Obama Science Czar Wrote Book Supporting Forced Abortions, Mass Sterilization And A World Government

Obama has worked long and hard to distance himself from extremists in his past such as Rev. Jermiah “Them Jews” Wright and William Ayers. And, to some extent, he’s managed to convince the public at large (with no small amount of help from his friends in the media) that his associations with these people in his past were trivial and inconsequential.
But how about someone he’s picked to actually serve in his administration? It turns out that John Holdren, Obama’s “Science Czar,” once wrote a book supporting things such as mass sterilization and forced abortions. Things even staunch members of the liberal Democrat base would probably find objectionable and radical.

Forced abortions. Mass sterilization. A “Planetary Regime” with the power of life and death over American citizens.
The tyrannical fantasies of a madman? Or merely the opinions of the person now in control of science policy in the United States? Or both?
These ideas (among many other equally horrifying recommendations) were put forth by John Holdren, whom Barack Obama has recently appointed Director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, Assistant to the President for Science and Technology, and Co-Chair of the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology — informally known as the United States’ Science Czar. In a book Holdren co-authored in 1977, the man now firmly in control of science policy in this country wrote that:
• Women could be forced to abort their pregnancies, whether they wanted to or not;
• The population at large could be sterilized by infertility drugs intentionally put into the nation’s drinking water or in food;
• Single mothers and teen mothers should have their babies seized from them against their will and given away to other couples to raise;
• People who “contribute to social deterioration” (i.e. undesirables) “can be required by law to exercise reproductive responsibility” — in other words, be compelled to have abortions or be sterilized.
• A transnational “Planetary Regime” should assume control of the global economy and also dictate the most intimate details of Americans’ lives — using an armed international police force.
Impossible, you say? That must be an exaggeration or a hoax. No one in their right mind would say such things.
Well, I hate to break the news to you, but it is no hoax, no exaggeration. John Holdren really did say those things, and this report contains the proof. Below you will find photographs, scans, and transcriptions of pages in the book Ecoscience, co-authored in 1977 by John Holdren and his close colleagues Paul Ehrlich and Anne Ehrlich.

Click through to read the entire report and see the scans.
It’d be nice if, in the coming days, someone could ask Obama if he agrees with Dr. Holdren on these issues. The backpedaling and evasions sure to be amusing.

Tags: , ,


«
»
  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    Further, that book was co-authored. He might not have even written those quoted passages.

    If he didn’t write them, little braindead troll, then he certainly agreed with them, or he would have taken his name off the book!

    You really aren’t very good at this whole “reason” and “argument” stuff, are you, Wankertized?

    Have you ever considered finding a blog with “training wheels” where you could practice first, Wankertized?

  • http://forums.kikizo.com/ Eddie_the_Hated

    Y’know, I read the pages in question, and the entire book is from a passive “some say” fashion, thus preventing any sort of rock solid backlash against the authors, but it’s disturbing to be sure.

  • http://www.dartemis.net/blog/ sayanything-42

    It is a good thing that Rob finally got around to addressing this issue on the front page…

  • Lioncourt

    I take it you have read the book?

    How about you Rodney?

  • http://www.dartemis.net/blog/ sayanything-42

    Heh!

    As to the question:

    Now can we compare liberals to NAZIs?

    Given that one of our Progressive commenters just segued from a racist apologia to commenting on donning a brown shirt (all on one comment thread), I’d say so!

  • steupz

    Doesn’t seem like anything there can be tied to Holdren. And even if it could be, the media seem bent on giving Obama the benefit of the doubt, even when there is no doubt

  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    Not always the case.

    Strong comeback, little H! /sarcasm
    He’s had, as you pointed out, over thirty years to post his objections to anything in the book he did not agree with. Maybe you could point to some of those?

    Bueller? Bueller???

  • jimmypop

    Y’know, I read the pages in question, and the entire book is from a passive “some say” fashion, thus preventing any sort of rock solid backlash against the authors, but it’s disturbing to be sure.

    most of these books are. these type of folks know there is jut some stuff you dont way out loud. funny thing; there are more people that think this way than we will ever know.

  • carrick

    Lioncourt:

    I take it you have read the book?

    This is an exceedingly lame argument from you, LC.

    Follow the original link, there are photocopied pages where you can read the original quotes in context… But seriously… anybody who knows anything about John Holdren wouldn’t dispute that these are (or were, in 1977) his beliefs.

    Holdren is one of those people who is permanently in “panic” mode, always looking for something needs immediate fixing: and always, it seems, something that requires a world government to fix.

    In 1977, the big scare was the population explosion time bomb. The claim at the time was that our Earth’s food supply wasn’t going to be able to sustain current growth rates (the requirement of a fix by circa 2000 was often bandied about, this is not unique to Holden’s ecosocialist perspective). Of course, improved agricultural technology and practices (mostly developed by the USDA in response to this perceived threat) has put the maximum sustainable population at well above current levels, but ecosocialists like Holdren would never allow facts to get in front of their narrative.

    If you want to question the notion that that the “reality based” group does this, you need look no further for confirmation than to the prevalent meme that “global climate models, that is ‘science’, underestimate the threat of global warming”. When the science doesn’t line up with their hysteria, they simply say “ignore the science”.

    All that said, what is the real surprise that Barack Obama would have somebody like John Holdren as his chief science advisor? He is only one of a long list of loons that Barack leans on, which includes of course his Secretary for the DOE, Stephen “let’s paint our roofs white” Chu.

    The list of socialist advisors and confidants to Barack Obama has grown long indeed.

  • http://www.willisms.com/ Zsa Zsa

    Why is this not surprising?

  • http://www.dartemis.net/blog/ sayanything-42

    Gee Rob,

    thanks for the Hat Tip / Promotion.

  • FlyOnTheWall

    I take it you have read the book?

    How about you Rodney?

    ZombieTime pulled full pages out for review. I read them and it is MUCH worse than those few quotes make out. Your just being contrarian or partisan Lion.

  • Old Retired Petty Officer

    As a Retired Seadog, from the Vietnam to Desert Storm era, I have made the Holder/Nappy list. So here it goes.
    This worthless piece of crap needs to be tied to a wooden post in front of an earth berm, facing seven good men with service rifles.

  • sayanything-5371

    All of the associates of the radical marxist muslim in the White House all share a commonality with him. They are nutjobs.

  • http://ndgoon.blogspot.com/ goon

    These policies are radical but it just matches the rest of the freaks in NOBAMA’s administration. Funny none of us should be surprised, what this clown is recommending is asinine.

  • http://magyartruth.blogspot.com/ Chief RZ

    Now can we compare liberals to NAZIs?

  • http://SayAnythingBlog.com The_Whistler_ofnd

    This is the science of the left now days. Pick an agenda, radicalize the “science” and use it to control people.

    The global warming scam is the current topic of choice.

  • Brent

    Rob,

    Why do you condemn him for being the most honest member of the administration?

  • moranpob

    This is the science of the left now days. Pick an agenda, radicalize the “science” and use it to control people.

    The global warming scam is the current topic of choice.

  • Brent

    Oh, I was just giving you crap, Rob.

    If these guys were honest, we wouldn’t be at all surprised about these seemingly radical beliefs. I’d dare say that most of the administration appointees are believers, to some extent, in most of the crazy ideas this guy wrote about.

  • FlyOnTheWall

    Now can we compare liberals to NAZIs?

    Heh. “Every Motherhood a wanted Motherhood.” They had lots and lots of slogans.

  • Hannitized

    The politics of personal destruction.

    What are you going to pull out next, what he thought as a pre-pubescent from the 60′s?

  • pparets

    What exactly is your objection to this post & thread, Hannitized?

    That its false?

    That its irrelevant?

    That its a smear?

    That its about Obama’s science advisor?

    That the subject is a democrat?

  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    That the subject is a democrat?

    Ding! Ding! Ding! Ding! Ding! Give that man a cigar! (Make sure Bill CLinton didn’t handle it first!)
    Hannitwit has wasted a couple of days over at this thread defending a guy that no one on the left cared about when rbb smeared him as an “Actual Real Racist Scumbag“, until after it was revealed he was an Obama supporter! Now, according to the ethicless, logicless, brainless partisan hack Hannitwit, I’m a racist and a race baiter for mentioning the man’s support for Obama!

  • Hannitized

    What is my objection?

    How about the idea that this was something written over 30 years ago?

    What exactly do you think Bush thought about things 30 years before he was president, and did it matter?

  • Hannitized

    Further, that book was co-authored. He might not have even written those quoted passages.

    Holdren earned a bachelor’s degree from MIT in 1965 and a PhD in plasma physics[3] from Stanford University in 1970. He taught at the University of California, Berkeley for more than two decades. His work has focused on global environmental change, energy technologies and policies, nuclear proliferation, and science and technology policy[4]. Dr. Holdren served as chairman of the board of directors of the American Association for the Advancement of Science from February 2007 until February 2008[5](AAAS) and is director of the Woods Hole Research Center.

    Dr. Holdren is the author of some 300 articles and papers[citation needed], and he has co-authored and co-edited some 20 books and book-length reports, such as Energy (1971), Human Ecology (1973), Ecoscience (1977), Energy in Transition (1980), Earth and the Human Future (1986), Strategic Defences and the Future of the Arms Race (1987), Building Global Security Through Cooperation (1990), Conversion of Military R&D (1998), and Ending the Energy Stalemate (2004). Holdren opposes the use of nuclear weapons to respond to chemical and biological attacks on Americans [6][7]

    He was the founding chair of the advisory board for Innovations, a quarterly journal about entrepreneurial solutions to global challenges published by MIT Press.

    He was unanimously confirmed as Assistant to the President for Science and Technology, Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy, and Co-Chair of the President’s Council of Advisers on Science and Technology on March 20, 2009.[8]

  • Hannitized

    If he didn’t write them, little braindead troll, then he certainly agreed with them, or he would have taken his name off the book!

    Not always the case.

  • FlyOnTheWall

    What exactly do you think Bush thought about things 30 years before he was president, and did it matter?

    Reasonable if he had disavowed the previous statements or even just stated new policies. But he and Ehrlich have not changed their tune, maybe toned down the obvious fascist wording such as ‘Planetary Regime.’

    These are the nutballs using Malthusian methods on Africa now, even if they couch the terms differently.

  • dawneyr

    This isn’t the least bit surprising. The most “successful” would-be result of the cap and trade scam.

  • sayanything-6955

    These guys are freaks, the entire O bummer administration is a bunch of marxists, leftists, and a hell of alot of them are racists too. I question my sanity every time I hear or read about these nutjobs. Then I read of others like Rodney, Zsa Zsa, Rob,[ great tea party in Bis BTW ] and the other true American conservatives and I get a glimmer of hope. Its not even a political party thing with me, the rinos disgust me. Im a hick I guess, only having lived in WY, NV, and now ND. Washington does not represent many of us anymore. Thank God for the 2nd amendment, Im locked and loaded.

  • sayanything-6955

    The global warming scam is the current topic of choice.

    And Climate nutjob in chief, algore talks about it leading to world governance. Climate Depot has the article and tape. Scares me and Im fearless.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    I don’t condemn him for that. I condemn him for his support for totalitarian government.

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development