<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama&#8217;s Flaws Are Becoming A Problem</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/obamas_flaws_are_becoming_a_problem/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/obamas_flaws_are_becoming_a_problem/</link>
	<description>North Dakota&#039;s Most Popular And Influential Political Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:06:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: proof_positive</title>
		<link>http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/obamas_flaws_are_becoming_a_problem/#comment-318105</link>
		<dc:creator>proof_positive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ed-dev.com/sab/entry/obamas_flaws_are_becoming_a_problem/#comment-318105</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;My professor once told me that&#039;s the surest sign that your opponent knows he has lost the battle.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Physician, heal thy peevish, whiny, little bitch self!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>My professor once told me that&#8217;s the surest sign that your opponent knows he has lost the battle.</p></blockquote>
<p>Physician, heal thy peevish, whiny, little bitch self!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thai</title>
		<link>http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/obamas_flaws_are_becoming_a_problem/#comment-318106</link>
		<dc:creator>Thai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ed-dev.com/sab/entry/obamas_flaws_are_becoming_a_problem/#comment-318106</guid>
		<description>Heck even MAUREEN DOWD thinks he&#039;s an elitist...

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/16/opinion/16dowd.html?_r=2&amp;ref=opinion&amp;oref=slogin&amp;oref=slogin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heck even MAUREEN DOWD thinks he&#8217;s an elitist&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/16/opinion/16dowd.html?_r=2&#038;ref=opinion&#038;oref=slogin&#038;oref=slogin" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/16/opinion/16dowd.html?_r=2&#038;ref=opinion&#038;oref=slogin&#038;oref=slogin</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bat One</title>
		<link>http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/obamas_flaws_are_becoming_a_problem/#comment-318107</link>
		<dc:creator>Bat One</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ed-dev.com/sab/entry/obamas_flaws_are_becoming_a_problem/#comment-318107</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;This just shows how out of touch Obama and the left are.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Either that, or the aids are lying too!  Young Mr. Obama is a product of the Democrat Party machine of Chicago, arguable one of the two largest, most corrupt city political organizations in the country.  Presumptions of public &quot;servant&quot; integrity in Chicago are for grade-schoolers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>This just shows how out of touch Obama and the left are.</p></blockquote>
<p>Either that, or the aids are lying too!  Young Mr. Obama is a product of the Democrat Party machine of Chicago, arguable one of the two largest, most corrupt city political organizations in the country.  Presumptions of public &#8220;servant&#8221; integrity in Chicago are for grade-schoolers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alice</title>
		<link>http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/obamas_flaws_are_becoming_a_problem/#comment-318108</link>
		<dc:creator>Alice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ed-dev.com/sab/entry/obamas_flaws_are_becoming_a_problem/#comment-318108</guid>
		<description>How can he lose now that he has been endorsed by &#039;Ludacris&#039;? HILARIOUS - http://nationalsquib.com/index.php/barack-obama-ludacris/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can he lose now that he has been endorsed by &#8216;Ludacris&#8217;? HILARIOUS &#8211; <a href="http://nationalsquib.com/index.php/barack-obama-ludacris/" rel="nofollow">http://nationalsquib.com/index.php/barack-obama-ludacris/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thai</title>
		<link>http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/obamas_flaws_are_becoming_a_problem/#comment-318109</link>
		<dc:creator>Thai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ed-dev.com/sab/entry/obamas_flaws_are_becoming_a_problem/#comment-318109</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;There it is. 

I knew it wouldn&#039;t take long for some complete dipshit &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Wow ... an ad hominem attack. And in the second sentence too. I must have struck a nerve. Are you that mad or are you suddenly realizing that you are completely bereft of ground to stand on so you need to resort to namecalling??

&lt;blockquote&gt;to tell us that Obama saying something exactly as he meant it was nothing more than a lie. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

When someone behind closed doors says one thing. And then when they are in public they say another. Which version should one believe?? I know it might be hard to admit (you being an obvious Obama supporter) but could it be that your candidate just might be exposing his real views when he thinks noone is watching? That is the logical conclusion when comparing public and private pronouncements.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Because Right-wing knobs just know what is in someone&#039;s heart and head.  So it doesn&#039;t really matter that there is a long, consistent pattern of thinking on this issue that has been stated by many Dems or Obama himself.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Been stated by them in &lt;b&gt;public&lt;/b&gt;. His unguarded word choice in &lt;b&gt;private&lt;/b&gt; revealed his disdain for those who are &quot;beneath him&quot;.  

&lt;blockquote&gt;In their feeble, inept, idiotic minds they are just being lied to.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Wow... more ad hominem attacks. You must really be mad at having to defend Obama if you have to &lt;u&gt;pound the table&lt;/u&gt; like this.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Republican knobs want to be lied to.  Only not by Obama, but by their dishonest, ignorant and hateful preachers like Rob.They want someone to tell them how they have nothing to fear from someone like Obama because they are scared and can&#039;t handle realty, so they create their own, denying all facts and evidence and by putting aside reason and replacing it with irrational thinking.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Rob relayed the message of Obama&#039;s unguarded moment. Sorry my friend. The only one who is willing to put their head in the sand is you. Critical thinking is a must my friend, if you are ever going to realize that when someone says something nicely in public and then in private they reveal their true nature with insult after insult in one swipe, that they are not to be trusted when they tell you to only go by what they say in front of a camera.

&lt;blockquote&gt;You are a shining star of the mental disorder that is known as Conservatism. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Wow...and now we have a hat trick of ad hominem attacks. Way to go Hannitized!!! I knew you could pull another one out of you in a desperate attampt to make Obama look like he understands the common man. I kept waiting for it to arrive. I was thinking to myself... &quot;Surely, he can&#039;t leave the ad hominem attacks to only two can he?&quot;. And there you go..a THIRD one. I&#039;m SO PROUD OF YOU!! :)


Look... when you&#039;re done pounding the table and whining about how Obama is being unfairly treated. 

Stop...

pull yourself together... 

and realize that your candidate just revealed how he feels about those of us in middle america when he was courting the hoi polloi in SF. It doesn&#039;t take a genius to figure out that when he says one thing in front of a camera and when he&#039;s in private he says another, that one should believe that which was said when the speaker is confident there are &quot;no witnesses&quot; so-to-speak.

I&#039;m hoping you can draw that distinction. I really am. But then again, I&#039;m also used to &lt;i&gt;Waiting for Godot&lt;/i&gt; and with your penchant for personal attacks and table pounding I believe you will not be able to do so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>There it is. </p>
<p>I knew it wouldn&#8217;t take long for some complete dipshit </p></blockquote>
<p>Wow &#8230; an ad hominem attack. And in the second sentence too. I must have struck a nerve. Are you that mad or are you suddenly realizing that you are completely bereft of ground to stand on so you need to resort to namecalling??</p>
<blockquote><p>to tell us that Obama saying something exactly as he meant it was nothing more than a lie. </p></blockquote>
<p>When someone behind closed doors says one thing. And then when they are in public they say another. Which version should one believe?? I know it might be hard to admit (you being an obvious Obama supporter) but could it be that your candidate just might be exposing his real views when he thinks noone is watching? That is the logical conclusion when comparing public and private pronouncements.</p>
<blockquote><p>Because Right-wing knobs just know what is in someone&#8217;s heart and head.  So it doesn&#8217;t really matter that there is a long, consistent pattern of thinking on this issue that has been stated by many Dems or Obama himself.</p></blockquote>
<p>Been stated by them in <b>public</b>. His unguarded word choice in <b>private</b> revealed his disdain for those who are &#8220;beneath him&#8221;.  </p>
<blockquote><p>In their feeble, inept, idiotic minds they are just being lied to.</p></blockquote>
<p>Wow&#8230; more ad hominem attacks. You must really be mad at having to defend Obama if you have to <u>pound the table</u> like this.</p>
<blockquote><p>Republican knobs want to be lied to.  Only not by Obama, but by their dishonest, ignorant and hateful preachers like Rob.They want someone to tell them how they have nothing to fear from someone like Obama because they are scared and can&#8217;t handle realty, so they create their own, denying all facts and evidence and by putting aside reason and replacing it with irrational thinking.</p></blockquote>
<p>Rob relayed the message of Obama&#8217;s unguarded moment. Sorry my friend. The only one who is willing to put their head in the sand is you. Critical thinking is a must my friend, if you are ever going to realize that when someone says something nicely in public and then in private they reveal their true nature with insult after insult in one swipe, that they are not to be trusted when they tell you to only go by what they say in front of a camera.</p>
<blockquote><p>You are a shining star of the mental disorder that is known as Conservatism. </p></blockquote>
<p>Wow&#8230;and now we have a hat trick of ad hominem attacks. Way to go Hannitized!!! I knew you could pull another one out of you in a desperate attampt to make Obama look like he understands the common man. I kept waiting for it to arrive. I was thinking to myself&#8230; &#8220;Surely, he can&#8217;t leave the ad hominem attacks to only two can he?&#8221;. And there you go..a THIRD one. I&#8217;m SO PROUD OF YOU!! <img src='http://sayanythingblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Look&#8230; when you&#8217;re done pounding the table and whining about how Obama is being unfairly treated. </p>
<p>Stop&#8230;</p>
<p>pull yourself together&#8230; </p>
<p>and realize that your candidate just revealed how he feels about those of us in middle america when he was courting the hoi polloi in SF. It doesn&#8217;t take a genius to figure out that when he says one thing in front of a camera and when he&#8217;s in private he says another, that one should believe that which was said when the speaker is confident there are &#8220;no witnesses&#8221; so-to-speak.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m hoping you can draw that distinction. I really am. But then again, I&#8217;m also used to <i>Waiting for Godot</i> and with your penchant for personal attacks and table pounding I believe you will not be able to do so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carrick</title>
		<link>http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/obamas_flaws_are_becoming_a_problem/#comment-318110</link>
		<dc:creator>carrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ed-dev.com/sab/entry/obamas_flaws_are_becoming_a_problem/#comment-318110</guid>
		<description>Thai: &lt;blockquote&gt;and I know its gonna be SUPER difficult to do. But try to actually refrain from personal attacks. I know you can do it Hannitized!! I have faith in you!!&lt;/blockquote&gt;I don&#039;t think so actually.

If he were forced to say exactly what he meant in clear terms, it would be an easy target, so he throws in  the ad hominems and other forms of dishonest discourse as  a distractor.

Nice commentary by the way.  Welcome to the blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thai:<br />
<blockquote>and I know its gonna be SUPER difficult to do. But try to actually refrain from personal attacks. I know you can do it Hannitized!! I have faith in you!!</p></blockquote>
<p>I don&#8217;t think so actually.</p>
<p>If he were forced to say exactly what he meant in clear terms, it would be an easy target, so he throws in  the ad hominems and other forms of dishonest discourse as  a distractor.</p>
<p>Nice commentary by the way.  Welcome to the blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bat One</title>
		<link>http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/obamas_flaws_are_becoming_a_problem/#comment-318111</link>
		<dc:creator>Bat One</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ed-dev.com/sab/entry/obamas_flaws_are_becoming_a_problem/#comment-318111</guid>
		<description>John Fund is correct.  Taken together, the miscues, misstatements, and mistakes of Barack and Michelle Obama constitute a cultural chasm of truly epic proportion.

At best, they are bewilderingly out of touch with the values and the cultural heritage of those he would govern.  At worst, like their more virulent supporters, here and elsewhere, they betray a condescension and disdain that mark them as dangerously surreal in their arrogance.

Barack and Michelle Obama are the very epitome of &quot;not ready for prime time.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Fund is correct.  Taken together, the miscues, misstatements, and mistakes of Barack and Michelle Obama constitute a cultural chasm of truly epic proportion.</p>
<p>At best, they are bewilderingly out of touch with the values and the cultural heritage of those he would govern.  At worst, like their more virulent supporters, here and elsewhere, they betray a condescension and disdain that mark them as dangerously surreal in their arrogance.</p>
<p>Barack and Michelle Obama are the very epitome of &#8220;not ready for prime time.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2Hotel9</title>
		<link>http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/obamas_flaws_are_becoming_a_problem/#comment-318112</link>
		<dc:creator>2Hotel9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ed-dev.com/sab/entry/obamas_flaws_are_becoming_a_problem/#comment-318112</guid>
		<description>Thai, first, nice blog name. Next, don&#039;t expect much out of sannitized. It is a screeching leftard, nothing more. It wants socialism, hold the compassion, and thats all it wants. It hares off on semantic arguments  in every single thread it toddles into. Then it spins around a few times, screeches about everyone else lying and propagandizing, then it will veer back across the subject, then claim that it meant what the article writer meant and that writer is a heinous liar because all its evidence simply proves the original point of the subject post.

DAMN!! Only 52 words in that sentence. I really thought that explanation of sannitized&#039;s SOP would take longer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thai, first, nice blog name. Next, don&#8217;t expect much out of sannitized. It is a screeching leftard, nothing more. It wants socialism, hold the compassion, and thats all it wants. It hares off on semantic arguments  in every single thread it toddles into. Then it spins around a few times, screeches about everyone else lying and propagandizing, then it will veer back across the subject, then claim that it meant what the article writer meant and that writer is a heinous liar because all its evidence simply proves the original point of the subject post.</p>
<p>DAMN!! Only 52 words in that sentence. I really thought that explanation of sannitized&#8217;s SOP would take longer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/obamas_flaws_are_becoming_a_problem/#comment-318113</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ed-dev.com/sab/entry/obamas_flaws_are_becoming_a_problem/#comment-318113</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m clinging to arugula. It&#039;s bitter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m clinging to arugula. It&#8217;s bitter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: proof_positive</title>
		<link>http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/obamas_flaws_are_becoming_a_problem/#comment-318114</link>
		<dc:creator>proof_positive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ed-dev.com/sab/entry/obamas_flaws_are_becoming_a_problem/#comment-318114</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;only to be validated by this video.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Bubba, if you have to be &lt;b&gt;validated by a video&lt;/b&gt;, then you ain&#039;t &lt;i&gt;shit!&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>only to be validated by this video.</p></blockquote>
<p>Bubba, if you have to be <b>validated by a video</b>, then you ain&#8217;t <i>shit!</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
