Oblique Prohibitionism: House Votes To Put FDA In Charge Of Tobacco

It sounds like an ok move, right? I mean, who doesn’t want the products they consume to be clean and (relatively, in terms of tobacco) safe? Of course, the real goal here isn’t product quality/safety but rather the regulation to death of your freedom to smoke tobacco if you want to.

After more than a decade of debate, federal oversight of the way cigarettes are made and sold appears closer than ever. The House approved a bill Thursday giving the Food and Drug Administration jurisdiction over tobacco.
The FDA would have the power to change the ingredients in cigarettes, dictate bold new warning labels and prohibit adjectives like “mild” and “light” that could mislead smokers.
But the bill stops short of allowing the agency to impose an outright ban on tobacco products or nicotine.

Never let it be said that the big-government prohibitionists didn’t learn their lesson from the failure of alcohol prohibition. They know they can’t just outright ban things like tobacco or guns or booze. But through regulation they can make it so difficult to use things like guns and tobacco and booze that nobody wants to anyway.
We don’t need FDA oversight of tobacco. But we’re going to get it. Because the government doesn’t want us smoking, your freedoms be damned.

Tags: , , ,


«
»
  • http://ndgoon.blogspot.com/ goon

    Well that’s the thing. People want the tobacco. They know it’s bad for them, they don’t care.
    So at what point do we just admit that they want the cigarettes and let them have them?

    Lets see the dems want to take cigs, SUVs and guns away from everyone. What next? Every day another another right is taken away. If someone want to smoke them selves to death more power to them. I am sure under the health care system the leftards think we need they are going to probably fine and punish smokers. By the way I don’t smoke.

  • http://SayAnythingBlog.com The_Whistler_ofnd

    I’m no smoker but I would think we’re on the edge of bootlegging being a major part of the tobacco market.

    I don’t think its a good thing to be buying cigarettes from the same guy that’s selling drugs.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/ likwidshoe

    The Whistler – I’m no smoker but I would think we’re on the edge of bootlegging being a major part of the tobacco market.

    We’re already there in places like NYC where the cost is over 11 bucks per pack.

    The mafia gives thanks to the prohibitionists.

    Not too many issues are truly bipartisan in problem, but this one is. I don’t know who is worse one this one. The Republicans talk a bigger prohibition game and seem to have the upper hand on limiting freedom here, but the Democrats (typically) sometimes talk a freedom game but then vote for prohibition.

    A pox on all of their houses!

  • GanjWeed

    I know that if you make some thin illegal you create a black markett for it. Examples are Weed And Liquor prohibition.

  • jimmypop

    its a legal product. leave it alone or ban it. if they ban this stuff, they are only one styep from banning things like fat people and gays.

  • docdave

    Wow, they are taking the T out of ATF. They are going to have to change their monogram to AF although AFU would probably be closer to the agencies reality. However, my guess is that now we will have both the FDA and ATF terrorizing tobacco smokers and producers.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    Well that’s the thing. People want the tobacco. They know it’s bad for them, they don’t care.

    So at what point do we just admit that they want the cigarettes and let them have them?

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development