Obamacare Might Price Smokers Out Of Health Insurance

Smokers 1

The so-called “Affordable Care Act” isn’t really making health insurance more affordable for anyone. Thanks to clouds of new regulations and mandates, health insurance is going to get more expensive for everyone in the country. But smokers, especially, are going to be hard hit:

WASHINGTON (AP) — Millions of smokers could be priced out of health insurance because of tobacco penalties in President Barack Obama’s health care law, according to experts who are just now teasing out the potential impact of a little-noted provision in the massive legislation.

The Affordable Care Act — “Obamacare” to its detractors — allows health insurers to charge smokers buying individual policies up to 50 percent higher premiums starting next Jan. 1.

For a 55-year-old smoker, the penalty could reach nearly $4,250 a year. A 60-year-old could wind up paying nearly $5,100 on top of premiums.

Some of you might be tempted to say, “So what, it’s just smokers, and they ought to be paying more anyway.” In a way, that’s right. Smoking is bad for you, and insurance companies should have the option of charging smokers more because smokers are likely to cost more in terms of health care dollars.

But there is a very dangerous precedent being set here. Smokers are not paying higher rates because of free market insurance pricing but rather because of government policy specifically targeting them with higher prices intended to manipulate their behavior. The government is trying to make them stop smoking not by banning tobacco but by making smoking so expensive they just quit.

Again, smokers aren’t seen very sympathetically by most of us, but what if the government applied this sort of policy to fat people? What if people over a certain BMI or other measure had to pay a penalty on their insurance? What if the government began implementing policies aimed at manipulating our diet and exercise routines?

Sure, we should all want to be healthy, but shouldn’t we have the option of choosing to be healthy rather than being forced into it through government policy?

This is the danger of collectivizing something like health care. Once health care is a “right,” once we’re all obligated to provide or guarantee health care or health insurance to one another, then we open the door to the collective manipulating the choices of the individual with the excuse that it’s what is best for the collective.

That, my friends, is the road to serfdom.

Rob Port is the editor of SayAnythingBlog.com. In 2011 he was a finalist for the Watch Dog of the Year from the Sam Adams Alliance and winner of the Americans For Prosperity Award for Online Excellence. In 2013 the Washington Post named SAB one of the nation's top state-based political blogs, and named Rob one of the state's best political reporters.

Related posts

  • ‘Tom Crawford

    Ah but the craziness on smoking is not limited to Obamacare…..

    “Rep. Mitch Greenlick, from Portland, is sponsoring a bill that makes cigarettes a Schedule III controlled substance, meaning it would be illegal to possess or distribute cigarettes without a doctor’s prescription.”

    “Under the proposal, offenders would face maximum punishments of one year in prison, a $6,250 fine or both.”


  • two_amber_lamps

    Price smokers out of the market? Sounds like discrimination to me…. So much for “universal.” Universal so long as you submit to government edict.


  • RandyBoBandy

    So what? All of the issues you brought up are characteristics of Obama’s dream for America. Ole’ Karl would be proud of his protege.

  • Thresherman

    This is life under the Democrat’s version of Animal Farm where all of us are equal but some are not as equal as others.

  • Roy_Bean

    Give them a couple years and we will have to report height and weight on our income tax so they can figure the fat tax.

  • Clairvoyant

    The “fat people” card is not apples to apples. I don’t have to taste your deep fried donuts, Rob.(unless I chose to have one of course) But with smoking, there is the chance of getting a whiff of a cigarette or look at butts, thrown on the ground by the lazies.

    • tony_o2

      Of course it is. The premium hike is not a punishment for secondhand smoke or littering. It is to cover the higher cost of individual claims. If a smoker can be charged more because they will have higher individual
      health care costs, then fat people can be charged more because they
      will also incur higher costs.

      • Laurie

        And lets not forget all gay people. Gay people cost more in health insurance because of aids. Now I realize not all gay people gets aids, however, not all smokers get cancer either.

  • mickey_moussaoui

    somehow I suspect that medical marijuana will escape this extra tax because it is trendy with the elites

  • Lynn Bergman

    Making people responsible for their actions…CRY ME A RIVER! I’m sick of paying for smokers’ health care. Insurance companies also do it because its is appropriate.