Home Mobile Archives Reader Blogs Register Login

Monday, August 25, 2008

Obama Trying To Suppress Free Speech Of Critics

A Texas billionaire is running an ad tying Obama to domestic terrorist William Ayers and Obama himself wants the Department of Justice to take the ad off the air.

Sen. Barack Obama has launched an all-out effort to block a Republican billionaire’s efforts to tie him to domestic and foreign terrorists in a wave of negative television ads.

Obama’s campaign has written the Department of Justice demanding a criminal investigation of the “American Issues Project,” the vehicle through which Dallas investor Harold Simmons is financing the advertisements. The Obama campaign — and tens of thousands of supporters — also is pressuring television networks and affiliates to reject the ads. The effort has met with some success: CNN and Fox News are not airing the attacks, and some local affiliates have refused as well.

Obama has also launched his own response ad, directly addressing Simmons’ attempt to link him to domestic terror.

The project is “a knowing and willful attempt to violate the strictures of federal election law,” Obama general counsel Bob Bauer wrote to Deputy Assistant Attorney General John Keeney last week in a letter provided to Politico. Bauer argued that by advocating Obama’s defeat, the ad should be subject to the contribution limits of federal campaign law, not the anything-goes regime of issue advocacy.

If a given campaign ad is libelous or slanderous then there are laws which allow for Obama to address that.  But to say that this ad is illegal under campaign law?  That sounds rather dangerously like a politician trying to silence the free speech of a group of citizens.

If this ad is indeed illegal under campaign laws then those laws (which, embarrassingly enough, McCain had a hand in writing) should be thrown off the books.

Here’s the ad:

Frankly, I don’t see a thing wrong with it other than the fact that it’s terribly inconvenient for Obama.  Meanwhile, the Obama campaign is responding with an ad of their own.

I think Obama is probably going to lose this fight.  By trying to silence the folks who are bringing up the facts about Obama’s relationship with Ayers he only looks as though he wants to hide something.  And with Obama’s history of associating himself closely with other radicals such as his pastor, Rev. Jeremiah “God Damn America” Wright, Obama’s close relationship with William Ayers is just too easy to believe.

Comments

Avatar for dan in michigan

Been reading the site for a month or so and like it.  But, I know it’s an IT thing but you have gotten way to cryptic.  I don’t want to have to click to see if I am interested in “reading the rest”.

dan in michigan on August 25, 2008 at 03:08 pm
Avatar for patriot

I don’t get it, why would FOX or CNN refuse to air it?  Nothing in it is untrue, so on what grounds do they refuse it?
Obama did launch his senate campaign at Ayers house, served on the board of the Woods Foundation and now we know they were connected through Annenburgh (sp?) project.

patriot on August 25, 2008 at 03:54 pm

DOJ.  Here come the secret police.


Communism is evil

Chief RZ on August 25, 2008 at 06:17 pm
Avatar for Texan Across the Pond

The first action of Obama’s “Ministry of Truth”.

Texan Across the Pond on August 25, 2008 at 07:39 pm
Avatar for Bruce

I’m sure Obama will be taking the same actions against the 527 groups getting their cash from Soros, Bing, et al and running anti-McCain attack ads.

Right?

Right?

Wings, pigs, some assembly required.

Bruce on August 25, 2008 at 07:59 pm
Avatar for jpe

I don’t get it, why would FOX or CNN refuse to air it?  Nothing in it is untrue, so on what grounds do they refuse it?

McCain’s law makes the ad illegal.  Exempt organizations can’t pay for advertisements that are for or against any candidate. 

The ad is an anti-Obama ad, so it violates McCain’s prohibition of political advocacy.  It’s fairly straight forward.

jpe on August 25, 2008 at 08:39 pm
Avatar for jpe

Rob: you’re right; this stinker of a law should’ve been tossed by the Supreme Court.  Stupidly, it was upheld in an entirely unreadable opinion by O’Connor.  So, bad law or no it’s the law of the land at the moment.

It would be hilarious, though, if McCain joined the effort to defend the law from his own law.  Hey, he’s flipped on every other issue, why not this. ("If my immigration law came before the Senate again I would vote no” being an instant classic).

jpe on August 25, 2008 at 08:42 pm

jpe, that ad does not tell the listener to not vote for Barri. It asks the question"do you know enough TO vote for Obama?”, that is all. Supplying information, even in such a melodramatic fashion, does not violate McCain-Feingold.


Una Salus Victus Nullam Sperare Salutem

2Hotel9 on August 26, 2008 at 08:58 am
Avatar for jpe

2hotel9: you don’t think it’s an ad opposing Obama?  If that’s the case, my uncle is an exiled king from Nigeria.  He has a stash of gold overseas and just needs funds to ship it......

jpe on August 26, 2008 at 09:47 am

Please to point out where it tells anyone to not vote for Barri.


Una Salus Victus Nullam Sperare Salutem

2Hotel9 on August 26, 2008 at 10:28 am

This isn’t the first filingby obama or his minions to stop a political ad against his campaign:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120380878248188549.html?mod=googlenews_wsj

“A fight over political spending by outside groups flared up over the weekend when backers of Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama sought to shut down a round of television advertisements launched by supporters of rival Sen. Hillary Clinton.

Supporters of Mr. Obama mailed a complaint to the Federal Election Commission charging that the organization funding the advertisements lauding Mrs. Clinton is violating election law.

At issue: The complicated rules for spending by outside political organizations on elections—and an effort by one such group to spend millions on advertisements that praise Mrs. Clinton before primaries next week...”


Without an honest exchange of ideas, how can a mind grow?

RebTex on August 26, 2008 at 12:26 pm

I don’t see what the problem is, its true, Barry was friends with Ayers.


Check out:
Goon’s North Dakota Red Neck
Goon’s World

goon on August 26, 2008 at 12:55 pm
Avatar for jpe

At issue: The complicated rules for spending by outside political organizations on elections—and an effort by one such group to spend millions on advertisements that praise Mrs. Clinton before primaries next week...”

It’s not so complicated.  501(c)(4) organizations can’t advocate for or against candidates for federal office.  If they want to, they have to follow the rules for PACs. 

Nothing complicated about it.

jpe on August 26, 2008 at 02:37 pm
Avatar for jpe

So, Hotel, do you or don’t you think it’s an ad opposing Obama?  Whether or not the ad has the magical words “don’t vote for Obama” is beside the point.  The only question is whether a reasonable person could interpret it as anything other than an ad opposing Obama.

jpe on August 26, 2008 at 02:39 pm

It is an ad advising voters they need to be better informed about Barri&Co before they vote. Many people watching that ad would agree with Ayres and Barri after doing more research. Or, are you trying to tell us that is not the case? That the more people know about Barri&Co the less likely they are to vote for it?


Una Salus Victus Nullam Sperare Salutem

2Hotel9 on August 26, 2008 at 06:31 pm
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.

    

By submitting your comment you agree to our terms of service.