Obamanomics: Worst Teen Employment Numbers for 44 Years

President Obama visits Northern Virginia Community College

Hopin’ 4 Change:

“The biggest problem [in the report] was that the summer job market for teenagers was nonexistent,” says Joel Naroff, of Naroff Economic Advisors, in a note. “The 24% unemployment rate for this group was the second-highest since the end of World War II. While teenagers comprise only 4% of the workforce, they made up over 22% of the increase in unemployment in June.”
In June, there were 5.6 million jobs for teenagers, down from 6.3 million a year ago, and nowhere near the level of the late 1990s, the golden age for teen employment. In July of 1999, there were a record 8.8 million working teens.

The liberals trolls that infest this blog will be happy that I’m happy to give some of the credit for this to George W. Bush for signing the minimum wage act. Minimum wage is going up to $7.25 this month which is more than many teenagers produce. This is exactly what we conservatives were warning against when the Democrats (including Obama) pushed through the minimum wage hike two years ago.
Of course the teenagers are also victims of Obamanomics which includes a high minimum wage. When the government quits mucking up the system the job market will start to recover, even for these teens that are victims of Washington.

Tags: ,


«
»
  • http://Array sayanything-5371

    Here is some bad news for you young people. Obama scares the shit out of investors because his policies are anti-capitalism. Investment is the engine that drives capitalism and creates economic prosperity for all. The rising tide lifts all boats analogy is best for all. No country has ever taxed and spent its way into prosperity. Only an idiot would believe that. And Obama believes that.

    This recession will last for Obama’s entire presidency. If you voted for Obama you helped screw yourself. It’s just that simple.

    Here’s a little humor to lighten your day.

    Over five thousand years ago, Moses said to the children of Israel ” pick up your shovel, mount your asses and camels, and I will lead you to the promised land”.

    Nearly 75 years ago, Roosevelt said, ” Lay down your shovels, sit on your asses, and light up a camel, this is the promised land”.

    Now Obama has stolen your shovel , taxed your asses, raised the price of camels, and mortgaged the promised land.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/realitybasedbob/ realitybasedbob

    Kinda puts the old kibosh on that gal who was telling kids to get a job if they’re hungry.

  • http://SayAnythingBlog.com The_Whistler_ofnd

    Too bad that Obama’s and his Dem buddies are such jerks that they made it illegal to hire those kids at a wage that they’re worth.

  • http://SayAnythingBlog.com The_Whistler_ofnd

    Way too stupid.

  • Bat One

    … unemployement will hit 11 to 12 percent in the next year.

    It shouldn’t take nearly that long. With the pending Obama tax hikes, the “Cap ‘n’ Trade” tax, Health Care “Reform” tax, and the real impact of the Obama deficits yet to hit the economy full force, few if any businesses are willing to invest in new employees when there is little reason to believe they’ll be able to hang on to the experienced ones they have now.

  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    You have just been spammed by a porn site.

    And over the ramparts we watched as the bombs bursting in air took them to spam heaven!

  • mudcat

    The only thing keeping Obama in office is MSM lies. Soon to be over.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/entry/homosexuality_is_wrong_-_a_compendium move_zig

    Ever hear of Antonio Gramsci?

    Or Saul Alinsky?

    Obama is operating according to form. It might not even be him calling the shots.

    I don’t see Obama as terribly intelligent.

    I do see him as extremely arrogant and completely contemptuous of American and of the Constitution. If someone who had bankrolled his campaign, say a George Soros type character, demanded a quid quo pro from him — we get you into power and you do x, y and z, then he is certainly acting according to the true Apparatchik‘s form.

    Under the saccharine guise of assistance to them, rigorous child labor laws are the best means to deny the child any right in society. By refusing to let him earn, by forcing him into unwanted dependence upon a grudging parent, by making certain in other channels that the parent is never in other than economic stress, the child can be driven in his teens into revolt. Delinquency will ensue.

    Psycho-Politics, Chap. V – An Examination of Loyalties

  • http://vdvfamily.com/ Sphagnum

    Kinda puts the old kibosh on that gal who was telling kids to get a job if they’re hungry.

    Not really, any teen worth his weight in salt could easily get a job, if they were properly motivated. 75% of those that want jobs have them! You just have to beat out the bottom 25%, which given todays teens isn’t exactly difficult…

  • http://SayAnythingBlog.com The_Whistler_ofnd

    A minimum wage does more helping then hurting,

    Tell that to entry level workers priced out of the market.

    sure there might be a few businesses in the country that are doing bad and need to hire more people but can not afford to but that is too small a percentage to matter.

    (Clueless tag) The law applies to all businesses so it doesn’t hurt businesses nearly as much as it does people who arne’t able to produce more than they cost. (close clueless tag.)

    It is absurd to believe that businesses would buy fair wages without a minimum,

    Prior to Congress screwing up the Minimum wage there were less than million workers making that wage.

    Somehow that obvious fact escaped your dimwitted ability to pick out facts.

    my own work barely pays the minimum despite increases in profits during recent years.

    You should open your own restaurant and put all of your knowledge to work while paying $20/hour.

  • http://www.dartemis.net/blog/ sayanything-42

    Another key constituency soon to be lost…

  • http://www.dartemis.net/blog/ sayanything-42

    Really?

    And do all employees perform work of equal quality and value?

    A poor workman can, and often does, reduce the value of a product.

    A good workman can, and often does, improve the value of a product.

    Should both be paid the same?

  • http://www.valleydeals.com/cgi-bin/board2/YaBB.pl Kevin

    What about all those “green” jobs, picking lettuce and beans?

  • http://SayAnythingBlog.com The_Whistler_ofnd

    The fallacy that you guys are too stupid to understand is that one teen who works hard and can get a job doesn’t outweigh the many teens that are young, inexperienced and don’t have the work ethic to be worth paying $7.25 an hour.

    People that can’t or won’t produce more than they cost simply won’t be employed.

    It’s amazing to me that you guys can’t understand how raising the price of entry level jobs 40% results in less entry level jobs being available.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/america_is_back/#c397018 DINO

    Don’t be deluded. The young blame bush and HATE republicans. Most everyone else does too.

    Republicans should be held in CAGES.

    Gen Dems: The Party’s Advantage Among Young Voters Widens

    Trends in the opinions of America’s youngest voters are often a barometer of shifting political winds. And that appears to be the case in 2008. The current generation of young voters, who came of age during the George W. Bush years, is leading the way in giving the Democrats a wide advantage in party identification, just as the previous generation of young people who grew up in the Reagan years — Generation X — fueled the Republican surge of the mid-1990′s.

    GOP Losses Span Nearly All Demographic Groups

    The decline in Republican Party affiliation among Americans in recent years is well documented, but a Gallup analysis now shows that this movement away from the GOP has occurred among nearly every major demographic subgroup. Since the first year of George W. Bush’s presidency in 2001, the Republican Party has maintained its support only among frequent churchgoers, with conservatives and senior citizens showing minimal decline.

  • http://SayAnythingBlog.com The_Whistler_ofnd

    You have to apply at one or two places before you’ve “hunted non-stop”

    Is Rez-Tick turning conservative?
    :-)

  • badlands4

    That’s too bad about kids having a hard time finding a job. I know that 3 of my cousin’s children are having trouble finding jobs because they are competing with out of work adults. I know it has been difficult for graduating college students who have student loans to pay. I hope they will be able to find jobs in the future.

    We have been fortunate to be in this economy. My daughter is able to work at the state park for 9.50 an hour, and my son has a yard business.

    I am glad the kids around here can get jobs if they want/need them.

  • http://SayAnythingBlog.com The_Whistler_ofnd

    Many in my generation learned how bad liberal policies were from Jimmy Carter.

    The current teens are going to learn the same way. Of course not all, after all the liberals have destroyed the schools as places of real learning.

  • Brent

    Good to see you pointed out the obvious, historical, and predictable cause. The minimum wage screws marginal workers the most, because it is illegal to hire them at wages that clear the market. A majority of people have heard the lecture explaining this, but most people think “teens don’t really need jobs” and that this will “help the single parent struggling to get by”. It’s stupid if you think about it (and totally unjust), but people think they’re clever… we’ll see.

    On another note, inflation will soon wipe out the minimum wage increase, which should put downward pressure on teen unemployment, if not total unemployment (which will continue slump — at least private employment, which is all that should count).

  • Rezistik

    Too bad the whole minimum wage argument doesn’t hold up. Minors can and are paid up to 85 cents less then full adults. And how do you judge minors to output less then an adult? I work harder and output much more then the adults at my work. It’s almost like its a per person thing.

  • http://forums.kikizo.com/ Eddie_the_Hated

    Not really, any teen worth his weight in salt could easily get a job, if they were properly motivated. 75% of those that want jobs have them! You just have to beat out the bottom 25%, which given todays teens isn’t exactly difficult…

    The hell they can. I’ve hunted non-stop for new steadier employment for the last two months, with barely a bite (and I’ve had a year’s experience in the workforce).

    Holding down a job, and finding a new job and/or getting into the job market are three completely different things.

  • http://insanereindeer.blogspot.com/ Kenny

    Too bad the whole minimum wage argument doesn’t hold up. Minors can and are paid up to 85 cents less then full adults. And how do you judge minors to output less then an adult? I work harder and output much more then the adults at my work. It’s almost like its a per person thing.

    I’m sorry, but I read this six times and each read thru prompted the same feeling…Rez is a moron.

    Of course teens make less money. They have no work experience, and for the most part, not even a high school degree. Why would they make as much as someone with a college degree or experience?

    Only an idiot would demand they do.

  • sc

    Most young people start out as liberals as that is so “cool” and then after 10-20 years or so, they get smarter and realize the adverse consequences of liberal policy.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/america_is_back/#c397018 DINO

    Obama scares the shit out of investors because his policies are anti-capitalism.

    How many stimulus projects is your firm bidding on? Has won? Careful with the answer, I work for an engineering firm related to construction. Try not to lie.

    No country has ever taxed and spent its way into prosperity.

    BUt I’ll bet that the taxation that pays your salary and for your LIFE was money well spent, right? Did taxation bring you prosperity?

    If you voted for Obama you helped screw yourself.

    Why don’t you tell us, Mr. “I get paid to build roads with other peoples’ tax money”, what you predict life would look like 6 months into a McCain/Palin term? (Assuming she didn’t quit by now.) Would we all be living large like it was 2005? Housing would have recovered and start appreciating at 20% a year again? The debt all down to zero, the bailouts paid back, the financial markets deliriously profitable again, unemployment at 2%? Be creative!

    Americans screwed themselves when they started voting republicans into office 30 years ago. And I love watching them paying for it now.

  • 2Hotel9

    And it has only just begun.

  • FlyOnTheWall

    I’m happy to give some of the credit for this to George W. Bush for signing the minimum wage act.

    Yeah, the ‘neo’ of neo-conservative came through there. “I’ll be generally conservative but liberal fiscally. What could go wrong?”

  • http://ndgoon.blogspot.com/ goon

    It shouldn’t take nearly that long. With the pending Obama tax hikes, the “Cap ‘n’ Trade” tax, Health Care “Reform” tax, and the real impact of the Obama deficits yet to hit the economy full force, few if any businesses are willing to invest in new employees when there is little reason to believe they’ll be able to hang on to the experienced ones they have now.

    You’re right we are so screwed. OBAMA owns this mess I don’t care if sock puppets like Dino try to deflect the blame and say it’s all Bush’s fault.

  • http://ndgoon.blogspot.com/ goon

    You have just been spammed by a porn site.

  • Brent

    Too bad the whole minimum wage argument doesn’t hold up. Minors can and are paid up to 85 cents less then full adults. And how do you judge minors to output less then an adult? I work harder and output much more then the adults at my work. It’s almost like its a per person thing.

    I was going to respond to this, but then I thought better of it. I just want to add to my previous comments about a majority of the public hearing the lecture about the consequences of the minimum wage — there are also many people who hear the lecture who are too stupid to understand it.

  • http://forums.kikizo.com/ Eddie_the_Hated

    Eddie:

    (and I’ve had a year’s experience in the workforce).

    One year’s experience in the workforce.

    You know, I’ve got practically new t-shirts that have seen more work than you. This explains so much.

    My argument holds, despite your ageism. A year in the workforce is work experience. Employers want an employee who’s held a job before, therefore, logically speaking, it should be easier for me to get a job than somebody with no work experience. This isn’t the case.

    I know it’s hard for you to listen to somebody who can turn out a coherent sentence without a college doctorate, or twenty years of entrepreneurship, but work with me here.

    Of course teens make less money. They have no work experience, and for the most part, not even a high school degree. Why would they make as much as someone with a college degree or experience?

    Maybe you’re missing his point, Kenny. Teens can legally be paid 85% of minimum wage. The same work is being done, and we’re being paid less money. If it could be proven on a case-for-case basis that every single teen does 85% of the work of an adult, then paying them 85% of minimum wage would be fair.

    This isn’t a case of people who are complaining because McDonalds doesn’t pay a Berkshire Hathaway level salary dude. People with degrees are paid more, as it should be. However, don’t tell me that because I’m underage, I’m not capable of working as hard as an adult, in a field in which I am equally qualified.

  • http://forums.kikizo.com/ Eddie_the_Hated

    Here is some bad news for you young people. Obama scares the shit out of investors because his policies are anti-capitalism.

    So, because I’m young, I’m in the Obama camp?

    Check your facts, and get back to me on that one.

  • Spartacus

    However, don’t tell me that because I’m underage, I’m not capable of working as hard as an adult, in a field in which I am equally qualified.

    I’m curious, in what fields are teens equally qualified to work as adults?

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/america_is_back/#c397018 DINO

    and don’t have the work ethic to be worth paying $7.25 an hour.

    If a business can’t afford to pay that little they’re not a viable business.

  • Rezistik

    The fallacy that you guys are too stupid to understand is that one teen who works hard and can get a job doesn’t outweigh the many teens that are young, inexperienced and don’t have the work ethic to be worth paying $7.25 an hour.

    People that can’t or won’t produce more than they cost simply won’t be employed.

    It’s amazing to me that you guys can’t understand how raising the price of entry level jobs 40% results in less entry level jobs being available.

    So those people are fired. The same is to be true of adults.

    Why would they make as much as someone with a college degree or experience?

    Only an idiot would demand they do.

    Because it is a minimum wage job. Minimum wage means minimum training needed. For instance a McDonalds, does a college degree really help them for a crew person? So why should a teenager be paid less automatically without any review of his skill level at that job.

  • Rezistik

    The hell they can. I’ve hunted non-stop for new steadier employment for the last two months, with barely a bite (and I’ve had a year’s experience in the workforce).

    Holding down a job, and finding a new job and/or getting into the job market are three completely different things.

    You haven’t looked that hard…I have yet to hear of you truly pounding the pavement. In fact you only put one application in to my understanding at my McDonald’s.

    You have to apply at one or two places before you’ve “hunted non-stop”

  • http://ndgoon.blogspot.com/ goon

    If a business can’t afford to pay that little they’re not a viable business.

    Did anyone in your family live? You can’t believe all of the stupid tired obnoxious shit that you sphew, its not possible.

  • Rezistik
    If a business can’t afford to pay that little they’re not a viable business.

    Did anyone in your family live? You can’t believe all of the stupid tired obnoxious shit that you sphew, its not possible.

    If a business can’t afford labor they go out of business. They arne’t then viable as one.

    A minimum wage does more helping then hurting, sure there might be a few businesses in the country that are doing bad and need to hire more people but can not afford to but that is too small a percentage to matter.

    It is absurd to believe that businesses would buy fair wages without a minimum, my own work barely pays the minimum despite increases in profits during recent years. (Cheap food profits during a time when people are getting poorer, go figure.)

    Even as a skilled employee at my job, skilled enough to now be a crew trainer (I know, real prestigious title) I make less then adults who are newly hired and have never worked in fast food again. Most of the teenagers employed at my McDonalds are harder workers then the adults and more stable. It actually makes sense, teenage years are for many people the time to blow of things and money isn’t of the utmost importance so those that have jobs clearly want or need them. Therefore it makes no sense to lower or remove a minimum wage.

    Is Rez-Tick turning conservative?

    I’ll be a conservative when I meet a conservative smarter enough to copy and paste my name if they can’t spell it.
    Rezistick

  • http://insanereindeer.blogspot.com/ Kenny

    Frequently the idiots making the demand are college post graduate degree holders.
    Sort of gives you a warm fuzzy feeling about the alleged educational establishment, doesn’t it?

    I understand where most union guys come off wanting a higher minimum wage, as many unions tie their wage to a multiple of the minimum…something like 3.5 times. It’s self interest. Most other people are sold on the idea that raising the minimum will help poor people…which it won’t.

  • robert108

    A minimum wage does more helping then hurting…

    Anything to back up this claim?

    It is absurd to believe that businesses would buy fair wages without a minimum…

    Spoken like a true Marxist. BTW, you don’t “buy” wages; they reflect the contribution the worker makes to the productivity of the business.
    Take an econ course.

  • http://SayAnythingBlog.com The_Whistler_ofnd

    By the way Rez-tick. If you’re underpaid by your current employer you find another one that recognizes your worth.

  • Rezistik

    Anything to back up this claim?

    lol troll forgot to read the rest of the post.

    Spoken like a true Marxist. BTW, you don’t “buy” wages; they reflect the contribution the worker makes to the productivity of the business.
    Take an econ course.

    Because of 108 disagrees with an idea, it must be Marxism.

    Take a class in social theory.

    AND BTW

    YOU DO BUY LABOR.

    You pay wages to workers, this is buying their time and energy and hopefully skills.

    In a time of recession with much job loss we are not exactly in an employees market, without a floor the employers would not pay fair wages.

    It wouldn’t be in their interest. And yes, businesses work for their interest. That is the point.

  • robert108

    Nice cherry-pick, little rez, but here’s the complete statement, with your Marxist screed included:

    It is absurd to believe that businesses would buy fair wages without a minimum…

    Karl Marx believed that all value is produced by labor, and management was stealing from the workers by not giving them all the proceeds from the business operation. It’s called “The Labor Theory of Value”. You subscribe to that belief system, whether you know it or not. You probably picked it up from some commie teacher who didn’t tell you its origin in “Das Kapital”.

    You still didn’t back up your claim that minimum wage does more good than harm; that would require a cost/benefit analysis, using facts and logic. Smearing someone as a “troll” is the avoidance of argument, from someone who apparently has nothing to back up his claim.

  • Rezistik

    By the way Rez-tick. If you’re underpaid by your current employer you find another one that recognizes your worth.

    I like where I work, I am not paid enough but I enjoy the people that work there and there is room for advancement, besides that they offer benefits that makes it possible to get slightly better jobs down the road which will help me through college.

    Sure, your argument would work perfectly in a different job market, if I was a college graduate with skills then demanding fair wages from my boss would make sense, however it hurts the employees when employers fail to pay good wages and in McJob market where it doesn’t take much skill and you can be replaced by anyone it is difficult to demand decent wages. This is why we elect a government to represent us.

  • Rezistik

    Karl Marx believed that all value is produced by labor, and management was stealing from the workers by not giving them all the proceeds from the business operation. It’s called “The Labor Theory of Value”. You subscribe to that belief system, whether you know it or not. You probably picked it up from some commie teacher who didn’t tell you its origin in “Das Kapital”.

    You still didn’t back up your claim that minimum wage does more good than harm; that would require a cost/benefit analysis, using facts and logic. Smearing someone as a “troll” is the avoidance of argument, from someone who apparently has nothing to back up his claim.

    Of course, I subscribe to Marxism because I believe employees contribute to the value of an item. Which is why items made cheaply from exquisite materials are worth the same value as items made from a master craftsmen with only decent or similar quality materials.

    I put my logic in the post, it is all I need until someone offers me some sort of facts. Do you have some to support your theory?

  • robert108

    If you’re underpaid by your current employer…

    What is the factual basis for your claim of being underpaid? Have you examined your employer’s books to see how much overhead he has to pay to provide you with a job opportunity? Do you know what his operating expenses are? Do you know how much it costs him to service his debt? Do you have any idea how much you actually contribute to his operation, in money terms? Are there others willing to take your job for less money?
    If you don’t know the answer to all the above questions, you don’t know what you’re talking about.

  • robert108

    Of course, I subscribe to Marxism because I believe employees contribute to the value of an item.

    Try again. Marx believed that all value produced is from labor, with no return to capital or management. Your belief that employers don’t want to pay workers fairly unless forced to is straight out Marxism, and is grossly untrue in the free enterprise economic system. Good, valuable workers are desirable, and employers want to keep them, and so want to pay them enough to accomplish that purpose; minimum wage laws require that inferior workers be paid more than they’re worth, which actually takes money away from the superior workers.
    Again, it’s basic economics. One of the basic errors of socialism/communism is to confuse social teaching with the facts of economics, which leads to attempts to use the economic system to engineer social outcomes, which always ends in failure, stagnation, poverty and shortages.

  • Rezistik

    Really?

    And do all employees perform work of equal quality and value?

    A poor workman can, and often does, reduce the value of a product.

    A good workman can, and often does, improve the value of a product.

    Should both be paid the same?

    No, Rodney that is my point. But both should be given the opportunity and both should start at the same wage. Remember, minimum wage jobs aren’t skilled jobs, it doesn’t take much to do them so setting a fair minimum is needed.

    What is the factual basis for your claim of being underpaid? Have you examined your employer’s books to see how much overhead he has to pay to provide you with a job opportunity? Do you know what his operating expenses are? Do you know how much it costs him to service his debt? Do you have any idea how much you actually contribute to his operation, in money terms? Are there others willing to take your job for less money?
    If you don’t know the answer to all the above questions, you don’t know what you’re talking about.

    Yes I have seen my bosses books for our store, and I have even seen books for similar stores. To provide me for a job opportunity? Are you serious? You act like I am indebted to him for allowing me to work there, at his ever so prestigious McDonalds. I have saved them thousands of dollars by helping them better manage their workers and materials. Pointing out people who steal and doing extra work when other employees would not. Not to mention I have designed business cards near pro bono for the execs of my franchise which saved them money as well as lead to new business opportunities.

  • robert108

    I believe employees contribute to the value of an item. Which is why items made cheaply from exquisite materials are worth the same value as items made from a master craftsmen with only decent or similar quality materials.

    You may believe that, as did Karl Marx, but the truth in our system is simple: Things are worth what people are willing to pay for them. The market determines value, nothing else. As you can see from the home loan meltdown, when the govt starts dictating values for social engineering purposes, disaster results.

  • http://magyartruth.blogspot.com/ Chief RZ

    It is quite simple. They have no work ethic. Their “parents” have taught them not to work.
    Their parents do not work. They mooch off the taxpayers who work. I saw this “ethic” while teaching public school for 29 years. About 90% were unmotivated except to steal, take drugs and force sex on underaged girls and some boys.

    In my day, you worked if you wanted money. I took just about any legal job available and still do.

    Simply disgusting what this country has come to. The pioneers of the West led the way and others took a different route.

  • robert108

    Are you serious? Absolutely. You act like I am indebted to him for allowing me to work there, Not what I said, so don’t confuse what you make up in your own mind with what I believe. at his ever so prestigious McDonalds.

    His capital investment and his management skills produced a place for you to work, something with you are too arrogant and ignorant to realize. It’s a mutually beneficial relationship, as are all voluntary relationships in a free enterprise economic system. You are not forced to work there, and you are not forced to stay there if you don’t like it. He is also not forced to hire you, but he is forced to pay you a minimum amount, no matter what your contribution may be.
    As someone who has been both employee and employer, as well as business owner and manager, I can tell you that some employees are very valuable, and some have negative value. When someone quits and you make more money and your operation runs more smoothly, you realize that they were a negative influence in the workplace. This happens much more often than you realize.

  • Neiman

    Rezistik says, “Religion, the best method to make the masses vote against their interests.”

    It is obvious Rezistik is a Marxist, both in economic theory and his religion is the opiate of the masses belief system.

    This is a no brainer: One need only look at the former Soviet Union, Cuba and any place at any time in history wherein socialism has been in force in a nation; and productivity and quality of products and services goes down the toilet, they cannot compete, until and unless they are forced to by police state threats or as in China when a semi-capitalist system has been permitted. It is either capitalism or force, and even with force they can only compete with lower prices based on slave wages and the poverty of their workers that live in fear of the state.

  • Rezistik

    As someone who has been both employee and employer, as well as business owner and manager, I can tell you that some employees are very valuable, and some have negative value. When someone quits and you make more money and your operation runs more smoothly, you realize that they were a negative influence in the workplace. This happens much more often than you realize.

    As someone who has seen and even requested that fellow employees were let go as detrimental to the work environment and profits I know what a valuable employee is. Don’t attempt to lecture when you fail to even read an entire post.

  • http://insanereindeer.blogspot.com/ Kenny

    If a business can’t afford to pay that little they’re not a viable business.

    What a stupid comeback. That’s most small businesses. And it’s not the business that suffers…it’s the teens.

    Thanks for proving again that you give a damn about no one, fascist.

    cause it is a minimum wage job. Minimum wage means minimum training needed. For instance a McDonalds, does a college degree really help them for a crew person? So why should a teenager be paid less automatically without any review of his skill level at that job.

    Except that most college grads aren’t beating down McDonald’s door to flip burgers. You originally said that adults make more money than teens. I pointed out what a stupid stat that was.

    No one is saying “We need college grads to flip our burgers! We’ll pay them more!” They might say “We need college grads to be higher up positions tho.

    So those people are fired. The same is to be true of adults.

    So this prices people out of the market who otherwize wouldn’t be. You admit it, then dismiss it. That’s fucking stupid Rez.

    If a business can’t afford labor they go out of business. They arne’t then viable as one.
    A minimum wage does more helping then hurting, sure there might be a few businesses in the country that are doing bad and need to hire more people but can not afford to but that is too small a percentage to matter.

    Tell that to the people priced out of a job. Tell that to the people who had their hours cut back to make the budget. Tell that to the millions of people who see the prices of goods go up because of minimum wage increases, while their own salaries don’t go up. Tell that to the businesses that go under.

    For a fairy tale benefit that goes to people who don’t need it (teens, who are dependants), lots of real world people are hurt. Teen unemployment went up about 2% in the 6 months after the raise enacted. That’s no small number of teens getting screwed cause “they deserve better pay”.

    Liberals never care about the effects of the policies they enact.

  • http://insanereindeer.blogspot.com/ Kenny

    To provide me for a job opportunity? Are you serious? You act like I am indebted to him for allowing me to work there, at his ever so prestigious McDonalds. I have saved them thousands of dollars by helping them better manage their workers and materials. Pointing out people who steal and doing extra work when other employees would not.

    Would you have a job without someone to provide it for you? Yes, there is a certain amount of gratitude you should have for being hired. He provides you an easy job for money, and you whine and cry about how underpaid you are. Go get a different job then. See if other employers think you worth more. That you think you should get paid higher for pointing out theft (see: being a decent person) is ridiculous.

    Stupid marxist teenager.

  • robert108

    Don’t attempt to lecture when you fail to even read an entire post.

    It only seems like a lecture to you because I’m telling you things you don’t know. I read your entire post; when your premise is false, the rest is also false. GIGO.
    Again, take a basic econ course, if you want to know what you’re talking about.

  • Rezistik

    So this prices people out of the market who otherwize wouldn’t be. You admit it, then dismiss it. That’s fucking stupid Rez.

    Isn’t it marxist to assume that people should be given jobs because they need them and not because they are able to perform them?

    If a person is unable to perform at 7 bucks an hour then they get fired, they don’t deserve to work. 7 bucks isn’t a huge amount for an hour of work. I’ve paid people 5 bucks to cut my lawn and thats only about 20 minutes work. If they can’t manage that amount of output they don’t deserve the job.

    And it isn’t about being given the opportunity, if I wasn’t a good worker he wouldn’t continue working me. He doesn’t owe me anything and I don’t owe him anything. That is how employment works, we are receiving something from each other for a set amount…no one is doing anyone favors.

  • robert108

    Minimum wage means minimum training needed.

    Not true at all; wages reflect the value of what the employee contributes to the business; the bottom line, again, is this: things and labor are worth what someone is willing to pay for them. You can’t mandate that a certain job is worth a certain amount of money, as the unemployment figures indicate very clearly in Obama’s economic disaster.

  • http://magyartruth.blogspot.com/ Chief RZ

    I should have a right to work without paying tribute to a union nor any government and certainly not to any gangs or protection. This was a free country.

  • djer

    And Chief I thought you believed in majority rules. If the majority of workers want a union in the workplace then I suppose you can go work someplace else. You are not entitled to work where you want.

  • robert108

    If the majority of workers want a union in the workplace…

    If they get to vote on a secret ballot, with no coercion and no false promises, then yes. Except for govt employee unions, union membership is falling in the US, which is why you lefties want to do away with the secret ballot.
    It would be more just if unions were also subjected to the same antitrust laws as is everyone else in the marketplace. Level playing field, you know.

  • robert108

    If a person is unable to perform at 7 bucks an hour then they get fired, they don’t deserve to work. 7 bucks isn’t a huge amount for an hour of work.

    That depends entirely on their value to whoever is paying them.
    If you could absorb this basic principle, you might learn something. There is no fixed value for a person’s work; to some extent, it depends on how much capital equipment they can use. Labor without capital is subsistence only. Would you prefer to make your own clothes and shoes, or have capital and labor cooperate to produce them for you?

  • Neiman

    I should have a right to work without paying tribute to a union nor any government and certainly not to any gangs or protection.

    Even if union thugs force a closed shop, there is a little used Supreme Court decision that allows a worker to take an inactive membership, pay 1/3 or less of the dues and still benefit from collective bargaining and grievance procedures. That is good to know when you realize most unions are not for the workers, but for the high living of union officials.

    If the majority of workers want a union in the workplace then I suppose you can go work someplace else. You are not entitled to work where you want.

    It is morally wrong to FORCE someone to belong to socialist, criminal enterprises (unions) just to get a job!

  • http://magyartruth.blogspot.com/ Chief RZ

    Yes, but if the owner does not want gangs in his workplace, he will either sell, move, or hire others who will work without being coerced. He, not you, nor any workers can force anyone to pay for work. That would be slavery in reverse. If the workers think they are so valuable, they can buy the workplace and work it themselves, or create their own business.

    Normally, they will not do this because they behave as children, not adults.

    During the 1930s, even FDR found this out. It is a game to them, but reality to honest people.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/america_is_back/#c397018 DINO

    That’s most small businesses.

    Then most small business isn’t viable or the system is in need of repair.

    Hey, I want to start a business but can’t afford the startup costs, the rent on the building and the utilities to keep it going. Can you get those costs lowered for me? Thanks!

    I also can’t afford the cost of having my trash picked up. Can I just throw it out the back door? Thanks!

    Oh and my process produces some fairly toxic by-products. Can I just take them to the river where you fish and your kids play and dump them? It would really save me some bank. Thanks!

    But what would really help me is if you stopped making me pay people and just offer them a pat on the back and occasionally buy them lunch. That would probably put me over the top as far as the success of my business goes.

    Gee, this capitalism thing is SUPER!

    Dumb fucking shitstain conservatives.

  • Spartacus

    Repeating this question to Eddie the hated because I don’t want it to get lost in the shuffle and I really am curious.

    However, don’t tell me that because I’m underage, I’m not capable of working as hard as an adult, in a field in which I am equally qualified.

    I’m curious, in what fields are teens equally qualified to work as adults?

  • http://magyartruth.blogspot.com/ Chief RZ

    Spartacus. The only reason there is a “child” labor law is to protect union members from competition. They know young inspired people can outperform them all day long.

    It is called government monopoly of labor, pure and simple.

  • robert108

    As usual from little parrot, no facts, just bad language.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/realitybasedbob/ realitybasedbob

    Thank you for acknowledging Chief is a piece of dung.

  • pparets

    Chief RZ… I can only hope that you meant something different than your comment on child labor laws sounds like.

  • Neiman

    Thank you for acknowledging Chief is a piece of dung.

    While you are free to disagree with Chief, even passionately; he served this country in uniform, in war, in defense of liberty and at great costs. I take offense therefore at him being compared to “dung”

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/realitybasedbob/ realitybasedbob

    Please, Neiman, tell us your true feeling about other men who wore the uniform. John Kerry, JFK, McGovern, Jimmy Carter.

    Perhaps I might just take offense.

    Chief is dung.

    He knows why.

    Jesus knows why.

  • robert108

    Little parrot remains fact-free.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/realitybasedbob/ realitybasedbob

    Image and video hosting by TinyPic

    The only reason there is a “child” labor law is to protect union members from competition. They know young inspired people can outperform them all day long.

    Ya know Chief, for a piece of dung, you really are a piece of dung.

  • 2Hotel9

    This,”You are not entitled to work where you want.”, is easily the stupidest fucking thing I have read in years.

    And rez? No one takes you seriously or believes anything you have to say after you proclaim that you embrace Marxism. No. One.

  • http://SayAnythingBlog.com The_Whistler_ofnd

    Even an uninspired piece of dung can outwork boob on a good day.

  • Rezistik

    I’m curious, in what fields are teens equally qualified to work as adults?

    Um any place that has a minimum wage?

    How is an adult more qualified to work at a fast food joint then an adult?

  • Rezistik

    I had to be harassed for an entire day to score as low as 167 and attended gifted classes and even founded one. It doesn’t change anything unless you understand their mentality. The people you look down on rule this world and their social structures and their sensibilities and their instincts rule the day, not yours.

    lol the internet genius. I invented physics and you just play the game lollll

    I too had to score low for the foolish minds of others to handle my IQ, originally I scored 200 points in puzzle solving. What can I say I am beast. So I can totally and completely sympathize.

  • Rezistik

    And rez? No one takes you seriously or believes anything you have to say after you proclaim that you embrace Marxism. No. One.

    ‘Twas sarcasm you fool.

    I was told I was a marxist because I dare to think workers contribute to the business and should be paid fair wages.

    I remember some quote…usually a marxist one used in reverse. Something about to those according to their skill.

    Which is basically what I advocate, a base line minimum for low skill jobs and then after that each person earns what they should earn according to their skill.

    Kind of doesn’t seem like Marxism to me. But what do I know.

    I only invented physics.

    Yeah, your welcome.

  • ellinas

    It is quite simple. They have no work ethic. Their “parents” have taught them not to work.Their parents do not work. They mooch off the taxpayers who work. I saw this “ethic” while teaching public school for 29 years. About 90% were unmotivated except to steal, take drugs and force sex on underaged girls and some boys.
    Chief RZ on July 4, 2009 at 11:58 am

    Chief. Identify and name who “they” and “their” are.
    This way Neiman and the rest of us will truly know what you mean.

  • robert108

    I was told I was a marxist because I dare to think workers contribute to the business and should be paid fair wages.

    Now you’re just lying; I identified you as a Marxist due to your many statements agreeing with Marx’s beliefs about how workers are exploited by employers and your general ignorance of how wages and prices are actually determined.

    If you want to claim sarcasm, after you have been busted for what you obviously believe, try the /sarcasm tag to make it clear. Using “sarcasm” for an excuse just doesn’t get it.

  • Neiman

    Chief is dung.

    He knows why.

    Jesus knows why.

    We were talking about Chief comrade ribby, not anyone else, stop the liberal obfuscations please. I honor Chief and his service to our c ountry and by his comments at SAB, I believe I know of his exceptional character and honor.

    You have no relationship to Jesus whatsoever, why do you blaspheme, He had nothing to do with this post or comments!

  • http://insanereindeer.blogspot.com/ Kenny

    If a person is unable to perform at 7 bucks an hour then they get fired, they don’t deserve to work. 7 bucks isn’t a huge amount for an hour of work. I’ve paid people 5 bucks to cut my lawn and thats only about 20 minutes work. If they can’t manage that amount of output they don’t deserve the job.

    That assumes that the job is even worth 7 dollars an hour to begin with.

    But hell, let’s add that to the list of downright false assumptions you’ve made. And how, despite being repeatedly corrected, you stand by your marxist tripe.

    The cold hard facts: Raising the minimum wage lays people off. It raises the costs of goods. It puts small businesses out of commission. Since most others dont get a raise, it effectively lowers their yearly income when prices rise.

    The benefits? Theoretically, teens get increased buying power for a week or two til the prices jump…beyond the increase in MW.

    Well, that’s TOTALLY worth screwing everyone over! Teenagers get a slightly cheaper movie night for a week or two! Huzzah! That makes me sleep better at night with my higher bills!

    Again, you show yourself uncaring how your policy works in real life. Like all liberals, you’re a theoretical moron with no sympathy to those who are getting hurt because of your idiocy. Good for you, asshat!

  • 2Hotel9

    Ah, ain’t that cute!?!? e falls back on her usual, pretend she does not understand, bullshit. Next she will cry&wail; that English is her second language and she just needs it explained, again. And again. And again. And again.

    Enforced, extended childhood is destructive. It has and is being used to drag people down to the level of the least mentally capable amongst us. The political left, all the shining examples of it that comment here brilliantly illustrating this point, drags everybody DOWN to its mental level. To the lowest common denominator. Never up. Look at public schools and at colleges. The standards continually go downward. A person who graduates after 4 years of college today has an education that is vastly inferior to a High School graduate of 100 years ago.

    And the political left calls this progress. Because a tiny fraction of the populace is incapable of rising above a certain level, mentally and morally, those “superior” intellects on the left drags everyone they can down to that level. And they call it “equality”.

    Look at dino, woofie, sannitized, buzzed, imagine, elinas, et al. All they screech&wail; about is how those who are successful and able to excel in life must be punished, because a tiny fraction of humans are incapable of success and entirely unable to excel.

    Now, let the wailing&gnashing; of teeth commence! Lets us see if any of you leftarded fucking morons can even compose a coherent sentence in defense of destroying 99% of the population in order to raise the “self esteem” of your 1%.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/entry/homosexuality_is_wrong_-_a_compendium move_zig

    RBBY-Tard

    (A)t a certain point you have to recognize that what some participants are doing are not engaging in discussion. That’s not their point. They are here to divert, distract, discredit and disrupt. That is their purpose. These bad actors are known as Internet Trolls.

    Trolls, Thread jacks, Dezinformatsia and 2010

    Download Greasemonkey

    Download IgnoreDino

    Modify as required

    Enjoy the silence

  • http://insanereindeer.blogspot.com/ Kenny

    Enforced, extended childhood is destructive.

    Which was a lot of the reason Dewey and Roosevelt starting the public schools, and redefining childhood up. And it’s the reason Dems want manditory college and manditory “volunteerism”, constantly defining up the age of childhood. Until we’re talking about 40 year old children…2 years away from retirement.

    Infantalize the populous and you can pass anything you want.

  • http://forums.kikizo.com/ Eddie_the_Hated

    Oooh, predictably dismissive with a big word. I love when people use words ending in -ism that they don’t actually understand because it was practically yesterday that they were worrying about getting laid for the first time.

    Ageism is the stereotyping and discrimination of an individual based on their age.

    I am told that because I am young, I am lazy. The notion that all young people are lazy is a stereotypical generalization (logical fallacy, by the way), therefore, the idea that all young people falls under the definition of ageism.

    But it’s okay Suite. If you can’t make a point without trying to distract the masses with an admittedly weak appeal to ridicule, it’s no fault of mine.

    However, don’t tell me that because I’m underage, I’m not capable of working as hard as an adult, in a field in which I am equally qualified.

    If he won’t, I will.

    What was it that made you so full of yourself? Getting all the exams right without studying? Correcting the teachers in their subject matter? The IQ tests?

    When did being confident in your work ethic become being full of yourself? Nice-straw man though. I never brought up my education or my success in school. Nice straw-man though. Back on topic:

    I had to be harassed for an entire day to score as low as 167 and attended gifted classes and even founded one. It doesn’t change anything unless you understand their mentality. The people you look down on rule this world and their social structures and their sensibilities and their instincts rule the day, not yours.

    It doesn’t matter how smart you are if you can’t pass for one of them.

    That’s why you’re having problems.

    Where did I ever stake the claim that I’m smarter than those around me? Or are you assuming, because it’s easier to pass me off as an ignorant little kid if you smear me with a purported elitist attitude?

    More appeal to ridicule. I expected better from you.

    I know, you’ll have all sorts of rebuttals and all that crap and will be in your late twenties still saying the job market was impossible and it wasn’t your fault.

    The job market is shit, no question about it, but the point where you begin to deceive is where you make the assumption that I’m blaming some sort of failure on my part on the job market. I never claimed that there was some failure on my part to secure a job. On top of that, I’m college bound, and set on entrepreneurship. If I fail to succeed,it’s nobody’s fault but mine, and that’s just the way I like it.

    I’ve got a job, and I work damn hard at it, and y’know why? Because if I don’t, there’s a string of unemployed people my age who would love to be doing the shit work I do.

  • robert108

    eddie: Adultism is the arrogant belief that young people are smarter than experienced adults. Dig yourself.

  • Bat One

    How many pills do you have to pop before you believe the insane dribble you spew each day?

    Perhaps if you weren’t quite so arrogantly vindictive, young man, R108 might consider appending a “//SARCASM//” tag where appropriate for your benefit.

  • http://insanereindeer.blogspot.com/ Kenny

    How many pills do you have to pop before you believe the insane dribble you spew each day?

    Look in the mirror and ask that ? Rez.

  • robert108

    Bat: Actually, it’s the other side of “ageism”, but little rez obviously isn’t current on his PC dictionary.
    To be more precise, it’s where older people are discriminated against, due to their age. It’s a disease of the young, arrogant and ignorant.

    Of course, little rez is simply projecting his habits on an older person, as an illustration of adultism.
    How ironic.

  • 2Hotel9

    You are not lazy because you are young, you are lazy simply because you are inferior. Clear the shit out of your head and you just might get over yourself and be someone someday.

  • Uncle Brian

    Apparently, economic researchers associated with the Federal Reserve bank in MN & the U of M also disagree with the Obamanomic response to this recession:

    http://tinyurl.com/ksbzc5

    They conclude that the market-driven responses of Finland and Chile minimized their downturns and lead to stronger economies. Sadly, the US is on the same course taken by Japan and Mexico, which lead to prolonged recessions and sluggish recoveries.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/america_is_back/#c397018 DINO

    You’ll never get unanimous opinions from a group of economists. I can find even more economists who think the conservative agenda was a disaster.

    We wouldn’t be talking about what direction is the right one to rescue us if the conservative agenda hadn’t failed so miserably.

  • Rezistik

    eddie: Adultism is the arrogant belief that young people are smarter than experienced adults. Dig yourself.

    How many pills do you have to pop before you believe the insane dribble you spew each day?

  • robert108

    You’ll never get unanimous opinions from a group of economists.

    The truth does not require either unanimity or consensus; it just needs to be true. Since little dino knows nothing about economics, he is unable to separate the wheat from the chaff, and so just parrots his commie lies.
    Fiscal conservatism(living within your means) always works, every time it’s put into practice.

  • http://insanereindeer.blogspot.com/ Kenny

    You’ll never get unanimous opinions from a group of economists. I can find even more economists who think the conservative agenda was a disaster.
    We wouldn’t be talking about what direction is the right one to rescue us if the conservative agenda hadn’t failed so miserably.

    Only an idiot would blame conservative principles for this. Oh wait, Dino IS blaming, and he IS an idiot.

    It makes sense now.

  • sayanything-6955

    And that minimum wage increase is going to hit several other small businesses too,Dont be fooled,unemployement will hit 11 to 12 percent in the next year.

  • http://suitepotato.blogspot.com/ sayanything-4808

    Eddie:

    (and I’ve had a year’s experience in the workforce).

    One year’s experience in the workforce.

    You know, I’ve got practically new t-shirts that have seen more work than you. This explains so much.

    Rez:

    I work harder and output much more then the adults at my work. It’s almost like its a per person thing.

    By inference, this would suggest you’re not an adult and you scored less than an A+ at spelling.

    That’s two down.

    How many other poseurs are young enough to be my kids? I couldn’t quite understand what made me want to smack some people and send them to bed without supper, but it’s all becoming clear now.

    Kenny:

    Why would they make as much as someone with a college degree or experience?

    Only an idiot would demand they do.

    Frequently the idiots making the demand are college post graduate degree holders.

    Sort of gives you a warm fuzzy feeling about the alleged educational establishment, doesn’t it?

  • http://suitepotato.blogspot.com/ sayanything-4808

    Eddie:

    My argument holds, despite your ageism. A year in the workforce is work experience. Employers want an employee who’s held a job before, therefore, logically speaking, it should be easier for me to get a job than somebody with no work experience. This isn’t the case.

    Oooh, predictably dismissive with a big word. I love when people use words ending in -ism that they don’t actually understand because it was practically yesterday that they were worrying about getting laid for the first time.

    “Employers want an employee who’s held a job before,”

    No, they want someone who gives them the impression they will actually show up, follow orders, and do the job with as close to zero disruption and maximum efficiency and output as possible.

    The world is full of people who have held jobs before but are walking warning alarms for the hiring manager’s spider sense as it were.

    “therefore, logically speaking, it should be easier for me to get a job than somebody with no work experience.”

    Simple logic generally not worthy of rebuttal but we’ll work with you here.

    Refer back to what I said above.

    Even if they wanted someone with work experience you must consider what experience is considered to be by the one doing the hiring. Is it the attitude, the carriage of the person, or simple numbers on paper?

    I’ve been working since I was six years old. What matters is if I give them that impression.

    “This isn’t the case.”

    A thousand years of work cannot change the outward impression that you’ve never changed under the effect of it if you will not give that affectation to it.

    Eddie:

    However, don’t tell me that because I’m underage, I’m not capable of working as hard as an adult, in a field in which I am equally qualified.

    If he won’t, I will.

    What was it that made you so full of yourself? Getting all the exams right without studying? Correcting the teachers in their subject matter? The IQ tests?

    I had to be harassed for an entire day to score as low as 167 and attended gifted classes and even founded one. It doesn’t change anything unless you understand their mentality. The people you look down on rule this world and their social structures and their sensibilities and their instincts rule the day, not yours.

    It doesn’t matter how smart you are if you can’t pass for one of them.

    That’s why you’re having problems.

    I know, you’ll have all sorts of rebuttals and all that crap and will be in your late twenties still saying the job market was impossible and it wasn’t your fault.

    Or you can learn and accept why so many of the world’s movers and shakers are almost textbook sociopaths.

    Spartacus:

    I’m curious, in what fields are teens equally qualified to work as adults?

    If they are female, porn.

  • http://suitepotato.blogspot.com/ sayanything-4808

    Eddie:

    Ageism is the stereotyping and discrimination of an individual based on their age.

    Don’t insult yourself by resorting to textbook copy and paste, kid. You’re smarter than that but you’re not seeing the truth of it, just a false perception reflected by what you think other people see of it. Since you’re a little too foggy yet, it means that in the end your perception of yourself is entirely dependent on others and if you get too comfortable with whatever you see coming back from them, you’ll be SOL the instant it changes and that will be one heck of a paradigm shift without popping the clutch for you.

    Eddie:

    I am told that because I am young, I am lazy.

    One sentence later, you prove my point. You go by what others say. The only reason that is, given that you lack enough experience to have given up in resignation, is that you yourself figure you are too young to have any experience and thus have to accept from others what they put before you.

    Don’t set yourself up for that letdown, because it’s a ninety story drop and no airbag.

    Eddie:

    The notion that all young people are lazy is a stereotypical generalization

    Made only by you. It’s one you inferred by way of social implication through observation of attitude through the kaleidescope of your own emotional melange and you fell for your own bullshit, hook, line and sinker.

    Eddie:

    (logical fallacy, by the way)

    No, a logical fallacy is undone by the simple logic contained within the premise itself. There’s no logical fallacy involved. “All young people are lazy” is a statement of belief or opinion or at the very least a starting premise for a logical puzzle but there’s no secondary line hence no logic. Just a statement that may or may not be true but is only proveable through observation by entities who share a common set of perceptual footings unless it is opinion in which case lacking the definition, also opinion, of that person’s idea of laziness, it must be accepted as true to that person.

    Since you yourself deduced that as being the statement or at least opinion of others, put into words by yourself, the opinion must be yours in the end since no other person put that to you directly.

    Eddie:

    therefore, the idea that all young people falls under the definition of ageism.

    Rules lawyering like my little sister when she was fifteen.

  • http://suitepotato.blogspot.com/ sayanything-4808

    Eddie:

    When did being confident in your work ethic become being full of yourself? Nice-straw man though. I never brought up my education or my success in school. Nice straw-man though. Back on topic:

    Eddie:

    Where did I ever stake the claim that I’m smarter than those around me? Or are you assuming, because it’s easier to pass me off as an ignorant little kid if you smear me with a purported elitist attitude?

    It’s you affectations Eddie.

    You look down on everyone else and tell yourself that you’re not doing so because the if you accepted that you did, you’d feel the need to prove to yourself a right to that attitude based on the old yardstick society has yet implied to you at your age, which is success which you’ve already admitted eludes you yet.

    So you accept what is before you hoping to find the little weakness that will allow your intellect purchase and to finally come out on top, giving you the success you think you desire.

    In doing so, you internalize the superficial affectations of others, such as repeating statements as if you’re hearing yourself speak them in your head, and using lines you’ve heard others make such as the repetitive “straw man” phrase, and R108′s pet word “smear”.

    You think you’re paying attention so that you will ultimately get to the front of the pack and lead the moment, but in reality all you’re doing is displaying a deep internalization of what you’ve taken from that interface between the individual and society, the realm of deduction and implication, which men sometimes call learning, and you’ve really learned to be like everyone else.

    That is what everyone deep down really wants after all. They all want to belong and be part of the group. Yet they want their individuality and they want to be in charge. Ultimately, they don’t get to be in charge, their individuality is nothing more than the group reflected from themselves, and they gain attachment and social place by what is in their minds surrender to conformity and they never really do get past the usual stages of shock, anger and denial and jump past acceptance.

    Neither wil you unless you give up right now.

    You won’t though.

    Eddie:

    The job market is shit, no question about it, but the point where you begin to deceive is where you make the assumption that I’m blaming some sort of failure on my part on the job market. I never claimed that there was some failure on my part to secure a job. On top of that, I’m college bound, and set on entrepreneurship. If I fail to succeed,it’s nobody’s fault but mine, and that’s just the way I like it.

    I’ve got a job, and I work damn hard at it, and y’know why? Because if I don’t, there’s a string of unemployed people my age who would love to be doing the shit work I do.[/quit]

    I produce an image, you respond, you attempt anticipation, and you feint to the wrong direction.

    We’ll see how long and well you can maintain that alleged attitude, but seeing what you’ve said so far, I don’t believe that you believe it for one second, only that you believe naively that I did.

    I’ll give you this. Niether Jung nor Skinner nor Freud are entirely to blame or to explain but as with other humans so full of their own needs they centered on an element as the entirety of the truth. From every point of view the entirety can be seen but the entirety is not contained within any of the points of view. Didn’t you ever read A Wrinkle in Time?

  • http://suitepotato.blogspot.com/ sayanything-4808

    Right now, there’s a train a comin’ and it won’t be stoppin’ round these here parts for Eddie…

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development