Obama Won’t Commit To Missile Defense, Leaves Poland Twisting In The Wind

Recently, after Russia invaded Georgia, Poland finally jumped on board with a missile defense treaty with the United States. Given that Poland, much like Georgia, was a Soviet hegemony and that the Russian government has been acting increasingly belligerent and aggressive of late this was a bold move for them. It directly contradicted Russia’s wishes and gave America a strong ally in the region.
Now, after the Poles put so much on the line by making that move, President-elect Obama is going to let them twist in the wind.

CHICAGO – President-elect Obama has spoken to the president of Poland about relations between the two countries but didn’t make a commitment on the multibillion-dollar missile defense program undertaken by the Bush administration, an Obama aide said Saturday.
That contrasts with a statement by Polish President Lech Kaczynski, who said Obama told him the missile defense project would continue.
The U.S. and Poland signed an agreement in August for basing American missiles in Poland as part of a shield against possible missile attacks from Iran.

Obama’s contradiction of the Polish President, and the apparent confusion surrounding the missile defense agreement, is a gigantic gaffe. And one America can ill-afford now with a resurgent Russia likely to be the most serious national security threat facing this country.

Tags: ,


«
»
  • http://sayanythingblog.com/ likwidshoe

    But Polan’s interest are not are interest.

    You don’t speak for me.

    Poland’s interest in remaining free from the communist threat, something that they dearly know about, is most certainly in my interest! It is in the interest of free men everywhere that totalitarian ideologies do not spread.

    You watch your mouth, Lioncourt, and don’t ever speak for me ever again. You son of a bitch.

  • 2Hotel9

    Iran does not have ballistic missiles. Then what are those 2 factories making, refrigerators?

  • robert108

    Yes, he won’t betray our allies, like you lefties will. You’re so afraid of confrontation, a strong stance is “provocation”. Spoken like a true coward, Woof. Clinton’s cowardice handed us numerous terrorist attacks, culminating in 9/11. Your cowardice doesn’t work; weakness invites aggression.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/entry/homosexuality_is_wrong_-_a_compendium move_zig

    Leftards whine, snivel and complain that Americans don’t consider them patriotic and even accuse them of being traitors.

    This is a good case-in-point: the Resident Leftards are once again, arguing on behalf of tyrants by arguing vociferously against defense.

    If it looks like a goose,

    Quacks like a goose, and

    Steps like a goose,

    Well then…

  • Lioncourt

    Poland has a recent history of communist aggression taken against the country. They know what is at stake and they want a missile defense system in place.

    I understand why Polan wants it.

    But Polan’s interest are not are interest.

    By continually antagonizing Russia we ensure that they maintain a hardline government.

    It may be too late now but when the Soviet Union fell it may have been wiser to engage them and foment a democratic government instead of extending NATO to their border.

  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    poland has said there will be no war with iran.

    Link?

    The U.S. and Poland signed an agreement in August for basing American missiles in Poland as part of a shield against possible missile attacks from Iran.

    Why would they do such a thing? Silly tarts! Or did the reporter get that wrong? Maybe you have a link to that?

    Or are you simply an attention whore that will argue any point, say anything outrageous just to get the attention?

    Offal, Sparkie. Simply offal.

  • bill-tb

    He should consult Joe the dummy for advice. Where did they hide flap jaw Joe?

  • 2Hotel9

    And spark can’t even transcribe a headline correctly.

  • http://www.indymedia.org/en/index.shtml Angry Vertebrate

    Proof, you linked to cruise missiles, not ballistic missiles.

    Cruise missiles can fly at low altitude and weave in between mountain ranges to minimise the risk of detection. They are much more difficult for SAMs and other air defences to track or attempt to engage. The only way to effectively deal with cruise missiles is to use AWACS to guide in fighters. Even then its hard for the fighters’ AAMs to engage the missiles. Trying to intercept cruise missiles over land is a difficult challenge for the defending side. — GlobalSecurity.org

    Even though there is no logical reason for Iran to attack Poland, Poland’s missile shield is designed to intercept ballistic missiles anyway, not cruise missiles.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/ likwidshoe

    Angry Vertebrate shows us how the far left defines discussion, Holy crap, morons, oops I mean “conservatives”, are still calling Russia “communist”. No wonder conservative is synonymous with unintelligent.

    I was wondering if some ass would come along to reject that part.

    Here’s the thing: communism is just the vehicle. The totalitarians in the old U.S.S.R. didn’t go anywhere. They’re still there in government jobs and growing their power.

    Also, kids with slingshots have as much chance at taking out incoming Russian missiles as the missile shield. The shield is a joke, Russia has already developed a new generation of missile that’ll defeat it even more easily.

    Russia’s actions to the shield belie your claims.

    Also, the “Missile Defense” was, and always will be, prone to being swarmed.

    Sure, that goes without saying. Nothing is unbreakable.

    Russia’s thorough annihilation of the Georgian military,(even though Georgian units were trained by US and Israeli specialists,) in response to Russian peace-keepers being murdered by Georgian aggressors, shows that Poland’s, and other Russian neighbors’, attempts are essentially futile.

    That’s what totalitarians and their apologists always say. It’s too tough to fight them, so just give in.

    Sorry, bud. Some of us aren’t as stupid and suicidal as you.

  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    Proof, that’s bit of a stretch claiming that a bunch of students with guns invading an embassy during a revolution is the same as one nation-state attacking another.

    Arguing principle with you is always a bit of a stretch. Want to start a war? Invade another country’s embassy. It is an act of war. Try to obfuscate that all you want, it won’t change the facts. Does being a liberal really mean you can never admit you’re wrong?

    And did you note that one of the “students with guns” is currently the President of Iran?

    Just finished a couple cheeseburgers, sans buns. Angus beef. Delicious! (No protein deficiencies here, Mr. Anemic Vegetarian!)

  • robert108

    Appease our enemies, betray our allies; typical leftie.

  • robert108

    Idiot: The Russians are reacting because it’s a missile shield to protect against Russian aggression. Are you really that stupid?

  • robert108

    Nothing is stopping you from submitting to Islam, Sparkie; just don’t try to include real Americans in your pathetic, squealing appeasement. Your cowardice has blinded you to the truth.

  • 2Hotel9

    This is way too fun! spark, you can’t even correctly type the headline of the article that shoots down your dhimmi argument, Iranian threats to shoot missiles at Europe never named Poland, they are directed at all the European members of the current coalition. But keep screeching, it is getting funnier by the minute.

    Angry Vegetarian:The Fucking Retard, have your mommy explain how missiles launched from Iran would track to countries in Europe, such as England, Norway, Germany, Netherlands, Hungary, et al. Not just ballistic missiles, even cruise missiles.

    I’ll ‘splain it to you stupid beatchs one last time. The Mad Mullahs have repeatedly said they will strike at all infidels who were part of the Coalition which has struck against the Chosen of Allah. America and our Allies, both NATO and not, are placing anti-missile system in countries facing Iran. Poland and Czech Republic are just two of the most recent to join in defending all of Europe from launches originating in Iran. Now, just to really piss you idiots off, there are also anti-missile systems in Spain and France. Who is that Capitalist Imperialist Aggression aimed at, fucking morons.

    This is way more entertaining than smacking e around.

  • http://www.rabidamerican.net/ Rabid American

    It’s some more of “The World thinks we’re cool again…“, huh……

    Didn’t someone in recent history say that the Russians just wanna sit down and talk, right?

    Who’da thunk it??

    Just like the Iranians, right?

    Huh……

    Maybe that’s what’s wrong with Mookie-Al-Sadr this week…. lonely, just wants some “Change” or maybe “Hope”…….

    http://www.courierpostonline.com/article/20081107/NEWS01/81107043/-1/stormwatcher

  • 2Hotel9

    You were saying, spark? “In Shift, Conservatives in Iran Back Ahmadinejad” But in a sign that conservatives fear their attacks might inadvertently strengthen a possible reformist candidate in Iran’s own presidential vote in June, their criticism has quickly shifted to early support for Mr. Ahmadinejad’s re-election.

    Oopsie!

  • 2Hotel9

    woofie, a battery of 10 will do the job nicely.

  • robert108

    I have yet to hear an argument against having a missile defense system, for anyone. We’re just getting the usual leftie bullshit on this one. It’s not “aggressive”(not that there’s anything wrong with that) to have a means of defense.
    It just makes it harder for assholes like Iran and Russia to move in or destroy other countries.

  • robert108

    Woof: Do you really think religious extremists will let a business agreement stop their insane aggression? You are just another leftie coward.

  • ollie-B

    The statement that Poland needs to fear a missle attack from Iran is pure poppycock. And you know it! The missle shield is aimed at Russia. Will one of you have the guts to admit it?
    Without enemies, our military-industrial complex wouldn’t know what to do with itself.

  • robert108

    Again, why is Iran going to attack its’ customers?

    Asked and answered already. Jihadis will take the money and kill the infidels. They just don’t care. Are you really that stupid?

  • robert108

    At least you weren’t stupid enough to mention the Iraq-Iran War.

    Are you really so stupid you can’t recognize that Iran attacked Iraq(another nation) during that war?

  • Jerry

    Oh! the world “LOVES” us now..

    Let’s see how much love is left after a year, or two with B.O.

  • 2Hotel9

    That is pretty!

    Looking at how ballistic missiles would track from Iran to Europe and England is something Anarchist Vegetarian:The Fucking Retard is not intelligent enough to grasp.

  • http://www.indymedia.org/en/index.shtml Angry Vertebrate

    Proof, that’s bit of a stretch claiming that a bunch of students with guns invading an embassy during a revolution is the same as one nation-state attacking another.

    At least you weren’t stupid enough to mention the Iraq-Iran War.

  • 2Hotel9

    Being a Democrat apologist has certainly given you plenty of insight into backstabbing, hasn’t it spark.

  • robert108

    Iran is not going to shoot missiles at Poland.

    What’s the basis for this claim, Sparkie? Wishful thinking or leftie cowardice?

  • http://www.indymedia.org/en/index.shtml Angry Vertebrate

    a battery of 10 will do the job nicely. — 2Hotel9

    What if Russia were to fire 11 missiles?

  • robert108

    Also, kids with slingshots have as much chance at taking out incoming Russian missiles as the missile shield.

    So, why are the russkies squealing so loudly about it?

    Of course you’re right about Obama, but there are real Americans who will clean russia’s clock. Depend on it.

  • 2Hotel9

    Shades of 1936 revisited.

  • robert108

    iran is not and has not been a threat to us or to greater europe.

    Pure idiocy. Why are they developing nuke weapons?

  • http://www.indymedia.org/en/index.shtml Angry Vertebrate

    2Hotel9: So you’re trying to say that Poland is getting an anti-missile system to defend itself from missiles that Iran doesn’t have (ballistic missiles capable of hitting Poland), even though Poland is also friendly with Iran too?

    And that the Pentagon sees this scenario as such a serious threat that it thinks it’s a good idea to foot the bill? (Even though Iran hasn’t attacked another country for over 2000 years.)

    Wow, you’re so smart, you have convinced me that I was wrong!!!

  • 2Hotel9

    What was that whiny sound?

  • robert108

    (Even though Iran hasn’t attacked another country for over 2000 years.)

    Another lie from you; the Iran-Iraq War, for one, and the attacks on both Iraq and the US(covertly, of course) in the last few years.

  • Lioncourt

    Idiot: The Russians are reacting because it’s a missile shield to protect against Russian aggression. Are you really that stupid?

    The stated purpose of putting the missiles in Poland is to prevent Iranian strikes. Are you saying that we are lying?

  • robert108

    The missle shield is aimed at Russia.

    You really don’t understand the concept of a “shield”, do you?
    It’s to protect against Russian attack. Duh.

  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    Sparkie: You certainly have a way of cutting through the crap.
    Unfortunately, it’s only after you’ve spread more crap and obfuscated the issue six ways from Sunday.

    BTW, do you need a link to understand “Sunday”? I can find you one!

  • http://www.indymedia.org/en/index.shtml Angry Vertebrate

    Have any of you leftards actually looked at a map? — 2Hotel9

    Let me guess, you have a map where Poland is right next to Iran?

  • robert108

    It’s not an excuse, Sparkie; it’s reality. Sorry you don’t know that.

  • 2Hotel9

    There you go. It admits to a total lack of any knowledge of geography or how ballistic missiles and anti-missile systems work. Ignorance is bliss for you, isn’t?

  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    we should not fund missles for poland. let europe do it if they are worried.

    Want to dissolve NATO for the same reasons, Spark? The UN? We send funds to both those places for the defense of Europe. Who’s next?

  • robert108

    By continually antagonizing Russia we ensure that they maintain a hardline government.

    Typical fear-based leftie. We defeated the Soviet Union by standing up to them; you are just trying to do the Neville Chamberlain technique here. Their aggression is not our fault; it’s their choice. Typical cowardly leftie backwards thinking.

  • 2Hotel9

    Have any of you leftards actually looked at a map? Anyone? Hello?
    I have always loved how leftards are always screeching against any type of defensive weapons systems, and how they go all apoplectic over any and all defensive troop and weapons placement. Coupled to their complete and total inability to grasp the most basic and rudimentary principles of ROE and tactics/strategy it makes them look exactly like the whiny little surrender monkey beatchs they are. Too fucking funny.

  • robert108

    the state controls our wealth here too. and?

    Off your meds again, Sparkie?

  • 2Hotel9

    Keep displaying that ignorance.

  • robert108

    I want the terrorists, slaveowners and dictators to fear us.
    Anything else is suicide. How many 9/11s will it take to convince the lefties to stand up to evil and kill it?

  • robert108

    LC: It’s called diplomacy. Isn’t that what you lefties want? I guess it’s OK, as long as it doesn’t defend us or our allies. Please explain the Russian reaction.

  • http://www.indymedia.org/en/index.shtml Angry Vertebrate

    Likwidshoe: All nation-states have laws which restrict what owners can do with their capital, including the US. These countries are capitalist because the govts tend not to have direct control over private capital, which the USSR did, but regulations instead.
    If you’re talking about the cronyism in Nazi Germany, Fascist Italy, etc, it’s present in pretty much every economy, socialist or capitalist (think “lobbyists”).

    Di Butler, the missile defense shield isn’t about defending Poland, Russia can circumvent it many different ways. The shield in Poland move is reminiscent of Cold War era political games and the US tax-payers are footing the bill for these childish games.

    Also, Russia has the greatest mineral wealth on the planet, if Obama wanted to help the economy, improved relations and trade deals with Russia would probably be a good move.

    Proof: Good suggestion about dissolving NATO, seems kind of pointless these days.

  • di butler

    I think Sparkie, Lioncourt and Angry Invertebrate are right. let’s just let the rest of the world do whatever the hell it wants, good, bad, indifferent. If they want to bomb each other, so what? We are going to be LOVED! After all, as one of them,{hard to remember which, they seem interchangeable}, so aply put it who cares? We don’t live over there. Maybe since all those great places are going to LOVE us after we have tea and cookies with them, they will just leave us in peace. And if we don’t have some countries as allies that were before? Again, so what? Screw them! Those terrorist countries will be BFFs with us 4-ever. Maybe Putin and Obama can get matching friendship bracelets.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/ likwidshoe

    WOOF gets silly, The usual unnecessary,
    incompetent Bush provocation.

    Yeah, sure, blame Bush.

    Meanwhile, Poland has a recent history of communist aggression taken against the country. They know what is at stake and they want a missile defense system in place.

    But, by all means – continue in your hyper-partisan game of blaming Bush as if that washes away what’s going on here. It lets the rest of us know that you’re not being serious.

  • atease

    Can some one from the left help this idiot find his balls..?

    atease

  • http://www.indymedia.org/en/index.shtml Angry Vertebrate

    Holy crap, morons, oops I mean “conservatives”, are still calling Russia “communist”. No wonder conservative is synonymous with unintelligent.

    Also, kids with slingshots have as much chance at taking out incoming Russian missiles as the missile shield. The shield is a joke, Russia has already developed a new generation of missile that’ll defeat it even more easily.

    Also, the “Missile Defense” was, and always will be, prone to being swarmed. If anything, Poland will having more glowing craters, if ever attacked by Russia, as a result of the so-called missile defense.

    The reason it annoys Russia is that in the early 90s there were assurances that NATO wouldn’t expand eastward, but that has happened, and now these new NATO allies are being decked out with the latest hardware.

    Russia’s thorough annihilation of the Georgian military,(even though Georgian units were trained by US and Israeli specialists,) in response to Russian peace-keepers being murdered by Georgian aggressors, shows that Poland’s, and other Russian neighbors’, attempts are essentially futile.

    Obama might as well work with Russia. He aint gonna beat them on home turf, not while Putin is around.

  • http://www.indymedia.org/en/index.shtml Angry Vertebrate

    Russia’s actions to the shield belie your claims. — Likwidshoe

    Here’s an example that hopefully should make it clearer:
    If I pointed a gun stapler at you, it isn’t the gun stapler that’s the problem, at worst it might sting a little if I fired it, it is me pointing it at you that is the problem. It is an aggressive action specifically targeting you.

    That’s why Russia is pissed off, they are capitalist now, they thought the cold war was over, but aggression towards them still continues.

    Also, totalitarianism can exist under any economic system. Saying that Russia is communist because it is totalitarian + capitalist just shows a lack of honesty or intelligence. Nazi Germany, Franco’s Spain, Mussolini’s Italy, Suharto’s Indonesia, and Pinochet’s Chile were all totalitarian + capitalist.

    Sorry, bud. Some of us aren’t as stupid and suicidal as you. — Likwidshoe

    Suicidal? How so? Even during the Cold War, Russia was never a big threat except to Central and Northern Europe. I don’t live in Europe. Russia’s actions barely affect me. (Maybe some correlation to oil prices?)

  • robert108

    …they are capitalist now…

    AV again proves his monumental ignorance. Are they practitioners of free people making free choices? As usual, you don’t know what you’re talking about.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/ likwidshoe

    Nazi Germany, Franco’s Spain, Mussolini’s Italy, Suharto’s Indonesia, and Pinochet’s Chile were all totalitarian + capitalist.

    Capitalist, eh?

    Heh.

  • http://www.indymedia.org/en/index.shtml Angry Vertebrate

    Yes Likwidshoe, capitalist. That private ownership of capital thing. You must have heard of it.

    Russia now allows the private ownership of capital too.
    (OK strictly speaking, all capitalist economies are actually hybrids. The govt typically owns atleast some of the infrastructure, like the roads, the military and police are publicly funded, but most capital is indeed privately owned. This hybrid approach seems to be more resilient than either extreme.)

  • 2Hotel9

    Ah, poor widdle woofie gonna cry now? Squeeze out some tears for us, woofie, maybe AV:TFR will come running to your rescue.

    And the only method to “circumvent” an anti-ballistic missile system is for Russia to invade Poland, AV:TFR. Is that what you are calling for?

  • robert108

    Russia now allows the private ownership of capital too.

    It doesn’t matter who technically owns it; the State controls it. Your attempt to avoid the matter of freedom is revealing.

  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    What’s the basis for this claim, Sparkie?

    Ask him for a link to mirror his new “play dumb” strategy.

    At least I think he’s just playing…

  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    Even though Iran hasn’t attacked another country for over 2000 years.

    You know, it just doesn’t seem like two thousand years since the Carter administration, but time flies when you’re having fun!
    Please tell me that you are at least mildly acquainted with the doctrine that an embassy is considered the sovereign territory of its occupant?
    So, tell me from your vast (or half-vast) experience: when the current president of Iran took part in the last attack against another country, might that make him more or less inclined to do it again?

    (Facts are such pesky things! You must try to include some on your next post!)

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/ likwidshoe

    Angry Vertebrate with that unintentional irony, Yes Likwidshoe, capitalist. That private ownership of capital thing. You must have heard of it.

    I have, which is why I question the name of Mussolini, among others, on the “capitalist. That private ownership of capital thing” list.

  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    Poof You ‘tard. Since when is Iran going to shoot missiles at Poland? Link?

    Vermontard: Please try to read the questions (or at least the post) before you shoot off your voluminous mouth and illustrate the extreme emptiness of your head.

    I was responding to the lame, nonsensical statement regarding the proximity of the borders in a discussion of missile defense.

    Let me guess, you have a map where Poland is right next to Iran?

    I illustrated (complete with links for the Vermontards) that with their current capabilities, the borders did not need to be adjacent in order for Iran to logistically hit Poland with a missile.

    As to intent:

    The U.S. and Poland signed an agreement in August for basing American missiles in Poland as part of a shield against possible missile attacks from Iran.

    Your argument is with the two countries that signed the agreement. And the link is above. The blue word “Chicago” in the article above. It’s a link. If you click on it, it will take you to the story the excerpt came from. If you hold down the “shift” key and click on it, it will open in a separate window.

    Spark: Stick to the links you know best: Pork sausage

  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    Image and video hosting by TinyPic
    Brainfood for omnivores.

  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    Let me guess, you have a map where Poland is right next to Iran?

    According to GlobalSecurity.org Iran purchased in 2005, a dozen cruise missiles that would travel 3,000 km.

    Anyone have a map where Poland is within 3,000 km of Iran, as the X-55 Long Range Cruise Missile flies?

    Of course, it could also be launched from an airplane or a ship, which could decrease the distance, but don’t worry your pretty little head with details like that!

    Seriously, dude! Get a cheeseburger! The protein deficiency affects what little mental capacity you have!

  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    Proof, you linked to cruise missiles, not ballistic missiles.

    You’re right! Ballistic missiles hit targets even farther away!

    The Shahab-5/Kosar was in the years 1996-2000 expected to have a range of 3,500-3,750 and 4,000-4,300 kilometers with a 1,000-750 (650 kg identified) kilogram warhead. The technology for this system was cited as coming from Russia and North Korea . [Reuters 1996] Initially it was reported that the missile would become operational by the year 2000, though other [less implausible] reports claims that Iran intends to complete the development of this system within five to ten years. It is possible that this missile is a Taepodong 2 derivative. There were few other indications that this is in fact an active development project. Israeli Intelligence calls this booster the Shahab-5 and Shahab-6. December 1996 news reports claimed that Iran is developing a 3,500-mile (5,632 kilometers) range missile called Shahab-6 that would be capable of reaching Europe.

    Why would they need a missile capable of reaching Europe? That speaks to intent. And if they’ve been working since the mid nineties to acquire them, can you tell us with complete certainty (before you spot the vapor trails) that they have not yet succeeded or are about to succeed?

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/sparkiearbuckle sayanything-81

    r108
    you are the one submitting to islam. go on about how much you like to crawl around on all fours and lick Saudi buttcrack.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/sparkiearbuckle sayanything-81

    r108
    defense. isn’t that our excuse?

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/sparkiearbuckle sayanything-81
  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/sparkiearbuckle sayanything-81

    Iran is not going to shoot missiles at Poland. Why can’t Saudi Arabia and Israel pay for their own f*cking defense? Those are the concerned parties here.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/sparkiearbuckle sayanything-81

    r108
    poland has said there will be no war with iran. poland has invested in iran. don’t be a fucking tart.

    again, the primary countries scared of iran are israel and saudi arabia. why should we protect them? they are both capable of protecting themselves. they can foot the bill.

    no, its just more of Bush succumbing to the crusader baiting of the jihadis. the iranian is using it to consolidate his support at home. so is russia. bush is good for that.

    too bad the BIG BAD iranian is on the way out. soon, you jerkoffs will have to find a new BIG MEANIE to scare everyone with and justify egregiously expensive projects that may or may not be effective when installed. remember ‘star wars’? what a stupid fucking meme that was. do you guys like being treated like children? do you believe in the boogieman?

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/sparkiearbuckle sayanything-81

    speaking of protein deficiencies, r108 lumbers in with more paranoid, xenophobic vitriol.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/sparkiearbuckle sayanything-81

    Poof
    You ‘tard. Since when is Iran going to shoot missiles at Poland? Link?

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/sparkiearbuckle sayanything-81

    No comment? Why are we socializing these foreign countries defense budgets for them? We did it for the ISI in the eighties and now they are smiling to our face and stabbing us in the back. Saudi Arabia already does that Janus faced bullshit too, and everyone knows it. Why not just take a fucking hint? Like getting stabbed in the back?

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/sparkiearbuckle sayanything-81

    iran is not and has not been a threat to us or to greater europe. the dickhead leader is a symbolic figurehead who is on the way out next june at the head of the most progressive islamic state in the middle east. the cold warriors are deluded xenophobes who are stuck in the past. listen to their emo whining!

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    basing American missiles in Poland as part of a shield against possible missile attacks from Iran.

    Those missiles fly a long way, Poodle. Wanting forward-deployed anti-missile installments to shoot down missiles launched by our enemies anywhere in the world is a good idea.

    Poland gets it. What’s Obama’s problem?

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/sparkiearbuckle sayanything-81

    hotel
    are europe and england part of the USA now?

  • WOOFX

    Again, why is Iran going to attack its’ customers?

    Poland to invest 1 billion dollars in Iran’s oil and gas

  • WOOFX

    The usual unnecessary,
    incompetent Bush provocation.

  • WOOFX

    Grimms Fairy tale.

    basing American missiles in Poland as part of a shield against possible missile attacks from Iran.

  • WOOFX

    02/26/08
    Poland to invest 1 billion dollars in Iran’s oil and gas

    TEHRAN, Feb. 26 (ISNA)-Iran and Poland are to start mutual energy cooperation in Iran’s different gas and oil fields.

    Tehran and Warsaw signed an agreement that allows Poland to invest 1 billion dollars in Iranian oil and gas projects, said the managing director of central area oil company Ali Reza Zeiqami.

    Also Poland’s gas company in a statement had announced that this project could lead to another agreement on LNG provision that would supply a great deal of the country’s need to this energy.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/sparkiearbuckle sayanything-81

    we should not fund missles for poland. let europe do it if they are worried. pouring out money for eastern block nations just because russia is sabre rattling is a joke. let them try to take poland. poland is in the EU. let the EU stress it.

  • WOOFX

    Batteries not included.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/sparkiearbuckle sayanything-81

    r108
    the state controls our wealth here too. and?

  • WOOFX

    How many anti-ballistic
    missiles does it take
    to keep Poland safe?

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development