Obama Wants A “New Spirit Of Innovation” In The Economy, But How Does That Happen With Bailouts?
Obama said today that our economy needs a “new spirit of innovation.” That’s interesting coming from the man whose approach to economic rescue has been massive bailouts and government spending programs.
The old saying has it that “necessity is the mother of invention.” Well, it’s the mother of innovation too which is defined in the Meriam-Webster dictionary as “a new idea, method, or device.” Now what incentives are there in the market right now to innovate? To implement new ideas or methods or technology?
None, at least among the industries the government is trying the hardest to rescue. Because the government is removing the possibility of failure from those industries. And without the potential for fail, what possible incentive is there to innovate? Why go through the often painful process of finding something new when you can just keep doing things the old way while the government props you up?
The same goes for the bailed out lenders. Why should they stop their profligate ways when the government is standing by with massive transfusions of our tax dollars?
And, frankly, the same goes for all the local governments in the nation as well. Why should California or any of the other states facing nasty budget shortfalls fix the problems causing those shortfalls (spending, spending, spending!) when they can just turn to the federal government for a bailout?
When the government gets involved in anything it stifles innovation and invention. Why should a farmer find a more efficient way to farm when he can just apply for subsidies? Why should a car company find a more profitable way to make cars when the government can just bail them out? Why should a union moderate its contract demands when they can get the politicians in their pockets to enforce their demands with law? Why should someone on welfare and/or food stamps or otherwise stuck on the government dole go out and work to improve their lot in life when they can sit back and let the government keep their heads above water?
If Obama were truly interested in innovation he’d limit government not expand it.



