse 38 confirms this my statement: “…here are two swords” – “that’s enough” he replied
But let’s read the most important verse 37, which explains everything:
———-
37: it is written “and he was numbered with the transgressors”…
————
So, Jesus COMPLAINS that they equalize him with bloody aggressors
————–
…and I tell you that this must be fulfilled in me. Yes, what is written about me is reaching its fulfillment
—————-
so, he refers their taking now a bloody weapon as a TOP if his service, which finally MUST BE FULFILLED. But WHAT??????? What exactly must be fulfilled???????? Whether you did not understand it yet, knowing the verse “Put your sword in its place, for all who take the sword will perish by the sword.” (Matt 26;52) Whether you still did not understand WHAT WAS THE TOP of his teaching to prove which he asked the disciples to get a sword, just one sword for all??????

The top of his teaching is coming clear from these five verses, as a sunny day:
be strong, but not violent and never use your power to execute your enemy. The evidence of this central point of Christ’s teaching was about to be fulfilled when he asked to get a sword. He invited to take a sword TO SHOW THE PRECISE POINT OF DIFFERENCE BETWEEN HIM AND TRANSGRESSORS. The difference with transgressors IS NOT IN HIS BEING WEAK while transgressors being strong. The difference is in HIS NOT USING HIS STRENGTH TO HARM THE ENEMY BUT TO LOVE THEM while being same or more strong as the enemy. If he would not have a sword the moment they arrested him, he would sound weak, and so his teaching would sound the teaching for weaks. This is why he sends for a sword: he wants to tell to everybody, that his non-violence IS NOT a sign of weakness, but a revelation of loving strength. Love your enemy!!!! That is what he wanted to say to everybody: do not fear you enemy (as it would be if the enemy has a sword but Jesus has not) BUT LOVE HIM!!!! Be strong as him or even stronger than him BUT LOVE HIM AND DO NOT EXECUTE HIM even if you can. This is why Jesus allowed to Peter to wound one of eth soldiers and then completely healed him. Yes, to demonstrate this healing, this love to teh enemy, but not fear, Jesus needed a sword. Just one sword for all. When he healed the soldier, he said to throw the sword away: he did not need it anymore, the sword played the role Jesus supposed it to play and was not needed any longer.

Re: Mac
Perhaps we could all chip in to fly in a team of psychiatrists from Vienna to help folks like Mac deal with their denial of reality. After all, it may not be entirely their fault. It takes years and years of hard work (intervention by family members and friends) to reprogram a mind that has been so completely indoctrinated from pre-K all the way through college.
Most of these people don’t recover until they’re in their 30′s.
But Mac, the first step to recovery is admitting you have a problem. If you are painstaking about this phase of your development, you will be amazed before you are half way through. You will lose interest in selfish things and gain interest in your fellow Americans. Your whole attitude and outlook upon life will change.
We’re here to help.

I think everyone will agree with the following sentiments:
We love you man! We’re here for you and we feel your pain. We want to be your friend.
Hopefully, like the Prodigal Son, one day you will come home and take your rightful place beside your American brothers and sisters.

Where did this problem start and how (&WHY) is it so deeply entrenched in the minds of people like Al Franken and Michael Moore and guys like bobocopy and mac?

Much of the empty nonsensical rhetoric that we hear today from misguided, illogical social justice appeasers (communist/socialist university professors, ignorant, Hollywood celebrities, harebrained movie producers, radical left-wing politicians, anti-war protesters, childish, uninformed college kids) was born in the deconstructionist, humanist, philosophy that became existentially popular in the 1960′s.
You know-the radical hippies that are now running our universities.

Two of its most prominent proselytizing proponents are Noam Chomsky and Howard Zinn; who happen to be the architects and gurus of the present day viewpoint and belief that democracy, capitalism, and American values and culture are exclusively responsible for all the world’s ills.

This errant school of thought is a major contributor to the severe abuses of academic freedom that are prevalent in a huge percentage of our universities. It’s the “poisonous fodder” used by power hungry politicians to appease dim-witted constituents,(like mac and bobocopy) and is the source of ceaseless propaganda offered by fame seeking, “unbiased” reporters who wish to appear “compassionate” before their audiences in order to increase their market share.
It’s this faulty reasoning that allows idiots like Michael Moore to re-characterize murdering terrorists as freedom fighting minutemen. It’s this defective reckoning that’s the basis of the erroneous belief that “homicidal fanatics” can be reasoned with in sit-down negotiations.

It goes something like this:

There is no absolute truth. My truth is my truth and your truth is your truth. Truth is relative and the application of ethics is situational. In fact there may be an infinite number of probable realities (truths).

Therefore, no one can ever be held accountable to any sort of principled standard of behavior.

In fact, the deconstructionists/humanists would even argue that it’s morally reprehensible for anybody to “perpetrate” a belief in the ethical superiority of one system of thought over another.

By their way of thinking, any system of thought is just as viable, honorable, and permissible as any other. Perhaps the color blue could be redefined as purple, orange or green. It’s like arguing that, since there are many ways to get from Florida to New York, a traveler doesn’t need the use of a road map.

Saying that there is no absolute truth is a very convenient way to avoid responsibility for our actions. If we say that there’s no absolute truth, it means that truth is relative.

What you think is true is possibly quite different from what I think is true. This means that no-one has the right to say that their version of truth, right and wrong is any better than other people’s.

While this might sound nice in theory, (as it does to all liberals) it’s disastrous in its application!!
If everyone actually lived according to this, life would be chaos. Joseph Stalin would no longer be one of the world’s worst serial killers, but just a man who believed in what he was doing. Similarly, those who flew planes into the World Trade Center on September 11th would not be terrorists, but just a group of freedom fighters who were living in harmony with their beliefs. Such a thought is no doubt ridiculous and abhorrent, yet this is exactly where we would be if there was no absolute truth.

Many recently translated Iraqi documents reveal that OBL and Saddam were partners in terrorism.

Realityboob is worried about misspending on defense, but do you think we could get him to criticize the $3 billion/day spending on MEdicare, Medicaid and Social Security? Spending that is growing at about 8% annually? Spending that is unsustainable and will eventually drag this country down?

Oh no, he’s find with that sort of waste of tax payer dollars. Which isn’t to suggest that misappropriating defense funds is a good thing. It isn’t, but let’s keep some perspective.

Rube…that’s a nice one realityboob. I am a rube. Backwoods, redneck, North Dakota rube.